AzTrials
AzTrials

COPD ExacerbationNCT01922180

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: CT Features of Severe Exacerbation

An observational study of COPD Exacerbation, run by Erasme University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To describe Computed Tomography (CT) features associated with severe exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
COPD Exacerbation
What is being tested?
Chest CT scans
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Jul 2007to Aug 2009
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: COPD patients followed in our institution (i.e. Erasme University Hospital), who are admitted for a severe exacerbation episode.

Who may be able to join

  • Severe exacerbation episode of COPD, requiring hospital admission

Who cannot join

  • No exclusion criteria

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Erasme University Hospital

    Brussels, Brussels Capital, 1070

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

To describe Computed Tomography (CT) features associated with severe exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Read the detailed description

The natural course of COPD is associated with episodes of exacerbation which are clinically defined as acute events characterized by a worsening of the patient's respiratory symptoms that is beyond normal day-to-day variations and which leads to a change in medication. Moreover, these episodes can be classified into mild, moderate, or severe exacerbations, following patient's need for medical environment. While the cause of about one-third of severe exacerbation episodes cannot be identified, two-thirds are associated with certain conditions such as respiratory tract infections (viral or bacterial), air pollution, as well as pulmonary embolism (PE), pulmonary edema, cardiac arrhythmia, pneumothorax, or pleural effusion. As COPD exacerbations are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as with increased healthcare costs, their prevention and treatment are two major objectives in COPD management with subsequent requirement for appropriate assessment tools. As imaging tool, chest radiography is limited to the detection of pneumonia and pleural abnormalities, and only leads to change in managements in a marginal proportion of patients. However, while Computed Tomography (CT) scans allows detecting more chest abnormalities, the knowledge of CT features at the time of exacerbation is a pre-requisite for determining possible role of CT in routine work-up of exacerbation. Nevertheless these features remain widely unknown, previous studies having focused on the prevalence of PE. The aim of our study was therefore to describe these features by comparing CT scans performed at severe exacerbation with control scans.

Being tested
Chest CT scans
Keywords
Chest Computed Tomography

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Chest CT scansRadiation

    CT examinations were performed with a commercially available 64-detector row scanner. Images were acquired in supine position after full inspiration and full expiration, using the following parameters: slice thickness, 0.6 mm; pitch, 1.4; rotation time, 330 msec; tube voltage, 120 kiloVolts; and tube current-time product, 100 milliAmperes, with automatic exposure control (CareDose 4D, Siemens Healthcare) switched on. From raw data, 1-mm-thick section images were reconstructed at 0.7-mm intervals by using a high spatial algorithm and a soft-tissue algorithm. The inspiratory CT scan at the time of exacerbation was performed with intravenous iodinated contrast material, whereas the control scan was unenhanced.

Study groups in NCT01922180
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
COPD ExacerbationCOPD patients aged 18 years or more, were included at the time of an exacerbation episode leading to admission in our hospital, which corresponds to a severe episode. There were no exclusion criteria. Patients underwent chest CT scans and PFT. After a minimum of two weeks free of any acute symptom after discharge, CT scans and PFT were redone.
Receives: Radiation: Chest CT scans

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Chest CT scan features at exacerbation

    Grading the severity of the following 15 features: bronchiectasis, mucous plugging, bronchial wall thickening, pulmonary consolidation, ground glass opacity, cysts or bullae, air trapping, centrilobular micronodules, platelike atelectasis, emphysema, pulmonary embolism, pleural effusion, mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy, reticular pattern or honeycombing, and pulmonary mass or nodule.

    Measured: 4 hours

  2. Chest CT scan features at control

    Grading the severity of the following 15 features: bronchiectasis, mucous plugging, bronchial wall thickening, pulmonary consolidation, ground glass opacity, cysts or bullae, air trapping, centrilobular micronodules, platelike atelectasis, emphysema, pulmonary embolism, pleural effusion, mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy, reticular pattern or honeycombing, and pulmonary mass or nodule.

    Measured: Minimum two weeks after exacerbation

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. PFT at control

    Measurements of the forced vital capacity (FVC), the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the functional residual capacity (FRC), the total lung capacity (TLC) and the residual volume (RV).

    Measured: Minimum two weeks after exacerbation

  2. PFT at exacerbation

    Measurements of the forced vital capacity (FVC), the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the functional residual capacity (FRC), the total lung capacity (TLC) and the residual volume (RV).

    Measured: 4 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2007
  3. Primary completionAug 2009
  4. Study completionAug 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01922180
Sponsor's protocol ID
COPD-EXAC-CT
Status last verified
Aug 2013
First submitted
9 Aug 2013
Last updated
15 Aug 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Rodriguez-Roisin R. Toward a consensus definition for COPD exacerbations. Chest. 2000 May;117(5 Suppl 2):398S-401S. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.5_suppl_2.398s.

    PubMed 10843984
  • Myint PK, Lowe D, Stone RA, Buckingham RJ, Roberts CM. U.K. National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project 2008: patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations who present with radiological pneumonia have worse outcome compared to those with non-pneumonic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Respiration. 2011;82(4):320-7. doi: 10.1159/000327203. Epub 2011 May 20.

    PubMed 21597277
  • Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, Remy J. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):697-722. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2462070712. Epub 2008 Jan 14.

    PubMed 18195376
  • Rutschmann OT, Cornuz J, Poletti PA, Bridevaux PO, Hugli OW, Qanadli SD, Perrier A. Should pulmonary embolism be suspected in exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? Thorax. 2007 Feb;62(2):121-5. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.065557. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

    PubMed 17101737
  • Hackx M, Ghaye B, Coche E, Muylem AV, Gevenois PA. Severe COPD exacerbation: CT features. COPD. 2015 Feb;12(1):38-45. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2014.903916. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

    PubMed 24914492

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of COPD Exacerbation, run by Erasme University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Chest CT scan features at exacerbation (time frame: 4 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01922180, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in