AzTrials
AzTrials

DeliriumNCT01902277

ICU Delirium: a One-week Snapshot of Burden Across the Eastern UK Region

An observational study of Delirium, run by Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

ICU delirium negatively impacts on patient outcomes, as well as on resources and clinical workflow of the ICU. Effective healthcare resource planning requires reliable (i.e., multicentre) data that can inform on both of these. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Delirium
How many people
225 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Jun 2012to Jul 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult critically ill patients across eastern UK region

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients treated within study time frame on Intensive Care Units across Norfolk, Suffolk, and Cambridgshire, UK

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB23 5EF

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

ICU delirium negatively impacts on patient outcomes, as well as on resources and clinical workflow of the ICU. Effective healthcare resource planning requires reliable (i.e., multicentre) data that can inform on both of these.

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of ICU delirium in terms of both patients and beds. The study was carried out prospectively, over a one-week period, at adult ICUs comprising the Norfolk, Suffolk, and Cambridgeshire Critical Care Network (NSC CCN).

Read the detailed description

Previous delirium prevalence research has been carried out at single sites and yielded highly variable results (between 3-87%). Reliable multisite data can be obtained cost-effectively using a point-prevalence ("snapshot") approach.

Purpose: to obtain reliable data informing on prevalence of ICU delirium, in terms of both patients and beds, across the eastern UK region.

Design and Setting: this one-week observational prospective cohort study was carried out between June 25, 2012 (start of ICU day shift) to July 01, 2012 (end of night shift). Nine ICUs comprising the Norfolk, Suffolk, and Cambridgeshire Critical Care Network (NSC CCN) took part. Cambridgeshire 2 Research Ethics Committee approved the study (REC reference: 10/H0308/116) and waived the need for informed consent.

Patients and procedure: All adults treated over the study week at participating ICUs were considered eligible for inclusion. Delirium screening was carried out by patients' direct care clinicians using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). All sites used this tool as part of their routine clinical practice and had delirium management guidelines in place at the time of the study. Patients who screened positive for delirium were treated according to local hospital practice.

Conditions
Delirium
Keywords
Delirium, Intensive Care Unit, Critical illness
Medical subject headings
Delirium, Critical Illness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01902277
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adult critically ill patientsAll adult patients treated within study time frame on Intensive Care Units across Norfolk, Suffolk, and Cambridgshire, UK

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Delirium prevalence

    Number of patients with at least one recorded delirium-positive result, over total number of patients recorded over study time frame. Delirium screening will be carried out using the CAM-ICU by local direct care clinicians in accordance with region-wide clinical delirium-screening guidelines.

    Measured: June 25, 2012 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Proportion of patient-days with delirium

    Number of patient-days with at least one recorded delirium-positive result over total patient-days recorded.

    Measured: June 25, 2012 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

  2. Median delirium duration

    In delirium patients: median number of days recorded with delirium over study time frame.

    Measured: June 25, 2012 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

  3. Median days to transition to delirium

    In delirium patients admitted during study time frame: median number of days from ICU admission to first recorded delirium day.

    Measured: June 25, 2012 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

  4. Patient age, by delirium status

    In delirium patients versus patients with no recorded delirium-positive result over study time frame: median age.

    Measured: June 25 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

  5. Patient gender, by delirium status

    In delirium patients versus patients with no recorded delirium-positive result over study time frame: number of males over total patients in each group.

    Measured: June 25 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

  6. Admission type, by delirium status

    In delirium patients versus patients with no recorded delirium-positive result over study time frame: number of (1) urgent/emergency and (2) elective admissions, over total patients in each group.

    Measured: June 25 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

  7. Admission reason, by delirium status

    In delirium patients versus patients with no recorded delirium-positive result over study time frame: number of (1) medical and (2) surgical admissions, over total patients in each group.

    Measured: June 25 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

  8. Organ support, by delirium status

    In delirium patients versus patients with no recorded delirium-positive result over study time frame: number receiving advanced and basic respiratory, advanced and basic cardiovascular, and renal support since ICU admission to end of study time frame, over total patients in each group.

    Measured: June 25 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

  9. Mobilisation therapy, by delirium status

    In delirium patients versus patients with no recorded delirium-positive result over study time frame: number receiving mobilisation therapy over study time frame, over total patients in each group.

    Measured: June 25 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

  10. Median ICU days, by delirium status

    In delirium patients versus patients with no recorded delirium-positive result over study time frame: median number of patient-days in ICU per patient, since admission to end of study time frame.

    Measured: June 25 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

  11. Delirium screening compliance

    Number of patient-days CAM-ICU administered (1) once or more and (2) twice or more, over total number of patient-days recorded over study time frame.

    Measured: June 25 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2012
  3. Primary completionJul 2012
  4. Study completionJul 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
225 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01902277
Sponsor's protocol ID
P01535
Status last verified
Jul 2013
First submitted
15 Jul 2013
Last updated
18 Jul 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Delirium, run by Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Delirium prevalence (time frame: June 25, 2012 (start of ICU day shift) to July 1, 2012 (end of ICU night shift)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in