HIV PositiveOLANCT01898754
Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay (OLA) Resistance Study
A study testing Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA) in people with HIV Positive, run by University of Washington at 2 sites in Kenya.
Trial summary
The investigators propose to gauge improvements in the rate of durable suppression of viral replication by ART when OLA is used to guide clinical decisions at the PEPFAR Coptic Hope Center in Kenya, and to determine the cost-effectiveness of implementing this strategy at Coptic Hope Center. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Positive
- What is being tested?
- Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 991 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesKenya
- Study dates
- May 2013to Feb 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Confirmed HIV infection
- >2 years of age
- Qualifying for 1st-line ART based on Kenyan Guidelines
- Plan to reside in area for >1 year
- Adult patient or parent of minor agrees to study and provides informed consent
Who cannot join
- Received ART previously from Hope Center
- Ongoing ART
- Plan to start 2nd-line ART
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Drug-resistance Testing in Kenya to Improve ART Suppression of HIV Replication
The investigators propose to gauge improvements in the rate of durable suppression of viral replication by ART when OLA is used to guide clinical decisions at the PEPFAR Coptic Hope Center in Kenya, and to determine the cost-effectiveness of implementing this strategy at Coptic Hope Center.
Read the detailed description
Durable suppression of HIV replication is critical to (1) improving the health of infected individuals, (2) to reducing HIV transmission to sexual partners and from mothers to their infants, and (3) to maintaining the effectiveness of the current 1st-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)- based ART. Across multiple trials, individuals with NNRTI-resistance, even at low-concentrations, have substantially greater virologic failure when treated with NVP- vs PI-ART. A cost-effective strategy is needed to detect and manage ARV-resistant HIV infections. A simple low-cost innovative assay the investigators developed and successfully transferred to Asian and African countries (oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA)) can detect NNRTI+lamivudine (3TC) resistant HIV using reagents that costs <$7.00/person. Furthermore, detection of NNRTI-resistance by OLA is highly (P<0.001) associated with virologic failure of nevirapine (NVP)-ART in two retrospective studies; one of Thai women who had been previously randomized to single-dose NVP and the second of ARV-naïve Kenyan adults.
The investigators hypothesize that implementation of OLA into routine care will allow Kenyan clinicians to appropriately target protease inhibitor (PI)-based ART and improve rates of durable suppression of viral replication, and thus improve CD4 cell gains and individuals' health, reduce the transmission of ARV-resistant HIV within the community, and maintain the utility of NNRTI-ART. In addition, the investigators hypothesize that programmatically OLA-guided ART will be more cost-efficient compared to the current strategy of empiric use of NNRTI-ART as initial treatment.
- Conditions
- HIV Positive
- Being tested
- Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA)
- Keywords
- Transmitted Drug Resistance
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Seropositivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA)Other
Also called Pre-ART OLA
Block randomization (1:1) to pre-ART OLA testing or OLA testing after 12mo on ART
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA) | Experimental | Pre-ART OLA will be tested for resistance at 5 pol codons conferring high-level resistance to NNRTI and 3TC (K103N, V106M, Y181C, G190A and M184V) Receives: Other: Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA) |
| No OLA (Standard of Care [SOC]) | No intervention | The participants will receive standard of care as per Kenya guidelines but will be offered OLA resistance testing after 12 months |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Virologic Failure With OLA-guided ART vs. Standard of Care
The primary endpoint will be a comparison of the rates of viral non-suppression >400 copies/mL between study arms at 12 months
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
The Difference in Virologic Failure Among Participants With Transmitted Drug-resistance (TDR) ≥10% Associated With Use of OLA-guided ART vs. SOC
We did not analyze and report outcome of people with TDR ≥10%, instead we reported pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) as this parameter could be determined but antiretroviral history was not reliably available. Thus, PDR ≥10% is considered below in place of TDR ≥10%.
Chung et al. Lancet HIV 2020; 7: e104-12.
Measured: 15 months
Difference in Virologic Failure in the Subgroup of Participants With Prior or Ongoing ART Use Associated With Use of OLA-guided ART vs. SOC
The primary outcome was virologic failure defined as plasma HIV RNA of at least 400 copies per mL after initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART).
Measured: 15 months
Prevalence of TDR by Consensus Sequencing and OLA
We did not analyze and report outcome of people with TDR, instead we reported pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) as this parameter could be determined but antiretroviral history was not reliably available. Thus, PDR is considered below in place of TDR. PDR was assessed by OLA and confirmed by consensus sequence or next-generation sequencing.
