AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)NCT01915173

Response to Supplement and Placebo in GERD

A study testing Supplement, Expanded Interview and Standard Interview in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Heartburn, run by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of a widely available over the counter supplement marketed for heartburn symptoms on symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Supplement, Expanded Interview and Standard Interview
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2013to Apr 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult humans age 18-80.
  • Fluency in written and spoken English.
  • Heartburn symptoms 3 or more days per week for the past month.

Who cannot join

  • Individuals taking a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or H2 receptor blocker with a dose change within 2 weeks of the initial study visit.
  • Individuals with Crohns disease, systemic sclerosis, known active ulcer disease, gastric cancer, Barrett's esophagitis
  • Significant pain or difficulty with swallowing
  • Heavy alcohol use (defined by > 6 drinks/week for women and > 13 drinks/week for men)
  • Concurrent pregnancy
  • Dementia
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric disease
  • Individuals unable to complete a paper symptom diary for 6 of 7 days prior to their baseline visit
  • Subjects whose symptoms are predominantly dyspeptic more than heartburn or reflux
  • Subjects who have used homeopathy for GI symptoms or have received constitutional homeopathic treatment within the past 2 weeks
  • Subjects taking herbal products or other supplements for GERD or dyspepsia related symptoms (includes peppermint oil)
  • Subjects who have taken > 12 doses of NSAIDS within the prior 30 days (aspirin ≤ 325 mg daily is allowed)
  • Subjects with lactose intolerance

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of a widely available over the counter supplement marketed for heartburn symptoms on symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study is designed as a pilot trial to assess safety and feasibility and to provide preliminary estimates of effect sizes.

Being tested
Supplement, Placebo, Expanded Interview, Standard Interview
Keywords
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Heartburn, Dyspepsia
Medical subject headings
Gastroesophageal Reflux, Heartburn, Dyspepsia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SupplementDrug

    Abies nigra 4C, Carbo vegetabilis 4C, Nux vomica 4C, and Robinia pseudoacacia 4C

  • PlaceboDrug

    Lactose tablets

  • Expanded InterviewBehavioural

  • Standard InterviewBehavioural

Study groups in NCT01915173
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Supplement + Expanded InterviewExperimentalSupplement, 2 tablets sublingually 3 times a day for 2 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Supplement; Behavioral: Expanded Interview
Placebo + Standard InterviewPlacebo comparatorPlacebo, 2 tablets sublingually 3 times a day for 2 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Behavioral: Standard Interview
Supplement + Standard InterviewExperimentalSupplement, 2 tablets sublingually 3 times a day for 2 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Supplement; Behavioral: Standard Interview
Placebo + Expanded InterviewPlacebo comparatorPlacebo, 2 tablets sublingually 3 times a day for 2 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Behavioral: Expanded Interview

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Safety - Number of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event

    Serious adverse events (as defined by the FDA) are events that are potentially life-threatening or result in death, hospitalization, an emergency room visit, disability or permanent damage, a congenital abnormality, require intervention to prevent permanent impairment, or seriously jeopardizes a patient's health.

    Measured: 2 week follow-up

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Number of Subjects With a 50% or Greater Decrease in GERD Symptom Severity

    Average daily GERD symptom severity during the last 7 days of the study was compared to average daily GERD symptom severity at baseline using daily study diary entries. GERD symptom severity for each day was based on the sum of scores assessing the severity of daytime heartburn, nighttime heartburn, and acid reflux each on a 0-4 point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Higher scores signify worse symptoms. The number of subjects with a 50% or greater decrease in GERD symptom severity from baseline to end of study in each group was calculated.

    Measured: Second week of the trial compared to pre-trial baseline

  2. GERD Health-Related Quality of Life at Follow-up

    The GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) scale is a validated instrument assessing GERD-specific health-related quality of life using 10 questions, each on a 0-5 point scale. Scale range is 0-50 with higher numbers signifying worse quality of life.

    Measured: Two weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2013
  3. Primary completionApr 2014
  4. Study completionApr 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01915173
Sponsor's protocol ID
2012P000409
Other IDs
IND 117358
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
30 Jul 2013
Last updated
29 Mar 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Dossett ML, Mu L, Davis RB, Bell IR, Lembo AJ, Kaptchuk TJ, Yeh GY. Patient-Provider Interactions Affect Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0136855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136855. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26422466

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Supplement, Expanded Interview and Standard Interview in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Heartburn, run by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Safety - Number of Participants Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (time frame: 2 week follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01915173, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in