SepsisNCT01904188
Clinical Microbial Species & Antibiotic Resistance ID in ED Patients Presenting With Infection - is Rapid ID Possible & Accurate?
An observational study of Sepsis and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, run by Michigan State University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The aim of this project is to test the utility of The Gene Z device (as of 2018 Gene Z no longer being used), now using In-Dx and other rapid identification techniques that the investigators have developed in the lab on clinically obtained bodily fluid samples taken from patients with suspected infection or sepsis… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sepsis, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Infection Mixed
- What is being tested?
- Gene Z or other rapid diagnostic techniques developed in our lab (as of 2018 not using Gene Z - now using In-Dx along with other developed techniquesregularly)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 2,500 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2015to Jul 2032
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients who undergo evaluation for suspected sepsis who have peripheral blood cultures and/or urine samples obtained and patient characteristics recorded. In addition those that have an obvious infection without sepsis will be consented. Those that have other bodily fluids involved in addition will also be included, with or without SIRS criteria. (Sputum, wound drainage, CSF, oral or nasal secretions).
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients with 3 of 4 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) characteristics (1. tachycardia, 2. fever or hypothermia, 3. tachypnea, 4. leukocytosis), who have blood cultures drawn and/or urine collected for the evaluation of suspected sepsis, and/or other bodily fluids collected for culture and sensitivity analysis.
- Patients with other sources of infection with less than 3 of 4 SIRS criteria including sputum, wound drainage, CSF, nasal or oral secretions.
Who cannot join
- Pediatric patients
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Michigan Health/Sparrow (name change only)
Lansing, Michigan, 48909
Brett Etchebarne, MD PhD, 517-353-3211, madcow@msu.edu
Brett E Etchebarne, MD/PhD
- Recruiting
McLaren Greater Lansing
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
Mary Hughes, DO, 5173533211, hughesm@msu.edu
About this study
Official title: Clinical Microbial Species and Antibiotic Resistance Identification in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Three of Four Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) Criteria - is Rapid Identification Possible and Accurate?
The aim of this project is to test the utility of The Gene Z device (as of 2018 Gene Z no longer being used), now using In-Dx and other rapid identification techniques that the investigators have developed in the lab on clinically obtained bodily fluid samples taken from patients with suspected infection or sepsis based on having three of four positive Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome markers, or having a known infection for which a specimen is being collected. Specimens will be collected at the University of Michigan Health/Sparrow and McLaren Greater Lansing , processed in our lab and stored for analysis at a later date to determine if the microbial pathogens identified by current methods of culture, as well as pathogen susceptibility to antibiotics by culture results, can be identified by the GeneZ technology (no longer in use) or other developed technology accurately, and more timely. It will not affect current patient care nor impact patient care, which will continue in the standard fashion today for sepsis. Results will be compared to standard culture results and antibiotic sensitivities. A secondary aim is related to the antibiotic resistance of the organism causing the infection in an attempt to determine if there are specific characteristics of the organism that allow it to be resistant to certain antibiotics. This requires analysis of the genetic material of the organism in our laboratory. Because there are also human cells in the specimens collected, with separate permission we will evaluate the human genome of the patient with the infection to determine characteristics and conditions that may predict a complicated versus uncomplicated disease course.
