Knee OsteoarthritisKUCENCT01905358
The Knee Usual Care Evaluation Study
An observational study of Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this prospective data collection is to track patients who are treated at HSS who are confirmed with knee osteoarthritis. The registry will collect prospective patient related and functional outcomes (including use of assistive devices), medication use and imaging data on patients with confirmed… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- How many people
- 906 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to 21 Mar 2014
- How long will I take part?
- 5 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Hospital for Special Surgery knee osteoarthritis patients
Who may be able to join
- Age greater than 30 years and less than 80 years
- Knee pain for at least 6 weeks
- Pain rate greater than or equal to 4/10 on a visual analog scale
- Morning stiffness less than 30 minutes
- Crepitus on active motion of the knee, bony tenderness, or bony enlargement of the knee
- Willing and able to consider all medical treatment options used to manage osteoarthritis of the knee
Show all 10Show fewer
- No contraindications to knee radiographs or MRI
- Willing to participate in a registry
- Able to understand and sign a consent
- Able to answer registry questions independently
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of a systemic rheumatic disease or crystalline arthritis (ie RA, SLE, systemic sclerosis, psoriatic arthritis or psoriasis, gout, pseudogout, lyme arthritis, reactive arthritis, viral arthritis
- pregnant or nursing
- unable to give informed consent
- contraindication to MRI such as indwelling paemaker or cochlear implant
- requirement of metal equipment (such as oxygen)
- known claustrophobia
- gadolinium allergy
- lack of fluency in English. Unfortunately, we do not have the financial resources to offer full translation services
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021
About this study
Official title: Title: The Study of Intra-articular Interventions of Platelet Rich Plasma or Hyaluronic Acid Compounds vs. Usual Care (Exercise/Diet/Supplements) in the Medical Management of Knee OA- Effects on Pain and Function; Effects on Articular Cartilage; Effects on Time to Partial or Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Knee Usual Care Evaluation (KUCE) Study
The purpose of this prospective data collection is to track patients who are treated at HSS who are confirmed with knee osteoarthritis. The registry will collect prospective patient related and functional outcomes (including use of assistive devices), medication use and imaging data on patients with confirmed osteoarthritis, and the effect of different medical interventions that include PRP, Synvisc / Orthovisc /Euflexxa, bracing, suggested exercises, supplements, and diet. Information from the data collection will be used to compare outcomes of non-surgical alternatives with the end point being knee arthroplasty. The information results will enhance our knowledge of the long-term efficacy and effectiveness of non-surgical interventions intended to treat the progression of osteoarthritis.
Hypotheses:
- Different non-surgical interventions such as PRP, Synvisc®, Orthrovisc®, Euflexxa, bracing, physical therapy, and a prescribed combination of exercise, diet, and supplements will demonstrate statistically significant differences in patient pain and functional outcomes compared to usual interventions including use of NSAIDs, corticosteroid injections, and use of assistive devices such as canes.
- Non-operative interventions for knee osteoarthritis will be associated with different rates of breakdown of articular cartilage and different rates of progression of osteoarthritis as evidenced by MRI or joint space narrowing on standing knee films?
- Education about available non-operative treatment methods may change time the end point of total or partial knee replacement for patients with knee osteoarthritis of varying severity.
- Different non-operative interventions will be associated with different times to total or partial knee arthroplasty in patient with knee osteoarthritis of similar severity.
- An electronic data capture system (EDC) for osteoarthritis patients will improve patient care and patient outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Specific Aims:
- To ascertain the long term success of non-surgical interventions intended to alleviate symptoms or slow progression of osteoarthritis of the knee.
- To ascertain if non-operative interventions for knee osteoarthritis improve patient pain, function, and quality of life.
- To ascertain if non-operative interventions for knee osteoarthritis affect the breakdown of articular cartilage and slow progression of osteoarthritis as evidenced by MRI or joint space narrowing on standing knee films?
- To ascertain the amount of time between the initial entry into care at HSS and the end point of total or partial knee replacement for patients with knee osteoarthritis of varying severity.
- To ascertain if non-operative interventions for knee osteoarthritis prolong time to knee replacement surgery.
- To implement at electronic data capture system (EDC) for osteoarthritis patients which will store validated patient reported outcomes, physical findings, and imaging results.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Short Form (12) Health Survey (SF-12)
Change is being assessed.
Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Change is being assessed.
Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completion21 Mar 2014
- Study completion21 Mar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 906 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 5 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01905358
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 29031
- Acronym
- KUCE
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 16 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 2 Dec 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 May 25;1:17. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-17.
PubMed 12801417Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S, Tirman PF, Miaux Y, White D, Kothari M, Lu Y, Fye K, Zhao S, Genant HK. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004 Mar;12(3):177-90. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2003.11.003.
PubMed 14972335Cameron ML, Briggs KK, Steadman JR. Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):83-6. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310012601.
