Relatively Healthy VolunteersPhase 4NCT01898689
Optimizing Local Anesthetic Concentration for Continuous Popliteal-Sciatic Nerve Blocks
A Phase 4 study testing Ropivacaine 0.1% and Ropivacaine 0.4% in people with Relatively Healthy Volunteers, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
A continuous peripheral nerve block-also termed "perineural local anesthetic infusion"-involves the insertion of a tiny tube (a "catheter") through the skin and adjacent to a peripheral nerve, followed by local anesthetic (numbing medicine) administration via the catheter, providing pain control following surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Relatively Healthy Volunteers
- What is being tested?
- Ropivacaine 0.1% and Ropivacaine 0.4%
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to Nov 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age ≥ 18 years
- willing to have bilateral femoral perineural catheters placed with a subsequent ropivacaine infusion and motor/sensory testing for 6 hours, requiring an overnight stay in the UCSD GCRC/CTRI to allow dissipation of local anesthetic infusion effects by the following morning
Who cannot join
- current daily analgesic use
- opioid use within the previous 4 weeks
- any neuro-muscular deficit of either femoral nerves and/or quadriceps muscles
- morbid obesity [weight > 35 kg/m2]
- pregnancy (as determined by a urine pregnancy test prior to any study interventions)
- incarceration
- We expect to recruit a maximum of 30 healthy volunteers; with a target goal of 24 for the analysis. Selection for inclusion will not be based on gender, race, or socioeconomic status. The study population of interest includes men and women of all races and socioeconomic status. There will be no participants from vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women, children, or prisoners.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University California San Diego
San Diego, California, 92103
About this study
A continuous peripheral nerve block-also termed "perineural local anesthetic infusion"-involves the insertion of a tiny tube (a "catheter") through the skin and adjacent to a peripheral nerve, followed by local anesthetic (numbing medicine) administration via the catheter, providing pain control following surgery. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks may be provided in the hospital setting, but the use of lightweight, portable pumps permits infusion at home as well. However, it remains unknown if the concentration of the local anesthetic influences the block effects; or, is it rather simply the total dose of medication that is important. If it is the latter, then the concentration of local anesthetic could be increased, allowing a decreased basal infusion rate, which would allow patients at home to receive twice the duration of potent pain control since their infusion pump local anesthetic reservoir would last twice as long as current practice. In addition, if one concentration/dose combination results in less muscle weakness, but with at least equivalent analgesia, then the risk of falling might be decreased as well.
The investigators will test the hypothesis that providing ropivacaine at different concentrations and rates (0.1% at 8 mL/hour vs. 0.4% at 2 mL/hour)-but at an equivalent total basal (8 mg/hour)-produces comparable effects when used in a continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block.
Read the detailed description
The investigators therefore propose a volunteer-based clinical trial testing the hypothesis that providing ropivacaine at different concentrations and rates (0.1% at 8 mL/hour vs. 0.4% at 2 mL/hour)-but at an equivalent total basal dose (8 mg/hour)-produces comparable effects when infused for a continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block. The primary endpoint will be tolerance to cutaneous electrical current applied on the plantar aspect of the foot. This is an objective endpoint that has been validated in multiple previous publications and correlates with intra- and post-operative pain.
This investigation will be a randomized, observer-masked, controlled, split-body, human-subjects clinical trial.
Enrollment. Subjects will be volunteers of both sexes, age 18 and older. Volunteers will be solicited using newspaper advertisements, fliers, and an existing database of volunteers (IRB approved). If a volunteer meets inclusion/exclusion criteria and desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained. Selection for inclusion will not be based on race or socioeconomic status. The study population of interest includes men and women of all races and socioeconomic status. A urine pregnancy test will be administered to all women of childbearing age following written informed consent but before any study interventions. This urine test will be administered by CTRI nursing staff using standard, FDA-approved urine pregnancy testing devices.
