Colorectal CancerPhase 3SALTONCT01918852
S-1 Versus Capecitabine in the First Line Treatment of MCC Patients.
A Phase 3 study testing Capecitabine, Teysuno and Bevacizumab in people with Colorectal Cancer and Metastases, run by Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group at 24 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The study is a two-arm randomised phase III trial. Patients will be randomised to receive capecitabine (arm A) or S-1 (arm B). Bevacizumab may be added according to the choice of the investigator. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer, Metastases
- What is being tested?
- Capecitabine, Teysuno and Bevacizumab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 161 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- Dec 2013to Mar 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histological proof of colorectal cancer.
- Distant metastases (patients with only local recurrence are not eligible).
- Unidimensionally measurable disease (≥1 cm on spiral CT scan or ≥2 cm on chest X-ray; liver ultrasound is not allowed). Serum CEA may not be used as a parameter for disease evaluation.
- In case of previous radiotherapy, at least one measurable lesion should be located outside the irradiated field.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Planned treatment with fluoropyrimidine monotherapy with or without bevacizumab.
Show all 13Show fewer
- WHO performance status 0-2 (Karnofsky PS ≥70%)
- Adequate bone marrow function (Hb ≥ 6.0 mmol/L, absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 x 109/L, platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L), renal function (serum creatinine ≤ 1.5x ULN and creatinine clearance, Cockroft formula, ≥30 ml/min), liver function (serum bilirubin ≤ 2 x ULN, serum transaminases ≤ 3 x ULN without presence of liver metastases or ≤ 5x ULN with presence of liver metastases).
- Life expectancy > 12 weeks.
- Negative pregnancy test in women with childbearing potential.
- Expected adequacy of follow-up.
- Institutional Review Board approval.
- Written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Prior adjuvant treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer completed within 6 months prior to randomisation.
- Any prior adjuvant treatment after resection of distant metastases.
- Any previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease.
- History or clinical signs/symptoms of CNS metastases.
- History of a second malignancy <5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma of cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of skin.
- Previous intolerance of capecitabine.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency or treatment within 4 weeks with DPD inhibitors, including sorivudine or its chemically related analogues such as brivudine.
- Planned radical resection of metastases after downsizing by systemic treatment.
- Significant cardiovascular disease < 1 yr before randomisation (symptomatic congestive heart failure, myocardial ischemia or infarction, unstable angina pectoris, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, arterial thrombosis, cerebrovascular event, pulmonary embolism).
- Any significant cardiovascular events during previous fluoropyrimidine therapy.
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 1 country.
24 sites in 1 country
Netherlands24 sites
Medisch Centrum Alkmaar
Alkmaar
Meander Medisch Centrum
Amersfoort
Nederlands Kanker Instituut/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis
Amsterdam, 1066 CX
Academic Medical Centre
Amsterdam
OLVG
Amsterdam
VUMC
Amsterdam
Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis
Assen
Ziekenhuis Lievensberg
Bergen op Zoom
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda
Slingeland Ziekenhuis
Doetinchem
Catherina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede
St Jansdal
Harderwijk
Spaarne Ziekenhuis
Hoofddorp
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
Leeuwarden
Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein
Waterland Ziekenhuis
Purmerend
Sint Franciscus Gasthuis
Rotterdam
Vlietland Ziekenhuis
Schiedam
Orbis Medisch Centrum
Sittard
Tweesteden Ziekenhuis
Tilburg
University Medical Centre Utrecht
Utrecht
VieCuri Medisch Centrum
Venlo
Zaans Medisch Centrum
Zaandam
About this study
Official title: S1 Versus Capecitabine in the First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients, the SALTO Randomised Phase III Study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. A Safety Evaluation of Oral Fluoropyrimidines
The study is a two-arm randomised phase III trial. Patients will be randomised to receive capecitabine (arm A) or S-1 (arm B). Bevacizumab may be added according to the choice of the investigator. Patients will be followed 3-weekly at the outpatient clinic, toxicity will be assessed according to study protocol guidelines. Patients will be evaluated every 3 cycles for response. Upon disease progression patients will be treated according to the local investigators
Read the detailed description
Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine, has shown a comparable efficacy but a better tolerability compared to bolus 5-FU/LV. However, capecitabine has a higher incidence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS). HFS is characterized by erythema, dysesthesia and/or paresthesia of the palms of the hands or soles of feet. In advanced stage, desquamation, ulceration and blistering can occur. Although HFS is not life threatening, it can cause significant discomfort and impairment of function, especially in elderly patients. This adverse event is becoming particularly relevant since many patients may require the administration of capecitabine over prolonged periods of time.
