AzTrials
AzTrials

Metastatic Colorectal CancerPhase 2NCT01925274

A Study Of PF-05212384 Plus Irinotecan Vs Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan In Patients With KRAS And NRAS Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing PF-05212384, irinotecan and Cetuximab in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by Pfizer at 32 sites in 4 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will investigate whether the combination of PF-05212384 plus Irinotecan improves progression free survival in patients with KRAS and NRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer when compared with the combination of cetuximab plus Irinotecan. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
PF-05212384, irinotecan and Cetuximab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
19 participants
Where
32 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
15 Nov 2013to 6 Apr 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • KRAS and NRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer
  • Progression following treatment for colorectal cancer with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine therapy in the metastatic setting.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2
  • At least one measurable lesion by Response Evaluation Criterion in Solid Tumors [RECIST]

Who cannot join

  • More than 2 prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer.
  • Prior treatment with a PI3K, mTOR, AKT or EGFR inhibitor
  • Patients who have discontinued treatment with prior irinotecan therapy due to toxicity.
  • Prior radiation to the pelvis or abdomen
  • Patients with history of interstitial lung disease.

Trial locations and contacts

32 sites in 4 countries.

32 sites in 4 countries

United States25 sites
  • CBCC Global Research, Inc. at Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center

    Bakersfield, California, 93309

  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute

    Buffalo, New York, 14263

  • Siteman Cancer Center - St Peters

    City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376

  • Siteman Cancer Center - West County

    Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141

  • Regulatory Office: Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada

    Henderson, Nevada, 89014

  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada

    Henderson, Nevada, 89052

  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada

    Henderson, Nevada, 89074

  • Kadlec Clinic Hematology and Oncology

    Kennewick, Washington, 99336

  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128

  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148

  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169

  • Drug Management Only: UCLA West Medical Pharmacy, Att: Steven L Wong, Pharm D

    Los Angeles, California, 90095-7349

  • Drug Management Only: UCLA West Medical Pharmacy

    Los Angeles, California, 90095-7349

  • UCLA West Medical Pharmacy

    Los Angeles, California, 90095-7349

  • Regulatory Management Only: TRIO-US Central Administration

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • TRIO-US Central Administration (Regulatory Management only)

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • TRIO_US

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • West Valley Hematology/Oncology Med Group

    Northridge, California, 91328

  • Kadlec Medical Center

    Richland, Washington, 99352

  • Outpatient Imaging Center

    Richland, Washington, 99352

  • Medical Oncology Associates, PS

    Spokane, Washington, 99208

  • Spokane Valley Cancer Center

    Spokane Valley, Washington, 99216

  • Barnes-Jewish Hospital

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Siteman Cancer Center - South County

    St Louis, Missouri, 63129

Other trials in United States

South Korea4 sites
  • National Cancer Center

    Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 410-769

  • Seoul National University Hospital / Department of Internal Medicine

    Seoul, 110-744

  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, 135-710

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 138-736

Other trials in South Korea

Japan2 sites
  • National Cancer Center Hospital East

    Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577

  • Aichi cancer center central hospital

    Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 464-8681

Other trials in Japan

Spain1 site
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón

    Madrid, 28009

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A RANDOMIZED PHASE 2 STUDY OF PF-05212384 PLUS IRINOTECAN VERSUS CETUXIMAB PLUS IRINOTECAN IN PATIENTS WITH KRAS AND NRAS WILD TYPE METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER

This study will investigate whether the combination of PF-05212384 plus Irinotecan improves progression free survival in patients with KRAS and NRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer when compared with the combination of cetuximab plus Irinotecan. A Japanese Lead in Cohort will assess the safety of the combination of PF-05212384 + irinotecan in patients enrolled at Japanese sites.

Being tested
PF-05212384, irinotecan, Cetuximab
Keywords
metastatic colorectal cancer, colorectal cancer, KRAS, colon cancer, mCRC, CRC, PF-05212384, KRAS wild type colorectal cancer, irinotecan, cetuximab, NRAS
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PF-05212384Drug

    Also called PKI-587

    30 minute IV infusion of PF-05212384 on days 2, 9, 16 and 23 of each cycle. Intra-patient dose escalation will commence with 110mg and will increase depending on tolerability.

