AzTrials
AzTrials

Uveal MelanomaNCT01924923

New Biopsy Technique for Uveal Melanoma

An observational study of Uveal Melanoma, run by Greater Houston Retina Research at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot study intends to investigate a new biopsy technique that will decrease the incidence of tumor cells in the biopsy tract. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Uveal Melanoma
How many people
1 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2013to Mar 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients over 21, diagnosed with uveal melanoma and scheduled to undergo enucleation surgery. No known metastatis.

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with uveal melanoma
  • Scheduled for enucleation surgery

Who cannot join

  • Patients under 21 years old
  • Patients unable to undergo surgery
  • Patients with known metastatic uveal melanoma or other cancer.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Retina Consultants of Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

This pilot study intends to investigate a new biopsy technique that will decrease the incidence of tumor cells in the biopsy tract.

Read the detailed description

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary malignancy of the eye and is one of the few fatal diseases that are detected initially through an eye examination. For many years, clinical decision-making regarding which patient with uveal melanoma required treatment has been based solely on clinical features observed at the time of diagnosis. These features include: tumor size as measured by ultrasound, associated subretinal fluid, presence of orange lipofuscin pigment, lack of drusen, posterior location, and ciliary body involvement. All of these clinical features have been demonstrated to be associated with tumor growth which is associated with the eventual development of metastases. However, these clinical features are not adequately sensitive or specific enough to predict which patients will develop metastases.

More recently, researchers studying the genomics of uveal melanoma have focused on identifying genetic abnormalities present in tumor tissue in order to characterize these lesions more fully. Several landmark papers over the past 15 years have reported cytogenic and genomic abnormalities in uveal melanoma tumor tissue that are associated with a poorer prognosis. Although rare, there have been at least five cases in which patients undergoing biopsy of these lesions have developed extraocular spread of melanoma from the biopsy sites. With this new technique, the possible rate of extraocular spread should be lower, making the biopsy a safer technique than what is currently in practice.

Conditions
Uveal Melanoma
Keywords
uveal melanoma, biopsy, enucleation, ocular cancer
Medical subject headings
Uveal Melanoma, Eye Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01924923
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Uveal MelanomaScheduled for enucleation surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of subjects with melanotic cells present at biopsy needle site

    Measured: 1 Year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2013
  3. Primary completionMar 2015
  4. Study completionMar 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01924923
Sponsor's protocol ID
NBT-01
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
13 Aug 2013
Last updated
26 Mar 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) randomized trial of pre-enucleation radiation of large choroidal melanoma III: local complications and observations following enucleation COMS report no. 11. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Sep;126(3):362-72. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00091-9.

    PubMed 9744369
  • The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) randomized trial of pre-enucleation radiation of large choroidal melanoma II: initial mortality findings. COMS report no. 10. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun;125(6):779-96. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00039-7.

    PubMed 9645716
  • Schyberg E. Fine needle biopsy of orbital tumours [proceedings]. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1975;(125):11. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01202.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 184645
  • Jakobiec FA, Coleman DJ, Chattock A, Smith M. Ultrasonically guided needle biopsy and cytologic diagnosis of solid intraocular tumors. Ophthalmology. 1979 Sep;86(9):1662-81. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35349-0.

    PubMed 551354
  • Caminal JM, Sanz S, Carreras M, Catala I, Arruga J, Roca G. Epibulbar seeding at the site of a transvitreal fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;124(4):587-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.4.587. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16606890
  • Glasgow BJ, Brown HH, Zargoza AM, Foos RY. Quantitation of tumor seeding from fine needle aspiration of ocular melanomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988 May 15;105(5):538-46. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90248-6.

    PubMed 3369520
  • Karcioglu ZA, Gordon RA, Karcioglu GL. Tumor seeding in ocular fine needle aspiration biopsy. Ophthalmology. 1985 Dec;92(12):1763-7. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(85)34105-2.

    PubMed 4088631
  • Engzell U, Esposti PL, Rubio C, Sigurdson A, Zajicek J. Investigation on tumour spread in connection with aspiration biopsy. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol. 1971 Aug;10(4):385-98. doi: 10.3109/02841867109130784. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4329702
  • SNELL AC Jr. Heterotransplantation of tumors into various regions of the guinea-pig eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 1951 May;34(5 1):733-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(51)92285-4. No abstract available.

    PubMed 14829489
  • Shields JA, Shields CL, Ehya H, Eagle RC Jr, De Potter P. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected intraocular tumors. The 1992 Urwick Lecture. Ophthalmology. 1993 Nov;100(11):1677-84. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31418-1.

    PubMed 8233394
  • Schefler AC, Gologorsky D, Marr BP, Shields CL, Zeolite I, Abramson DH. Extraocular extension of uveal melanoma after fine-needle aspiration, vitrectomy, and open biopsy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;131(9):1220-4. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.2506.

    PubMed 24030334

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Uveal Melanoma, run by Greater Houston Retina Research at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of subjects with melanotic cells present at biopsy needle site (time frame: 1 Year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01924923, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in