S-1 (Teysuno®) is an oral fluoropyrimidine that has shown comparable efficacy to 5FU and capecitabine in gastrointestinal cancers but is associated with a much lower incidence of HFS. Studies on S-1 have mainly been performed in Asian patients,which population has known differences in tumour biology and toxicity compared to Western population. S-1 has shown comparable efficacy to other fluoropyrimidines as monotherapy or in combination chemotherapy schedules in several gastrointestinal tumors. However, given the lack of data from prospective studies on S-1 as monochemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer in Western patients, this study is designed to compare S-1 and capecitabine monotherapy in terms of safety, with particular interest in HFS, in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Metastases
- Being tested
- Capecitabine, Teysuno, Bevacizumab
- Keywords
- Hand-foot syndrome, Toxicity, Fluoropyrimidine, Capecitabine, Teysuno, S1
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis, Hand-Foot Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CapecitabineDrug
Also called Xeloda
TeysunoDrug
Also called S1
BevacizumabDrug
Also called Avastin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine | Active comparator | Capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 for patients < 70 years of age, and 1000 mg/m2 for patients ≥ 70 years of age, orally b.i.d. day 1-14 with or without bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg i.v. day 1. Receives: Drug: Capecitabine; Drug: Bevacizumab |
| S1 | Experimental | S-1 30 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. irrespective of age, day 1-14 with or without bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg i.v. day 1. Receives: Drug: Teysuno; Drug: Bevacizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of HFS in first line treatment
To determine the incidence of HFS in first line treatment with S-1 compared to capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Measured: HFS will be assessed every 3 weeks up to 6 months average.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Grade 3 HFS
Incidence of grade 3 hand-foot syndrome, according to CTC 4.0.
Measured: HFS will be assessed every 3 weeks, up to 6 months average
Progression-free survival
Time from randomisation until progression or death whichever comes first
Measured: Every 9 weeks, for 6 months (average)
Overall toxicity
Adverse events graded accoording to the NCI CTCAE version 4
Measured: Every 3 weeks, for 6 months (average)
Overall survival
From date of randomisation to death or last known to be alive
Measured: 2 years
Response rate
Response acccording to RECIST 1.1
Measured: Response will be assessed every 9 weeks, up to 6 months average.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2013
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionMar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 161 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nordic Pharma SAS
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Cornelis JA Punt, Prof MD PhD, Principal investigator, Amsterdam Medical Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01918852
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SALTO
- Acronym
- SALTO
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2013
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Kwakman JJM, van Werkhoven E, Simkens LHJ, van Rooijen JM, van de Wouw YAJ, Tije AJT, Creemers GM, Hendriks MP, Los M, van Alphen RJ, Polee MB, Muller EW, van der Velden AMT, van Voorthuizen T, Koopman M, Mol L, Punt CJA. Updated Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase III Trial of S-1 Versus Capecitabine in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019 Jun;18(2):e229-e230. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 29. No abstract available.
PubMed 30782413Kwakman JJM, Simkens LHJ, van Rooijen JM, van de Wouw AJ, Ten Tije AJ, Creemers GJM, Hendriks MP, Los M, van Alphen RJ, Polee MB, Muller EW, van der Velden AMT, van Voorthuizen T, Koopman M, Mol L, van Werkhoven E, Punt CJA. Randomized phase III trial of S-1 versus capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: SALTO study by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1288-1293. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx122.
PubMed 28383633
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- S1 Versus Capecitabine in the First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients, the SALTO Randomised Phase III Study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. A Safety Evaluation of Oral Fluoropyrimidines
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01918852
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SALTO / SALTO
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Metastases
- Keywords
- Hand-foot syndrome, Toxicity, Fluoropyrimidine, Capecitabine, Teysuno, S1
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 161 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dutch Colorectal Cancer GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nordic Pharma SAS
- Study start
- Dec 2013
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is a two-arm randomised phase III trial. Patients will be randomised to receive capecitabine (arm A) or S-1 (arm B). Bevacizumab may be added according to the choice of the investigator. Patients will be followed 3-weekly at the outpatient clinic, toxicity will be assessed according to study protocol guidelines. Patients will be evaluated every 3 cycles for response. Upon disease progression patients will be treated according to the local investigators
Detailed description
Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine, has shown a comparable efficacy but a better tolerability compared to bolus 5-FU/LV. However, capecitabine has a higher incidence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS). HFS is characterized by erythema, dysesthesia and/or paresthesia of the palms of the hands or soles of feet. In advanced stage, desquamation, ulceration and blistering can occur. Although HFS is not life threatening, it can cause significant discomfort and impairment of function, especially in elderly patients. This adverse event is becoming particularly relevant since many patients may require the administration of capecitabine over prolonged periods of time.
