AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD)Phase 2/3NCT01896102

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transduced With Lenti-D Lentiviral Vector for the Treatment of Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD)

A Phase 2/3 study testing Lenti-D Drug Product (eli-cel) in people with Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD), run by Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc. at 8 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of autologous cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34+) hematopoietic stem cells, transduced ex-vivo with Lenti-D lentiviral vector (also called elivaldogene autotemcel or eli-cel), for the treatment of cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 17 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD)
What is being tested?
Lenti-D Drug Product (eli-cel)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
32 participants
Where
8 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
21 Aug 2013to 26 Mar 2021
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 17 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Informed consent was obtained from a competent custodial parent or guardian with legal capacity to execute a local institutional review board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved consent (informed assent will be sought from capable participants, in accordance with the directive of the IRB/IEC and with local requirements).
  • Males aged 17 years and younger, at the time of parental/guardian consent and, where appropriate, participant assent.
  • Active cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) as defined by:
  • Elevated very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) values, and
  • Active CNS disease established by central radiographic review of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating:
  • Loes score between 0.5 and 9 (inclusive) on the 34-point scale, and
  • Gadolinium enhancement on MRI of demyelinating lesions.
  • NFS less than or equal to (<or=) 1.

Who cannot join

  • Receipt of an allogeneic transplant or gene therapy.
  • Availability of a willing 10/10 HLA-matched sibling donor (excluding female heterozygotes).
  • Use of statins, Lorenzo's Oil, or dietary regimens used to lower very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) levels. Note: participants must discontinue use of these medications at time of consent.
  • Receipt of an investigational study drug or procedure within 3 months before Screening that might confound study outcomes. Use of investigational study drugs is prohibited throughout the course of the study.
  • Any conditions that make it impossible to perform MRI studies (including allergies to anesthetics or contrast agents).
  • Hematological compromise as evidenced by:
Show all 22Show fewer
  • Peripheral blood absolute neutrophil count (ANC) count < 1500 cells/ cubic milli meter (mm3),
  • Platelet count < 100,000 cells/mm3, or
  • Hemoglobin < 10 gram per deciliter (g/dL).
  • Uncorrected bleeding disorder.
  • Hepatic compromise as evidenced by:
  • Aspartate transaminase (AST) value > 2.5×upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Alanine transaminase (ALT) value > 2.5×ULN
  • Total bilirubin value > 3.0 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL), except if there is a diagnosis of Gilbert's Syndrome and the participant is otherwise stable
  • Renal compromise as evidenced by abnormal renal function (actual or calculated creatinine clearance < 50 milliliter per minute [mL/min])
  • Cardiac compromise as evidenced by left ventricular ejection fraction <40 percent (%)
  • Immediate family member with a known or suspected Familial Cancer Syndrome (including but not limited to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome, and familial adenomatous polyposis).
  • Clinically significant active bacterial, viral, fungal, parasitic, or prion-associated infection
  • Positive for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 or 2 (HIV-1, HIV-2); hepatitis B; hepatitis C; human T lymphotrophic virus 1 (HTLV-1). (Note that participants who have been vaccinated against hepatitis B [hepatitis B surface antibody-positive] who are negative for other markers of prior hepatitis B infection [eg, negative for hepatitis B core antibody (Ab)] are eligible. Participants with past exposure to hepatitis B virus (HBV [HBcAb positive and/or HBeAb positive]) are also eligible for the study provided they have a negative test for HBV DNA. Also note that participants who are positive for anti-hepatitis C antibody are eligible as long as they have a negative hepatitis C viral load.
  • Any clinically significant cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, or other disease or condition that would be contraindicated for any of the other study procedures.
  • Absence of adequate contraception for fertile participants. Male participants and their female partners are required to use two different effective methods of contraception from Screening through at least 6 months after drug product infusion. If subjects are truly sexually abstinent (where true sexual abstinence is defined as being in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject), no second method is required.
  • Any contraindications to the use of granulocyte colony stimulating (G-CSF) during the mobilization of HSCs, and any contraindications to the use of busulfan or cyclophosphamide, including known hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients in their formulations.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 6 countries.

8 sites in 6 countries

United States3 sites
  • Boston Children's Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Mattel Children's Hospital UCLA/Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

Other trials in United States

Argentina1 site
  • Medeos SRL

    Buenos Aires, C1022

Other trials in Argentina

Australia1 site
  • Women and Children's Hospital

    North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006

Other trials in Australia

France1 site
  • Hôpital Bicêtre

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275

Other trials in France

Germany1 site
  • University of Leipzig

    Leipzig, 04103

Other trials in Germany

United Kingdom1 site
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust

    London, WC1N3JH

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2/3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transduced With Lenti-D Lentiviral Vector for the Treatment of Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD)

This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of autologous cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34+) hematopoietic stem cells, transduced ex-vivo with Lenti-D lentiviral vector (also called elivaldogene autotemcel or eli-cel), for the treatment of cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD). A participant's blood stem cells were collected and modified (transduced) using the Lenti-D lentiviral vector encoding human adrenoleukodystrophy protein. After modification (transduction) with the Lenti-D lentiviral vector, the cells were transplanted back into the participant following myeloablative conditioning. Participants in this study will be continuously followed in study LTF-304.