  • irinotecanDrug

    Also called Camptosar, Campto, CPT-11

    90 minutes IV infusion of irinotecan 180mg/m^2 on days 1 and 15 of each cycle

  • CetuximabDrug

    Also called Erbitux

    120 minute IV infusion of cetuximab 400mg/m^2 on cycle 1 day 1; 60 minute IV infusion of cetuximab on days 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle, and on day 1 of each cycle after cycle 1

  • IrinotecanDrug

    Also called Camptosar, Campto, CPT-11

    90 minutes IV infusion of Irinotecan 180mg/m^2 on days 1 and 15 of each cycle

Study groups in NCT01925274
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm AExperimentalPF-05212384 plus Irinotecan
Receives: Drug: PF-05212384; Drug: irinotecan
Arm BActive comparatorCetuximab plus Irinotecan
Receives: Drug: Cetuximab; Drug: Irinotecan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigators

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. Median PFS was estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: From date of first dose until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years

Secondary outcomes (30)
  1. Number of Participants With Unacceptable Toxicity in Cycle 1 (Japanese LIC Only)

    Unacceptable toxicity (according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], Version 4.0) was any of the following occurrences: (1) Grade 4 neutropenia >7 days, or febrile neutropenia, or Grade 4 thrombocytopenia; (2) Grade >=3 nausea/vomiting despite optimal antiemetic treatment, or Grade >=3 diarrhea despite optimal anti diarrheal treatment; (3) unmanageable Grade >=3 hyperglycemia; (4) mean QTc interval (time from electrocardiogram [ECG] Q wave to the end of the T wave corresponding to electrical systole, corrected for heart rate) >501 msec in triplicate 12-lead ECG, or myocardial infarction, or ventricular arrhythmia; (5) Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicity; (6) treatment delay of >=2 weeks due to study drug related toxicity; (7) persistent, intolerable toxicities which resulted in failure to deliver at least 75% of doses of both PF-05212384 and irinotecan during Cycle 1; (8) Grade >=2 respiratory toxicities.

    Measured: 28 days

  2. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

    Percentage of participants with objective response was based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. Confirmed PR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Confirmed PR was defined as >=30% decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking the baseline sum as a reference. Confirmed responses were those that persisted on repeat imaging study >=4 weeks after initial documentation of response.

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Duration of Response

    For participants with an objective response (CR or PR), duration of response was defined as the time from first documentation of CR or PR to date of first documentation of objective progression or death. Date of first documentation of progression and date of first documentation of CR or PR were based on Investigator's assessment of response.

    Measured: 2 years

  4. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration from enrollment to death. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact.

    Measured: 2 years

  5. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was defined as any untoward occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study drug.

    Measured: Administration of the first dose of study drug through 28 calendar days after the last administration of study drug

  6. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade

    TEAEs were those AEs with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study drug. CTCAE version 4.0 was used to grade the severity of TEAEs. Grade 1 referred to mild AEs; Grade 2 referred to moderate AEs; Grade 3 referred to severe AEs; Grade 4 referred to AEs with life-threatening consequences, and urgent intervention was needed to manage them; Grade 5 referred to death related to AE.

    Measured: Administration of the first dose of study drug through 28 calendar days after the last administration of study drug

  7. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Hematology) Abnormalities

    The following hematology parameters were evaluated in this study: hemoglobin, white blood cells (WBC) with differential, and platelets.

    Measured: 2 years

  8. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Chemistry) Abnormalities

    The following chemistry parameters were evaluated in this study: sodium, potassium, magnesium, chloride, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, albumin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or urea, creatinine, total calcium, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), glucose, uric acid, phosphorus or phosphate, insulin, and C-peptide.

    Measured: 2 years

  9. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Urinalysis) Abnormalities

    Urinalysis included urine dipstick for protein and blood: if positive, perform a microscopic analysis. Number of participants with urine protein tested positive is presented.

    Measured: 2 years

  10. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Coagulation) Abnormalities

    Coagulation analysis included partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and international normalized ratio (INR) or prothrombin time (PT).

    Measured: 2 years

  11. Number of Participants With ECG Post-Baseline Maximum Absolute Values Meeting Pre-defined Criteria

    The number of participants with ECG post-baseline maximum absolute values meeting the following criteria was reported: (1) maximum QTc interval ranged from 450 to 480 msec; >480-500 msec; >500 msec; (2) maximum QTcB (QT corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula) interval ranged from 450 to 480 msec; >480-500 msec; >500 msec; (3) maximum QTcF (QT corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula) interval ranged from 450 to 480 msec; >480-500 msec; >500 msec.