PubMed 12531763Hunter DJ, Li J, LaValley M, Bauer DC, Nevitt M, DeGroot J, Poole R, Eyre D, Guermazi A, Gale D, Felson DT. Cartilage markers and their association with cartilage loss on magnetic resonance imaging in knee osteoarthritis: the Boston Osteoarthritis Knee Study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(5):R108. doi: 10.1186/ar2314.
PubMed 17958892Ornetti P, Brandt K, Hellio-Le Graverand MP, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kloppenburg M, Lane N, Maillefert JF, Mazzuca SA, Spector T, Utard-Wlerick G, Vignon E, Dougados M. OARSI-OMERACT definition of relevant radiological progression in hip/knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jul;17(7):856-63. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Feb 9.
PubMed 19230857Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett FC, Deyo RA, Felson DT, Giannini EH, Heyse SP, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, Hunder GG, Liang MH, Pillemer SR, Steen VD, Wolfe F. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 May;41(5):778-99. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:53.0.CO;2-V.
PubMed 9588729Rhon D. Re: Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:137-62. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Dec;16(12):1585; author reply 1589. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.04.019. Epub 2008 Jun 2. No abstract available.
PubMed 18515155Kon E, Mandelbaum B, Buda R, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Timoncini A, Fornasari PM, Giannini S, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injection versus hyaluronic acid viscosupplementation as treatments for cartilage pathology: from early degeneration to osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy. 2011 Nov;27(11):1490-501. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
PubMed 21831567Loza E, Benito-Ruiz P, Blanco F, de Miguel E, Roman JA; ARTROACAS study group, Spain. Feasibility and efficacy of a multidisciplinary health care programme for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Nov-Dec;29(6):913-20. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
PubMed 22132760Keller SD, Bayliss MS, Ware JE Jr, Hsu MA, Damiano AM, Goss TF. Comparison of responses to SF-36 Health Survey questions with one-week and four-week recall periods. Health Serv Res. 1997 Aug;32(3):367-84.
PubMed 9240286Pincus T, Maclean R, Yazici Y, Harrington JT. Quantitative measurement of patient status in the regular care of patients with rheumatic diseases over 25 years as a continuous quality improvement activity, rather than traditional research. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6 Suppl 47):69-81.
PubMed 18021510Gourlay ML, Fine JP, Preisser JS, May RC, Li C, Lui LY, Ransohoff DF, Cauley JA, Ensrud KE; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Bone-density testing interval and transition to osteoporosis in older women. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 19;366(3):225-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107142.
PubMed 22256806Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index--additional dimensions for use in subjects with post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the knee. Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 Mar;7(2):216-21. doi: 10.1053/joca.1998.0153.
PubMed 10222220Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Sep-Oct;12(5):505-16. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1700. Epub 2005 May 19.
PubMed 15905487Wilson AS, Kitas GD, Carruthers DM, Reay C, Skan J, Harris S, Treharne GJ, Young SP, Bacon PA. Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Mar;41(3):268-73. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.3.268.
PubMed 11934962
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Dec 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Title: The Study of Intra-articular Interventions of Platelet Rich Plasma or Hyaluronic Acid Compounds vs. Usual Care (Exercise/Diet/Supplements) in the Medical Management of Knee OA- Effects on Pain and Function; Effects on Articular Cartilage; Effects on Time to Partial or Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Knee Usual Care Evaluation (KUCE) Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01905358
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KUCE / 29031
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 906 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2013
- Primary completion
- 21 Mar 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this prospective data collection is to track patients who are treated at HSS who are confirmed with knee osteoarthritis. The registry will collect prospective patient related and functional outcomes (including use of assistive devices), medication use and imaging data on patients with confirmed osteoarthritis, and the effect of different medical interventions that include PRP, Synvisc / Orthovisc /Euflexxa, bracing, suggested exercises, supplements, and diet. Information from the data collection will be used to compare outcomes of non-surgical alternatives with the end point being knee arthroplasty. The information results will enhance our knowledge of the long-term efficacy and effectiveness of non-surgical interventions intended to treat the progression of osteoarthritis.
Hypotheses:
- Different non-surgical interventions such as PRP, Synvisc®, Orthrovisc®, Euflexxa, bracing, physical therapy, and a prescribed combination of exercise, diet, and supplements will demonstrate statistically significant differences in patient pain and functional outcomes compared to usual interventions including use of NSAIDs, corticosteroid injections, and use of assistive devices such as canes.
- Non-operative interventions for knee osteoarthritis will be associated with different rates of breakdown of articular cartilage and different rates of progression of osteoarthritis as evidenced by MRI or joint space narrowing on standing knee films?
- Education about available non-operative treatment methods may change time the end point of total or partial knee replacement for patients with knee osteoarthritis of varying severity.
- Different non-operative interventions will be associated with different times to total or partial knee arthroplasty in patient with knee osteoarthritis of similar severity.
- An electronic data capture system (EDC) for osteoarthritis patients will improve patient care and patient outcomes.
Detailed description
Specific Aims:
- To ascertain the long term success of non-surgical interventions intended to alleviate symptoms or slow progression of osteoarthritis of the knee.
- To ascertain if non-operative interventions for knee osteoarthritis improve patient pain, function, and quality of life.
