Acute AbdomenPhase 2NCT01911702
Different Fluidic Strategy in Patients With Acute Abdomen : The Sure Volume
A Phase 2 study testing Standard fluidic resuscitation. and Volemic small treatment in people with Acute Abdomen, run by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena.
Trial summary
Acute abdomen is the clinical manifestation of irritation of the peritoneum, due to intra-abdominal generalized infection. With the exception of the primary ones which are the result of a bacterial translocation from the gastro-intestinal tract or an abdominal contamination for hematogenous way sometimes treatable… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Abdomen
- What is being tested?
- Standard fluidic resuscitation. and Volemic small treatment
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 99 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2010to Jul 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients with acute abdomen undergoing abdominal surgery under emergency and presenting on arrival in ICU at least a sign of bad perfusion.
Who cannot join
- Patients with chronic renal failure already receiving dialysis treatment
- Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) <12 months and New York Hearth Classification (NHYA ) class > 3
- Patients judged at the admission not subject to resuscitative measures for severity and comorbidity
- Patients with massive hemorrhage in operative room or in the immediate perioperative with the need for blood transfusions and abundant blood products > 5 units of Erytrocyte Concentrates (EC)
- Patients scheduled for Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (OLT)
- Patients younger than 18 years old
About this study
Official title: MANAGEMENT OF THE PATIENT WITH ACUTE ABDOMEN SUBMITTED TO URGENT ABDOMINAL SURGERY: a Pilot Randomized Multicentre Study
Acute abdomen is the clinical manifestation of irritation of the peritoneum, due to intra-abdominal generalized infection. With the exception of the primary ones which are the result of a bacterial translocation from the gastro-intestinal tract or an abdominal contamination for hematogenous way sometimes treatable with medical therapy alone, peritonitis represents a complex condition that requires an early surgical treatment.
Mortality linked to the peritonitis is extremely high and variable between 42% and 80% when associated with a systemic framework of severe sepsis. This variability is linked to a number of risk factors, including advanced age of the patients, the presence of comorbidity, male sex, a poor nutritional status, and a number of re-operations; as well as specific characteristics related to the type of infection, the timing of surgery, the beginning of an appropriate and early antibiotic therapy.The post-operative treatment of the patient with peritonitis significantly affects the outcome of the same. The presence of peritonitis and then the seizure of large volumes of liquids and the possible state of systemic vasodilation induced by the infectious process, provide a framework of hypovolemia. There is a literature that identifies in abdominal trauma damage patient's volemic aggressive resuscitation an element of pejorative outcomes. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the clinical changes determined by a different volemic strategy.
Read the detailed description
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY AND SURGICAL SPECIALITIES SERVICE OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
Head: Prof. M. Girardis
MANAGEMENT OF THE PATIENT WITH ACUTE ABDOMEN SUBMITTED TO URGENT ABDOMINAL SURGERY: pilot study randomized multicentre
INTRODUCTION Acute abdomen is the clinical manifestation of irritation of the peritoneum, due to intra-abdominal generalized infection. Mortality linked to the peritonitis is extremely high and variable between 42% and 80% when associated with a systemic framework of severe sepsis. This variability is linked to a number of risk factors, including advanced age of the patients, the presence of comorbidity, male sex, a poor nutritional status, and a number of reoperations; as well as specific characteristics related to the type of infection, the timing of surgery, the beginning of an appropriate and early antibiotic therapy.
The post-operative treatment of the patient with peritonitis significantly affects the outcome of the same.
The centers involved in the study will be three:
- post operative intensive care unit (ICU) - Modena University Hospital
- reanimation unit - Carpi Hospital
- intensive care unit (ICU) - Modena New Civil Hospital
OBJECTIVES PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of 30-day mortality.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of surgical complications, occurrence of organ failure, duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in ICU. Please refer to Section 6 for the definition of the endpoints / response variables for the secondary goals.
PLAN STUDY Study setting
The study will be conducted at the following facilities:
- post operative intensive care unit (ICU) at Modena University Hospital
- intensive care unit (ICU) at Modena Baggiovara
- reanimation unit at Carpi Inclusion criteria All patients with acute abdomen undergoing abdominal surgery under emergency and presenting on arrival in ICU at least a sign of bad perfusion.
