AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationNCT01896570

Role of Subsequent Atrial Tachycardia in Mechanisms of Persistent AF

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study, the investigators aim to examine the prognostic role of subsequent Atrial Tachycardias (ATs) in the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, the investigators compare patients who were randomly assigned to either undergo cardioversion after AF has been terminated to AT or further ablation… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Catheter ablation of subsequent atrial tachycardia
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
110 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Jun 2009to Mar 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with persistent AF

Who may be able to join

  • persistent AF for at least 1 months,
  • age > 18 years,
  • refractory to drug therapy,
  • no prior ablation

Who cannot join

  • prior AF ablation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • University Hospital Eppendorf, Dept. of Electrophysiology

    Hamburg, D-20246

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: The Prognostic Role of Subsequent Atrial Tachycardias Occurring After Atrial Fibrillation Termination: A Prospective Randomized Trial

In this study, the investigators aim to examine the prognostic role of subsequent Atrial Tachycardias (ATs) in the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, the investigators compare patients who were randomly assigned to either undergo cardioversion after AF has been terminated to AT or further ablation until the achievement of sinus rhythm.

Being tested
Catheter ablation of subsequent atrial tachycardia
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, subsequent atrial tachycardia, mechanisms
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Catheter ablation of subsequent atrial tachycardiaProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT01896570
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A: cardioversion at ATafter achievement of AT, pts were cardioverted
Group B: ablation to SRAfter AT has been achieved, all subsequent AT were ablated with the endpoint of procedural SR termination
Receives: Procedure: Catheter ablation of subsequent atrial tachycardia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Arrhythmia-free survival

    Measured: 24 months after enrolment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Type of Arrhythmia recurrence

    Measured: 24 months after enrolement

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2009
  3. Primary completionMar 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
110 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01896570
Sponsor's protocol ID
Ciritical endpoint HH
Status last verified
Jul 2013
First submitted
6 Jul 2013
Last updated
11 Jul 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Rostock T, Salukhe TV, Hoffmann BA, Steven D, Berner I, Mullerleile K, Theis C, Bock K, Servatius H, Sultan A, Willems S. Prognostic role of subsequent atrial tachycardias occurring during ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;6(6):1059-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001019. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

    PubMed 24162833

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Atrial Fibrillation, run by Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Arrhythmia-free survival (time frame: 24 months after enrolment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01896570, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in