Read the detailed description

For study ALD-102 the Transplant Population (TP), Neutrophil Engraftment Population (NEP), and Intent-to-Treat Population (ITT) were identical.

Being tested
Lenti-D Drug Product (eli-cel)
Keywords
Adrenoleukodystrophy, X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy, Gene therapy, Hematopoietic stem cell
Medical subject headings
Adrenoleukodystrophy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lenti-D Drug Product (eli-cel)Genetic

    Also called elivaldogene autotemcel, eli-cel

    Participants received a single IV infusion of Lenti-D Drug Product.

Study groups in NCT01896102
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lenti-D Drug ProductExperimentalParticipants received a single intravenous (IV) infusion of Lenti-D Drug Product at a dose of greater than or equal to (>=) 5.0 × 10^6 CD34+ cells/kilogram (kg) (autologous CD34+ cell-enriched population that contained cells transduced with lentiviral vector encoding ABCD1 cDNA for human adrenoleukodystrophy protein, suspended in a cryopreservative solution) on Day 0.
Receives: Genetic: Lenti-D Drug Product (eli-cel)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Have None of the 6 Major Functional Disabilities (MFDs) at Month 24 and Without Allo-HSCT or Rescue Cell Administration

    The 6 MFDs consisted of loss of communication, cortical blindness, tube feeding, total incontinence, wheelchair dependence, complete loss of voluntary movement. Month 24 MFD-Free survival criteria was defined as: alive at 24 months post-infusion; had not developed any of the MFDs by 24 months post-infusion; had not received rescue cell administration or allo-HSCT by 24 months post-infusion; and had not withdrawn from the study or had not been lost to follow-up by 24 months post-infusion. Percentage of participants who were alive and have none of the 6 major functional disabilities (MFDs) at Month 24 were reported.

    Measured: At Month 24

  2. Proportion of Participants Who Had Experienced Either Acute ([>or=] Grade II) or Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) by Month 24

    Acute GVHD graded on the Acute GVHD Grading Scale (I-IV): Grade I is characterized as mild disease, Grade II as moderate, Grade III as severe (involvement of any organ system), and Grade IV as life-threatening; chronic GVHD was determined by the Investigator. Percentage of participants who experienced with either acute (>= Grade II) or chronic GVHD at Month 24 were reported.

    Measured: By Month 24

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Resolution of Gadolinium Positivity on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Month 24

    Percentage of participants who demonstrated resolution of gadolinium positivity (i.e., GdE-) on MRI at Month 24 were reported.

    Measured: At Month 24

  2. Time to Sustained Resolution of Gadolinium Positivity on MRI

    Sustained resolution of gadolinium positivity was defined as having at least two consecutive GdE- results by MRI without a subsequent evaluation indicating GdE+.

    Measured: Up to Month 24

  3. Number of Participants With Change in Total Neurologic Function Score (NFS) From Baseline up to Month 24

    NFS was a 25-point score used to evaluate the severity of gross neurologic dysfunction in CALD by scoring 15 symptoms (functional domains) across 6 categories. Listed here are the 15 symptoms followed by their maximal score out of 25 points: a) Hearing / auditory processing problems-1, b) Aphasia/apraxia-1, c) Loss of communication-3, d) Vision impairment/field cut-1, e) Cortical blindness-2, f) Swallowing/other CNS dysfunctions-2, g) Tube feeding-2, h) Running difficulties/hyperreflexia-1, i) Walking difficulties/spasticity/spastic gait (no assistance)-1, j) Spastic gait (needs assistance)-2, k) Wheelchair dependence-2, l) Complete loss of voluntary movement-3, m) Episodes of incontinence -1, n) Total incontinence-2, o) Nonfebrile seizures-1. A score of "0" denoted absence of clinical signs of cerebral disease. Maximal signs within a domain score the total of all grades within that domain. Number of participants with change in total NFS from baseline up to Month 24 were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to Month 24

  4. Major Functional Disability (MFD)-Free Survival Rate

    MFD-free survival rate was defined as percentage of participants from drug product infusion to either second transplant, MFD, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. MFD-free survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimated MFD-free survival rate at 24 months after Lenti-D drug infusion was reported.

