Antiviral Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis BPhase 3NCT01892241
Efficacy and Safety of Peginterferon a-2a in Patients of Chronic Hepatitis B With Spontaneous Decline of HBV DNA
A Phase 3 study testing Pegasys(Roche) and Entecavir in people with Antiviral Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University.
Trial summary
Patients with spontaneous decline of HBV DNA were non-randomly assigned to accept peginterferon alfa-2a or entecavir therapy, or didn't accept any antiviral regiment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Antiviral Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B
- What is being tested?
- Pegasys(Roche) and Entecavir
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 74 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2010to Feb 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
This study focused on the subsequential antiviral therapeutic strategies for chronic hepatitis B patients with spontaneous decline of HBV DNA after acute exacerbation. Patients fullfilled the following criterias were chosen for screening: They were antiviral treatment naı¨ve and had been positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) for at least 6 months, were positive for HBeAg and had an HBV DNA Level of more than 500,000IU/ml. Their serum alanine aminotransferase level was greater than 2 but less than or equal to 30 times the upper limit of the normal range, their peak value of total bililubin ranged from 2mg/ml to 20mg/ml and the prothrombin time activity was greater than 60%.
ALL of these patients were hospitalized and pretreated with anti-inflammation and liver protection agents such as Stronger Neo-Minophagen C, Polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine (Essentiale), Ursodeoxycholic Acid and L-Glutathione reduced, without any nuclutide of nucleoside. Their ALT、TBIL and PTA were monitor weekly and HBVDNA level were measured every two weeks. Patients were eligible if their HBVDNA declined spontaneously by 2 log(10) IU/mL while their ALT falled below 10 ULN and TBIL falled below 2mg/ml within 8 weeks of pretreatment.
Patients with advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatoma were excluded. Other cause of chronic liver disease should be systematically checked to exclude co-infection with HDV, HCV and HIV, comorbidities with alcoholism, autoimmune and metabolic liver disease. Serious medical or psychiatric illnesses that had usage of corticosteroid or immunosup-pressive agents at the time of study were excluded. All patients in this study lived in Guangdong, a province of 100,000,000 populations, with same demographics. Owing to patients fear or refusal of liver biopsy, no patients had the liver biopsy and the rest relied on other clinical methods to obtain equivalent information of patient conditions. In our cases, ultrasonorgraphy helped to filter out patients with advanced fibrosis.The liver sonar examination was performed by two experi-enced hepatologists at least three times on each patient.
About this study
Patients with spontaneous decline of HBV DNA were non-randomly assigned to accept peginterferon alfa-2a or entecavir therapy, or didn't accept any antiviral regiment.
Read the detailed description
It was a prospective, non-randomized, open-label study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pegasys treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients with spontaneous HBVDNA decline after acute exacerbation.Patients with spontaneous decline of HBV DNA(a decrease of HBV DNA levels of more than 2 log(10) IU/mL as compared to baseline before antiviral treatment) after acute exacerbation (ALT was 10-30ULN,TBIL was 2-20mg/ml,PTA>60%)were non-randomly divided into 3 groups: group A, B and C. Before treatment, the patients were counselled on the advantages and disadvantages of taking peginterferon or nucleos(t)ide analogue, and the subsequential treatment were decided by themselves. Cases in group A receive 180µg of peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys,Roche) once weekly for 48 weeks. Group B and C were control group, cases in group B received an continual entecavir therapy(0.5 mg orally once daily) and those in group C didn't accept any antiviral regiment.
- Being tested
- Pegasys(Roche), Entecavir
- Keywords
- Chronic hepatitis B,Spontaneous Decline of HBV DNA,Peginterferon a-2a, entecavir
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pegasys(Roche)Drug
Also called peginterferon alfa-2a
180µg of peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys,Roche) once weekly for 48 weeks.
EntecavirDrug
continual entecavir therapy(0.5 mg orally once daily)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 180µg of peginterferon alfa-2a | Experimental | Cases in group A receive 180µg of peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys,Roche) once weekly for 48 weeks. Receives: Drug: Pegasys(Roche) |
| Entecavir | Active comparator | cases in group B received an continual entecavir therapy(0.5 mg orally once daily) Receives: Drug: Entecavir |
| Control group | No intervention | Those in group C didn't accept any antiviral regiment . |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complete viralogic response
Complete viralogic response was defined as suppression of HBV DNA to the level below 60IU/mL(detected by Cobas Amplicor HBV Monitor Test, Roche Diagnostics).