- To ascertain if non-operative interventions for knee osteoarthritis affect the breakdown of articular cartilage and slow progression of osteoarthritis as evidenced by MRI or joint space narrowing on standing knee films?
- To ascertain the amount of time between the initial entry into care at HSS and the end point of total or partial knee replacement for patients with knee osteoarthritis of varying severity.
- To ascertain if non-operative interventions for knee osteoarthritis prolong time to knee replacement surgery.
- To implement at electronic data capture system (EDC) for osteoarthritis patients which will store validated patient reported outcomes, physical findings, and imaging results.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 5 Years
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Hospital for Special Surgery knee osteoarthritis patients
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Age greater than 30 years and less than 80 years
- Knee pain for at least 6 weeks
- Pain rate greater than or equal to 4/10 on a visual analog scale
- Morning stiffness less than 30 minutes
- Crepitus on active motion of the knee, bony tenderness, or bony enlargement of the knee
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Diagnosis of a systemic rheumatic disease or crystalline arthritis (ie RA, SLE, systemic sclerosis, psoriatic arthritis or psoriasis, gout, pseudogout, lyme arthritis, reactive arthritis, viral arthritis
- pregnant or nursing
- unable to give informed consent
- contraindication to MRI such as indwelling paemaker or cochlear implant
- requirement of metal equipment (such as oxygen)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Short Form (12) Health Survey (SF-12)
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months.
Change is being assessed.
1 secondary outcome
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Dec 2017.
- Background: PubMed 12801417Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 May 25;1:17. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-17.
- Background: PubMed 14972335Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S, Tirman PF, Miaux Y, White D, Kothari M, Lu Y, Fye K, Zhao S, Genant HK. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004 Mar;12(3):177-90. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2003.11.003.
- Background: PubMed 12531763Cameron ML, Briggs KK, Steadman JR. Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):83-6. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310012601.
- Background: PubMed 17958892Hunter DJ, Li J, LaValley M, Bauer DC, Nevitt M, DeGroot J, Poole R, Eyre D, Guermazi A, Gale D, Felson DT. Cartilage markers and their association with cartilage loss on magnetic resonance imaging in knee osteoarthritis: the Boston Osteoarthritis Knee Study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(5):R108. doi: 10.1186/ar2314.
- Background: PubMed 19230857Ornetti P, Brandt K, Hellio-Le Graverand MP, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kloppenburg M, Lane N, Maillefert JF, Mazzuca SA, Spector T, Utard-Wlerick G, Vignon E, Dougados M. OARSI-OMERACT definition of relevant radiological progression in hip/knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jul;17(7):856-63. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Feb 9.
- Background: PubMed 9588729Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett FC, Deyo RA, Felson DT, Giannini EH, Heyse SP, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, Hunder GG, Liang MH, Pillemer SR, Steen VD, Wolfe F. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 May;41(5):778-99. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:53.0.CO;2-V.
- Background: PubMed 18515155Rhon D. Re: Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:137-62. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Dec;16(12):1585; author reply 1589. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.04.019. Epub 2008 Jun 2. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21831567Kon E, Mandelbaum B, Buda R, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Timoncini A, Fornasari PM, Giannini S, Marcacci M. Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injection versus hyaluronic acid viscosupplementation as treatments for cartilage pathology: from early degeneration to osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy. 2011 Nov;27(11):1490-501. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 22132760Loza E, Benito-Ruiz P, Blanco F, de Miguel E, Roman JA; ARTROACAS study group, Spain. Feasibility and efficacy of a multidisciplinary health care programme for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Nov-Dec;29(6):913-20. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
- Background: PubMed 9240286Keller SD, Bayliss MS, Ware JE Jr, Hsu MA, Damiano AM, Goss TF. Comparison of responses to SF-36 Health Survey questions with one-week and four-week recall periods. Health Serv Res. 1997 Aug;32(3):367-84.
- Background: PubMed 18021510Pincus T, Maclean R, Yazici Y, Harrington JT. Quantitative measurement of patient status in the regular care of patients with rheumatic diseases over 25 years as a continuous quality improvement activity, rather than traditional research. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6 Suppl 47):69-81.
- Background: PubMed 22256806Gourlay ML, Fine JP, Preisser JS, May RC, Li C, Lui LY, Ransohoff DF, Cauley JA, Ensrud KE; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Bone-density testing interval and transition to osteoporosis in older women. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 19;366(3):225-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107142.
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 3
Phase 3 Pivotal Trial Comparing CARTISTEM® and Surgical Comparator for Knee Cartilage Lesions and Osteoarthritis
Knee Cartilage Defects
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Recruiting
The Effect of Different Exercise Training Programs on Muscle Oxygenation in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis of Knee
RecruitingPhase 4
Post-Operative Pain Relief: Zynrelef or Periarticular Injections in RATKA
Periarticular Block, Osteoarthritis (OA)
Not yet recruiting
Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty With Virtual Home-Based Rehabilitation
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Short Form (12) Health Survey (SF-12) (time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months and 60 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01905358, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.