    Measured: 2 years

  12. Number of Participants With ECG Maximum Increase From Baseline Meeting Pre-defined Criteria

    The number of participants with ECG maximum increase from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported:

    Criterion A: maximum QTc interval increase from baseline >30 msec and ≤60 msec; criterion B: maximum QTc interval increase from baseline >60 msec; criterion C: maximum QTcB interval increase from baseline >30 msec and ≤60 msec; criterion D: maximum QTcB interval increase from baseline >60 msec; criterion E: maximum QTcF interval increase from baseline >30 msec and ≤60 msec; criterion F: maximum QTcF interval increase from baseline >60 msec.

    Measured: 2 years

  13. Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-05212384

    Cmax of PF-05212384 was observed directly from data.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 72, 120 hours post PF-05212384 infusion on Cycle 1 Day 9 and Cycle 1 Day 16.

  14. Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan

    Cmax of irinotecan was observed directly from data.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

  15. Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of SN-38

    SN-38 is an irinotecan metabolite. Cmax of SN-38 was observed directly from data.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

  16. Time for Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-05212384

    Tmax of PF-05212384 was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 72, 120 hours post PF-05212384 infusion on Cycle 1 Day 9 and Cycle 1 Day 16.

  17. Time for Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Irinotecan

    Tmax of irinotecan was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

  18. Time for Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of SN-38

    SN-38 is an irinotecan metabolite. Tmax of SN-38 was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

  19. Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) of PF-05212384

    T½ was calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log-linear decline were used in the regression.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 72, 120 hours post PF-05212384 infusion on Cycle 1 Day 9 and Cycle 1 Day 16.

  20. Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) of Irinotecan

    T½ was calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log-linear decline were used in the regression.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

  21. Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) of SN-38

    T½ was calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log-linear decline were used in the regression.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

  22. Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to the Time for the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of PF-05212384

    AUClast refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero to the time for the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast of PF-05212384 was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 72, 120 hours post PF-05212384 infusion on Cycle 1 Day 9.

  23. Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to the Time for the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Irinotecan

    AUClast refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero to the time for the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast of irinotecan was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

  24. Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to the Time for the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of SN-38

    AUClast refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero to the time for the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast of SN-38 (an irinotecan metabolite) was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

  25. Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of PF-05212384

    AUCinf refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinite time. AUCinf of PF-05212384 was calculated using the formula: AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 72, 120 hours post PF-05212384 infusion on Cycle 1 Day 9.

  26. Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Irinotecan

    AUCinf refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinite time. AUCinf of irinotecan was calculated using the formula: AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

  27. Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of SN-38

    AUCinf refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinite time. AUCinf of SN-38 (an irinotecan metabolite) was calculated using the formula: AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis.

    Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

  28. Levels of Signaling Proteins in Paired and Single Tumor Biopsies

    Pre defined signaling proteins included Akt (protein kinase B), p-Akt (phosphorylated Akt), p-S6 (phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6), p-Met (phosphorylated Met, a receptor tyrosine kinase), p-mTOR (phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin), EGFR (epithelial growth factor receptor), and p-EGFR (phosphorylated EGFR).

    Measured: 2 years

  29. Number of Participants With Expression of Pre-defined Gene Sequences in Biopsied Tumor Tissues

    Pre-defined gene sequences were those related to EGFR, PI3K (phosphoinositide-3 kinase) and other oncogenic pathways; examples included but were not limited to PIK3CA (this gene encodes the catalytic subunit of PI3K), PIK3R1 (this gene encodes the regulatory subunit of PI3K), KRAS, NRAS and BRAF (this gene encodes serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf) sequences and PIK3CA gene amplification. Due to early termination of this study, these pre-defined gene sequences were not analyzed, except for KRAS and NRAS. Number of participants who had KRAS and NRAS wild type status confirmed by the central laboratory is presented.

    Measured: 2 years

  30. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C)

    Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was used in this study to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and CRC-related symptoms in participants enrolled to the randomized portion of the study. The FACT-C is part of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system, a comprehensive and extensive set of self-reported instruments for the assessment of health-related quality of life in participants with cancer or other chronic illnesses.

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Nov 2013
  3. Primary completion6 Apr 2016
  4. Study completion6 Apr 2016

Why it stopped: Enrollment to the study was terminated on 11Nvo2014 due to slow recruitment. There were no safety or efficacy issues that contributed to this decision.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
19 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01925274
Sponsor's protocol ID
B2151005
Other IDs
2013-002095-40
Status last verified
Dec 2018
First submitted
15 Aug 2013
Last updated
8 Jan 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing PF-05212384, irinotecan and Cetuximab in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by Pfizer at 32 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 32 sites in United States, South Korea, Japan, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigators (time frame: From date of first dose until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in