AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 2/3STARTNCT01901692

Sorafenib vs.TransArterial Chemoembolization Plus RadioTherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Macrovascular Invasion

A Phase 2/3 study testing TACE+External beam RT and Sorafenib in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus trans-arterial chemoembolization plus external beam radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading major intrahepatic vessels Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
What is being tested?
TACE+External beam RT and Sorafenib
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
29 Jul 2013to 31 Aug 2017
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >19 years
  • Child-Pugh class A liver function
  • Performance status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0 or 1
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) confirmed by dynamic CT or MRI, or by biopsy
  • HCC invasion of first or second branch portal vein or hepatic vein or inferior vena cava
  • Reserved unilateral portal blood flow at least in partial
Show all 12Show fewer
  • HCC size larger than 1 cm and less than 50% of total liver volume
  • No confirmed extrahepatic metastasis
  • Adequate hematopoietic function Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 750/mm3 Platelet count ≥ 30,000/mm3
  • Creatinine < 1.5mg/dL
  • No plan for pregnancy or breast feeding. Active contraception.
  • Willing to give informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Prior history to or exposure of transarterial chemoembolization, external beam radiation to liver, or sorafenib
  • Complete obstruction of hepatic outflow
  • Confirmed extrahepatic metastasis of HCC
  • HCC occupying more than 50% of liver volume
  • Uncontrolled ascites of hepatic encephalopathy
  • Prior liver transplantation
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Active gastric or duodenal ulcer
  • Other uncontrolled comorbidities or malignancy
  • Inability to give informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 05505

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial Comparing Sorafenib and Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus External Beam Radiotherapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Showing Macroscopic Vascular Invasion

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus trans-arterial chemoembolization plus external beam radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading major intrahepatic vessels

Read the detailed description

Current practice guidelines recommend only sorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading major intrahepatic vessels. However, recent data from observational studies suggest that the combination of transarterial chemoembolization and external beam radiotherapy would be as effective as sorafenib.

Being tested
TACE+External beam RT, Sorafenib
Keywords
liver cancer, first-line, tumor thrombus, vascular invasion
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Liver Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TACE+External beam RTRadiation

    Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) every 6 weeks + external beam radiation therapy starting within 3 weeks after first TACE

  • SorafenibDrug

    Also called Nexavar

    Sorafenib 800 mg/day orally

Study groups in NCT01901692
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TACE+External beam RTExperimentalTransarterial chemoembolization plus external beam radiation therapy
Receives: Radiation: TACE+External beam RT
SorafenibActive comparatorSorafenib 800 mg/day orally
Receives: Drug: Sorafenib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-free survival (PFS) rate

    Progression is defined as progressive disease (PD) by independent radiologic review according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1), termination of the assigned treatment, or death from any cause, assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for treatment comparisons with the intention-to-treat principle.

    Measured: at 12 weeks after randomization

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Progression-free survival (PFS) rate

    Progression is defined as progressive disease (PD) by independent radiologic review according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1), termination of the assigned treatment, or death from any cause, assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for treatment comparisons.

    Measured: at 24 weeks and up to 4 years after randomization

  2. Radiologic response rate

    Radiologic response rate by independent radiologic review according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1), , assessed by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.

    Measured: at 12 and 24 weeks after randomization

  3. treatment-crossover rate

    Crossover of treatment is permitted after confirming the disease progression during the initially assigned treatment, assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for treatment comparisons.

    Measured: at 12 and 24 weeks after randomization

  4. time to progression

    The median time to progression assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for treatment comparisons.

    Measured: up to 4 years after randomization

  5. Overall patient survival rate

    The median overall patient survival rate assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test for treatment comparisons.

    Measured: up to 4 years after randomization

  6. Exploratory analysis for overall patient survival rate

    By using Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the interaction between important baseline characteristics and the effect of treatments on overall survival.

    Measured: up to 4 years after randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start29 Jul 2013
  3. Primary completion20 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01901692
Sponsor's protocol ID
AMC IRB 2013-0627
Acronym
START
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
14 Jul 2013
Last updated
18 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Yoon SM, Ryoo BY, Lee SJ, Kim JH, Shin JH, An JH, Lee HC, Lim YS. Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus External Beam Radiotherapy vs Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Macroscopic Vascular Invasion: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018 May 1;4(5):661-669. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5847.

    PubMed 29543938

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing TACE+External beam RT and Sorafenib in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-free survival (PFS) rate (time frame: at 12 weeks after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01901692, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in