Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)Phase 2/3NCT01905657
Study of Two Doses of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Participants With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MK-3475-010/KEYNOTE-010)
A Phase 2/3 study testing Pembrolizumab and Docetaxel in people with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.
Trial summary
This study compared two doses of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) versus docetaxel in participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had experienced disease progression after platinum-containing systemic therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- What is being tested?
- Pembrolizumab and Docetaxel
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,034 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 9 Aug 2013to 30 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Life expectancy of at least 3 months
- Histologically- or cytologically-confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC that is anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive per central laboratory review
- At least one bi-dimensional measurable lesion
- Radiographic progression after treatment with at least 2 cycles of a platinum-containing doublet
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
Who cannot join
- Prior therapy with docetaxel for NSCLC
- Receiving systemic steroid therapy within 3 days prior to the first dose of study treatment or receiving any other form of immunosuppressive medication
- Currently participating or has participated in a study using an investigational antineoplastic agent or device within 30 days of first dose
- Expected to require any other form of systemic or localized antineoplastic therapy while on trial
- History of allogeneic tissue/solid organ transplant
- Prior systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy, antineoplastic biological therapy (e.g., cetuximab), major surgery within 3 weeks of the first dose of study drug; received thoracic radiation therapy of >30 Gy within 6 months of the first dose of study drug; received prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy or completed palliative radiotherapy within 7 days of the first dose of study drug
Show all 13Show fewer
- Prior therapy with an anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, anti-tumor necrosis factor CD137, or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) antibody (including ipilimumab or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting T-cell co-stimulation or checkpoint pathways), or took part in another pembrolizumab trial
- Known history of prior malignancy, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma of the skin, superficial bladder cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ cervical cancer, and has undergone potentially curative therapy with no evidence of that disease recurrence for 5 years since initiation of that therapy
- Known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis
- Active autoimmune disease, or a documented history of autoimmune disease, or a syndrome that requires systemic steroids or immunosuppressive agents
- Interstitial lung disease, or history of pneumonitis requiring systemic steroids for treatment
- Known history or active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C
- Pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive or father children within the projected duration of the trial through 120 days after last dose of pembrolizumab or 180 days after last dose of docetaxel
About this study
Official title: A Phase II/III Randomized Trial of Two Doses of MK-3475 (SCH900475) Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Subjects With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
This study compared two doses of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) versus docetaxel in participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had experienced disease progression after platinum-containing systemic therapy. Participants were assigned randomly to receive either pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg once every three weeks (Q3W), pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg Q3W or docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 Q3W. The total number of participants randomized depended upon demonstration of sufficient objective responses at an interim analysis.
Eligible participants who were allocated to the first course of pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg Q3W or 10 mg/kg Q3W) and experienced disease progression, to be permitted to receive a second course of pembrolizumab as long as Inclusion/Exclusion criteria were met.
Read more
Protocol Amendment 12 (effective date: 09 Dec 2015) enabled eligible participants who were allocated to docetaxel and experienced disease progression, to be permitted to switch over to receive pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg Q3W as long as Inclusion/Exclusion criteria were met.
With Protocol Amendment 15 (effective date: 03 Jan 2018), all second course and switch over participants will receive pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W. Response or progression during the second and switch over pembrolizumab courses will not count towards efficacy outcome measures, and adverse events during the second and switch over pembrolizumab courses will not count towards safety outcome measures.
Also with Amendment 15, once a participant has achieved the study objective or the study has ended, the participant will be discontinued from this study and enrolled in an extension study (Keynote 587; NCT03486873) to continue protocol-defined assessments and treatment. Switch over participants who have not transitioned to pembrolizumab will be considered for the extension study on a case-by-case basis.
The primary study hypotheses are that pembolizumab prolongs Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-free Survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by independent radiologists' review in previously-treated participants with NSCLC in the strongly positive programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) stratum compared to docetaxel and in participants whose tumors express PD-L1 compared to docetaxel.