In the definition of acute abdomen, the following frameworks will be included:
- primary peritonitis: bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity by microorganisms starting from extra-peritoneal sites (hematogenous in sepsis / bacteremia, from the female genital tract in the course of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), from the retroperitoneum); translocation of microorganisms through the bowel
- secondary peritonitis: bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity as a result of phlogosis or perforation of the digestive tract or female genital tract:
- acute abdominal infections (appendicitis, diverticulitis, cholecystitis, gallbladder empyema, suppurative cholangitis)
- other diseases (occlusion of the mesenteric, gastric or duodenal ulcer, strangulated hernia or volvulus, colic neoplasia, toxic megacolon, ruptured of intraperitoneal or visceral abscess)
- various intestinal diseases (tuberculosis, typhoid fever, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, infection with Clostridium)
- penetrating and not abdominal trauma (rupture or perforation of a hollow internal organ)
- surgical operation (stomach and duodenum, ileum, colon - rectum, bile - ducts) for dehiscence of anastomosis and / or sutures
- tertiary or relapsing peritonitis, understood as persistent or recurrent peritonitis after apparently adequate medical and surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis
- intestinal ischemia
- pancreatitis with or without evidence of hemorrhagic- necrotic areas
The condition of hypoperfusion is identified by:
- perioperative metabolic acidosis that can not be explained by other morbid conditions
- arterial hypotension with PAM <60 mmHg or less than 15% of the preoperative
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with chronic renal failure already receiving dialysis treatment.
- Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) <12 months and New York Hearth Classification (NHYA ) class > 3
- Patients judged at the admission not subject to resuscitative measures for severity and comorbidity
- Patients with massive hemorrhage in operative room or in the immediate perioperative with the need for blood transfusions and abundant blood products > 5 units of Erythrocyte Concentrates (EC)
- Patients scheduled for Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (OLT)
- Patients younger than 18 years old
In the definition of ACS, chest pain of suspected coronary origin with or without ST-segment elevation are included. According to the classification accepted by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the serum dosage of cardiac troponins can make the diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
STUDY PROCEDURES Screening and inclusion
At the entrance to the ICU all patients that meet the criteria for inclusion and don't present exclusion criteria - will be evaluated for randomization.
The attending physician will have to notify the coordinating center as soon deemed to have identified a patient to be enrolled. The coordinating center is at the Intensive Care Unit of the University Hospital of Modena.
Randomization must be done at the time of admission to ICU.
The method of randomization will be by "parallel group", the type of simple randomization and the randomization list will be obtained through the use of a random number generator computerized in a 1:1 ratio. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria are assigned over the telephone by medical coordinator:
- or to the group receiving volemic standard treatment (conventional)
- or to the group receiving volemic small treatment (restrictive) The contact number for randomization is always 0594224896
Group "conventional"
Goals of the treatment:
- arterial pressure mean ≥ 65 mmHg or equal to the pre-operative
- diuretic rhythm ≥ 1 ml / Kg / h
- venous saturation in vena cava ≥ 70% or mixed venous saturation as Swan Ganz's catheter (SG) ≥ 65%
- base excess (BE) > - 3
- Central Venous Pression (PVC) ≥ 8 mmHg; for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, this limit may be raised to 12-15 mmHg.
To achieve the therapeutic goals set out above will be executed a volemic fill until reaching central venous pressure values of 8-10 mmHg. Crystalloid solutions and specifically balanced III, Ringer solutions or alternatively glucose solution will be infused at 5% in patients with serum sodium ≥ 145 milliequivalent (mEq) / L.
For this group of patients, the overall water balance won't be binding. If after proper filling the targets aren't yet achieved, the patient will begin infusion of vasoactive drugs following the practice of department.
