AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaPhase 4MAN03NCT01892787

Effects of Particle Size in Small Airways Dysfunction

A Phase 4 study testing Formoterol and Salmeterol in people with Asthma, run by University of Dundee at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The airways in the lungs get smaller the further into the lungs they go. Most simple measurements of lung function only reflect the larger 'central' airways and do not provide information on the smaller 'peripheral' airways. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Asthma
What is being tested?
Formoterol and Salmeterol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Jul 2013to Dec 2014
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female volunteers aged at least 16 years with a diagnosis of asthma
  • Persistent severe small airways dysfunction on impulse oscillometry with R5 > 150% and R5-R20 > 0.05 kPa/L.s despite taking ICS or inhaled corticosteroids / long-acting beta-agonists
  • FEV1 > 60 %
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Agreement for their GP to be made aware of study participation and to receive feedback as relevant to the participant's well being

Who cannot join

  • Participants already receiving extra-fine particle long-acting beta agonists
  • Other respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis or alergic allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis
  • An asthma exacerbation or respiratory tract infection requiring systemic steroids and/or antibiotics within 3 months of the study commencement
  • Smoking within one year or 10 pack year history
  • Any clinically significant medical condition that may endanger the health or safety of the participant
  • Participation in another trial within 30 days before the commencement of the study
  • Pregnancy or lactation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Brian Lipworth

    Dundee, DD1 3AU

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Randomised Controlled Single and Chronic Dosing Crossover Comparison of Extra Fine Particle Formoterol and Coarse Particle Salmeterol in Asthmatic Patients With Persistent Small Airways Dysfunction

The airways in the lungs get smaller the further into the lungs they go. Most simple measurements of lung function only reflect the larger 'central' airways and do not provide information on the smaller 'peripheral' airways. Newer measurements have been developed that can now give us accurate information on how the smaller airways are working. Indeed the small airways seem to play a significant role in asthma in terms of inflammation and airway narrowing. Recently, new types of inhaler formulations have been developed that have a much smaller particle size than other standard formulations. These formulations have been shown to go further into the lungs, thus getting into the smaller airways. In this study we aim to compare the two extremes of available long acting beta agonists in terms of particle size i.e. extra fine formoterol (Atimos) versus coarse particle salmeterol (Serevent)in asthmatics with abnormal small airway function using a breathing test called impulse oscillometry. By using this test we will be able to find out whether using an extrafine particle inhaler improves small airway function.

Read the detailed description

The small airways are gaining greater recognition for their role in the pathophysiology of persistent asthma and as a relevant target for asthma treatment(1). Pathological abnormalities in the small airways have been demonstrated regardless of asthma severity and seem to persist even in patients with stable asthma(2, 3).

Historically, the small airways have been difficult to assess. Spirometry generally reflects large airways function although the mean forced expiratory flow (FEF) between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25-75) has been used to assess small airway obstruction.(4) More recently, impulse oscillometry (IOS) has been used to assess the role of small airways in asthma(5). IOS is an effort-independent test, using oscillation of differing sound waves to derive a variety of output measurements determining both the degree of total and peripheral airway resistance. Resistance at 5 Hz reflects total airway resistance and central airway resistance is approximated using resistance at 20 Hz (R20). The peripheral or small airway component can thus be evaluated by calculating the difference between these two measurements i.e. R5 - R20.

We have identified from our database of primary care referrals, a cohort of patients who appear to have evidence of an unmet physiological need in terms of persistent small airways dysfunction, on the basis of impairment of R5 and R5-R20 despite taking step 2/3/4 asthma treatment(6). Approximately 32% of patients across steps 2/3/4 had severely abnormal values for both R5-R20 (>0.05 kPa/L.s) and R5 (> 150%). Such small airway dysfunction at step 3/4 occurred despite patients being prescribed ICS with LABA, although there were no patients being prescribed extra fine ICS/LABA or extra fine LABA (i.e. Fostair or Atimos). In terms of the ICS moiety, observational data has shown that patients taking extra fine HFA-beclometasone solution (Qvar) have equal or better control than those taking Fluticasone suspension, while receiving a lower maintenance dose of ICS(7). In another study, patients switched from beclometasone suspension to solution at half the dose had an improvement in asthma quality of life. In neither of these studies was there any information available regarding small airway dysfunction in order to explain the potential improvements with HFA-beclometasone(8).

