AzTrials
AzTrials

ContraceptionPhase 2NCT01915069

Cilostazol and Its Effects on Resumption of Meiosis in the Human Ovary

A Phase 2 study testing Cilostazol in people with Contraception, run by University of Southern California at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) are the most commonly used hormonal form of birth control in the United States with at least 87% of women of reproductive age reporting oral contraceptive use at some point in their lives (9). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 33 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Contraception
What is being tested?
Cilostazol
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
4 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2013to Aug 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 33 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • previous oocyte donor in USC IVF clinic within past 3 years
  • age 18-33
  • willingness and ability to commit to the time requirements of the study
  • willingness to donate oocytes for research purposes
  • willingness to discontinue current hormonal contraception
  • otherwise healthy subjects

Who cannot join

  • contraindications to combined hormonal contraceptive use (CDC MEC class 3 or 4)
  • pregnancy
  • history of cardiac arrhythmias
  • history of heart failure
  • history of bleeding disorder
  • concomitant use of anti-platelet therapy such as aspirin
  • current use of drugs that inhibit cytochrome P450 CYP 3A4 (erythromycin, diltiazem, ketoconazole, itraconazole) or CYP 2C19 (omeprazole) as they may lead to increased serum levels of cilostazol.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Southern California Fertility Clinic

    Los Angeles, California, 90017

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Cilostazol and Its Effects on Human Oocyte Maturation in Vivo: A Pilot Study

Combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) are the most commonly used hormonal form of birth control in the United States with at least 87% of women of reproductive age reporting oral contraceptive use at some point in their lives (9). Despite their frequent use, the six and twelve month discontinuation rates for oral contraceptive pills are 31 and 47 % respectively (17), with common reasons for discontinuation attributed to the side effects of abnormal bleeding, headache, and weight gain.

Additionally, COCs are contraindicated in certain groups of women as outlined by The Centers for Disease Control Medical Eligibility Criteria (11). Given the high prevalence of oral contraceptive users who commonly discontinue use secondary to side effects or who are not eligible for use as a result of underlying health conditions, the development of novel oral non-hormonal methods that are equally effective at pregnancy prevention are warranted.

Read more

This current study aims to evaluate the effect of an FDA approved drug, Cilostazol, on human oocyte maturation. Such a study has not been conducted to date. If Cilostazol demonstrates an ability in humans to affect resumption of meiosis, then this non-hormonal agent could be uses as a possible contraceptive agent in the future. This knowledge would have profound reproductive health implications.

The investigators propose that women undergoing treatment with the FDA approved dose of 100mg PO every 12 hours of Cilostazol will demonstrate an impairment of egg maturation in comparison to paired historic controls following ovarian follicle stimulation.

Read the detailed description

Combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) are the most commonly used hormonal form of birth control in the United States with at least 87% of women of reproductive age reporting oral contraceptive use at some point in their lives (9). Despite their frequent use, the six and twelve month discontinuation rates for oral contraceptive pills are 31 and 47 % respectively (17), with common reasons for discontinuation attributed to the side effects of abnormal bleeding, headache, and weight gain.

Additionally, COCs are contraindicated in certain groups of women as outlined by The Centers for Disease Control Medical Eligibility Criteria (11). Given the high prevalence of oral contraceptive users who commonly discontinue use secondary to side effects or who are not eligible for use as a result of underlying health conditions, the development of novel oral non-hormonal methods that are equally effective at pregnancy prevention are warranted.

The potential for the development of non-hormonal contraception has been present in the scientific literature since the 1980s at which point the critical components of gametogenesis of the mammalian oocyte were being classified. Bornslaeger and colleagues discovered that high concentrations of intracellular cAMP, an important second messenger for many biological processes, inhibited resumption of meiosis I in mouse oocytes (3). Later studies demonstrated that phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitors, capable of preventing the breakdown of cAMP, were able to prevent resumption of meiosis in mouse oocytes cultured in vitro (6).

Since the 1980s, additional studies have examined phosphodiesterase inhibitors and their role in prevention of oocyte maturation. Tsafriri and colleagues showed that phosphodiesterase inhibitors were able to exert their effects selectively via type specific isoforms. This study revealed that granulosa cells exert effects via type 4 phosphodiesterase inhibitors and oocytes respond to signals via type 3 phosphodiesterase inhibitors such that oocyte maturation was prevented in the presence of PDE3 inhibitors yet ovulation was unaffected (15). Most recently, Jensen and colleagues examined both in vitro and in vivo effects of a phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor ORG 9935 on oocyte maturation in rhesus monkeys. In these animal studies, it was found that in vitro, ORG 9935 at a concentration of 1.0umol/l was able to completely inhibit oocyte maturation (7).