If you are unable to get a goal value of venous saturation you can consider:
- The chance to infuse additional volumes of fluids
- the chance to transfuse concentrate red blood cells
- The chance to infuse dobutamine up to 20 microg / kg / min
Group "restrictive"
Goals of the treatment:
- arterial pressure mean ≥ 60 mmHg or ≥ 10% less than the preoperative values
- diuretic rhythm ≥ 0.5 ml / kg / h
- venous saturation in vena cava ≥ 60% or mixed venous saturation ≥ 55% by SG
- BE> - 5
- PVC goal not necessary
To achieve the therapeutic goals set out above will be executed a volemic fill up to values of PVC ≤ 5 mmHg or at maximum values of 2 mmHg more the incoming If after proper filling the targets aren't yet achieved, the patient will begin infusion of vasoactive drugs following the practice of department. If after 12 hours of admission the water balance will be > 10-15 ml / kg / h an infusion of furosemide should be initiated in order to bring the budget of the patient to 10-15 ml / kg in 24 hours.
DATA COLLECTION Data Collection Program
Data collection will be done by compiling data collection forms. In particular, the following types of data collection formats will be filled:
- basal and randomization card (Record Form 1)
- card to 6 hours after randomization (Record Form 2)
- 24 hours card (Record Form 3)
- daily continuation card (as long as the patient is admitted to Post Operative Intensive Therapy, Record Form 4)
- Conclusion card (Record Form 5)
The basal card will contain:
- patient's personal details
- information according with remote and proximal medical history
- patient's vital parameters
- patient's therapy
The final board will collect data until it will be verified:
- patient's discharge from the hospital
- thirtieth day of hospitalization
- patient's death
END POINT / VARIABLE RESPONSE
Study end point:
- Primary: Mortality at 30 days
- Secondary:
- Number of surgical complications (anastomotic dehiscences, need for re-operation, need for percutaneous drainages of evacuation, the development of abdominal hypertension).
- Occurrence of acute respiratory failure identified with respiratory exchanges with values of P / F less than 300 mmHg
- Occurrence of lack of circulation with the use of vasoactive amines in the post-operative
- Occurrence of acute renal failure (number of extracorporeal treatments and / or serum creatinine ≥ 1.9 mg / dl)
- Occurrence of hepatic insufficiency with serum total bilirubin values greater than 2.0 mg / dl
- Days of mechanical ventilation
- Days of ICU staying
In the definition of surgical complications all the following situations are included:
- anastomotic dehiscences
- the need for reoperation
- the need to place percutaneous drainages of evacuation
- wound infection that requires surgical toilet or with microbiological samples positive
The accepted definition of abdominal hypertension is hypertension of the abdominal cavity of retroperitoneal, intraperitoneal or parietal origin. The measurement system accepted in the study is exclusively that one of the intravesical bladder catheterization. The values considered as reference are:
- mild abdominal hypertension: 10-20 mmHg
- moderate abdominal hypertension: 20-40 mmHg
- severe abdominal hypertension: > 40 mmHg The numeric variables which indicate organ failure shall be guided by the SOFA score for severity score ≥ 2. In extracorporeal treatments hemo-filtration sessions with both intermittent and continuous methods are considered.
SIZE OF THE STUDY AND DATA ANALYSIS CRITERIA This is a phase II study, which is exploratory and estimative and that involves randomization of all recruitable patients during the period of study all over the three centers involved in the work. The study will begin on January 2010 and will last for 3 years. The sample size has been calculated on the basis of the available data at the Post-Operative Intensive Care Unit of the Hospital in 2007: these data showed a mortality of the patients with acute abdomen undergoing abdominal surgery under emergency and presenting at the moment of arrival to Post Operative Intensive Therapy at least a sign of hypoperfusion of 30%. Assuming a two-tailed alpha level <0.05 and a power of 80%, we have calculated that 100 patients per arm are needed to detect an absolute reduction in mortality of 15%. This reduction appears to be significant from the clinical point of view considering previous trials of fluidic therapy in shocked patients . For comparisons between the means, the t-student test will be used. For comparison of events frequencies the χ2 test or Fisher's test - as indicated - will be used. A p <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Static analysis will be performed using version 16.0 of SPSS software.
