Spinal Compression FractureNCT01913587
Efficacy Study of Acupuncture on Spinal Compression Fracture
A study testing Acupuncture and Nerve block in people with Spinal Compression Fracture, run by Daegu Catholic University Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
This study is to investigate the effectiveness of acupuncture for alleviating pain from Spinal Compression Fracture in Patients Treated with Nerve Block. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Compression Fracture
- What is being tested?
- Acupuncture and Nerve block
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Vertebral compression fracture by trauma or osteoporosis
- Minimum 15% height loss of vertebrae
- Patient diagnosed with x-ray or computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance image (MRI)
- Visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 5 or more
- Age over 50
- 2 weeks from onset or more
- Follow-up possible during the clinical trial
- Written informed consent voluntarily
Who cannot join
- Within 2 weeks from onset
- Pathological fracture due to malignancy/myeloma, osteomyelitis
- Major retropulsion of bony segments into the spinal canal
- Bone metabolic disease
- Significant renal or hepatic disease
- Hypersensitive reaction to acupuncture treatment
- Senile dementia, impaired cognitive function or other cerebral disease, severe psychiatric or psychological disorders
- Alcohol/drug abuse
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
Daegu, Kyungsangbukdo
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture on Spinal Compression Fracture in Patients Treated With Nerve Block
This study is to investigate the effectiveness of acupuncture for alleviating pain from Spinal Compression Fracture in Patients Treated with Nerve Block.
Read the detailed description
Spinal compression fracture is mainly caused by trauma, furthermore, in old age, osteoporosis increases the risk of spinal compression fracture. Nerve block is effective for the management of pain from inflammation or nerve root stimulation from spinal compression fracture. As one of alternative interventions, acupuncture is effective for controlling spinal compression fracture.
This study aims to investigate that combination with acupuncture and nerve block may relieve spinal compression fracture-related pain versus nerve block alone.
- Conditions
- Spinal Compression Fracture
- Being tested
- Acupuncture, Nerve block
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AcupunctureDevice
Acupuncture points are ST36, GB34 (bilateral), BL60 (bilateral), BL40 (bilateral), and 2 Back-su points (bilateral). Back-su points are selected as close as possible to pain region. Electroacupuncture will be performed at only 2 Back-su points (bilateral).
Nerve blockProcedure or surgery
Epidural nerve block uses the mixture (10ml) of dexamethasone (10 mg) and bupivacaine (10 mg) dissolved in saline solution. Medial branch block uses mepivacaine (10 mg).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture & Nerve block | Experimental | Acupuncture will be performed 3 times per week, total 9 sessions, during 3 weeks. Epidural nerve block and medial branch block will be performed once per week, total 3 sessions, during 3 weeks. Receives: Device: Acupuncture; Procedure: Nerve block |
| Nerve block | Active comparator | Epidural nerve block and medial branch block will be performed once per week, total 3 sessions, during 3 weeks. Receives: Procedure: Nerve block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
The patients will be required to document 100mm pain VAS, where '0' represents 'no pain' and '100', 'unbearable pain'. The change of pain will be reported by comparing the mean VAS before treatment, after 3 week, and 5 week (2 weeks follow-up).
Measured: Change from baseline to 5 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Short form McGill pain questionnaire
Evaluation will performed before treatment, after 3 week, and 5 week (2 weeks follow-up).
Measured: Change from baseline to 5 weeks
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Evaluation will be performed before treatment, after 3 week, and 5 week (2 weeks follow-up).
Measured: Change from baseline to 5 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionMar 2014
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Compression FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jin Yong Jung, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
- Investigators
- Jeong-Chul Seo, KMD, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Comprehensive and Intergrative Medicine InstituteMin-Ah Gwak, KMD, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Daegu Oriental Hospital of Daegu Haany UniversitySeong-Hoon Park, KMD, Principal investigator, Comprehensive and Integrative Medicine Insitute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01913587
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIMI-13-01-21
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 22 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture on Spinal Compression Fracture in Patients Treated With Nerve Block
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01913587
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIMI-13-01-21
- Conditions
- Spinal Compression Fracture
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Daegu Catholic University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to investigate the effectiveness of acupuncture for alleviating pain from Spinal Compression Fracture in Patients Treated with Nerve Block.
Detailed description
Spinal compression fracture is mainly caused by trauma, furthermore, in old age, osteoporosis increases the risk of spinal compression fracture. Nerve block is effective for the management of pain from inflammation or nerve root stimulation from spinal compression fracture. As one of alternative interventions, acupuncture is effective for controlling spinal compression fracture.
This study aims to investigate that combination with acupuncture and nerve block may relieve spinal compression fracture-related pain versus nerve block alone.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture & Nerve block | Experimental | Device: Acupuncture, Procedure: Nerve blockAcupuncture will be performed 3 times per week, total 9 sessions, during 3 weeks. Epidural nerve block and medial branch block will be performed once per week, total 3 sessions, during 3 weeks. |
| Nerve block | Active comparator | Procedure: Nerve blockEpidural nerve block and medial branch block will be performed once per week, total 3 sessions, during 3 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Vertebral compression fracture by trauma or osteoporosis
- Minimum 15% height loss of vertebrae
- Patient diagnosed with x-ray or computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance image (MRI)
- Visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 5 or more
- Age over 50
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Within 2 weeks from onset
- Pathological fracture due to malignancy/myeloma, osteomyelitis
- Major retropulsion of bony segments into the spinal canal
- Bone metabolic disease
- Significant renal or hepatic disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AcupunctureAcupuncture points are ST36, GB34 (bilateral), BL60 (bilateral), BL40 (bilateral), and 2 Back-su points (bilateral). Back-su points are selected as close as possible to pain region. Electroacupuncture will be performed at only 2 Back-su points (bilateral). | Device | Acupuncture & Nerve block |
| Nerve blockEpidural nerve block uses the mixture (10ml) of dexamethasone (10 mg) and bupivacaine (10 mg) dissolved in saline solution. Medial branch block uses mepivacaine (10 mg). | Procedure or surgery | Acupuncture & Nerve block, Nerve block |
Primary outcome
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 5 weeks
The patients will be required to document 100mm pain VAS, where '0' represents 'no pain' and '100', 'unbearable pain'. The change of pain will be reported by comparing the mean VAS before treatment, after 3 week, and 5 week (2 weeks follow-up).
2 secondary outcomes
Short form McGill pain questionnaire
Time frame: Change from baseline to 5 weeks
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time frame: Change from baseline to 5 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Dec 2021.
Related trials for Spinal Compression Fracture
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Trial of Combined Radiotherapy and Vertebroplasty for Patients With Painful Metastatic Spinal Lesions
Spinal Metastases
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Evaluation of Therapeutic Combination in Treating Vertebral Compression Fractures
Vertebral Compression Fractures, Pathological Fracture
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Cement Augmentation in Preventing Vertebral Body Compression Fracture Following Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Solid Tumors and Spinal Metastases
Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Spine, Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Active, not recruiting
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Bone Pain Study
Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Anemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeong-Chul Seo, KMD, Ph.D principal investigator
Comprehensive and Intergrative Medicine Institute
Min-Ah Gwak, KMD, Ph.D principal investigator
Daegu Oriental Hospital of Daegu Haany University
Seong-Hoon Park, KMD principal investigator
Comprehensive and Integrative Medicine Insitute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Acupuncture and Nerve block in people with Spinal Compression Fracture, run by Daegu Catholic University Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual analogue scale (VAS) (time frame: Change from baseline to 5 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2021.