- Conditions
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- Being tested
- Pembrolizumab, Docetaxel
- Keywords
- Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD1, PD-1), Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL1, PD-L1)
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Parkinson Disease 4, Autosomal Dominant Lewy Body
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PembrolizumabBiological
Also called MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®
IV infusion
DocetaxelDrug
Also called TAXOTERE®
IV infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg | Experimental | Participants received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes Q3W for up to 2 years. Receives: Biological: Pembrolizumab |
| Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg | Experimental | Participants received pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg IV over 30 minutes Q3W for up to 2 years. Receives: Biological: Pembrolizumab |
| Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 | Active comparator | Participants received docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 IV over 1 hour Q3W for up to 2 years. Receives: Drug: Docetaxel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months. Per protocol, final analysis for this primary outcome measure was performed for the first pembrolizumab course and docetaxel treatment arms, with a protocol-specified analysis data cutoff date of 30 September (Sep) 2015.
Measured: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)
PFS was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central radiologists' review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as either a 20% relative increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study OR an absolute increase of >5 mm in the sum of lesions, OR the appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months. Per protocol, final analysis for this primary outcome measure was performed for the first pembrolizumab course and docetaxel treatment arms, with a protocol-specified analysis data cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015.
Measured: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the study drug, was also an AE. Per protocol, final analysis for this primary outcome measure was performed for the first pembrolizumab course and docetaxel treatment arms, with a protocol-specified analysis data cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015.
Measured: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to AEs
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the study drug, was also an AE. Per protocol, final analysis for this primary outcome measure was performed for the first pembrolizumab course and docetaxel treatment arms, with a protocol-specified analysis data cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015.
Measured: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR; disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR; at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters) based on blinded independent central radiologists' review using RECIST 1.1. Per protocol, final analysis for this secondary outcome measure was performed for the first pembrolizumab course and docetaxel treatment arms, with a protocol-specified analysis data cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015.
Measured: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
Duration of Response (DOR) by RECIST 1.1
DOR is measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for CR/PR (whichever was first recorded) until the first date that death or progressive disease was objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded on study). Non-responders were not included in the analysis. DOR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in weeks. Per protocol, final analysis for this secondary outcome measure was performed for the first pembrolizumab course and docetaxel treatment arms, with a protocol-specified analysis data cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015.
Measured: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study start9 Aug 2013
- Primary completion30 Sep 2015
- Study completion30 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,034 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01905657
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3475-010
- Other IDs
- 2012-004391-19, 132355, MK-3475-010, KEYNOTE-010
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
Publications
Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Perez-Gracia JL, Han JY, Molina J, Kim JH, Arvis CD, Ahn MJ, Majem M, Fidler MJ, de Castro G Jr, Garrido M, Lubiniecki GM, Shentu Y, Im E, Dolled-Filhart M, Garon EB. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-1550. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
PubMed 26712084Cristescu R, Aurora-Garg D, Albright A, Xu L, Liu XQ, Loboda A, Lang L, Jin F, Rubin EH, Snyder A, Lunceford J. Tumor mutational burden predicts the efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy: a pan-tumor retrospective analysis of participants with advanced solid tumors. J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Jan;10(1):e003091. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003091.
PubMed 35101941Jemielita T, Li XN, Piperdi B, Zhou W, Burke T, Chen C. Overall Survival With Second-Line Pembrolizumab in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial Versus Propensity-Adjusted Real-World Data. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Jan;5:56-65. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00099.
PubMed 33439727Lala M, Li TR, de Alwis DP, Sinha V, Mayawala K, Yamamoto N, Siu LL, Chartash E, Aboshady H, Jain L. A six-weekly dosing schedule for pembrolizumab in patients with cancer based on evaluation using modelling and simulation. Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;131:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
PubMed 32305010Herbst RS, Garon EB, Kim DW, Cho BC, Perez-Gracia JL, Han JY, Arvis CD, Majem M, Forster MD, Monnet I, Novello S, Szalai Z, Gubens MA, Su WC, Ceresoli GL, Samkari A, Jensen EH, Lubiniecki GM, Baas P. Long-Term Outcomes and Retreatment Among Patients With Previously Treated, Programmed Death-Ligand 1-Positive, Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the KEYNOTE-010 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 10;38(14):1580-1590. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02446. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
PubMed 32078391van Vugt MJH, Stone JA, De Greef RHJMM, Snyder ES, Lipka L, Turner DC, Chain A, Lala M, Li M, Robey SH, Kondic AG, De Alwis D, Mayawala K, Jain L, Freshwater T. Immunogenicity of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced tumors. J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Aug 8;7(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0663-4.