Read the detailed description
Dramatic improvement in the timely and effective treatment of patients afflicted with sepsis can be achieved with the implementation of modern technologies for identification of offending microbial species and their innate genetic antibiotic treatment targets. Our collaborative team is planning to address this need using a Point-of-Care (POC) device equipped for identification of a bacterial species within 60 minutes of a routine Emergency Department laboratory blood draw or other specimen collection, followed by targeted analysis of its innate genetic antibiotic resistance elements within as little as 7 hours time. This revolutionary improvement in clinical management is critical for improving patient outcomes for a disease syndrome that is not only highly prevalent worldwide, consuming a massive amount of medical resources daily, but that only threatens to continue to worsen given current antibiotic stewardship practices. Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) is the standard by which medical interventions are now shaped across fields in the modern clinical setting, ranging from trauma and neurosurgery to cardiology and infectious disease. Rapid and accurate diagnoses, paired with aggressive and effective intervention, are manifest to stemming the disease process as well as maintaining economically feasible care and improving long-term morbidity. The effort to apply EGDT to patients at high risk for systemic infection, sepsis, was initiated over a decade ago by Rivers and colleagues in the Emergency Department setting. Systematic approaches to early sepsis identification and intervention including broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage, and adequate fluid volume resuscitation have yielded definite improvements in patient outcomes and health care resource utilization. It has been recognized that one of the limiting factors in treatment of sepsis in the hospital setting is the timeliness of pathogen identification and implementation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The current "gold standard" of sepsis microbial identification is blood culture, which takes 3-5 days for a definitive species identification. Antimicrobial agent susceptibility for the given organism is generally garnered within this same time frame. However, in the period it takes from specimen collection to culture results, empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage, often involving multiple antibiotics, must be provided to ensure organism eradication. This proposal aims to use Point of Care (POC) testing, as described by the investigatos' laboratory, to accurately identify pathogenic microorganisms in patients with suspected sepsis within 20 minutes of a laboratory blood draw or urine collection. The scope of the investigators' proposal is feasible in that 20 organisms account for 87% of microbial infections identified by culture-based techniques at University of Michigan Health/Sparrow Hospital, representing the greater Lansing, Michigan area, and 50 microorganisms would account for virtually every microbial infectious species (Khalife, 2011, unpublished data). In preliminary studies the investigators have validated this approach with laboratory-processed samples of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The investigators now are creating panels for multiple types of infections and have validated these efforts on over 30 microorganisms. POC testing will now be expanded to include additional microorganisms commonly encountered in sepsis patients or those with other identifiable infectious sources. Secondarily, antimicrobial resistance genes will be scanned using a functional genomics approach with highly-parallel quantitative PCR as performed by the investigators' laboratory in a previous study exploring the microbiota of porcine gastrointestinal tract. Because there are also human cells in the specimens collected, with separate permission we would like to evaluate the human genome of the patient with the infection to determine characteristics and conditions that may predict a complicated versus uncomplicated disease course.
- Conditions
- Sepsis, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Infection Mixed, Infection, Bacterial, Infection, Fungal, Infection, Coronavirus
- Being tested
- Gene Z or other rapid diagnostic techniques developed in our lab (as of 2018 not using Gene Z - now using In-Dx along with other developed techniquesregularly)
- Keywords
- microbial identification, antibiotic resistance, In-Dx and other methods as developed, sepsis, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, antibiotic resistance genes, human genome analysis
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Coinfection, Bacterial Infections, Mycoses, Coronavirus Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gene Z or other rapid diagnostic techniques developed in our lab (as of 2018 not using Gene Z - now using In-Dx along with other developed techniquesregularly)Device
The Gene Z device (no longer in use) and now using In-Dx created in our lab, and other rapid diagnostic techniques that we have developed in our lab will be used to analyze previously processed specimens for microbial organisms and compared to prior culture and sensitivity results. It is not a separate arm - all samples will be cultured in lab per standard protocol and then the Gene Z device or other rapid diagnostic techniques developed in our lab will be used to re-analyze at a later date specimens that were previously frozen and stored and compared to culture results
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SIRS positive | Adult (> or = 18 years) patients with 3 of 4 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) characteristics (1. tachycardia, 2. fever or hypothermia, 3. tachypnea, 4. leukocytosis), who have blood cultures drawn and/or urine collected for the evaluation of suspected sepsis, or those with a source of infection in any other bodily fluid suspected to be the source of infection. (Sputum, stool, saliva, nasal secretions, CSF, wound drainage) May also include others without SIRS criteria but with bodily fluid production or infection of a bodily fluid. With separate permission will analyze human genome and compare characteristics to severity of illness experienced. Receives: Device: Gene Z or other rapid diagnostic techniques developed in our lab (as of 2018 not using Gene Z - now using In-Dx along with other developed techniquesregularly) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Correlation of microbial identification with culture results from clinical laboratory
Frozen microbial specimens will be transported to an off site laboratory for analysis with the GeneZ or other point of care or rapid diagnostic technique or device, with investigators blinded to the final culture results of the specimen - positive or negative. Comparison will be made between final culture result and GeneZ identification of organism or other method as developed in the investigators' lab.