Measured: week 96
Secondary outcomes (3)
HBsAg loss and seroconversion
HBsAg loss was defined as HBsAg titre less than 0.05 IU/mL and the HBsAg seroconversion was defined as the loss of HBsAg and the presence of anti-HBs antibody. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as disappearance of HBeAg and appearance of anti-HBe antibody, while HBeAg loss was defined as disappearance of HBeAg only.
Measured: week 24,48,72 and 96
ALT normalization
ALT normalization was defined as ALT level less than 40 IU/L(determined by a sequential multiple autoanalyzer).
Measured: week 24,48,72 and 96
Sick leave in patients in different groups
Measured: week 48,72 and 96
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2010
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionFeb 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Antiviral Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis BStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Cai Qingxian, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
- Investigators
- Gao Zhiliang, doctor, Study chair, The Third Affliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen UniversityZhao Zhixin, doctor, Study director, The Third Affliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01892241
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ATFSHBVD
- Status last verified
- Sep 2013
- First submitted
- 22 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Peginterferon a-2a in Patients of Chronic Hepatitis B With Spontaneous Decline of HBV DNA
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01892241
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ATFSHBVD
- Keywords
- Chronic hepatitis B,Spontaneous Decline of HBV DNA,Peginterferon a-2a, entecavir
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2010
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with spontaneous decline of HBV DNA were non-randomly assigned to accept peginterferon alfa-2a or entecavir therapy, or didn't accept any antiviral regiment.
Detailed description
It was a prospective, non-randomized, open-label study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pegasys treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients with spontaneous HBVDNA decline after acute exacerbation.Patients with spontaneous decline of HBV DNA(a decrease of HBV DNA levels of more than 2 log(10) IU/mL as compared to baseline before antiviral treatment) after acute exacerbation (ALT was 10-30ULN,TBIL was 2-20mg/ml,PTA>60%)were non-randomly divided into 3 groups: group A, B and C. Before treatment, the patients were counselled on the advantages and disadvantages of taking peginterferon or nucleos(t)ide analogue, and the subsequential treatment were decided by themselves. Cases in group A receive 180µg of peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys,Roche) once weekly for 48 weeks. Group B and C were control group, cases in group B received an continual entecavir therapy(0.5 mg orally once daily) and those in group C didn't accept any antiviral regiment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 180µg of peginterferon alfa-2a | Experimental | Drug: Pegasys(Roche)Cases in group A receive 180µg of peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys,Roche) once weekly for 48 weeks. |
| Entecavir | Active comparator | Drug: Entecavircases in group B received an continual entecavir therapy(0.5 mg orally once daily) |
| Control group | No intervention | –Those in group C didn't accept any antiviral regiment . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pegasys(Roche)Also: peginterferon alfa-2a180µg of peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys,Roche) once weekly for 48 weeks. | Drug | 180µg of peginterferon alfa-2a |
| Entecavircontinual entecavir therapy(0.5 mg orally once daily) | Drug | Entecavir |
Primary outcome
Complete viralogic response
Time frame: week 96
Complete viralogic response was defined as suppression of HBV DNA to the level below 60IU/mL(detected by Cobas Amplicor HBV Monitor Test, Roche Diagnostics).
3 secondary outcomes
HBsAg loss and seroconversion
Time frame: week 24,48,72 and 96
ALT normalization
Time frame: week 24,48,72 and 96
Sick leave in patients in different groups
Time frame: week 48,72 and 96
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2013.
Related trials for Antiviral Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effectiveness of Antiviral Treatment in Cirrhotic Patients With Low-level Hepatitis B Virus DNA Levels
Hepatitis B, Chronic
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
TAF vs TDF During the Pregancy
Hepatitis B Virus Infection; Pregnant Women
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase 1 Study to Evaluate Safety and Antiviral Activity of PBGENE-HBV in Adult Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B
HEPATITIS B CHRONIC
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Antiviral Activity and Immune Response of AHB-137 Injection in Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hepatitis B Infection Surveillance
Chronic Hepatitis B Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gao Zhiliang, doctor study chair
The Third Affliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Zhao Zhixin, doctor study director
The Third Affliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Pegasys(Roche) and Entecavir in people with Antiviral Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complete viralogic response (time frame: week 96). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2013.