In vivo models demonstrated a similar reduction in oocyte maturation, with the most dramatic reduction in monkeys treated with an extended dose regimen of ORG 9935 (200mg/kg/d) prior to ovulation (8). Additionally, pregnancy rates in macaques treated with ORG 9935 was studied and compared to controls. Overall, there was not a statistically significant decrease in pregnancy rates in those macaques treated with PDE3 inhibitor; however, there did appear to be evidence of a dose response as no animal became pregnant who had serum ORG 9935 levels above 300nM/L (9). Despite a clear dose response, authors of this study acknowledge that PDE3-Is have systemic effects that are also dose-limiting. At higher doses, adverse effects such as tachycardia and hypotension were observed.

Phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitors have additionally been studied in vitro to assess oocyte maturation in humans. Human oocytes cultured in the presence of ORG 9935 (1um) for 24 hours demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in germinal vesicle breakdown (an early marker of oocyte maturation) in comparison to control oocytes (12). However, no human in vivo models assessing oocyte maturation following treatment with a phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor exist.

Cilostazol, an FDA approved drug for the treatment of intermittent claudication, is a class IIIa phosphodiesterase inhibitor. Its systemic effects in humans include vasodilation, decrease in platelet aggregation, reduction in triglyceride levels, and increase in HDL cholesterol levels (4). Human clinical trials did not address fertility and pregnancy rates; however, manufacturer product labeling reports that no fertility effects occurred in rats. Most recently, however, two animal in vivo studies examining pregnancy rates of mice treated with Cilostazol were conducted (1,10). In both of these studies, mice treated with Cilostazol were shown to be completely infertile at follow up; however, once the drug was discontinued, all mice that were unable to conceive during treatment with cilostazol were subsequently able to have pregnancies of normal litter sizes. It is important to mention that in the study by Albarzanchi, mice received PO cilostazol at a dose of 7.5 or 15 mg PO for three days (1). In the study by Li conducted in China, the maxium dose was higher (300mg/kg) (10). Pregnancy outcomes for both studies were the same.

These studies demonstrate two important aspects of a contraceptive method: efficacy and reversibility. Additionally, the investigators who published Cilostazol's fertility effects in mice published an abstract demonstrating a similar effect in swine (2). When a human dose of 100mg bid of Cilostazol was given prior to ovulation, no documented pregnancies occurred. Following cessation of study drug, all swine were able to conceive.

Given the success of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in both in vivo and in vitro models for prevention of oocyte maturation and pregnancy in animal models, it is reasonable that we further examine this potential non-hormonal oral contraceptive method. Given the many FDA clinical trials that need to be conducted, new contraceptive methods take decades to develop. However, since Cilostazol is an approved FDA medication with an acceptable side effect profile, we believe that it is appropriate to complete initial studies of this drug in humans using an in vivo technique validated in macaques, a model with the same timing of peri-ovulatory events as women, to ascertain its possible use as a non-hormonal oral contraceptive.

The primary objective of the research study is to determine if women taking Cilostazol demonstrate impairment of oocyte maturation in comparison to paired historic controls following ovarian follicle stimulation. For the purposes of our study, oocyte maturation will be assessed using the oocyte maturational stages of prophase I, metaphase I, and metaphase II. Thus, we will be assessing the percent of oocytes aspirated from follicles during controlled ovarian stimulation that progress beyond the germinal vesicle stage (e.g. GVBD) in those women receiving cilostazol and compare this to the maturation of oocytes obtained from the same women who underwent ovarian follicle stimulation previously while not on study drug.

We propose that women undergoing treatment with the FDA approved dose of 100mg PO BID of Cilostazol will demonstrate an impairment of oocyte maturation in comparison to paired historic controls following ovarian follicle stimulation.

Conditions
Contraception
Being tested
Cilostazol
Keywords
contraception, Cilostazol, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, To assess the ability of Cilostazol to act as a contraceptive agent

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CilostazolDrug

    Also called Pletal

Study groups in NCT01915069
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CilostazolExperimentalThe primary aim of the study is to assess the affects of oral Cilostazol taken at the FDA approved dose of 100mg PO bid on human oocyte maturation.
Receives: Drug: Cilostazol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Oocyte maturation

    For the purposes of our study, oocyte maturation will be assessed using the oocyte maturational stages of prophase I, metaphase I, and metaphase II. Thus, we will be assessing the percent of oocytes aspirated from follicles during controlled ovarian stimulation that progress beyond the germinal vesicle stage (e.g. GVBD) in those women receiving cilostazol and compare this to the maturation of oocytes obtained from the same women who underwent ovarian follicle stimulation previously while not on study drug.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2013
  3. Primary completionAug 2014
  4. Study completionAug 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
4 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01915069
Sponsor's protocol ID
SFPRF 13-14
Status last verified
May 2015
First submitted
5 Jul 2013
Last updated
12 May 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Cilostazol in people with Contraception, run by University of Southern California at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Oocyte maturation (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in