Inclusion criteria for the trial will be: (1) age ≥ 18 years; and (2) willing to have bilateral femoral perineural catheters placed with a subsequent ropivacaine infusion and motor/sensory testing for 6 hours, requiring an overnight stay in the UCSD GCRC/CTRI to allow dissipation of local anesthetic infusion effects by the following morning. Exclusion criteria for the trial will be: (1) current daily analgesic use; (2) opioid use within the previous 4 weeks; (3) any neuro-muscular deficit of either femoral nerves and/or quadriceps muscles; (4) morbid obesity [weight > 35 kg/m2]; (5) pregnancy (as determined by a urine pregnancy test prior to any study interventions); and (6) incarceration. We expect to recruit a maximum of 30 healthy volunteers; with a target goal of 24 for the analysis. Selection for inclusion will not be based on gender, race, or socioeconomic status. The study population of interest includes men and women of all races and socioeconomic status. There will be no participants from vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women, children, or prisoners
Perineural catheter insertion. Following written, informed consent, subjects will be admitted to the UCSD CTRI and have demographic/morphometric data recorded (e.g., age, weight, height). An intravenous line will be placed in an upper extremity, followed by external monitors (pulse oximeter, blood pressure, and EKG), and oxygen by nasal cannula. Sedation will be provided with intravenous fentanyl (50 mcg) and/or midazolam (1 mg), or oral valium (10 mg) and/or dilaudid (4 mg), as necessary. Subjects will then have bilateral popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters placed using standard UC San Diego techniques as previously published by the current P.I.7,8
Treatment Group Assignment. Subjects will have the right-sided catheter randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: a ropivacaine concentration of 0.1% or 0.4%. Subjects will act as their own controls, with the contralateral side receiving the alternative concentration. The Investigational Drug Service will prepare the randomization list as well as the two ropivacaine reservoirs and two electronic infusion pumps (SIGMA Spectrum Infusion System, Baxter Healthcare International, Deerfield, IL) used to infuse the ropivacaine. All pumps will be FDA approved for infusion of local anesthetic. The basal rate of each infusion will be determined by the ropivacaine concentration in each pump reservoir: 0.1% (8 mL/h) or 0.4% (2 mL/h). While the basal rate and bolus volume will differ for each concentration, the total dose of local anesthetic will be the same for both treatments (8 mg/h). The local anesthetic reservoirs will be contained within an opaque bag prepared by the Investigational Drug Service, and the infusion rates displayed on the pumps covered, ensuring masking for both the subjects and observers (clinical research nurse taking the measurements). Following 6 hours (48 mg), the infusions will be discontinued and the catheters removed.
Treatment Group Basal Rate (mL/h) Basal Dose (mg/h) Total Dose (mg in 6 h) Ropivacaine 0.1% 8 8 48 Ropivacaine 0.4% 2 8 48
The tubing from the pumps to the subjects will be gently wound at least 5 rotations and covered with opaque tape, masking which perineural catheter is receiving which treatment (ropivacaine is clear, so the flow through the clear tubing from the tape to the perineural catheters will not be visually distinguishable). Subjects will remain within the CTRI until the following morning at least until Hour 22 for the final measurement; or, until their perineural infusion sensory and motor effects have resolved. If a subject requests early withdrawal from the study, they will remain in the CTRI until their perineural infusion sensory and motor effects have resolved.
Outcome Measurements. The selected measures have established reliability and validity and minimal inter-rater discordance. Measurements will be performed at Hour 0 (baseline), and on the hour until Hour 14, as well as the following morning at Hour 22. In all cases, measurements will be taken in the supine position with the dominant side measured first, followed by the non-dominant side.
Tolerance of transcutaneous electrical stimulation: Sensory perception-depth of analgesia-will be evaluated using tolerance of transcutaneous electrical stimulation with the same quantitative procedure validated and used in multiple clinical trials. Electrocardiogram pads are placed on the lateral aspect of the plantar surface of the foot which is covered by the sciatic nerve distribution; and, the tolerance to cutaneous electrical current is obtained using a nerve stimulator. The current is increased from 0 mA until subjects detect the electrical current (up to a maximum of 80 mA), at which time the current is recorded and the nerve stimulator turned off.