    Measured: At 24 months after Lenti-D drug infusion

  5. Overall Survival Rate

    Overall survival rate was defined as percentage of participants alive from date of Lenti-D drug product infusion (Day 0) to date of death of all causes. Overall survival rate was censored at the date of last visit if the participant were alive. Participants who are alive were censored at the date of last contact. Overall survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimated overall survival rate at 24 months after Lenti-D drug infusion was reported.

    Measured: At 24 months after Lenti-D drug infusion

  6. Proportion of Participants With Neutrophil Engraftment by 42 Days Post-drug Product Infusion

    Neutrophil engraftment (NE) was defined as achieving 3 consecutive absolute neutrophil count (ANC) laboratory values of >= 0.5×10^9 cells/Liter (L) (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days by 42 days post-infusion of Lenti-D Drug Product (Relative Day 43). Percentage of participants with neutrophil engraftment by 42 Days post-drug product infusion were reported.

    Measured: By 42 days post-drug infusion

  7. Time to Neutrophil Engraftment Post-drug Product Infusion

    Neutrophil Engraftment was defined as achieving 3 consecutive ANC laboratory values of >= 0.5×10^9 cells/L (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days by 42 days post-infusion of Lenti-D Drug Product (Relative Day 43). Time to neutrophil engraftment post-drug product infusion was reported.

    Measured: By 42 days post-drug infusion

  8. Proportion of Participants With Platelet Engraftment by Month 24

    Platelet Engraftment was defined as achieving 3 consecutive unsupported platelet counts of >=20 × 10^9 cells/L (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days while no platelet transfusions were administered for 7 days immediately preceding and during the evaluation period. The first day of 3 consecutive platelet counts >=20 × 10^9 cells/L was the day of PE. Percentage of participants with Platelet Engraftment by Month 24 (Rel Day 730) were reported.

    Measured: By Month 24

  9. Time to Platelet Engraftment Post-drug Product Infusion

    Platelet Engraftment was defined as achieving 3 consecutive unsupported platelet counts of > or =20 × 10^9 cells/L (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days while no platelet transfusions were administered for 7 days immediately preceding and during the evaluation period. The first day of 3 consecutive platelet counts >=20 × 10^9 cells/L was the day of PE. Time to Platelet Engraftment post-drug product infusion up to Month 24 was reported.

    Measured: By Month 24

  10. Proportion of Participants With Engraftment Failure By Month 24

    Participants were considered to have primary engraftment failure if they did not achieve NE by Relative Day 43. A participant was considered to have secondary engraftment failure if they achieved and then subsequently lost NE by the Month 24, i.e., if they met both the conditions; Achieved NE by Relative Day 43 as defined above and had sustained decline in ANC to < 0.5×10^9 cells/L for 3 consecutive measurements on different days after Relative Day 43, without alternate etiology. First day of the 3 consecutive ANC decline to < 0.5×10^9 cells/L was considered the day of secondary engraftment failure. Percentage of participants with both primary and secondary engraftment failure at Month 24 were reported.

    Measured: By Month 24

  11. Proportion of Participants Who Underwent a Subsequent Allo-Hematopoietic Stem Cell (HSC) Infusion by Month 24

    Percentage of Participants who have undergone a subsequent allo-HSC infusion at Month 24 were reported.

    Measured: By Month 24

  12. Percentage of Participants With Transplant-related Mortality Through 100 and 365 Days Post-drug Product Infusion

    Transplant-related mortality was determined by the Investigator in participants who had died from transplant-related causes by 100 days post-drug product infusion (Rel Day 101) or 365 days post-drug product infusion (Rel Day 366) respectively or had been followed to at least Rel Day 101 or 366 respectively if no events yet. Percentage of participants with transplant-related mortality through 100 and 365 days post-drug product infusion were reported.

    Measured: From time of drug product infusion through 100 and 365 days post-drug product infusion

  13. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Grade >=3 AE, Related AEs, Related SAEs and Related Grade >=3 AEs

    Adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug product in participants, whether or not considered drug related. SAE was any AE, occurring at any dose and regardless of causality, that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was considered an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent an outcome listed previously. Percentage of participants with all AEs, all SAEs, all drug-product related AEs and SAEs Grade >=3 (severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening AE) and related Grade >=3 AEs were reported.

    Measured: From date of informed consent up to Month 24

  14. Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinical Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters by Month 24

    Laboratory parameters included hematology (Leukocytes [with a threshold (TS) range <4.0 x 10^9/L, >=18 x 10^9/L], Neutrophils [<1.0 x 10^9/L], Erythrocytes [<=3.0 x 10^12/L], Platelets [<=75 x 10^9/L]); clinical chemistry (Sodium [<=126 millimoles per liter (mmol/L), >=156 mmol/L], Potassium [<=3 mmol/L, >=6 mmol/L], Glucose [<=3.0 mmol/L], Urea Nitrogen [>=10.7 mmol/L], Creatinine [>=150 umol/L]) and liver function tests (LFT) (Alanine Aminotransferase [ALA]. Aspartate Aminotransferase [ASA], Alkaline Phosphatase [AP] with TS range of >=3 x upper limit of normal (ULN), Bilirubin [>=34.2 micromoles per liter (umol/L)]). Clinical significance was decided by investigator.