S-1 (Teysuno®) is an oral fluoropyrimidine that has shown comparable efficacy to 5FU and capecitabine in gastrointestinal cancers but is associated with a much lower incidence of HFS. Studies on S-1 have mainly been performed in Asian patients,which population has known differences in tumour biology and toxicity compared to Western population. S-1 has shown comparable efficacy to other fluoropyrimidines as monotherapy or in combination chemotherapy schedules in several gastrointestinal tumors. However, given the lack of data from prospective studies on S-1 as monochemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer in Western patients, this study is designed to compare S-1 and capecitabine monotherapy in terms of safety, with particular interest in HFS, in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine | Active comparator | Drug: Capecitabine, Drug: BevacizumabCapecitabine 1250 mg/m2 for patients < 70 years of age, and 1000 mg/m2 for patients ≥ 70 years of age, orally b.i.d. day 1-14 with or without bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg i.v. day 1. |
| S1 | Experimental | Drug: Teysuno, Drug: BevacizumabS-1 30 mg/m2 orally b.i.d. irrespective of age, day 1-14 with or without bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg i.v. day 1. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Histological proof of colorectal cancer.
- Distant metastases (patients with only local recurrence are not eligible).
- Unidimensionally measurable disease (≥1 cm on spiral CT scan or ≥2 cm on chest X-ray; liver ultrasound is not allowed). Serum CEA may not be used as a parameter for disease evaluation.
- In case of previous radiotherapy, at least one measurable lesion should be located outside the irradiated field.
- Age ≥ 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Prior adjuvant treatment for stage II/III colorectal cancer completed within 6 months prior to randomisation.
- Any prior adjuvant treatment after resection of distant metastases.
- Any previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease.
- History or clinical signs/symptoms of CNS metastases.
- History of a second malignancy <5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma of cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of skin.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CapecitabineAlso: Xeloda | Drug | Capecitabine |
| TeysunoAlso: S1 | Drug | S1 |
| BevacizumabAlso: Avastin | Drug | Capecitabine, S1 |
Primary outcome
Incidence of HFS in first line treatment
Time frame: HFS will be assessed every 3 weeks up to 6 months average.
To determine the incidence of HFS in first line treatment with S-1 compared to capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
5 secondary outcomes
Grade 3 HFS
Time frame: HFS will be assessed every 3 weeks, up to 6 months average
Progression-free survival
Time frame: Every 9 weeks, for 6 months (average)
Overall toxicity
Time frame: Every 3 weeks, for 6 months (average)
Overall survival
Time frame: 2 years
Response rate
Time frame: Response will be assessed every 9 weeks, up to 6 months average.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30782413Kwakman JJM, van Werkhoven E, Simkens LHJ, van Rooijen JM, van de Wouw YAJ, Tije AJT, Creemers GM, Hendriks MP, Los M, van Alphen RJ, Polee MB, Muller EW, van der Velden AMT, van Voorthuizen T, Koopman M, Mol L, Punt CJA. Updated Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase III Trial of S-1 Versus Capecitabine in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019 Jun;18(2):e229-e230. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 29. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28383633Kwakman JJM, Simkens LHJ, van Rooijen JM, van de Wouw AJ, Ten Tije AJ, Creemers GJM, Hendriks MP, Los M, van Alphen RJ, Polee MB, Muller EW, van der Velden AMT, van Voorthuizen T, Koopman M, Mol L, van Werkhoven E, Punt CJA. Randomized phase III trial of S-1 versus capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: SALTO study by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1288-1293. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx122.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cornelis JA Punt, Prof MD PhD principal investigator
Amsterdam Medical Centre
24 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Capecitabine, Teysuno and Bevacizumab in people with Colorectal Cancer and Metastases, run by Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group at 24 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of HFS in first line treatment (time frame: HFS will be assessed every 3 weeks up to 6 months average.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01918852, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2018.