Muscle strength: We will evaluate muscle strength with an isometric force electromechanical dynamometer to measure the force produced during a maximum voluntary isometric plantar-flexion (muscles innervated by the sciatic nerve). The dynamometer will be placed against the bed's foot board (immobile) and the subject will be asked to take 2 seconds to come to maximum effort contracting the target muscles, maintain this effort for 5 seconds, and then relax. The measurements immediately prior to perineural ropivacaine administration will be designated as baseline measurements, and all subsequent measurements will be expressed as a percentage of the pre-infusion baseline.
Food and Drink: Both food and accompanying beverages/water will be provided by the hospital and served by the nursing staff immediately following catheter insertion. Meals will be provided without charge to the study subjects. There is no restriction on oral intake following catheter insertion.
Statistical Analysis. Sample size calculations are based on the primary aim of determining the relationship between perineural ropivacaine concentration and continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block effects. To this end, we will perform an equivalency trial with the primary endpoint designated as the maximum tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation at Hour 6. We will aim to demonstrate that differing the concentration (0.1% vs. 0.4%) applied to different legs of each subject, but providing an equal total dose (8 mg/h) of ropivacaine through a popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter does not result in a significant difference in tolerance between legs at Hour 6. We will conclude that the interventions are equivalent if the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference in tolerance between legs is contained within the pre-specified tolerance interval of +/- 10 mA. This value is used as the minimally clinically-relevant current since it approximates the tolerated electrical current range at baseline of the general population-in other words, natural variability and therefore a relatively small amount of current to detect.4 Based on previously-published data,1,4 we assume the standard deviation of tolerance difference between legs is SD=13 mA. With n=24 subjects, we will correctly conclude equivalence with approximately 80% probability ("power"). Alternatively, if the population difference is 10 mA, we will correctly reject equivalence with probability 5%. The mean difference between treatments will be estimated by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA), using baseline tolerance difference as a covariate. Subjects will receive each of the two treatments applied randomly to the left and right legs.
The same analyses will be applied to the secondary endpoints. Profiles of the responses over time will be examined with spaghetti and mean plots. Further secondary analyses will include mixed-effects modeling of the repeated measures. These models account for the hierarchical correlation of paired measures from each subject over time, and will be used to test the effects of subject characteristics, including sex, height, weight, body mass index, and age. The model will also allow simultaneous analysis of all observations while accounting for within-subject correlation, which can improve the standard errors of the estimated differential at each time point. The within-subject correlation will be modeled via a subject-specific random intercept. This is similar to a compound symmetric correlation structure without a random effect. The change from baseline, Y, for subject i and time t will be modeled with the linear mixed-effect model:
Yi(t¬j) = Yi(0) β0 + 1{t¬j=1}β1 + … + 1{t¬j=9}β9 + bi + eij
where 1{t¬j=k} is 1 if t¬j=k and 0 otherwise. The subject-specific random intercepts bi and residuals eij are assumed to follow a Gaussian distribution. We will present the estimated difference at each hour with unadjusted p-values, and p-values adjusted using the single-step method for simultaneous inference from parametric models.
Analyses will be executed using R version 2.12 (http://www.r-project.org). Additional analyses will include the Mann-Whitney U for nonparametric comparisons and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables (InStat, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, United States).
- Conditions
- Relatively Healthy Volunteers
- Being tested
- Ropivacaine 0.1%, Ropivacaine 0.4%
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ropivacaine 0.1%Drug
Also called continuous peripheral nerve block
A sciatic catheter was inserted and ropivacaine 0.1% was administered as a basal infusion for 6 hours.
Ropivacaine 0.4%Drug
Also called continuous peripheral nerve block
A sciatic catheter was inserted and ropivacaine 0.4% was administered as a basal infusion for 6 hours.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RIGHT side Ropivacaine 0.1% and LEFT side Ropivacaine 0.4% | Experimental | Bilateral sciatic perineural catheters were inserted and ropivacaine administered as a basal infusion concurrently. For the right catheter, ropivacaine 0.1% was infused at 8 mL/h basal for 6 hours. For the left catheter, ropivacaine 0.4% was infused at 2 mL/h for 6 hours. Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine 0.1%; Drug: Ropivacaine 0.4% |
| RIGHT side Ropivacaine 0.4% and LEFT side Ropivacaine 0.1% | Active comparator | Bilateral sciatic perineural catheters were inserted and ropivacaine administered as a basal infusion concurrently. For the right catheter, ropivacaine 0.4% was infused at 8 mL/h basal for 6 hours. For the left catheter, ropivacaine 0.1% was infused at 2 mL/h for 6 hours. Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine 0.1%; Drug: Ropivacaine 0.4% |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximum Tolerance to Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation
Electrocardiogram pads are placed on the lateral aspect of the plantar surface of the foot which is covered by the sciatic nerve distribution; and, the tolerance to cutaneous electrical current is obtained using a nerve stimulator. The current is increased from 0 mA until subjects detect the electrical current (up to a maximum of 80 mA), at which time the current is recorded and the nerve stimulator turned off.
