Spinal Cord InjuryNCT01903226
Intervention Study to Assess the Effects of Moderate and High Intensity Aerobic Training on Physical Capacity and Activity Level in Persons With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing High intensity training and Moderate intensity training in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
The aims of this study are to assess the effects of medium versus high intensity 12-week adjusted training programs on physical capacity in persons with incomplete SCI, early after discharge from primary rehabilitation, and to investigate if the training program induces a more active lifestyle in terms of increased… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury
- What is being tested?
- High intensity training and Moderate intensity training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Apr 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Spinal cord injury
- incomplete lesion (classified as ASIA D)
- admitted to Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital for primary rehabilitation,
- able to walk for 5 minutes on the treadmill (without assistive aids) at 4 km/hour
Who cannot join
- cardiovascular diseases
- progressive diseases
- severe psychiatric conditions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: High Intensity Aerobic Training in Persons With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
The aims of this study are to assess the effects of medium versus high intensity 12-week adjusted training programs on physical capacity in persons with incomplete SCI, early after discharge from primary rehabilitation, and to investigate if the training program induces a more active lifestyle in terms of increased daily energy expenditure.
Read the detailed description
Design:
Randomized controlled trial.
Participants:
45 subjects, between 18 and 65 years of age, will be recruited with the following inclusion criteria: Traumatic spinal cord injury, incomplete lesions (classified as ASIA D), admitted to Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital for primary rehabilitation, and able to walk for 5 minutes on the treadmill (without assistive aids) at 4 km/hour.
Subjects with cardiovascular diseases, progressive diseases and severe psychiatric conditions will be excluded.
Procedures:
The participants will be included after medical approval (by a specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation) and before being discharged from primary rehabilitation. During the last week at the hospital, usually between 3 to 6 months post injury, a pre-test to examine physical capacity will be performed; maximal exercise test on a treadmill and six-minute walking test (Fig. 1).
After the pre-test the participants will be randomized into one of three groups; Intervention Group I (high intensity training), Intervention Group II (medium intensity training), and a Control Group (treatment as usual, no additional training). To achieve balanced randomization (the compared groups should have about the same size), we will use block randomization. A computer random number generator will be used, with a block size of 15 and an allocation ratio of 1:1.
The subjects in the training groups will have practical training at the hospital in how to perform moderate or high intensity training. They will be taught how to apply a heart rate monitor and how to use it during training sessions.
At discharge from primary rehabilitation, and before start-up of the 12 week training program, the physical activity level (energy expenditure; kilo joule (kJ) · min -1) will be monitored by wearing a SWA for seven days in the home situation.
After having completed the training program, the participants (including those in the control group) will wear the SWA in 7 days and return to Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital to repeat the physical capacity tests (post-test). This procedure will also be repeated at a follow-up one year after discharge from primary rehabilitation (12-months follow-up).
All tests are performed under supervision of a physiotherapist, who has several years of experience in exercise testing. This physiotherapist is unaware of which of the three groups the patient the patient is recruited from (blind controlled trail).
Interventions:
Subjects in the two intervention groups will perform a 12 week individual training program, where 15 subjects will perform high intensity training and 15 subjects will perform a training program with moderate intensity training. Since literature indicates that SCI patients, on group level, do not improve their physical capacity after being discharged, our subjects will perform the training program in their home situation. To verify the intensity level during the training session, the participants have to wear a heart rate monitor. The heart rate will be stored for later analyses. Subjects in both training groups will be contacted, by telephone, during the first and the sixth week of the training program, to evaluate the training. A training log will be filled out by all the subjects (including those in the control group) during week 2-13.
When comparing two training programs, one must be sure that the total amount of energy expended (total oxygen uptake) is equal. The calculation of the total oxygen uptake for the different training programs is based on the relationship between %HRmax and %VO2max, established by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM).
Intervention group I - High intensity training The training program with high intensity will consist of two high intensity training sessions per week, using a treadmill or by outdoor walking/running. During these sessions the subjects will walk/run 4 times 4 minutes at an intensity of 85-95% of HRmax (interval training). Between the intervals, the subjects will have an active resting period (3 minutes), in which they walk at an intensity of 70% of HRmax. The subjects are free to choose which days of the week they conduct the training sessions, however, they must have at least one (resting) day in between.
Intervention group II - Moderate intensity training The training program with moderate intensity will consist of three moderate intensity training sessions per week, using a treadmill or by walking outdoor. During these sessions the subjects will walk for 45 minutes at 70% of HRmax. The subjects are free to choose which days of the week they conduct their training session Control group The subjects in the control group (n=15) will have no additional training program, but left with treatment as usual. They will, however, be offered an individual training program after the one year follow-up test.
