Need Tracheal IntubationPhase 2NCT01914601
King Vision and Cervical Spines Movement
A Phase 2 study testing Macintosh-King Vision and King Vision-Macintosh in people with Need Tracheal Intubation, run by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Extensive cervical spines movement during endotracheal intubation can result in serious neurological injury, especially in the patients with unrecognized cervical spines injury.[1-2] Moreover, direct laryngoscopy may be difficult if spine movement is limited because of arthritis, disc disease or a small gap between… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Need Tracheal Intubation
- What is being tested?
- Macintosh-King Vision and King Vision-Macintosh
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Sixteen American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I-II
- aged 18-65 years
- scheduled for elective minor surgery
- under general anesthesia
Who cannot join
- predicted or known difficult airway
- history of cervical spine injury
- history of cervical spine surgery
- previous oral surgery
- previous throat surgery
- previous neck surgery
Show all 12Show fewer
- gastro-esophageal reflux disease
- need for rapid sequence induction
- emergent surgery
- pregnancy
- body mass index higher than 35 kg/m2
- without incisor teeth
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
Egypt1 site
Mansoura University Hospitals
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 050
Saudi Arabia1 site
King Fahd Hospital of Dammam University
Khobar, Eastern Province, 31592
About this study
Official title: Does King Vision® Videolaryngoscope Reduce Cervical Spine Motion During Endotracheal Intubation? A Cross-over Study.
Extensive cervical spines movement during endotracheal intubation can result in serious neurological injury, especially in the patients with unrecognized cervical spines injury.[1-2] Moreover, direct laryngoscopy may be difficult if spine movement is limited because of arthritis, disc disease or a small gap between the occiput and the spinous process of the atlas.[3-4]
Video laryngoscopes allow for intubation without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes which minimize the cervical movements, especially in the patients with restricted cervical movements. [5,6] Compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, the use of AirWay Scope decreases median upper cervical-spine movement during intubation under in-line stabilization in patients with normal cervical-spine. [6] Unfortunately, the use video laryngoscopes are associated with longer times to tracheal intubation compared with the traditional techniques which may be attributed to the variable learning curves of the practitioners. [7-9]
Read more
The King Vision video laryngoscope® (King Systems Company, a division of Consort Medical, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) is an anatomically shaped, rigid laryngoscope that uses fiberoptic technology to view the larynx with micro camera offers a 160 degree of view potentially eliminating the need for neck flexion and head extension. [10]
To the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no study has evaluated the King vision laryngoscope regarding the neck movement during routine tracheal intubation under general anesthesia.
Read the detailed description
Hypothesis:
The investigators hypothesize that the use of King Vision video laryngoscope may reduce the cervical spines movements during endotracheal intubation compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Aim of the study:
The present clinical trial aims to compare the effects of the Macintosh and King Vision laryngoscopes, on cervical spines movement, time to intubation, laryngoscopic view, ease of intubation, number of intubation attempts, and number of optimization maneuvers during tracheal intubation, in the patients undergoing minor elective surgery under propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium anesthesia.
Methods:
Thirty two ASA I-II patients who need tracheal intubation will be included in this randomized cross-over controlled blind comparative study at the author's center after obtaining approval of the local Ethical Committee and an informed written consent from all participants.
The Mallampati airway score, thyromental and sternomental distances, neck extension, and the degree of mouth opening will be evaluated preoperatively as factors predicting difficult intubation.
Sample size calculation:
A priori power analysis of the previous published data [9] showed that the investigators will need to study 14 pairs to detect a 10% difference in the cervical spine extension (occiput-C5) values (25.9 degrees) with a SD of 2.8 degrees, after intubation with of Macintosh laryngoscope, a type-I error of 0.05 and a power of 90%. The investigators will add 10% more patients for a final sample size of 32 patients to account for patients dropping out during the study.
Anesthesia:
Patients will be placed on the operating room table with a rigid board from the shoulders to the occiput with the patient's head rested on a pillow in a position judged by the patient to be neutral. After verification that the patient will be properly centered, the fluoroscopy unit and operating room table will remain fixed for the rest of the study.
Patients' monitoring includes pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure electrocardiography, state and response Entropy (SE and RE) and train of four (TOF)stimulation of the ulnar nerve.