Measured: Hour 6
Secondary outcomes (2)
Maximum Tolerance to Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation
Electrocardiogram pads are placed on the lateral aspect of the plantar surface of the foot which is covered by the sciatic nerve distribution; and, the tolerance to cutaneous electrical current is obtained using a nerve stimulator. The current is increased from 0 mA until subjects detect the electrical current (up to a maximum of 80 mA), at which time the current is recorded and the nerve stimulator turned off.
Measured: baseline, Hours 1-14 (except 6 which was the primary outcome) and Hour 22
Percent of Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Baseline (Quadriceps Femoris)
Muscle strength was evaluated with an isometric force electromechanical dynamometer (MicroFET2, Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, IN) to measure the force produced during a MVIC during plantar flexion. The dynamometer was placed against the bed's foot board (immobile) and the subjects asked to take 2 seconds to come to maximum effort plantar flexing, maintaining this effort for 5 seconds, and then relaxing. The measurements immediately prior to perineural ropivacaine administration were designated as baseline measurements, and all subsequent measurements expressed as a percentage of the pre-infusion baseline.
Measured: baseline, Hours 1-14 and Hour 22
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionNov 2013
- Study completionNov 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Relatively Healthy VolunteersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a split-body study in which each study subject receives both treatments: one on each side of the body. Which treatment is applied to which side of the body is randomized (and masked).
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Diego
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baxter Healthcare Corporation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS, University of California, San Diego
- Investigators
- Brian M Ilfeld, MD, MS, Principal investigator, University California San Diego
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01898689
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Baxter Popliteal Volunteer
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Madison SJ, Monahan AM, Agarwal RR, Furnish TJ, Mascha EJ, Xu Z, Donohue MC, Morgan AC, Ilfeld BM. A randomized, triple-masked, active-controlled investigation of the relative effects of dose, concentration, and infusion rate for continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve blocks in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;114(1):121-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu333. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
PubMed 25248648
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimizing Local Anesthetic Concentration for Continuous Popliteal-Sciatic Nerve Blocks
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01898689
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Baxter Popliteal Volunteer
- Conditions
- Relatively Healthy Volunteers
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San DiegoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baxter Healthcare Corporation
- Study start
- Jul 2013
- Primary completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Mar 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A continuous peripheral nerve block-also termed "perineural local anesthetic infusion"-involves the insertion of a tiny tube (a "catheter") through the skin and adjacent to a peripheral nerve, followed by local anesthetic (numbing medicine) administration via the catheter, providing pain control following surgery. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks may be provided in the hospital setting, but the use of lightweight, portable pumps permits infusion at home as well. However, it remains unknown if the concentration of the local anesthetic influences the block effects; or, is it rather simply the total dose of medication that is important. If it is the latter, then the concentration of local anesthetic could be increased, allowing a decreased basal infusion rate, which would allow patients at home to receive twice the duration of potent pain control since their infusion pump local anesthetic reservoir would last twice as long as current practice. In addition, if one concentration/dose combination results in less muscle weakness, but with at least equivalent analgesia, then the risk of falling might be decreased as well.
The investigators will test the hypothesis that providing ropivacaine at different concentrations and rates (0.1% at 8 mL/hour vs. 0.4% at 2 mL/hour)-but at an equivalent total basal (8 mg/hour)-produces comparable effects when used in a continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block.