Measured: up to one year per specimen
Secondary outcomes (2)
Microbial Resistance Gene Pattern
Frozen specimens will be analyzed via real time PCR and genetic analysis of the organism to identify microorganism resistance gene patterns of organisms identified by the GeneZ device or other rapid diagnostic technique or point of care device. These will be compared to the antibiotic sensitivity results from the culture and sensitivity reports done in the clinical laboratory.
Measured: up to one year per specimen
Human genome analysis in consented patients
With separate consent starting on specimens collected in 2026 and going forward will analyze the human genome from cells in the specimens collected that are of human origin, and compare to severity of illness to attempt to determine if there are genetic predictors of the patient's infectious disease course.
Measured: one year per specimen
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2015
- Primary completionJul 2030 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2032 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SepsisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 2,500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Michigan State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mary Hughes, Michigan State University
- Investigators
- Mary J Hughes, DO, Principal investigator, Michigan State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01904188
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C13-033F
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Microbial Species and Antibiotic Resistance Identification in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Three of Four Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) Criteria - is Rapid Identification Possible and Accurate?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01904188
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C13-033F
- Conditions
- Sepsis, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Infection Mixed, Infection, Bacterial, Infection, Fungal, Infection, Coronavirus
- Keywords
- microbial identification, antibiotic resistance, In-Dx and other methods as developed, sepsis, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, antibiotic resistance genes, human genome analysis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Michigan State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2015
- Primary completion
- Jul 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2032 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this project is to test the utility of The Gene Z device (as of 2018 Gene Z no longer being used), now using In-Dx and other rapid identification techniques that the investigators have developed in the lab on clinically obtained bodily fluid samples taken from patients with suspected infection or sepsis based on having three of four positive Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome markers, or having a known infection for which a specimen is being collected. Specimens will be collected at the University of Michigan Health/Sparrow and McLaren Greater Lansing , processed in our lab and stored for analysis at a later date to determine if the microbial pathogens identified by current methods of culture, as well as pathogen susceptibility to antibiotics by culture results, can be identified by the GeneZ technology (no longer in use) or other developed technology accurately, and more timely. It will not affect current patient care nor impact patient care, which will continue in the standard fashion today for sepsis. Results will be compared to standard culture results and antibiotic sensitivities. A secondary aim is related to the antibiotic resistance of the organism causing the infection in an attempt to determine if there are specific characteristics of the organism that allow it to be resistant to certain antibiotics. This requires analysis of the genetic material of the organism in our laboratory. Because there are also human cells in the specimens collected, with separate permission we will evaluate the human genome of the patient with the infection to determine characteristics and conditions that may predict a complicated versus uncomplicated disease course.
Detailed description
Dramatic improvement in the timely and effective treatment of patients afflicted with sepsis can be achieved with the implementation of modern technologies for identification of offending microbial species and their innate genetic antibiotic treatment targets. Our collaborative team is planning to address this need using a Point-of-Care (POC) device equipped for identification of a bacterial species within 60 minutes of a routine Emergency Department laboratory blood draw or other specimen collection, followed by targeted analysis of its innate genetic antibiotic resistance elements within as little as 7 hours time. This revolutionary improvement in clinical management is critical for improving patient outcomes for a disease syndrome that is not only highly prevalent worldwide, consuming a massive amount of medical resources daily, but that only threatens to continue to worsen given current antibiotic stewardship practices. Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) is the standard by which medical interventions are now shaped across fields in the modern clinical setting, ranging from trauma and neurosurgery to cardiology and infectious disease. Rapid and accurate diagnoses, paired with aggressive and effective intervention, are manifest to stemming the disease process as well as maintaining economically feasible care and improving long-term morbidity. The effort to apply EGDT to patients at high risk for systemic infection, sepsis, was initiated over a decade ago by Rivers and colleagues in the Emergency Department setting. Systematic approaches to early sepsis identification and intervention including broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage, and adequate fluid volume resuscitation have yielded definite improvements in patient outcomes and health care resource utilization. It has been recognized that one of the limiting factors in treatment of sepsis in the hospital setting is the timeliness of pathogen identification and implementation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. The current "gold standard" of sepsis microbial identification