Anesthetic technique will be standardized in all studied. After breathing 100% oxygen for 3 min through a facemask in a neutral position, anesthesia will be induced with fentanyl 2-3µg/kg/min and propofol 2-3 mg/kg to achieve a SE < 50 and the difference between RE and SE less than 10. Rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg will be administered for complete relaxation on the TOF (TOF-GE, Datex-Ohmeda Division, Instrumentarium Corporation, Helsinki, Finland). Anesthesia will be maintained using sevoflurane end-tidal concentrations of 2.5-3.5% in oxygen via a bag-mask for 3 min before endotracheal intubation.
Standard precautions against radiation exposure will be taken, movement of the cervical spines during endotracheal intubation will be studied and recorded with portable X-ray machine. Laryngoscopy will be performed twice, once with the King Vision and once with the Macintosh laryngoscope in random order. For the first device, the patient's mouth will be opened and the tip of the tracheal tube will be introduced into the glottis. The second device will be studied in an identical manner, and intubation will be completed with the second device. The intubators who will participate in the study will receive a standard manikin based training which will be followed with 50 successful endotracheal intubations in the clinical practice with the use of Macintosh and King Vision® laryngoscopes.
The studied data during intubation will be collected by an independent investigator. The intubator will attempt to minimize neck movement during both techniques through the acceptance of the first view [8] that will offer a reasonable opportunity to adequately position the tracheal tube at the glottis opening.
Three lateral radiographs will be taken with a portable X-ray system provides fixed images from which hard copies are generated. Patient will be served as their own control with reference to the first image, which will be obtained after induction of anesthesia before laryngoscopy and intubation, with the patient in neutral position. A further two images, one with the Macintosh and one with King Vision laryngoscopes. These images will be taken at the time of laryngeal exposure, with the tip of the endotracheal tube passing between the vocal cords.
On each image, lines will be drawn to mark the relative position of the occiput, atlas (C1), axis (C2) and the fifth cervical vertebra (C5). The angle between each of these lines will be measured to determine the degree of angulation of C1, C2 and C5 relative to the occiput and each other. [9] The radiographs will be reviewed by a radiology consultant who will be blinded to the order of intubation technique and unfamiliar with the laryngoscopes being used.
Statistical Analysis
Data will be tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Fisher exact test will be used for categorical data. Repeated two-way ANOVA and paired t-test will be used to study the changes in the primary and secondary endpoints during each intervention. The Wilcoxon 2 rank sum test will be used for the non-parametric values. The investigators will avoid the carryover effect (persistence of the effect of the first intervention on the operative conditions into the second period) through the comparison of the effects of period (time effect) and the order of treatment using independent t-tests. Data will be expressed as mean ± SD, number (%), or median [range]. A value of P < 0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Need Tracheal Intubation
- Being tested
- Macintosh-King Vision, King Vision-Macintosh
- Keywords
- Laryngoscope, Macintosh, King Vision, tracheal intubation, cervical spines
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Macintosh-King VisionDevice
laryngoscopy will be performed with the Macintosh followed by the King Vision laryngoscope
King Vision-MacintoshDevice
laryngoscopy will be performed with the King Vision followed by the Macintosh laryngoscope.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Macintosh-King Vision | Active comparator | laryngoscopy will be performed with the Macintosh followed by the King Vision laryngoscope Receives: Device: Macintosh-King Vision |
| King Vision-Macintosh | Active comparator | laryngoscopy will be performed with the King Vision followed by the Macintosh laryngoscope. Receives: Device: King Vision-Macintosh |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
cervical spine movement
cervical spine movement during tracheal intubation
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of tracheal intubation, an expected average of 60 seconds
Secondary outcomes (5)
time to intubation
the time when the investigated laryngoscope passes the central incisors to the time when the tip of the tracheal tube passed through the glottis
Measured: participants will be followed for the duration of tracheal intubation, an expected average of 60 seconds
laryngoscopic view
The glottic view during laryngoscopy will be assessed according to the Cormack-Lehane grading system: Grade 1, full view; Grade 2, only arytenoid cartilages visible; Grade 3, only epiglottis visible; and Grade 4, epiglottis not visible
Measured: participants will be followed for the duration of laryngoscopy, an expected average of 90 seconds
ease of intubation
rate the ease of intubation using a 100 mm visual analog scale (0 for much of ease and 100 for extremely difficult).