- Conditions
- Acute Abdomen
- Being tested
- Standard fluidic resuscitation., Volemic small treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Abdomen, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard fluidic resuscitation.Other
Goals:
- arterial pressure mean ≥ 65 mmHg or equal to the pre-operative
- diuretic rhythm ≥ 1 ml / Kg / h
- venous saturation in vena cava ≥ 70% or mixed venous saturation as Swan Ganz's catheter (SG) ≥ 65%
- BE> - 3
- Central Venous Pression (PVC) ≥ 8 mmHg; for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, this limit may be raised to 12-15 mmHg.
Volemic small treatmentOther
Goals of the treatment:
- arterial pressure mean ≥ 60 mmHg or ≥ 10% less than the preoperative values
- diuretic rhythm ≥ 0.5 ml / kg / h
- venous saturation in vena cava ≥ 60% or mixed venous saturation ≥ 55% by SG
- BE> - 5
- PVC goal not necessary
To achieve the therapeutic goals set out above will be executed a volemic fill up to values of PVC ≤ 5 mmHg or at maximum values of 2 mmHg more the incoming If after proper filling the targets aren't yet achieved, the patient will begin infusion of vasoactive drugs following the practice of department. If after 12 hours of admission the water balance will be > 10-15 ml / kg / h an infusion of furosemide should be initiated
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Group | Active comparator | In this group patients receive volemic standard treatment (conventional) Receives: Other: Standard fluidic resuscitation. |
| Restrictive Group | Active comparator | In this group patients receive volemic small treatment (restrictive) Receives: Other: Volemic small treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of 30-day mortality.
The purpose of this work is to evaluate the clinical changes determined by a different volemic strategy.
Measured: within the first 30 days after surgery
Secondary outcomes (4)
differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of surgical complications
Measured: within the forst 30 days after surgery
differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of occurrence of organ failure,
Measured: within the first 30 days after surgery
differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation
Measured: within the first 30 days after surgery
differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of length of stay in ICU
Measured: within 6 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2010
- Primary completionJan 2013
- Study completionJul 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute AbdomenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 99 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Emanuela Biagioni, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena
- Investigators
- Massimo Girardis, Professor, Study chair, Azienda Ospedalier Universitaria di Modena
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01911702
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AOModena
- Status last verified
- Jul 2013
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Streat SJ, Plank LD, Hill GL. Overview of modern management of patients with critical injury and severe sepsis. World J Surg. 2000 Jun;24(6):655-63. doi: 10.1007/s002689910107.
PubMed 10773117Raymond DP, Pelletier SJ, Crabtree TD, Schulman AM, Pruett TL, Sawyer RG. Surgical infection and the aging population. Am Surg. 2001 Sep;67(9):827-32; discussion 832-3.
PubMed 11565758Farinas-Alvarez C, Farinas MC, Fernandez-Mazarrasa C, Llorca J, Casanova D, Delgado-Rodriguez M. Analysis of risk factors for nosocomial sepsis in surgical patients. Br J Surg. 2000 Aug;87(8):1076-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01466.x.
PubMed 10931054Stafford RE, Weigelt JA. Surgical infections in the critically ill. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002 Oct;8(5):449-52. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200210000-00013.
PubMed 12357114Madigan MC, Kemp CD, Johnson JC, Cotton BA. Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome after severe extremity injury: are early, aggressive fluid resuscitation strategies to blame? J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2):280-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181622bb6.
PubMed 18301187Cotton BA, Guy JS, Morris JA Jr, Abumrad NN. The cellular, metabolic, and systemic consequences of aggressive fluid resuscitation strategies. Shock. 2006 Aug;26(2):115-21. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000209564.84822.f2.
PubMed 16878017Marshall JC, Innes M. Intensive care unit management of intra-abdominal infection. Crit Care Med. 2003 Aug;31(8):2228-37. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000087326.59341.51.
PubMed 12973184Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL; International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee; American Association of Critical-Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Critical Care Society; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; European Respiratory Society; International Sepsis Forum; Japanese Association for Acute Medicine; Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Hospital Medicine; Surgical Infection Society; World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.
