AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerNCT01900561

Optimizing Veteran-Centered Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care

A study testing Interactive Voice Response Symptom Management and Tailored Newsletters in people with Prostate Cancer, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 4 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will provide much needed information about how to optimize the quality of care and quality of life of Veterans who are survivors of prostate cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostate Cancer
What is being tested?
Interactive Voice Response Symptom Management and Tailored Newsletters
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
556 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited States
Study dates
17 Apr 2015to 7 Feb 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Veteran patient at one of the four study sites (Ann Arbor VA, Cleveland VA, Pittsburgh VA, St. Louis VA)
  • History of treatment for prostate cancer treated by surgery, radiation or androgen deprivation therapy between 1-10 years prior to identification

Who cannot join

  • No phone number on file
  • Not able to converse on the telephone in English
  • Treated for metastatic disease or non-prostate cancer
  • Dementia or other significant mental impairment

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United States4 sites
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105

  • Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15240

  • St. Louis VA Medical Center John Cochran Division, St. Louis, MO

    St Louis, Missouri, 63106

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study will provide much needed information about how to optimize the quality of care and quality of life of Veterans who are survivors of prostate cancer.

Read the detailed description

Although there are nearly 150,000 prostate cancer survivors in the VA, there has been little research to understand and improve survivorship care for this large population of Veterans. A substantial proportion of prostate cancer survivors in the general population have significant side effects from treatment (surgery or radiation therapy) that often persist for years, including incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and metabolic syndrome, all of which can contribute to decreased quality of life. The investigators' pilot data suggests that VA prostate cancer survivors experience similar or worse symptom burden to that of the general population of survivors. To address the need to improve patient-centered survivorship care management for Veterans with prostate cancer, the investigators propose a 4 year study with two aims: 1) to conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare a personally tailored automated telephone symptom management intervention for improving symptoms and symptom self-management to usual care. The investigators expect that those in the intervention group will have more confidence in symptom self-management and better symptom self-management and prostate cancer quality of life following the intervention, and that these outcomes will translate to more efficient use of services for these Veterans, and 2) to compare utilization of services among those in the intervention group to those in the control group.

Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Being tested
Interactive Voice Response Symptom Management, Tailored Newsletters
Keywords
prostate cancer, survivorship, intervention, telemedicine
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interactive Voice Response Symptom ManagementBehavioural

    The Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system will provide automated telephone monitoring of PC survivor symptoms and goals for symptom reduction, based on a patient empowerment approach.

  • Tailored NewslettersBehavioural

    Personally tailored newsletters will incorporate elements of CBT to improve survivors' identification with the material, confidence/self-efficacy in symptom management, and to reduce common cognitive distortions related to successful implementation of behavior change. Information collected during automated phone assessments will be used to construct tailored newsletters, which will be sent following each automated call.

Study groups in NCT01900561
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IVR InterventionExperimentalThe intervention will consist of two components, both with content design based on established theories for self-management support: 1) automated telephone monitoring of PC survivor symptoms and goals for symptom reduction, based on a patient empowerment approach, and 2) personally tailored newsletters that incorporate elements of CBT to improve survivors' identification with the material, confidence/self-efficacy in symptom management, and to reduce common cognitive distortions related to successful implementation of behavior change. Intervention-group participants will receive four automated assessment and self-management support calls over a 3-month period (at baseline, 1-month, 2-month, 3-months). Information collected during automated phone assessments will be used to construct tailored newsletters, which will be sent following each automated call.
Receives: Behavioral: Interactive Voice Response Symptom Management; Behavioral: Tailored Newsletters
Enhanced Usual CareNo interventionBecause of the strong evidence documenting symptom burden in PC survivors, the investigators believe that providing control subjects with some information about symptom self-management is warranted. The investigators further believe, based on the investigators' prior experience conducting RCTs, that offering some type of educational material for Veterans randomized to the control arm will increase their willingness to enroll in the study (as opposed to a pure usual care arm where they would not receive any such materials). Therefore, survivors randomized to the control condition will receive written material at the time of enrollment designed to educate them about PC symptoms and symptom management. Material will be approximately six pages in length, also written at or below an 8th grade reading level, and will include a summary of common symptoms experienced by prostate cancer survivors.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Irritative

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Obstructive

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Bowel Health

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Sexual Health

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - General Health

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - EPIC-26 Mean

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    The EPIC-26 mean is the average of the five EPIC subscales.

    Measured: Baseline

  7. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Irritative

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: 5 Months

  8. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Obstructive

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: 5 Months

  9. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Bowel Health

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: 5 Months

  10. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Sexual Health

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: 5 Months

  11. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - General Health

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: 5 Months

  12. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Irritative

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: 12 Months

  13. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Obstructive

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: 12 Months

  14. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Bowel Health

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: 12 Months

  15. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Sexual Health

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: 12 Months

  16. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - General Health

    The EPIC is a 26-item measure that assesses symptom burden in four domains: urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms and vitality. Each domain has a subscale related to function and bother which together contribute to disease specific quality of life. Each domain has a range of possible scores from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating worse symptom burden. Lower EPIC scores for any one domain are associated with lower function in that domain and lower QOL. Thus higher symptom burden, which reflects both function and bother scores, translate into lower EPIC scores.

    Measured: 12 Months

  17. Confidence in Symptom Self-Management

    Confidence in symptom self-management was measured using a 5-item scale developed from our pilot work. Scores range from 5 to 15 with higher scores indicating higher level of confidence.