Measured: participants will be followed for the duration of tracheal intubation, an expected average of 60 seconds
number of intubation attempts
Measured: participants will be followed for the duration of tracheal intubation, an expected average of 60 seconds
number of optimization maneuvers
Measured: participants will be followed for the duration of laryngoscopy, an expected average of 90 seconds
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionJan 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Need Tracheal IntubationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mansoura University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Abdulmohsen Al Ghamdi, MD, Principal investigator, Associate Professor/Chairman of AnesthesiologyMohamed R El Tahan, MD, Study director, Associate Professor of AnesthesiologyAlaa M Khidr, MD, Study chair, Assistant Professor of AnesthesiologyAbdullah s Al Mulhim, MD, Study chair, Demonstrator of RadiologySamah A El Kenany, MD, Study chair, Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Mansoura University, Egypt
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01914601
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KFHU-FBR 0040, MU-R/15.11.04
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 28 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does King Vision® Videolaryngoscope Reduce Cervical Spine Motion During Endotracheal Intubation? A Cross-over Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01914601
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KFHU-FBR 0040, MU-R/15.11.04
- Conditions
- Need Tracheal Intubation
- Keywords
- Laryngoscope, Macintosh, King Vision, tracheal intubation, cervical spines
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mansoura University
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Extensive cervical spines movement during endotracheal intubation can result in serious neurological injury, especially in the patients with unrecognized cervical spines injury.[1-2] Moreover, direct laryngoscopy may be difficult if spine movement is limited because of arthritis, disc disease or a small gap between the occiput and the spinous process of the atlas.[3-4]
Video laryngoscopes allow for intubation without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes which minimize the cervical movements, especially in the patients with restricted cervical movements. [5,6] Compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, the use of AirWay Scope decreases median upper cervical-spine movement during intubation under in-line stabilization in patients with normal cervical-spine. [6] Unfortunately, the use video laryngoscopes are associated with longer times to tracheal intubation compared with the traditional techniques which may be attributed to the variable learning curves of the practitioners. [7-9]
The King Vision video laryngoscope® (King Systems Company, a division of Consort Medical, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) is an anatomically shaped, rigid laryngoscope that uses fiberoptic technology to view the larynx with micro camera offers a 160 degree of view potentially eliminating the need for neck flexion and head extension. [10]
To the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no study has evaluated the King vision laryngoscope regarding the neck movement during routine tracheal intubation under general anesthesia.
Detailed description
Hypothesis:
The investigators hypothesize that the use of King Vision video laryngoscope may reduce the cervical spines movements during endotracheal intubation compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope.
Aim of the study:
The present clinical trial aims to compare the effects of the Macintosh and King Vision laryngoscopes, on cervical spines movement, time to intubation, laryngoscopic view, ease of intubation, number of intubation attempts, and number of optimization maneuvers during tracheal intubation, in the patients undergoing minor elective surgery under propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium anesthesia.
Methods:
Thirty two ASA I-II patients who need tracheal intubation will be included in this randomized cross-over controlled blind comparative study at the author's center after obtaining approval of the local Ethical Committee and an informed written consent from all participants.
The Mallampati airway score, thyromental and sternomental distances, neck extension, and the degree of mouth opening will be evaluated preoperatively as factors predicting difficult intubation.
Sample size calculation:
A priori power analysis of the previous published data [9] showed that the investigators will need to study 14 pairs to detect a 10% difference in the cervical spine extension (occiput-C5) values (25.9 degrees) with a SD of 2.8 degrees, after intubation with of Macintosh laryngoscope, a type-I error of 0.05 and a power of 90%. The investigators will add 10% more patients for a final sample size of 32 patients to account for patients dropping out during the study.
Anesthesia:
Patients will be placed on the operating room table with a rigid board from the shoulders to the occiput with the patient's head rested on a pillow in a position judged by the patient to be neutral. After verification that the patient will be properly centered, the fluoroscopy unit and operating room table will remain fixed for the rest of the study.
Patients' monitoring includes pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure electrocardiography, state and response Entropy (SE and RE) and train of four (TOF)stimulation of the ulnar nerve.