is blood culture, which takes 3-5 days for a definitive species identification. Antimicrobial agent susceptibility for the given organism is generally garnered within this same time frame. However, in the period it takes from specimen collection to culture results, empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage, often involving multiple antibiotics, must be provided to ensure organism eradication. This proposal aims to use Point of Care (POC) testing, as described by the investigatos' laboratory, to accurately identify pathogenic microorganisms in patients with suspected sepsis within 20 minutes of a laboratory blood draw or urine collection. The scope of the investigators' proposal is feasible in that 20 organisms account for 87% of microbial infections identified by culture-based techniques at University of Michigan Health/Sparrow Hospital, representing the greater Lansing, Michigan area, and 50 microorganisms would account for virtually every microbial infectious species (Khalife, 2011, unpublished data). In preliminary studies the investigators have validated this approach with laboratory-processed samples of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The investigators now are creating panels for multiple types of infections and have validated these efforts on over 30 microorganisms. POC testing will now be expanded to include additional microorganisms commonly encountered in sepsis patients or those with other identifiable infectious sources. Secondarily, antimicrobial resistance genes will be scanned using a functional genomics approach with highly-parallel quantitative PCR as performed by the investigators' laboratory in a previous study exploring the microbiota of porcine gastrointestinal tract. Because there are also human cells in the specimens collected, with separate permission we would like to evaluate the human genome of the patient with the infection to determine characteristics and conditions that may predict a complicated versus uncomplicated disease course.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SIRS positive | – | Device: Gene Z or other rapid diagnostic techniques developed in our lab (as of 2018 not using Gene Z - now using In-Dx along with other developed techniquesregularly)Adult (> or = 18 years) patients with 3 of 4 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) characteristics (1. tachycardia, 2. fever or hypothermia, 3. tachypnea, 4. leukocytosis), who have blood cultures drawn and/or urine collected for the evaluation of suspected sepsis, or those with a source of infection in any other bodily fluid suspected to be the source of infection. (Sputum, stool, saliva, nasal secretions, CSF, wound drainage) May also include others without SIRS criteria but with bodily fluid production or infection of a bodily fluid. With separate permission will analyze human genome and compare characteristics to severity of illness experienced. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients who undergo evaluation for suspected sepsis who have peripheral blood cultures and/or urine samples obtained and patient characteristics recorded. In addition those that have an obvious infection without sepsis will be consented. Those that have other bodily fluids involved in addition will also be included, with or without SIRS criteria. (Sputum, wound drainage, CSF, oral or nasal secretions).
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult patients with 3 of 4 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) characteristics (1. tachycardia, 2. fever or hypothermia, 3. tachypnea, 4. leukocytosis), who have blood cultures drawn and/or urine collected for the evaluation of suspected sepsis, and/or other bodily fluids collected for culture and sensitivity analysis.
- Patients with other sources of infection with less than 3 of 4 SIRS criteria including sputum, wound drainage, CSF, nasal or oral secretions.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pediatric patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gene Z or other rapid diagnostic techniques developed in our lab (as of 2018 not using Gene Z - now using In-Dx along with other developed techniquesregularly)The Gene Z device (no longer in use) and now using In-Dx created in our lab, and other rapid diagnostic techniques that we have developed in our lab will be used to analyze previously processed specimens for microbial organisms and compared to prior culture and sensitivity results. It is not a separate arm - all samples will be cultured in lab per standard protocol and then the Gene Z device or other rapid diagnostic techniques developed in our lab will be used to re-analyze at a later date specimens that were previously frozen and stored and compared to culture results | Device | SIRS positive |
Primary outcome
Correlation of microbial identification with culture results from clinical laboratory
Time frame: up to one year per specimen
Frozen microbial specimens will be transported to an off site laboratory for analysis with the GeneZ or other point of care or rapid diagnostic technique or device, with investigators blinded to the final culture results of the specimen - positive or negative. Comparison will be made between final culture result and GeneZ identification of organism or other method as developed in the investigators' lab.
2 secondary outcomes
Microbial Resistance Gene Pattern
Time frame: up to one year per specimen
Human genome analysis in consented patients
Time frame: one year per specimen
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2026.
Related trials for Sepsis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Double Plasma Separation and Adsorption in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (DPMAS-ACLF Trial)
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mary J Hughes, DO principal investigator
Michigan State University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sepsis and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, run by Michigan State University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mary J Hughes, DO (517-353-3211, hughesm@msu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Correlation of microbial identification with culture results from clinical laboratory (time frame: up to one year per specimen). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2026.