AzTrials
AzTrials

D Vitamin Deficiency PatientsPhase 2NCT01893385

Vitamin D Supplementation and the Immune Response

A Phase 2 study testing Vitamin D (drug) in people with D Vitamin Deficiency Patients, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main objective is to assess the variation in plasma levels of cathelicidin before and after influenza vaccination. All bibliographic data suggests that supplementation vitamin D in the elderly often deficient in this vitamin may have a double interest: By induction of cathelicidin, assist in anti-infective… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
D Vitamin Deficiency Patients
What is being tested?
Vitamin D (drug)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
37 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jun 2013to Nov 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 65 or over subject,
  • Subjects with a vitamin D levels below 30 ng / ml,
  • Acceptance of vitamin D (100 000 IU of UVEDOSE ®)
  • Acceptance of influenza vaccination with INTANZA15 ®
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme
  • The subject agrees not to change their eating habits

Who cannot join

  • Liver disease: cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis.
  • Renal impairment whatever degree
  • Hypercalcemia (serum calcium> 2.6 mol / l)
  • Hypo-or hyperparathyroidism history, history of renal colic.
  • Disease / acute infection, moderate or severe (at the discretion of the investigator) on the day of vaccination or febrile illness (temperature ≥ 38 ° C). The subject should not be included in the study as his condition is not cured or her fever has not gone down).
  • Long-term treatment with bisphosphonates, corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsant, antiepileptics, fibrates.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Known hypersensitivity to vitamin D
  • Prior supplementation (in the last year) or supplementation of vitamin D during
  • Participation at the time of inclusion in the trial, or planned participation during the same period that this trial, another trial on a vaccine, drug, medical device.
  • Vaccination during the 4 weeks prior to vaccination or immunization of the test set out in the three weeks after vaccination test.
  • Transfusion of immunoglobulins, blood or blood products during the last 3 months
  • Congenital or acquired, known or suspected immunodeficiency, immunosuppressive therapy in the last 6 months, such as cancer chemotherapy or radiotherapy; steroids long-term systemic (prednisone or equivalent for more than two consecutive weeks in the Previous 3 months).
  • Systemic Hypersensitivity to any component of the vaccine (ovalbumin, chicken protein, neomycin, formaldehyde, octoxinol 9), or a history of reaction to influenza vaccine or a vaccine containing one of the substances in the vaccine trial, which involved life-threatening.
  • Deprivation of liberty or by administrative order issued by a court, subject to emergency medical or involuntary hospitalization.
  • Topic enjoying a measure of legal protection (guardianship, guardianship ...).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU Clermont-Ferrand

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Impact of Vitamin D Supplementation on Immune Functions: Study in Subjects Aged Over 65 Years Vaccinated Against Influenza

The main objective is to assess the variation in plasma levels of cathelicidin before and after influenza vaccination.

All bibliographic data suggests that supplementation vitamin D in the elderly often deficient in this vitamin may have a double interest:

Read more
  • By induction of cathelicidin, assist in anti-infective response in particular to the influenza virus
  • The normalization of vitamin D status, promote the return to an appropriate immune response limiting excess inflammation and improving capacity to respond.

The entire project will collect new information on the merits of the use of vitamin D in aging. A better knowledge of mechanisms involved and the impact of aging on them is a necessary prerequisite the definition of a new strategy using this drug in the elderly particularly fragile in order to improve its autonomy. This definition seems a sociological interest obvious economic knowing the current aging population and its impact future of our health system.

Read the detailed description

CONDUCT OF THE STUDY:

Visit 1: selection of subjects (CPC / CIC-Inserm CIC501)

  • Medical Examination, clinical examination, explanation of the protocol and collection of written consent,
  • Collection of anthropometric data measured size and not declarative weight form examination, measurement of current weight, BMI, waist circumference measurement.
  • Food Survey.
  • Fasting blood sampling: for dosing of vitamin D, cathelicidin, exploration of immunocompetent cells, calcium, phosphorus, urea and creatinine.

Visit 2: randomization (CPC / CIC-Inserm CIC501)

  • Fasting blood sampling: for dosing of vitamin D, cathelicidin, and the serum calcium, phosphorus, urea and creatinine.
  • Exploration of immune cells in patients deficient in vitamin D (molecular and cellular analyzes).

Start of vitamin D supplementation or placebo

  • Subjects with vitamin D levels <30ng/mL will be randomized into two groups:
  • Arm receiving vitamin D (BS).
  • Arm receiving placebo (BC).
  • It will be given to the patient 4 bulbs product (vitamin D or placebo) for supplementation for 2 months (1 / 15 days).