Detailed description
The investigators therefore propose a volunteer-based clinical trial testing the hypothesis that providing ropivacaine at different concentrations and rates (0.1% at 8 mL/hour vs. 0.4% at 2 mL/hour)-but at an equivalent total basal dose (8 mg/hour)-produces comparable effects when infused for a continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block. The primary endpoint will be tolerance to cutaneous electrical current applied on the plantar aspect of the foot. This is an objective endpoint that has been validated in multiple previous publications and correlates with intra- and post-operative pain.
This investigation will be a randomized, observer-masked, controlled, split-body, human-subjects clinical trial.
Enrollment. Subjects will be volunteers of both sexes, age 18 and older. Volunteers will be solicited using newspaper advertisements, fliers, and an existing database of volunteers (IRB approved). If a volunteer meets inclusion/exclusion criteria and desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained. Selection for inclusion will not be based on race or socioeconomic status. The study population of interest includes men and women of all races and socioeconomic status. A urine pregnancy test will be administered to all women of childbearing age following written informed consent but before any study interventions. This urine test will be administered by CTRI nursing staff using standard, FDA-approved urine pregnancy testing devices.
Inclusion criteria for the trial will be: (1) age ≥ 18 years; and (2) willing to have bilateral femoral perineural catheters placed with a subsequent ropivacaine infusion and motor/sensory testing for 6 hours, requiring an overnight stay in the UCSD GCRC/CTRI to allow dissipation of local anesthetic infusion effects by the following morning. Exclusion criteria for the trial will be: (1) current daily analgesic use; (2) opioid use within the previous 4 weeks; (3) any neuro-muscular deficit of either femoral nerves and/or quadriceps muscles; (4) morbid obesity [weight > 35 kg/m2]; (5) pregnancy (as determined by a urine pregnancy test prior to any study interventions); and (6) incarceration. We expect to recruit a maximum of 30 healthy volunteers; with a target goal of 24 for the analysis. Selection for inclusion will not be based on gender, race, or socioeconomic status. The study population of interest includes men and women of all races and socioeconomic status. There will be no participants from vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women, children, or prisoners
Perineural catheter insertion. Following written, informed consent, subjects will be admitted to the UCSD CTRI and have demographic/morphometric data recorded (e.g., age, weight, height). An intravenous line will be placed in an upper extremity, followed by external monitors (pulse oximeter, blood pressure, and EKG), and oxygen by nasal cannula. Sedation will be provided with intravenous fentanyl (50 mcg) and/or midazolam (1 mg), or oral valium (10 mg) and/or dilaudid (4 mg), as necessary. Subjects will then have bilateral popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters placed using standard UC San Diego techniques as previously published by the current P.I.7,8
Treatment Group Assignment. Subjects will have the right-sided catheter randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: a ropivacaine concentration of 0.1% or 0.4%. Subjects will act as their own controls, with the contralateral side receiving the alternative concentration. The Investigational Drug Service will prepare the randomization list as well as the two ropivacaine reservoirs and two electronic infusion pumps (SIGMA Spectrum Infusion System, Baxter Healthcare International, Deerfield, IL) used to infuse the ropivacaine. All pumps will be FDA approved for infusion of local anesthetic. The basal rate of each infusion will be determined by the ropivacaine concentration in each pump reservoir: 0.1% (8 mL/h) or 0.4% (2 mL/h). While the basal rate and bolus volume will differ for each concentration, the total dose of local anesthetic will be the same for both treatments (8 mg/h). The local anesthetic reservoirs will be contained within an opaque bag prepared by the Investigational Drug Service, and the infusion rates displayed on the pumps covered, ensuring masking for both the subjects and observers (clinical research nurse taking the measurements). Following 6 hours (48 mg), the infusions will be discontinued and the catheters removed.
Treatment Group Basal Rate (mL/h) Basal Dose (mg/h) Total Dose (mg in 6 h) Ropivacaine 0.1% 8 8 48 Ropivacaine 0.4% 2 8 48
The tubing from the pumps to the subjects will be gently wound at least 5 rotations and covered with opaque tape, masking which perineural catheter is receiving which treatment (ropivacaine is clear, so the flow through the clear tubing from the tape to the perineural catheters will not be visually distinguishable). Subjects will remain within the CTRI until the following morning at least until Hour 22 for the final measurement; or, until their perineural infusion sensory and motor effects have resolved. If a subject requests early withdrawal from the study, they will remain in the CTRI until their perineural infusion sensory and motor effects have resolved.