Outcome measures
Primary outcome measures:
- Difference in VO2peak (change between pre-test and post-test 1) for both interventions groups and the control group.
Healthy, untrained subjects show about 0.5 % increase in VO2peak for every (high intensity) training session. Assuming that persons with incomplete SCI show the same increase, we need about 15 subjects to detect a mean difference of 12 % in VO2peak. Sample size calculation is based on a standard deviation of 10 % with a significance level of 0.05 and power output of 80%.
Secondary outcome measures:
- Difference in VO2peak between intervention group 1 (high intensity) and 2 (moderate intensity), after having completed the training program (post-test 1)
- Changes in VO2peak (changes between pre-test, post-test 1 and post-test 2) for both interventions groups and the control group.
- Difference in VO2peak between intervention group I (high intensity) and II (moderate intensity), one year after discharge (post-test 2).
- Difference in daily energy expenditure (kilo joule (kJ) · min -1) between pre-test, posttest 1 and post-test 2
- Difference in daily energy expenditure (kilo joule (kJ) · min -1) between intervention group I (high intensity) and II (moderate intensity), one year after discharge (post-test 2).
Data analyses and statistics:
Oxygen uptake during the last 30 seconds of the maximal exercise test will be used to estimate peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak). VO2peak of pre- and post test (1, 2 and 3) will be compared to evaluate a possible training effect. From the SWA data, the daily energy expenditure (energy expended during one week divided by 7 days) before the training program, after the training program and one year after discharge, will be compared to evaluate a possible effect of the training programs on the subjects' physical activity level.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Being tested
- High intensity training, Moderate intensity training
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, physical capacity, energy expenditure, training
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High intensity trainingOther
Moderate intensity trainingOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High intensity training | Experimental | Patients in this group will perform high aerobic intensity training, in 30 minutes, twice a week, in a 12 week period. Receives: Other: High intensity training |
| Moderate intensity training | Experimental | Patients in this group will perform moderate aerobic intensity training, in 45 minutes, three times a week, in a 12 week period. Receives: Other: Moderate intensity training |
| controll | No intervention | Patients in this group will perform no (additional) training. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
change in VO2peak
Physical capacity (VO2peak) will be measured before intervention (baseline), after 3 months and after 1 year (12 months. Changes (from baseline) in VO2peak after 3 months and after one year is the primary outcome measure.
Measured: 0 months, 3 months and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionJan 2017
- Study completionApr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Matthijs Ferdinand Wouda, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01903226
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPREK
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High Intensity Aerobic Training in Persons With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01903226
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPREK
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, physical capacity, energy expenditure, training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sunnaas Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aims of this study are to assess the effects of medium versus high intensity 12-week adjusted training programs on physical capacity in persons with incomplete SCI, early after discharge from primary rehabilitation, and to investigate if the training program induces a more active lifestyle in terms of increased daily energy expenditure.
Detailed description
Design:
Randomized controlled trial.
Participants:
45 subjects, between 18 and 65 years of age, will be recruited with the following inclusion criteria: Traumatic spinal cord injury, incomplete lesions (classified as ASIA D), admitted to Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital for primary rehabilitation, and able to walk for 5 minutes on the treadmill (without assistive aids) at 4 km/hour.
Subjects with cardiovascular diseases, progressive diseases and severe psychiatric conditions will be excluded.
Procedures:
The participants will be included after medical approval (by a specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation) and before being discharged from primary rehabilitation. During the last week at the hospital, usually between 3 to 6 months post injury, a pre-test to examine physical capacity will be performed; maximal exercise test on a treadmill and six-minute walking test (Fig. 1).
After the pre-test the participants will be randomized into one of three groups; Intervention Group I (high intensity training), Intervention Group II (medium intensity training), and a Control Group (treatment as usual, no additional training). To achieve balanced randomization (the compared groups should have about the same size), we will use block randomization. A computer random number generator will be used, with a block size of 15 and an allocation ratio of 1:1.
The subjects in the training groups will have practical training at the hospital in how to perform moderate or high intensity training. They will be taught how to apply a heart rate monitor and how to use it during training sessions.
At discharge from primary rehabilitation, and before start-up of the 12 week training program, the physical activity level (energy expenditure; kilo joule (kJ) · min -1) will be monitored by wearing a SWA for seven days in the home situation.
After having completed the training program, the participants (including those in the control group) will wear the SWA in 7 days and return to Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital to repeat the physical capacity tests (post-test). This procedure will also be repeated at a follow-up one year after discharge from primary rehabilitation (12-months follow-up).