PubMed 31395089Barlesi F, Garon EB, Kim DW, Felip E, Han JY, Kim JH, Ahn MJ, Fidler MJ, Gubens MA, de Castro G Jr, Surmont V, Li Q, Deitz AC, Lubiniecki GM, Herbst RS. Health-Related Quality of Life in KEYNOTE-010: a Phase II/III Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced, Programmed Death Ligand 1-Expressing NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 May;14(5):793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
PubMed 30711649Herbst RS, Baas P, Perez-Gracia JL, Felip E, Kim DW, Han JY, Molina JR, Kim JH, Dubos Arvis C, Ahn MJ, Majem M, Fidler MJ, Surmont V, de Castro G Jr, Garrido M, Shentu Y, Emancipator K, Samkari A, Jensen EH, Lubiniecki GM, Garon EB. Use of archival versus newly collected tumor samples for assessing PD-L1 expression and overall survival: an updated analysis of KEYNOTE-010 trial. Ann Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;30(2):281-289. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy545.
PubMed 30657853
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II/III Randomized Trial of Two Doses of MK-3475 (SCH900475) Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Subjects With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01905657
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 3475-010
- Conditions
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- Keywords
- Programmed Cell Death-1 (PD1, PD-1), Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL1, PD-L1)
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,034 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 9 Aug 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Jan 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study compared two doses of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) versus docetaxel in participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had experienced disease progression after platinum-containing systemic therapy. Participants were assigned randomly to receive either pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg once every three weeks (Q3W), pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg Q3W or docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 Q3W. The total number of participants randomized depended upon demonstration of sufficient objective responses at an interim analysis.
Eligible participants who were allocated to the first course of pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg Q3W or 10 mg/kg Q3W) and experienced disease progression, to be permitted to receive a second course of pembrolizumab as long as Inclusion/Exclusion criteria were met.
Protocol Amendment 12 (effective date: 09 Dec 2015) enabled eligible participants who were allocated to docetaxel and experienced disease progression, to be permitted to switch over to receive pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg Q3W as long as Inclusion/Exclusion criteria were met.
With Protocol Amendment 15 (effective date: 03 Jan 2018), all second course and switch over participants will receive pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W. Response or progression during the second and switch over pembrolizumab courses will not count towards efficacy outcome measures, and adverse events during the second and switch over pembrolizumab courses will not count towards safety outcome measures.
Also with Amendment 15, once a participant has achieved the study objective or the study has ended, the participant will be discontinued from this study and enrolled in an extension study (Keynote 587; NCT03486873) to continue protocol-defined assessments and treatment. Switch over participants who have not transitioned to pembrolizumab will be considered for the extension study on a case-by-case basis.
The primary study hypotheses are that pembolizumab prolongs Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-free Survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by independent radiologists' review in previously-treated participants with NSCLC in the strongly positive programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) stratum compared to docetaxel and in participants whose tumors express PD-L1 compared to docetaxel.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg | Experimental | Biological: PembrolizumabParticipants received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes Q3W for up to 2 years. |
| Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg | Experimental | Biological: PembrolizumabParticipants received pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg IV over 30 minutes Q3W for up to 2 years. |
| Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 | Active comparator | Drug: DocetaxelParticipants received docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 IV over 1 hour Q3W for up to 2 years. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Life expectancy of at least 3 months
- Histologically- or cytologically-confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC that is anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive per central laboratory review
- At least one bi-dimensional measurable lesion
- Radiographic progression after treatment with at least 2 cycles of a platinum-containing doublet
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Prior therapy with docetaxel for NSCLC
- Receiving systemic steroid therapy within 3 days prior to the first dose of study treatment or receiving any other form of immunosuppressive medication
- Currently participating or has participated in a study using an investigational antineoplastic agent or device within 30 days of first dose
- Expected to require any other form of systemic or localized antineoplastic therapy while on trial
- History of allogeneic tissue/solid organ transplant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PembrolizumabAlso: MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®IV infusion | Biological | Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg, Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg |
| DocetaxelAlso: TAXOTERE®IV infusion | Drug | Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months. Per protocol, final analysis for this primary outcome measure was performed for the first pembrolizumab course and docetaxel treatment arms, with a protocol-specified analysis data cutoff date of 30 September (Sep) 2015.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)
Time frame: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
PFS was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central radiologists' review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as either a 20% relative increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study OR an absolute increase of >5 mm in the sum of lesions, OR the appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months. Per protocol, final analysis for this primary outcome measure was performed for the first pembrolizumab course and docetaxel treatment arms, with a protocol-specified analysis data cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the study drug, was also an AE. Per protocol, final analysis for this primary outcome measure was performed for the first pembrolizumab course and docetaxel treatment arms, with a protocol-specified analysis data cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015.