Outcome Measurements. The selected measures have established reliability and validity and minimal inter-rater discordance. Measurements will be performed at Hour 0 (baseline), and on the hour until Hour 14, as well as the following morning at Hour 22. In all cases, measurements will be taken in the supine position with the dominant side measured first, followed by the non-dominant side.
Tolerance of transcutaneous electrical stimulation: Sensory perception-depth of analgesia-will be evaluated using tolerance of transcutaneous electrical stimulation with the same quantitative procedure validated and used in multiple clinical trials. Electrocardiogram pads are placed on the lateral aspect of the plantar surface of the foot which is covered by the sciatic nerve distribution; and, the tolerance to cutaneous electrical current is obtained using a nerve stimulator. The current is increased from 0 mA until subjects detect the electrical current (up to a maximum of 80 mA), at which time the current is recorded and the nerve stimulator turned off.
Muscle strength: We will evaluate muscle strength with an isometric force electromechanical dynamometer to measure the force produced during a maximum voluntary isometric plantar-flexion (muscles innervated by the sciatic nerve). The dynamometer will be placed against the bed's foot board (immobile) and the subject will be asked to take 2 seconds to come to maximum effort contracting the target muscles, maintain this effort for 5 seconds, and then relax. The measurements immediately prior to perineural ropivacaine administration will be designated as baseline measurements, and all subsequent measurements will be expressed as a percentage of the pre-infusion baseline.
Food and Drink: Both food and accompanying beverages/water will be provided by the hospital and served by the nursing staff immediately following catheter insertion. Meals will be provided without charge to the study subjects. There is no restriction on oral intake following catheter insertion.
Statistical Analysis. Sample size calculations are based on the primary aim of determining the relationship between perineural ropivacaine concentration and continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block effects. To this end, we will perform an equivalency trial with the primary endpoint designated as the maximum tolerance to transcutaneous electrical stimulation at Hour 6. We will aim to demonstrate that differing the concentration (0.1% vs. 0.4%) applied to different legs of each subject, but providing an equal total dose (8 mg/h) of ropivacaine through a popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter does not result in a significant difference in tolerance between legs at Hour 6. We will conclude that the interventions are equivalent if the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference in tolerance between legs is contained within the pre-specified tolerance interval of +/- 10 mA. This value is used as the minimally clinically-relevant current since it approximates the tolerated electrical current range at baseline of the general population-in other words, natural variability and therefore a relatively small amount of current to detect.4 Based on previously-published data,1,4 we assume the standard deviation of tolerance difference between legs is SD=13 mA. With n=24 subjects, we will correctly conclude equivalence with approximately 80% probability ("power"). Alternatively, if the population difference is 10 mA, we will correctly reject equivalence with probability 5%. The mean difference between treatments will be estimated by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA), using baseline tolerance difference as a covariate. Subjects will receive each of the two treatments applied randomly to the left and right legs.
The same analyses will be applied to the secondary endpoints. Profiles of the responses over time will be examined with spaghetti and mean plots. Further secondary analyses will include mixed-effects modeling of the repeated measures. These models account for the hierarchical correlation of paired measures from each subject over time, and will be used to test the effects of subject characteristics, including sex, height, weight, body mass index, and age. The model will also allow simultaneous analysis of all observations while accounting for within-subject correlation, which can improve the standard errors of the estimated differential at each time point. The within-subject correlation will be modeled via a subject-specific random intercept. This is similar to a compound symmetric correlation structure without a random effect. The change from baseline, Y, for subject i and time t will be modeled with the linear mixed-effect model:
Yi(t¬j) = Yi(0) β0 + 1{t¬j=1}β1 + … + 1{t¬j=9}β9 + bi + eij
where 1{t¬j=k} is 1 if t¬j=k and 0 otherwise. The subject-specific random intercepts bi and residuals eij are assumed to follow a Gaussian distribution. We will present the estimated difference at each hour with unadjusted p-values, and p-values adjusted using the single-step method for simultaneous inference from parametric models.