Anesthetic technique will be standardized in all studied. After breathing 100% oxygen for 3 min through a facemask in a neutral position, anesthesia will be induced with fentanyl 2-3µg/kg/min and propofol 2-3 mg/kg to achieve a SE < 50 and the difference between RE and SE less than 10. Rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg will be administered for complete relaxation on the TOF (TOF-GE, Datex-Ohmeda Division, Instrumentarium Corporation, Helsinki, Finland). Anesthesia will be maintained using sevoflurane end-tidal concentrations of 2.5-3.5% in oxygen via a bag-mask for 3 min before endotracheal intubation.
Standard precautions against radiation exposure will be taken, movement of the cervical spines during endotracheal intubation will be studied and recorded with portable X-ray machine. Laryngoscopy will be performed twice, once with the King Vision and once with the Macintosh laryngoscope in random order. For the first device, the patient's mouth will be opened and the tip of the tracheal tube will be introduced into the glottis. The second device will be studied in an identical manner, and intubation will be completed with the second device. The intubators who will participate in the study will receive a standard manikin based training which will be followed with 50 successful endotracheal intubations in the clinical practice with the use of Macintosh and King Vision® laryngoscopes.
The studied data during intubation will be collected by an independent investigator. The intubator will attempt to minimize neck movement during both techniques through the acceptance of the first view [8] that will offer a reasonable opportunity to adequately position the tracheal tube at the glottis opening.
Three lateral radiographs will be taken with a portable X-ray system provides fixed images from which hard copies are generated. Patient will be served as their own control with reference to the first image, which will be obtained after induction of anesthesia before laryngoscopy and intubation, with the patient in neutral position. A further two images, one with the Macintosh and one with King Vision laryngoscopes. These images will be taken at the time of laryngeal exposure, with the tip of the endotracheal tube passing between the vocal cords.
On each image, lines will be drawn to mark the relative position of the occiput, atlas (C1), axis (C2) and the fifth cervical vertebra (C5). The angle between each of these lines will be measured to determine the degree of angulation of C1, C2 and C5 relative to the occiput and each other. [9] The radiographs will be reviewed by a radiology consultant who will be blinded to the order of intubation technique and unfamiliar with the laryngoscopes being used.
Statistical Analysis
Data will be tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Fisher exact test will be used for categorical data. Repeated two-way ANOVA and paired t-test will be used to study the changes in the primary and secondary endpoints during each intervention. The Wilcoxon 2 rank sum test will be used for the non-parametric values. The investigators will avoid the carryover effect (persistence of the effect of the first intervention on the operative conditions into the second period) through the comparison of the effects of period (time effect) and the order of treatment using independent t-tests. Data will be expressed as mean ± SD, number (%), or median [range]. A value of P < 0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Macintosh-King Vision | Active comparator | Device: Macintosh-King Visionlaryngoscopy will be performed with the Macintosh followed by the King Vision laryngoscope |
| King Vision-Macintosh | Active comparator | Device: King Vision-Macintoshlaryngoscopy will be performed with the King Vision followed by the Macintosh laryngoscope. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Sixteen American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I-II
- aged 18-65 years
- scheduled for elective minor surgery
- under general anesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- predicted or known difficult airway
- history of cervical spine injury
- history of cervical spine surgery
- previous oral surgery
- previous throat surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Macintosh-King Visionlaryngoscopy will be performed with the Macintosh followed by the King Vision laryngoscope | Device | Macintosh-King Vision |
| King Vision-Macintoshlaryngoscopy will be performed with the King Vision followed by the Macintosh laryngoscope. | Device | King Vision-Macintosh |
Primary outcome
cervical spine movement
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of tracheal intubation, an expected average of 60 seconds
cervical spine movement during tracheal intubation
5 secondary outcomes
time to intubation
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of tracheal intubation, an expected average of 60 seconds
laryngoscopic view
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of laryngoscopy, an expected average of 90 seconds
ease of intubation
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of tracheal intubation, an expected average of 60 seconds
number of intubation attempts
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of tracheal intubation, an expected average of 60 seconds
number of optimization maneuvers
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of laryngoscopy, an expected average of 90 seconds
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2016.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abdulmohsen Al Ghamdi, MD principal investigator
Associate Professor/Chairman of Anesthesiology
Mohamed R El Tahan, MD study director
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Alaa M Khidr, MD study chair
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Macintosh-King Vision and King Vision-Macintosh in people with Need Tracheal Intubation, run by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Egypt, Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
cervical spine movement (time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of tracheal intubation, an expected average of 60 seconds). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2016.