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Drug Due to AEs
Time frame: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the study drug, was also an AE. Per protocol, final analysis for this primary outcome measure was performed for the first pembrolizumab course and docetaxel treatment arms, with a protocol-specified analysis data cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015.
2 secondary outcomes
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1
Time frame: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
Duration of Response (DOR) by RECIST 1.1
Time frame: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 26712084Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Perez-Gracia JL, Han JY, Molina J, Kim JH, Arvis CD, Ahn MJ, Majem M, Fidler MJ, de Castro G Jr, Garrido M, Lubiniecki GM, Shentu Y, Im E, Dolled-Filhart M, Garon EB. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-1550. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35101941Cristescu R, Aurora-Garg D, Albright A, Xu L, Liu XQ, Loboda A, Lang L, Jin F, Rubin EH, Snyder A, Lunceford J. Tumor mutational burden predicts the efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy: a pan-tumor retrospective analysis of participants with advanced solid tumors. J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Jan;10(1):e003091. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003091.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33439727Jemielita T, Li XN, Piperdi B, Zhou W, Burke T, Chen C. Overall Survival With Second-Line Pembrolizumab in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial Versus Propensity-Adjusted Real-World Data. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Jan;5:56-65. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00099.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32305010Lala M, Li TR, de Alwis DP, Sinha V, Mayawala K, Yamamoto N, Siu LL, Chartash E, Aboshady H, Jain L. A six-weekly dosing schedule for pembrolizumab in patients with cancer based on evaluation using modelling and simulation. Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;131:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32078391Herbst RS, Garon EB, Kim DW, Cho BC, Perez-Gracia JL, Han JY, Arvis CD, Majem M, Forster MD, Monnet I, Novello S, Szalai Z, Gubens MA, Su WC, Ceresoli GL, Samkari A, Jensen EH, Lubiniecki GM, Baas P. Long-Term Outcomes and Retreatment Among Patients With Previously Treated, Programmed Death-Ligand 1-Positive, Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the KEYNOTE-010 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 10;38(14):1580-1590. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02446. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31395089van Vugt MJH, Stone JA, De Greef RHJMM, Snyder ES, Lipka L, Turner DC, Chain A, Lala M, Li M, Robey SH, Kondic AG, De Alwis D, Mayawala K, Jain L, Freshwater T. Immunogenicity of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced tumors. J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Aug 8;7(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0663-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30711649Barlesi F, Garon EB, Kim DW, Felip E, Han JY, Kim JH, Ahn MJ, Fidler MJ, Gubens MA, de Castro G Jr, Surmont V, Li Q, Deitz AC, Lubiniecki GM, Herbst RS. Health-Related Quality of Life in KEYNOTE-010: a Phase II/III Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced, Programmed Death Ligand 1-Expressing NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 May;14(5):793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30657853Herbst RS, Baas P, Perez-Gracia JL, Felip E, Kim DW, Han JY, Molina JR, Kim JH, Dubos Arvis C, Ahn MJ, Majem M, Fidler MJ, Surmont V, de Castro G Jr, Garrido M, Shentu Y, Emancipator K, Samkari A, Jensen EH, Lubiniecki GM, Garon EB. Use of archival versus newly collected tumor samples for assessing PD-L1 expression and overall survival: an updated analysis of KEYNOTE-010 trial. Ann Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;30(2):281-289. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy545.
- Merck Oncology Clinical Trial InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf
Related trials for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Pembrolizumab and Docetaxel in people with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (OS) (time frame: Through pre-specified database cutoff date of 30 Sep 2015 (Up to approximately 24 months)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01905657, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2021.