    Measured: From time of drug product infusion up to Month 24

  15. Number of Emergency Room Visits (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) By Month 24

    Number of emergency room visits (post-neutrophil engraftment) up to Month 24 were reported.

    Measured: From Post-Neutrophil Engraftment up to Month 24

  16. Number of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) By Month 24

    Number of In-patient hospitalizations (post-neutrophil engraftment) by Month 24 were reported.

    Measured: From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24

  17. Duration of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) up to Month 24

    Duration of in-patient hospitalizations was calculated as: Duration = (Date of hospital discharge) - (Date of hospital admission before NE) + 1. Duration of In-patient hospitalizations (post-neutrophil engraftment) up to Month 24 was reported.

    Measured: From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24

  18. Number of Intensive Care Units (ICU) Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) By Month 24

    Number of ICU Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) By Month 24 were reported.

    Measured: From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24

  19. Duration of ICU Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) By Month 24

    Duration of ICU Stays was calculated as: Duration = (Date of hospital discharge) - (Date of hospital admission before NE) + 1. Duration of ICU Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24 was reported.

    Measured: From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24

  20. Number of Participants With Vector-Derived Replication Competent Lentivirus (RCL) Detected by Month 24

    Number of Participants with Vector-derived RCL detected at Month 24 were reported. Screening participants blood samples for RCL at month 24 following Lenti-D Drug infusion was performed, with the more rigorous co-culture assays used to distinguish any false positives as applicable.

    Measured: By Month 24

  21. Number of Participants With Insertional Oncogenesis By Month 24

    Insertional oncogenesis including myelodysplasia, leukemia, lymphoma. Number of participants with insertional oncogenesis at Month 24 were reported.

    Measured: By Month 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start21 Aug 2013
  3. Primary completion26 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion26 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
32 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01896102
Sponsor's protocol ID
ALD-102
Other IDs
2011-001953-10
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
22 Mar 2013
Last updated
25 Apr 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Bluebird bio is committed to transparency and appropriately de-identified patient-level datasets and supporting documents may be shared following attainment of applicable marketing approvals associated with this study and consistent with criteria established by bluebird bio and/or industry best practices to maintain the privacy of study participants. Note that given the rarity of the disease and the identifiable nature of the participants in this study, it is anticipated that the sharing of data from this study may be limited. For enquiries, please contact us at datasharing@bluebirdbio.com.

Publications

  • Eichler F, Duncan CN, Musolino PL, Lund TC, Gupta AO, De Oliveira S, Thrasher AJ, Aubourg P, Kuhl JS, Loes DJ, Amartino H, Smith N, Folloni Fernandes J, Sevin C, Sankar R, Hussain SA, Gissen P, Dalle JH, Platzbecker U, Downey GF, McNeil E, Demopoulos L, Dietz AC, Thakar HL, Orchard PJ, Williams DA. Lentiviral Gene Therapy for Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 10;391(14):1302-1312. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2400442.

    PubMed 39383459
  • Duncan CN, Bledsoe JR, Grzywacz B, Beckman A, Bonner M, Eichler FS, Kuhl JS, Harris MH, Slauson S, Colvin RA, Prasad VK, Downey GF, Pierciey FJ, Kinney MA, Foos M, Lodaya A, Floro N, Parsons G, Dietz AC, Gupta AO, Orchard PJ, Thakar HL, Williams DA. Hematologic Cancer after Gene Therapy for Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 10;391(14):1287-1301. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2405541.

    PubMed 39383458
  • Eichler F, Duncan C, Musolino PL, Orchard PJ, De Oliveira S, Thrasher AJ, Armant M, Dansereau C, Lund TC, Miller WP, Raymond GV, Sankar R, Shah AJ, Sevin C, Gaspar HB, Gissen P, Amartino H, Bratkovic D, Smith NJC, Paker AM, Shamir E, O'Meara T, Davidson D, Aubourg P, Williams DA. Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Gene Therapy for Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 26;377(17):1630-1638. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700554. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

    PubMed 28976817

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Lenti-D Drug Product (eli-cel) in people with Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD), run by Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc. at 8 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States, Argentina, Australia, France, Germany and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Apr 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Have None of the 6 Major Functional Disabilities (MFDs) at Month 24 and Without Allo-HSCT or Rescue Cell Administration (time frame: At Month 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01896102, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in