All tests are performed under supervision of a physiotherapist, who has several years of experience in exercise testing. This physiotherapist is unaware of which of the three groups the patient the patient is recruited from (blind controlled trail).
Interventions:
Subjects in the two intervention groups will perform a 12 week individual training program, where 15 subjects will perform high intensity training and 15 subjects will perform a training program with moderate intensity training. Since literature indicates that SCI patients, on group level, do not improve their physical capacity after being discharged, our subjects will perform the training program in their home situation. To verify the intensity level during the training session, the participants have to wear a heart rate monitor. The heart rate will be stored for later analyses. Subjects in both training groups will be contacted, by telephone, during the first and the sixth week of the training program, to evaluate the training. A training log will be filled out by all the subjects (including those in the control group) during week 2-13.
When comparing two training programs, one must be sure that the total amount of energy expended (total oxygen uptake) is equal. The calculation of the total oxygen uptake for the different training programs is based on the relationship between %HRmax and %VO2max, established by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM).
Intervention group I - High intensity training The training program with high intensity will consist of two high intensity training sessions per week, using a treadmill or by outdoor walking/running. During these sessions the subjects will walk/run 4 times 4 minutes at an intensity of 85-95% of HRmax (interval training). Between the intervals, the subjects will have an active resting period (3 minutes), in which they walk at an intensity of 70% of HRmax. The subjects are free to choose which days of the week they conduct the training sessions, however, they must have at least one (resting) day in between.
Intervention group II - Moderate intensity training The training program with moderate intensity will consist of three moderate intensity training sessions per week, using a treadmill or by walking outdoor. During these sessions the subjects will walk for 45 minutes at 70% of HRmax. The subjects are free to choose which days of the week they conduct their training session Control group The subjects in the control group (n=15) will have no additional training program, but left with treatment as usual. They will, however, be offered an individual training program after the one year follow-up test.
Outcome measures
Primary outcome measures:
- Difference in VO2peak (change between pre-test and post-test 1) for both interventions groups and the control group.
Healthy, untrained subjects show about 0.5 % increase in VO2peak for every (high intensity) training session. Assuming that persons with incomplete SCI show the same increase, we need about 15 subjects to detect a mean difference of 12 % in VO2peak. Sample size calculation is based on a standard deviation of 10 % with a significance level of 0.05 and power output of 80%.
Secondary outcome measures:
- Difference in VO2peak between intervention group 1 (high intensity) and 2 (moderate intensity), after having completed the training program (post-test 1)
- Changes in VO2peak (changes between pre-test, post-test 1 and post-test 2) for both interventions groups and the control group.
- Difference in VO2peak between intervention group I (high intensity) and II (moderate intensity), one year after discharge (post-test 2).
- Difference in daily energy expenditure (kilo joule (kJ) · min -1) between pre-test, posttest 1 and post-test 2
- Difference in daily energy expenditure (kilo joule (kJ) · min -1) between intervention group I (high intensity) and II (moderate intensity), one year after discharge (post-test 2).
Data analyses and statistics:
Oxygen uptake during the last 30 seconds of the maximal exercise test will be used to estimate peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak). VO2peak of pre- and post test (1, 2 and 3) will be compared to evaluate a possible training effect. From the SWA data, the daily energy expenditure (energy expended during one week divided by 7 days) before the training program, after the training program and one year after discharge, will be compared to evaluate a possible effect of the training programs on the subjects' physical activity level.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High intensity training | Experimental | Other: High intensity trainingPatients in this group will perform high aerobic intensity training, in 30 minutes, twice a week, in a 12 week period. |
| Moderate intensity training | Experimental | Other: Moderate intensity trainingPatients in this group will perform moderate aerobic intensity training, in 45 minutes, three times a week, in a 12 week period. |
| controll | No intervention | –Patients in this group will perform no (additional) training. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Spinal cord injury
- incomplete lesion (classified as ASIA D)
- admitted to Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital for primary rehabilitation,
- able to walk for 5 minutes on the treadmill (without assistive aids) at 4 km/hour
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- cardiovascular diseases
- progressive diseases
- severe psychiatric conditions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High intensity training | Other | High intensity training |
| Moderate intensity training | Other | Moderate intensity training |
Primary outcome
change in VO2peak
Time frame: 0 months, 3 months and 12 months
Physical capacity (VO2peak) will be measured before intervention (baseline), after 3 months and after 1 year (12 months. Changes (from baseline) in VO2peak after 3 months and after one year is the primary outcome measure.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2018.
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High intensity training and Moderate intensity training in people with Spinal Cord Injury, run by Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
change in VO2peak (time frame: 0 months, 3 months and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2018.