AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Transplant RecipientsNCT01914406

High-intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Heart Transplant Recipients.

A study testing high intense interval training and continuous moderate training in people with Heart Transplant Recipients, run by Bispebjerg Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of high intensity aerobic interval training (AIT) versus moderate continuous training (CON) in heart transplant recipients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Heart Transplant Recipients
What is being tested?
high intense interval training and continuous moderate training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Jan 2011to Oct 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • -stable Heart transplant recipients > 12 month or more after HTx, age > 18 years,< 80. willing and capable of giving written informed consent for study participation.

Who cannot join

  • unstable condition postoperative complications, recent severe rejection episodes (>H1R < 3 month), re-transplantation or multi-organtransplantation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Cardiac Rehabilitation, Bispebjerg University Hospital

    Copenhagen, 2400

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: High-intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Heart Transplant Recipients With Impaired Chronotropic Response: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of high intensity aerobic interval training (AIT) versus moderate continuous training (CON) in heart transplant recipients.

Read the detailed description

Clinically stable heart transplant recipients > 12 month or more after HTx, age > 18 years, willing and capable of giving written informed consent for study participation and anticipated to be able to participate in the study for 12 months were included from the Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital.

Patients were excluded due to unstable condition or postoperative complications, recent severe rejection episodes (>H1R < 3 month), physical disabilities which prevent participation and re-transplantation or multi-organtransplantation.

Being tested
high intense interval training, continuous moderate training
Keywords
Heart transplant recipients, Exercise capacity, endothelial function, Quality of life

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • high intense interval trainingOther

    Each AIT session consisted a 10 minute warm-up period followed by 16 minutes of interval training consisting of intervals of 4-3-2 and 1 minutes duration at 85-95% of their peak capacity separated by 2-4 min active rest.

  • continuous moderate trainingOther

    Continued exercise 45 min.

Study groups in NCT01914406
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
high intense interval trainingOtherEach AIT session consisted a 10 minute warm-up period followed by 16 minutes of interval training consisting of intervals of 4-3-2 and 1 minutes duration at 85-95% of their peak capacity separated by 2-4 min active rest.
Receives: Other: high intense interval training
continuous moderate trainingActive comparatorContinued exercise 45 min.
Receives: Other: continuous moderate training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. VO2peak

    baseline test before randomization

    1. follow-up after 12 weeks of exercise
    2. follow-up after 5 month washout.
    3. follow-up after second 12 weeks period of exercise.

    Measured: baseline test (inclusion), follow-up 1(3 month), follow-up 2 (8 month), follow-up 3 (11 month).

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Endothelial function (endoPAT)

    After the release of the cuff the hyperemic response was recorded and the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) was calculated automatic independent of operator. (endoPAT)

    Measured: baseline test (inclusion), follow-up 1(3 month), follow-up 2 (8 month), follow-up 3 (11 month).

  2. Quality of Life (QoL)SF-36

    SF-36, information on Quality of Life

    Measured: baseline test (inclusion), follow-up 1(3 month), follow-up 2 (8 month), follow-up 3 (11 month).

  3. HADS-a, HADS-d anxiety and depression

    Symptoms of anxiety and depression measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

    Measured: baseline test (inclusion), follow-up 1(3 month), follow-up 2 (8 month), follow-up 3 (11 month).

  4. Bloodsamples/biomarkers.

    Samples cooled on ice, centrifuged for 10 minutes and the plasma transferred to microtubes and stored at -80°C. Biomarkers analysed at department of biomedicine at University of Copenhagen.

    Measured: baseline test (inclusion), follow-up 1(3 month), follow-up 2 (8 month), follow-up 3 (11 month).

  5. augmentation index (AI), endoPAT

    Augmentation index (AI)derived from pulse wave analyses and is a measure of arterial stiffness, (EndoPAT).

    Measured: baseline test (inclusion), follow-up 1(3 month), follow-up 2 (8 month), follow-up 3 (11 month).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2011
  3. Primary completionOct 2013
  4. Study completionOct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01914406
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-3-2010 030
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
25 Jul 2013
Last updated
24 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing high intense interval training and continuous moderate training in people with Heart Transplant Recipients, run by Bispebjerg Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

VO2peak (time frame: baseline test (inclusion), follow-up 1(3 month), follow-up 2 (8 month), follow-up 3 (11 month).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Oct 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in