PubMed 18158437
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MANAGEMENT OF THE PATIENT WITH ACUTE ABDOMEN SUBMITTED TO URGENT ABDOMINAL SURGERY: a Pilot Randomized Multicentre Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01911702
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AOModena
- Conditions
- Acute Abdomen
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 99 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di ModenaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute abdomen is the clinical manifestation of irritation of the peritoneum, due to intra-abdominal generalized infection. With the exception of the primary ones which are the result of a bacterial translocation from the gastro-intestinal tract or an abdominal contamination for hematogenous way sometimes treatable with medical therapy alone, peritonitis represents a complex condition that requires an early surgical treatment.
Mortality linked to the peritonitis is extremely high and variable between 42% and 80% when associated with a systemic framework of severe sepsis. This variability is linked to a number of risk factors, including advanced age of the patients, the presence of comorbidity, male sex, a poor nutritional status, and a number of re-operations; as well as specific characteristics related to the type of infection, the timing of surgery, the beginning of an appropriate and early antibiotic therapy.The post-operative treatment of the patient with peritonitis significantly affects the outcome of the same. The presence of peritonitis and then the seizure of large volumes of liquids and the possible state of systemic vasodilation induced by the infectious process, provide a framework of hypovolemia. There is a literature that identifies in abdominal trauma damage patient's volemic aggressive resuscitation an element of pejorative outcomes. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the clinical changes determined by a different volemic strategy.
Detailed description
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY AND SURGICAL SPECIALITIES SERVICE OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
Head: Prof. M. Girardis
MANAGEMENT OF THE PATIENT WITH ACUTE ABDOMEN SUBMITTED TO URGENT ABDOMINAL SURGERY: pilot study randomized multicentre
INTRODUCTION Acute abdomen is the clinical manifestation of irritation of the peritoneum, due to intra-abdominal generalized infection. Mortality linked to the peritonitis is extremely high and variable between 42% and 80% when associated with a systemic framework of severe sepsis. This variability is linked to a number of risk factors, including advanced age of the patients, the presence of comorbidity, male sex, a poor nutritional status, and a number of reoperations; as well as specific characteristics related to the type of infection, the timing of surgery, the beginning of an appropriate and early antibiotic therapy.
The post-operative treatment of the patient with peritonitis significantly affects the outcome of the same.
The centers involved in the study will be three:
- post operative intensive care unit (ICU) - Modena University Hospital
- reanimation unit - Carpi Hospital
- intensive care unit (ICU) - Modena New Civil Hospital
OBJECTIVES PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of 30-day mortality.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of surgical complications, occurrence of organ failure, duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in ICU. Please refer to Section 6 for the definition of the endpoints / response variables for the secondary goals.
PLAN STUDY Study setting
The study will be conducted at the following facilities:
- post operative intensive care unit (ICU) at Modena University Hospital
- intensive care unit (ICU) at Modena Baggiovara
- reanimation unit at Carpi Inclusion criteria All patients with acute abdomen undergoing abdominal surgery under emergency and presenting on arrival in ICU at least a sign of bad perfusion.
In the definition of acute abdomen, the following frameworks will be included:
- primary peritonitis: bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity by microorganisms starting from extra-peritoneal sites (hematogenous in sepsis / bacteremia, from the female genital tract in the course of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), from the retroperitoneum); translocation of microorganisms through the bowel
- secondary peritonitis: bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity as a result of phlogosis or perforation of the digestive tract or female genital tract:
- acute abdominal infections (appendicitis, diverticulitis, cholecystitis, gallbladder empyema, suppurative cholangitis)
- other diseases (occlusion of the mesenteric, gastric or duodenal ulcer, strangulated hernia or volvulus, colic neoplasia, toxic megacolon, ruptured of intraperitoneal or visceral abscess)
- various intestinal diseases (tuberculosis, typhoid fever, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, infection with Clostridium)
- penetrating and not abdominal trauma (rupture or perforation of a hollow internal organ)
- surgical operation (stomach and duodenum, ileum, colon - rectum, bile - ducts) for dehiscence of anastomosis and / or sutures
- tertiary or relapsing peritonitis, understood as persistent or recurrent peritonitis after apparently adequate medical and surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis
- intestinal ischemia
- pancreatitis with or without evidence of hemorrhagic- necrotic areas
The condition of hypoperfusion is identified by:
- perioperative metabolic acidosis that can not be explained by other morbid conditions
- arterial hypotension with PAM <60 mmHg or less than 15% of the preoperative
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with chronic renal failure already receiving dialysis treatment.
- Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) <12 months and New York Hearth Classification (NHYA ) class > 3
- Patients judged at the admission not subject to resuscitative measures for severity and comorbidity
- Patients with massive hemorrhage in operative room or in the immediate perioperative with the need for blood transfusions and abundant blood products > 5 units of Erythrocyte Concentrates (EC)
- Patients scheduled for Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (OLT)
- Patients younger than 18 years old
In the definition of ACS, chest pain of suspected coronary origin with or without ST-segment elevation are included. According to the classification accepted by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the serum dosage of cardiac troponins can make the diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
STUDY PROCEDURES Screening and inclusion
At the entrance to the ICU all patients that meet the criteria for inclusion and don't present exclusion criteria - will be evaluated for randomization.
The attending physician will have to notify the coordinating center as soon deemed to have identified a patient to be enrolled. The coordinating center is at the Intensive Care Unit of the University Hospital of Modena.
Randomization must be done at the time of admission to ICU.
The method of randomization will be by "parallel group", the type of simple randomization and the randomization list will be obtained through the use of a random number generator computerized in a 1:1 ratio. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria are assigned over the telephone by medical coordinator:
- or to the group receiving volemic standard treatment (conventional)
- or to the group receiving volemic small treatment (restrictive) The contact number for randomization is always 0594224896
Group "conventional"
Goals of the treatment:
- arterial pressure mean ≥ 65 mmHg or equal to the pre-operative
- diuretic rhythm ≥ 1 ml / Kg / h
- venous saturation in vena cava ≥ 70% or mixed venous saturation as Swan Ganz's catheter (SG) ≥ 65%
- base excess (BE) > - 3
- Central Venous Pression (PVC) ≥ 8 mmHg; for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, this limit may be raised to 12-15 mmHg.
To achieve the therapeutic goals set out above will be executed a volemic fill until reaching central venous pressure values of 8-10 mmHg. Crystalloid solutions and specifically balanced III, Ringer solutions or alternatively glucose solution will be infused at 5% in patients with serum sodium ≥ 145 milliequivalent (mEq) / L.
For this group of patients, the overall water balance won't be binding. If after proper filling the targets aren't yet achieved, the patient will begin infusion of vasoactive drugs following the practice of department.
If you are unable to get a goal value of venous saturation you can consider:
- The chance to infuse additional volumes of fluids
- the chance to transfuse concentrate red blood cells
- The chance to infuse dobutamine up to 20 microg / kg / min
Group "restrictive"
Goals of the treatment:
- arterial pressure mean ≥ 60 mmHg or ≥ 10% less than the preoperative values
- diuretic rhythm ≥ 0.5 ml / kg / h
- venous saturation in vena cava ≥ 60% or mixed venous saturation ≥ 55% by SG
- BE> - 5
- PVC goal not necessary
To achieve the therapeutic goals set out above will be executed a volemic fill up to values of PVC ≤ 5 mmHg or at maximum values of 2 mmHg more the incoming If after proper filling the targets aren't yet achieved, the patient will begin infusion of vasoactive drugs following the practice of department. If after 12 hours of admission the water balance will be > 10-15 ml / kg / h an infusion of furosemide should be initiated in order to bring the budget of the patient to 10-15 ml / kg in 24 hours.
DATA COLLECTION Data Collection Program
Data collection will be done by compiling data collection forms. In particular, the following types of data collection formats will be filled:
- basal and randomization card (Record Form 1)
- card to 6 hours after randomization (Record Form 2)
- 24 hours card (Record Form 3)
- daily continuation card (as long as the patient is admitted to Post Operative Intensive Therapy, Record Form 4)
- Conclusion card (Record Form 5)
The basal card will contain:
- patient's personal details
- information according with remote and proximal medical history
- patient's vital parameters
- patient's therapy
The final board will collect data until it will be verified:
- patient's discharge from the hospital
- thirtieth day of hospitalization
- patient's death
END POINT / VARIABLE RESPONSE
Study end point:
- Primary: Mortality at 30 days
- Secondary:
- Number of surgical complications (anastomotic dehiscences, need for re-operation, need for percutaneous drainages of evacuation, the development of abdominal hypertension).