Call subjects at 4 weeks of vitamin supplementation / placebo to assess the clinical safety of the product, as well as compliance with the instructions of supplementation.

Visit 3: After seven weeks of vitamin supplementation / placebo (CPC / CIC-Inserm CIC501)

  • Fasting blood assay for vitamin D and calcium collection.
  • urinary dosage calcium. Visit 4: Month 2 (CPC / CIC-Inserm CIC501)
  • Validation of laboratory measurements made by an independent medical M2 protocol.
  • Delivery of products to test for the third month of vitamin supplementation / placebo.

For the placebo group given two bulbs for the third month placebo placebo supplementation.

For the VitD group: dose adjustment according to the following scheme:

  • If [25(OH) D]> 75 ng / ml and / or calcium levels> 106 mg / ml and / or calcium excretion> 300 mg / l: presentation of two bulbs placebo.
  • If [25(OH) D] <75 ng / ml and serum calcium <106 mg / ml and calcium excretion <300 mg / l: presentation of two ampoules of Vitamin D. Visit 5 - Month 3 vaccination INTANZA 15 ® (3 months after the start of supplementation)
  • Recovery of boxes and empty ampoules of vitamin D.
  • Evaluation of the clinical safety of vitamin D.
  • Collection of anthropometric data: measurement of current weight and BMI,
  • Fasting blood sampling: for dosing of vitamin D, cathelicidin, exploration of immunocompetent cells, calcium, phosphorus, urea and creatinine.
  • Influenza serology, Visit 6 - Month 4: end of study
  • Clinical examination with assessment of tolerability of vaccination and delivery of the form of reporting due to immunization and infectious complications side effects according to the criteria of toxicity CTCNCI Bethesda,
  • Collection of anthropometric data: measurement of current weight, calculating the weight change,
  • Fasting blood sampling: for dosing of vitamin D, cathelicidin, exploration of immunocompetent cells, calcium, phosphorus, urea and creatinine.
  • Measurement of seroconversion, seroprotection, MGT antibodies following vaccination.

End of the study Removal of anonymity for physician investigators to propose a vitamin D the subjects who received placebo.

Being tested
Vitamin D (drug)
Keywords
vitamin D, supplementation, immunocompetente cells, immune system, influenza vaccine, elderly
Medical subject headings
Influenza, Human

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin D (drug)Drug

Study groups in NCT01893385
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
vitamin DExperimentalThe entire project will collect new information on the merits of the use of vitamin D in aging. A better knowledge of mechanisms involved and the impact of aging on them is a necessary prerequisite the definition of a new strategy using this drug in the elderly particularly fragile in order to improve its autonomy. This definition seems a sociological interest obvious economic knowing the current aging population and its impact future of our health system
Receives: Drug: Vitamin D (drug)
INTANZA 15OtherThe entire project will collect new information on the merits of the use of vitamin D in aging. A better knowledge of mechanisms involved and the impact of aging on them is a necessary prerequisite the definition of a new strategy using this drug in the elderly particularly fragile in order to improve its autonomy. This definition seems a sociological interest obvious economic knowing the current aging population and its impact future of our health system
Receives: Drug: Vitamin D (drug)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. levels of cathelicidin

    Measured: at Month 3

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Levels of plasma 25(OH) D

    Measured: Day 0, week 7 and Month 3.

  2. Levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and anti-inflammatory (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17, IL-23, TFN, IFN and TGF)

    Measured: Day 0, week 7 and Month 3.

  3. Rate of seroconversion, seroprotection, the MGT antibodies

    Measured: Day 0, week 7 and Month 3.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2013
  3. Primary completionNov 2014
  4. Study completionNov 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
37 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01893385
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHU-0160
Other IDs
2012-005658-52
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
25 Jun 2013
Last updated
6 Aug 2026
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Goncalves-Mendes N, Talvas J, Duale C, Guttmann A, Corbin V, Marceau G, Sapin V, Brachet P, Evrard B, Laurichesse H, Vasson MP. Impact of Vitamin D Supplementation on Influenza Vaccine Response and Immune Functions in Deficient Elderly Persons: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Front Immunol. 2019 Feb 8;10:65. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00065. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 30800121

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Vitamin D (drug) in people with D Vitamin Deficiency Patients, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

levels of cathelicidin (time frame: at Month 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01893385, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in