Measured: 15 months
Proportion of Subgroup With TDR With Virologic Failure by Randomization Arm
We did not analyze and report outcome of people with TDR, instead we reported pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) as this parameter could be determined but antiretroviral history was not reliably available. Thus, PDR is considered below in place of TDR. The primary outcome for this analysis was the difference in virologic failure, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA of at least 400 copies per mL following ART initiation, by PDR. [Chung et al. Lancet HIV 2020; 7: e104-12]
Measured: 15 months
Estimates of Medical Resource Utilization During the One-year Trial Period
Estimates of medical resource utilization during was not calculated. No data available (data on medical resource utilization was not collected during the one-year trial)
Measured: 15 months
An Assessment of the Potential Long-term Cost-effectiveness of OLA-guided Testing Over a Patient's Lifetime
This was not calculated as the model could not test for a period longer than 15 years due to computing limitations.
Measured: 15 months
Determination of Whether Low-level ARV Resistance (<5%) Detected by PYRO But Not by OLA is Associated With Virologic Failure
The prespecified outcomes of this study included differences in the rate of virologic failure over 24 months of efavirenz-based ART between participants by frequency of drug-resistant variants detected by next-generation sequencing at enrollment. Drug-resistance frequency was defined as the proportion of a nucleotide variant encoding a drug-resistant codon in specimens with at least 100 viral templates sequenced. Virologic failure was defined as plasma HIV RNA of at least 400 copies/ml in sequential specimens or at the final study visit in participants prescribed efavirenz-based ART. [Milne et al. AIDS 2022 Nov 15;36(14):1949-1958]
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2013
- Primary completionDec 2016
- Study completionFeb 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV PositiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 991 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Nairobi
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Chung, University of Washington
- Investigators
- Lisa Frenkel, MD, Principal investigator, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Research InstituteMichael H Chung, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Department of Global Health, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01898754
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14124-SCH
- Acronym
- OLA
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chung MH, McGrath CJ, Beck IA, Levine M, Milne RS, So I, Andersen N, Dross S, Coombs RW, Chohan B, Yatich N, Kiptinness C, Sakr SR, Kiarie JN, Frenkel LM. Evaluation of the management of pretreatment HIV drug resistance by oligonucleotide ligation assay: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2020 Feb;7(2):e104-e112. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30337-6. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
PubMed 31818716Silverman RA, Beck IA, Kiptinness C, Levine M, Milne R, McGrath CJ, Bii S, Richardson BA, John-Stewart G, Chohan B, Sakr SR, Kiarie JN, Frenkel LM, Chung MH. Prevalence of Pre-antiretroviral-Treatment Drug Resistance by Gender, Age, and Other Factors in HIV-Infected Individuals Initiating Therapy in Kenya, 2013-2014. J Infect Dis. 2017 Dec 19;216(12):1569-1578. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix544.
PubMed 29040633
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Drug-resistance Testing in Kenya to Improve ART Suppression of HIV Replication
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01898754
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OLA / 14124-SCH
- Conditions
- HIV Positive
- Keywords
- Transmitted Drug Resistance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 991 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Nairobi
- Study start
- May 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Nov 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators propose to gauge improvements in the rate of durable suppression of viral replication by ART when OLA is used to guide clinical decisions at the PEPFAR Coptic Hope Center in Kenya, and to determine the cost-effectiveness of implementing this strategy at Coptic Hope Center.
Detailed description
Durable suppression of HIV replication is critical to (1) improving the health of infected individuals, (2) to reducing HIV transmission to sexual partners and from mothers to their infants, and (3) to maintaining the effectiveness of the current 1st-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)- based ART. Across multiple trials, individuals with NNRTI-resistance, even at low-concentrations, have substantially greater virologic failure when treated with NVP- vs PI-ART. A cost-effective strategy is needed to detect and manage ARV-resistant HIV infections. A simple low-cost innovative assay the investigators developed and successfully transferred to Asian and African countries (oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA)) can detect NNRTI+lamivudine (3TC) resistant HIV using reagents that costs <$7.00/person. Furthermore, detection of NNRTI-resistance by OLA is highly (P<0.001) associated with virologic failure of nevirapine (NVP)-ART in two retrospective studies; one of Thai women who had been previously randomized to single-dose NVP and the second of ARV-naïve Kenyan adults.