- Occurrence of acute respiratory failure identified with respiratory exchanges with values of P / F less than 300 mmHg
- Occurrence of lack of circulation with the use of vasoactive amines in the post-operative
- Occurrence of acute renal failure (number of extracorporeal treatments and / or serum creatinine ≥ 1.9 mg / dl)
- Occurrence of hepatic insufficiency with serum total bilirubin values greater than 2.0 mg / dl
- Days of mechanical ventilation
- Days of ICU staying
In the definition of surgical complications all the following situations are included:
- anastomotic dehiscences
- the need for reoperation
- the need to place percutaneous drainages of evacuation
- wound infection that requires surgical toilet or with microbiological samples positive
The accepted definition of abdominal hypertension is hypertension of the abdominal cavity of retroperitoneal, intraperitoneal or parietal origin. The measurement system accepted in the study is exclusively that one of the intravesical bladder catheterization. The values considered as reference are:
- mild abdominal hypertension: 10-20 mmHg
- moderate abdominal hypertension: 20-40 mmHg
- severe abdominal hypertension: > 40 mmHg The numeric variables which indicate organ failure shall be guided by the SOFA score for severity score ≥ 2. In extracorporeal treatments hemo-filtration sessions with both intermittent and continuous methods are considered.
SIZE OF THE STUDY AND DATA ANALYSIS CRITERIA This is a phase II study, which is exploratory and estimative and that involves randomization of all recruitable patients during the period of study all over the three centers involved in the work. The study will begin on January 2010 and will last for 3 years. The sample size has been calculated on the basis of the available data at the Post-Operative Intensive Care Unit of the Hospital in 2007: these data showed a mortality of the patients with acute abdomen undergoing abdominal surgery under emergency and presenting at the moment of arrival to Post Operative Intensive Therapy at least a sign of hypoperfusion of 30%. Assuming a two-tailed alpha level <0.05 and a power of 80%, we have calculated that 100 patients per arm are needed to detect an absolute reduction in mortality of 15%. This reduction appears to be significant from the clinical point of view considering previous trials of fluidic therapy in shocked patients . For comparisons between the means, the t-student test will be used. For comparison of events frequencies the χ2 test or Fisher's test - as indicated - will be used. A p <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Static analysis will be performed using version 16.0 of SPSS software.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional Group | Active comparator | Other: Standard fluidic resuscitation.In this group patients receive volemic standard treatment (conventional) |
| Restrictive Group | Active comparator | Other: Volemic small treatmentIn this group patients receive volemic small treatment (restrictive) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients with acute abdomen undergoing abdominal surgery under emergency and presenting on arrival in ICU at least a sign of bad perfusion.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with chronic renal failure already receiving dialysis treatment
- Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) <12 months and New York Hearth Classification (NHYA ) class > 3
- Patients judged at the admission not subject to resuscitative measures for severity and comorbidity
- Patients with massive hemorrhage in operative room or in the immediate perioperative with the need for blood transfusions and abundant blood products > 5 units of Erytrocyte Concentrates (EC)
- Patients scheduled for Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (OLT)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard fluidic resuscitation.Goals: 1. arterial pressure mean ≥ 65 mmHg or equal to the pre-operative 2. diuretic rhythm ≥ 1 ml / Kg / h 3. venous saturation in vena cava ≥ 70% or mixed venous saturation as Swan Ganz's catheter (SG) ≥ 65% 4. BE> - 3 5. Central Venous Pression (PVC) ≥ 8 mmHg; for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, this limit may be raised to 12-15 mmHg. | Other | Conventional Group |
| Volemic small treatmentGoals of the treatment: 1. arterial pressure mean ≥ 60 mmHg or ≥ 10% less than the preoperative values 2. diuretic rhythm ≥ 0.5 ml / kg / h 3. venous saturation in vena cava ≥ 60% or mixed venous saturation ≥ 55% by SG 4. BE> - 5 5. PVC goal not necessary To achieve the therapeutic goals set out above will be executed a volemic fill up to values of PVC ≤ 5 mmHg or at maximum values of 2 mmHg more the incoming If after proper filling the targets aren't yet achieved, the patient will begin infusion of vasoactive drugs following the practice of department. If after 12 hours of admission the water balance will be > 10-15 ml / kg / h an infusion of furosemide should be initiated | Other | Restrictive Group |
Primary outcome
differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of 30-day mortality.