There is a paucity of information on the potential benefits of extra fine formoterol on the small airways. In a single dosing study comparing extra fine HFA versus coarse particle dry powder formulations of formoterol, there was a 30% difference (absolute difference of 2.9 kPa/L.s.min)in R5 AUC0-60min and 63% difference (absolute difference of 2.4 kPa/L.s.min) in R5-R20 AUC0-60min, although this was not the primary end point(9).

1.2 RATIONALE Thus, the primary objective for the present study is to compare the two extremes of available long acting beta-agonist formulations - i.e. extra fine HFA formoterol ( Atimos ) versus coarse particle DPI salmeterol (i.e. Serevent Accuhaler). If there turns out to be a significant improvement in small airways function conferred by extra fine formoterol, then this would in turn support the rationale for performing a further chronic study to assess the clinical impact of treating persistent small airways dysfunction at step 3/4 by switching patients to Fostair HFA and comparing to Seretide DPI, in terms of improving asthma control in patients with the small airway phenotype who are already taking conventional ICS/LABA formulations. We will use impulse oscillometry to assess the small airways response using the difference between resistance measured at 5Hz and 20Hz (R5-R20) as the primary outcome. In this regard we have previously reported in asthmatic patients receiving propranolol that there was a 104.1 % (95%CI 22.6-185.6%) worsening of R5-R20 in terms of the bronchoconstrictor response to propranolol, and following subsequent histamine challenge, there was a 115.6 % (95%CI 55.6-175.7% ) improvement in R5-R20 in terms of the bronchodilator response to nebulised salbutamol.(10)

Conditions
Asthma
Being tested
Formoterol, Salmeterol
Keywords
Asthma, Small airways, Extra fine particle long-acting beta agonists
Medical subject headings
Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FormoterolDrug

    Also called Atimos Modulite

    Participants receive Atimos for 1 to 2 weeks.Partcipants then enter a washout period and after the washout period receive the alternative treatment arm.

  • SalmeterolDrug

    Also called Serevent Accuhaler

    Participants receive Serevent for 1 to 2 weeks. Participants then enter a washout period and after the washout period receive the alternative treatment arm.

Study groups in NCT01892787
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Formoterol (Atimos Modulite)ExperimentalAtimos Modulite 1 puff (12 micrograms) twice a day
Receives: Drug: Formoterol
Salmeterol (Serevent Accuhaler)Active comparatorSerevent Accuhaler 1 puff (50 micrograms) of twice a day
Receives: Drug: Salmeterol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in R5-R20 as change from baseline after first and last dose

    R5 - Resistance at 5Hz, R20 - Resistance at 20Hz

    Measured: At baseline & after 1-2 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change in remaining impulse oscillometry variables (R5,R20,X5,AX,RF) after first and last dose

    R5 - Resistance at 5Hz, R20 - Resistance at 20Hz, X5 - Reactance at 5Hz, RF - Frequency of resonance, AX - Area under reactance curve

    Measured: Baseline and after 1-2 weeks

  2. Area under the curve from 0 to 60 min

    Measured: Baseline and 1-2 weeks

  3. Spirometry

    Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1); forced vital capacity (FVC); forced expriatory flow between 25-75% of vital capacity.

    Measured: Baseline & 1-2 weeks

  4. Domiciliary peak expiratory flow

    Measured: 1-2 weeks

  5. Asthma Control Questionnaire

    Measured: 1-2 weeks

  6. Exhaled nitirc oxide

    Measured: 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2014
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01892787
Sponsor's protocol ID
2013RC01
Other IDs
2013-001103-36, 13/ES/0050
Acronym
MAN03
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
1 Jul 2013
Last updated
12 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Manoharan A, von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff A, Morrison A, Lipworth BJ. Effects of formoterol or salmeterol on impulse oscillometry in patients with persistent asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Mar;137(3):727-33.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

    PubMed 26220533

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Formoterol and Salmeterol in people with Asthma, run by University of Dundee at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in R5-R20 as change from baseline after first and last dose (time frame: At baseline & after 1-2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01892787, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in