The investigators hypothesize that implementation of OLA into routine care will allow Kenyan clinicians to appropriately target protease inhibitor (PI)-based ART and improve rates of durable suppression of viral replication, and thus improve CD4 cell gains and individuals' health, reduce the transmission of ARV-resistant HIV within the community, and maintain the utility of NNRTI-ART. In addition, the investigators hypothesize that programmatically OLA-guided ART will be more cost-efficient compared to the current strategy of empiric use of NNRTI-ART as initial treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA) | Experimental | Other: Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA)Pre-ART OLA will be tested for resistance at 5 pol codons conferring high-level resistance to NNRTI and 3TC (K103N, V106M, Y181C, G190A and M184V) |
| No OLA (Standard of Care [SOC]) | No intervention | –The participants will receive standard of care as per Kenya guidelines but will be offered OLA resistance testing after 12 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Confirmed HIV infection
- >2 years of age
- Qualifying for 1st-line ART based on Kenyan Guidelines
- Plan to reside in area for >1 year
- Adult patient or parent of minor agrees to study and provides informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Received ART previously from Hope Center
- Ongoing ART
- Plan to start 2nd-line ART
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA)Also: Pre-ART OLABlock randomization (1:1) to pre-ART OLA testing or OLA testing after 12mo on ART | Other | Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA) |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Virologic Failure With OLA-guided ART vs. Standard of Care
Time frame: 12 months
The primary endpoint will be a comparison of the rates of viral non-suppression >400 copies/mL between study arms at 12 months
7 secondary outcomes
The Difference in Virologic Failure Among Participants With Transmitted Drug-resistance (TDR) ≥10% Associated With Use of OLA-guided ART vs. SOC
Time frame: 15 months
Difference in Virologic Failure in the Subgroup of Participants With Prior or Ongoing ART Use Associated With Use of OLA-guided ART vs. SOC
Time frame: 15 months
Prevalence of TDR by Consensus Sequencing and OLA
Time frame: 15 months
Proportion of Subgroup With TDR With Virologic Failure by Randomization Arm
Time frame: 15 months
Estimates of Medical Resource Utilization During the One-year Trial Period
Time frame: 15 months
An Assessment of the Potential Long-term Cost-effectiveness of OLA-guided Testing Over a Patient's Lifetime
Time frame: 15 months
Determination of Whether Low-level ARV Resistance (<5%) Detected by PYRO But Not by OLA is Associated With Virologic Failure
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31818716Chung MH, McGrath CJ, Beck IA, Levine M, Milne RS, So I, Andersen N, Dross S, Coombs RW, Chohan B, Yatich N, Kiptinness C, Sakr SR, Kiarie JN, Frenkel LM. Evaluation of the management of pretreatment HIV drug resistance by oligonucleotide ligation assay: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2020 Feb;7(2):e104-e112. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30337-6. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29040633Silverman RA, Beck IA, Kiptinness C, Levine M, Milne R, McGrath CJ, Bii S, Richardson BA, John-Stewart G, Chohan B, Sakr SR, Kiarie JN, Frenkel LM, Chung MH. Prevalence of Pre-antiretroviral-Treatment Drug Resistance by Gender, Age, and Other Factors in HIV-Infected Individuals Initiating Therapy in Kenya, 2013-2014. J Infect Dis. 2017 Dec 19;216(12):1569-1578. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix544.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for HIV Positive
RecruitingPhase 2
Evaluating the Safety and Immunogenicity of MTBVAC
HIV I Infection, Tuberculosis
Enrolling by invitation
ORCHID: An Online Intervention for Persons With HIV (Miami)
HIV/AIDS, HPV Infection
Recruiting
Bring BPaL2Me Trial Comparing Nurse-Led RR-TB Treatment to Physician-Led RR-TB Treatment
Drug Resistant Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Bedaquiline Roll-out Evidence in Contacts and People Living With HIV to Prevent TB
Tuberculosis, Latent
Recruiting
Feasibility Study Comparing Use of One Or Two Probes for Thermal Ablation Among Screen Positive Women Living With HIV in C1001P-CS2 Kenya
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HPV
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lisa Frenkel, MD principal investigator
University of Washington, Seattle Children's Research Institute
Michael H Chung, MD, MPH principal investigator
Department of Global Health, University of Washington
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pre-ART Oligonucleotide Assay (OLA) in people with HIV Positive, run by University of Washington at 2 sites in Kenya.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Kenya. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Nov 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Virologic Failure With OLA-guided ART vs. Standard of Care (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01898754, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2025.