Time frame: within the first 30 days after surgery
The purpose of this work is to evaluate the clinical changes determined by a different volemic strategy.
4 secondary outcomes
differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of surgical complications
Time frame: within the forst 30 days after surgery
differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of occurrence of organ failure,
Time frame: within the first 30 days after surgery
differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation
Time frame: within the first 30 days after surgery
differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of length of stay in ICU
Time frame: within 6 months after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2013.
- Background: PubMed 10773117Streat SJ, Plank LD, Hill GL. Overview of modern management of patients with critical injury and severe sepsis. World J Surg. 2000 Jun;24(6):655-63. doi: 10.1007/s002689910107.
- Background: PubMed 11565758Raymond DP, Pelletier SJ, Crabtree TD, Schulman AM, Pruett TL, Sawyer RG. Surgical infection and the aging population. Am Surg. 2001 Sep;67(9):827-32; discussion 832-3.
- Background: PubMed 10931054Farinas-Alvarez C, Farinas MC, Fernandez-Mazarrasa C, Llorca J, Casanova D, Delgado-Rodriguez M. Analysis of risk factors for nosocomial sepsis in surgical patients. Br J Surg. 2000 Aug;87(8):1076-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01466.x.
- Background: PubMed 12357114Stafford RE, Weigelt JA. Surgical infections in the critically ill. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002 Oct;8(5):449-52. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200210000-00013.
- Background: PubMed 18301187Madigan MC, Kemp CD, Johnson JC, Cotton BA. Secondary abdominal compartment syndrome after severe extremity injury: are early, aggressive fluid resuscitation strategies to blame? J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2):280-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181622bb6.
- Background: PubMed 16878017Cotton BA, Guy JS, Morris JA Jr, Abumrad NN. The cellular, metabolic, and systemic consequences of aggressive fluid resuscitation strategies. Shock. 2006 Aug;26(2):115-21. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000209564.84822.f2.
- Background: PubMed 12973184Marshall JC, Innes M. Intensive care unit management of intra-abdominal infection. Crit Care Med. 2003 Aug;31(8):2228-37. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000087326.59341.51.
- Background: PubMed 18158437Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL; International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee; American Association of Critical-Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Critical Care Society; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; European Respiratory Society; International Sepsis Forum; Japanese Association for Acute Medicine; Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Hospital Medicine; Surgical Infection Society; World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.
Related trials for Acute Abdomen
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
RecruitingObservational study
AIDE: Decision Support for Anastomosis or Colostomy in Emergency Surgery for Complicated Acute Diverticulitis
Complicated Diverticulitis, Acute Diverticulitis
Active, not recruiting
Influence of FreeO2 on Percentage of Time Within Oxygen Saturation Target Using Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for Patients Admitted for AECOPD or Bariatric Surgery
COPD Exacerbation, Oxygen Toxicity
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar ESP Block Versus TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia, Postoperative Pain
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Intestinal Obstruction Surgery. Acute Abdominal Pathology. №9:05/05/2026
Small Bowel Adhesion, Obstruction Bowel
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Massimo Girardis, Professor study chair
Azienda Ospedalier Universitaria di Modena
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Standard fluidic resuscitation. and Volemic small treatment in people with Acute Abdomen, run by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
differences between the two treatment groups with different fluidic strategy in terms of 30-day mortality. (time frame: within the first 30 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01911702, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2013.