Analyses will be executed using R version 2.12 (http://www.r-project.org). Additional analyses will include the Mann-Whitney U for nonparametric comparisons and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables (InStat, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, United States).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a split-body study in which each study subject receives both treatments: one on each side of the body. Which treatment is applied to which side of the body is randomized (and masked).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RIGHT side Ropivacaine 0.1% and LEFT side Ropivacaine 0.4% | Experimental | Drug: Ropivacaine 0.1%, Drug: Ropivacaine 0.4%Bilateral sciatic perineural catheters were inserted and ropivacaine administered as a basal infusion concurrently. For the right catheter, ropivacaine 0.1% was infused at 8 mL/h basal for 6 hours. For the left catheter, ropivacaine 0.4% was infused at 2 mL/h for 6 hours. |
| RIGHT side Ropivacaine 0.4% and LEFT side Ropivacaine 0.1% | Active comparator | Drug: Ropivacaine 0.1%, Drug: Ropivacaine 0.4%Bilateral sciatic perineural catheters were inserted and ropivacaine administered as a basal infusion concurrently. For the right catheter, ropivacaine 0.4% was infused at 8 mL/h basal for 6 hours. For the left catheter, ropivacaine 0.1% was infused at 2 mL/h for 6 hours. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- age ≥ 18 years
- willing to have bilateral femoral perineural catheters placed with a subsequent ropivacaine infusion and motor/sensory testing for 6 hours, requiring an overnight stay in the UCSD GCRC/CTRI to allow dissipation of local anesthetic infusion effects by the following morning
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- current daily analgesic use
- opioid use within the previous 4 weeks
- any neuro-muscular deficit of either femoral nerves and/or quadriceps muscles
- morbid obesity [weight > 35 kg/m2]
- pregnancy (as determined by a urine pregnancy test prior to any study interventions)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ropivacaine 0.1%Also: continuous peripheral nerve blockA sciatic catheter was inserted and ropivacaine 0.1% was administered as a basal infusion for 6 hours. | Drug | RIGHT side Ropivacaine 0.1% and LEFT side Ropivacaine 0.4%, RIGHT side Ropivacaine 0.4% and LEFT side Ropivacaine 0.1% |
| Ropivacaine 0.4%Also: continuous peripheral nerve blockA sciatic catheter was inserted and ropivacaine 0.4% was administered as a basal infusion for 6 hours. | Drug | RIGHT side Ropivacaine 0.1% and LEFT side Ropivacaine 0.4%, RIGHT side Ropivacaine 0.4% and LEFT side Ropivacaine 0.1% |
Primary outcome
Maximum Tolerance to Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation
Time frame: Hour 6
Electrocardiogram pads are placed on the lateral aspect of the plantar surface of the foot which is covered by the sciatic nerve distribution; and, the tolerance to cutaneous electrical current is obtained using a nerve stimulator. The current is increased from 0 mA until subjects detect the electrical current (up to a maximum of 80 mA), at which time the current is recorded and the nerve stimulator turned off.
2 secondary outcomes
Maximum Tolerance to Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation
Time frame: baseline, Hours 1-14 (except 6 which was the primary outcome) and Hour 22
Percent of Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Baseline (Quadriceps Femoris)
Time frame: baseline, Hours 1-14 and Hour 22
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 25248648Madison SJ, Monahan AM, Agarwal RR, Furnish TJ, Mascha EJ, Xu Z, Donohue MC, Morgan AC, Ilfeld BM. A randomized, triple-masked, active-controlled investigation of the relative effects of dose, concentration, and infusion rate for continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve blocks in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;114(1):121-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu333. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Relatively Healthy Volunteers
Recruiting
Daily Intake of Multivitamin & Mineral Supplementation Effects on Biological Age of Relatively Healthy Middle-aged Individuals
Relatively Healthy Volunteers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brian M Ilfeld, MD, MS principal investigator
University California San Diego
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Ropivacaine 0.1% and Ropivacaine 0.4% in people with Relatively Healthy Volunteers, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Mar 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximum Tolerance to Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (time frame: Hour 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01898689, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2021.