    Measured: 5 months

  18. Confidence in Symptom Self-Management

    Confidence in symptom self-management was measured using a 5-item scale developed from our pilot work. Scores range from 5 to 15 with higher scores indicating higher level of confidence.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Cancer Control

    We assessed perceived cancer control and outlook using five items from a validated measure developed to examine the psychosocial impact of prostate cancer. This measure, the Measuring Patients' Perceptions of the Outcomes of Treatment for Early PC instrument by Clark et al., includes three domains related to confidence that one's cancer is under control, worries about recurrence, and appraisals of one's coping with PC. Cancer control was assessed during the five- and 12-month follow-ups using two cancer control items from the instrument. Scores range from 2 to 10 and higher scores indicate higher confidence that cancer is under control.

    Measured: 5 months

  2. Cancer Control

    We assessed perceived cancer control and outlook using five items from a validated measure developed to examine the psychosocial impact of prostate cancer. This measure, the Measuring Patients' Perceptions of the Outcomes of Treatment for Early PC instrument by Clark et al., includes three domains related to confidence that one's cancer is under control, worries about recurrence, and appraisals of one's coping with PC. Cancer control was assessed during the five- and 12-month follow-ups using two cancer control items from the instrument. Scores range from 2 to 10 and higher scores indicate higher confidence that cancer is under control.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Cancer Outlook

    We assessed perceived cancer control and outlook using five items from a validated measure developed to examine the psychosocial impact of prostate cancer. This measure, the Measuring Patients' Perceptions of the Outcomes of Treatment for Early PC instrument by Clark et al., includes three domains related to confidence that one's cancer is under control, worries about recurrence, and appraisals of one's coping with PC. Cancer outlook was assessed during the five- and 12-month follow-ups using three cancer outlook items from the instrument. Scores range from 3 to 15 and higher scores indicate more positive cancer outlook.

    Measured: 5 months

  4. Cancer Outlook

    We assessed perceived cancer control and outlook using five items from a validated measure developed to examine the psychosocial impact of prostate cancer. This measure, the Measuring Patients' Perceptions of the Outcomes of Treatment for Early PC instrument by Clark et al., includes three domains related to confidence that one's cancer is under control, worries about recurrence, and appraisals of one's coping with PC. Cancer outlook was assessed during the five- and 12-month follow-ups using three cancer outlook items from the instrument. Scores range from 3 to 15 and higher scores indicate more positive cancer outlook.

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) - 5-item Short Form

    Self-efficacy in patient-physician interactions was assessed at 5 and 12 months using a five-item short form version of the Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI). The PEPPI was developed to measure older patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and attention to their medical concerns from physicians. Scores range from 0-25 with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.

    Measured: 5 months

  6. Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) - 5-item Short Form

    Self-efficacy in patient-physician interactions was assessed at 5 and 12 months using a five-item short form version of the Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI). The PEPPI was developed to measure older patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and attention to their medical concerns from physicians. Scores range from 0-25 with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.

    Measured: 12 months

  7. Brief Cope - 6 Items

    We assessed participants' coping during the five- and 12-month follow-up assessments using six items from the 28-item Brief Cope instrument. This instrument measures emotion-focused, problem-focused, and dysfunctional coping and has been used in cancer survivors. Scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating better coping skills.

    Measured: 5 months

  8. Brief Cope - 6 Items

    We assessed participants' coping during the five- and 12-month follow-up assessments using six items from the 28-item Brief Cope instrument. This instrument measures emotion-focused, problem-focused, and dysfunctional coping and has been used in cancer survivors. Scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating better coping skills.

    Measured: 12 months

  9. Veteran Quality of Life Scale (VR-12) - Physical Health, 2 Items

    We assessed subjective physical health using 2 items from the VR-12 (SF-12 for veterans), an established measure of overall QOL that includes perceptions of one's health that may be impacted by prostate cancer. The scores range from 1- 3 and higher scores correspond to better health.

    Measured: 12 months

  10. Veteran Quality of Life Scale (VR-12) - Emotional Health, 3 Items

    We assessed subjective emotional health using 3 items from the VR-12 (SF-12 for veterans), an established measure of overall QOL that includes perceptions of one's health that may be impacted by prostate cancer. The scores range from 1- 6 and higher scores correspond to better health.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start17 Apr 2015
  3. Primary completion7 Feb 2018
  4. Study completion7 Feb 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
556 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01900561
Sponsor's protocol ID
IIR 12-116
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
2 Jul 2013
Last updated
7 May 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Telem DA, Dimick J, Skolarus TA. Dissecting Surgeon Behavior: Leveraging the Theoretical Domains Framework to Facilitate Evidence-based Surgical Practice. Ann Surg. 2018 Mar;267(3):432-434. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002506. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28902665
  • Skolarus TA, Wittmann D, Hawley ST. Enhancing prostate cancer survivorship care through self-management. Urol Oncol. 2017 Sep;35(9):564-568. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

    PubMed 28619632
  • Skolarus TA, Metreger T, Hwang S, Kim HM, Grubb RL 3rd, Gingrich JR, Hawley ST. Optimizing veteran-centered prostate cancer survivorship care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 18;18(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1925-4.

    PubMed 28420419
  • Skolarus TA, Metreger T, Wittmann D, Hwang S, Kim HM, Grubb RL 3rd, Gingrich JR, Zhu H, Piette JD, Hawley ST. Self-Management in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1326-1335. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01770. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

    PubMed 30925126

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Interactive Voice Response Symptom Management and Tailored Newsletters in people with Prostate Cancer, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 4 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) - Urinary Health, Irritative (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 18 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01900561, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in