Atrial FibrillationIMPACT-AFNCT01927367
Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
A study testing Clinical Decision Support System for AF in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Jafna L Cox at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Research Question: Among community-based patients with AF, does providing an integrated Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) to providers and patients improve process of care and clinical outcomes, and decrease the healthcare costs and resource utilization over 12 months, as compared to usual care? Intervention: A… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Clinical Decision Support System for AF
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,145 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Nov 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age >/= 18 years (no max age limit)
- Confirmed atrial fibrillation.
- Able to provide informed consent in English.
Who cannot join
- Patients unable to provide informed consent.
- Patients who are not expected to be alive at the end of the 12 month follow up.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
Capital District Health Authority
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3A7
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6
About this study
Official title: Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF)
Research Question: Among community-based patients with AF, does providing an integrated Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) to providers and patients improve process of care and clinical outcomes, and decrease the healthcare costs and resource utilization over 12 months, as compared to usual care?
Intervention: A web-based clinical decision support system, computerizing the Canadian AF clinical guidelines, to support primary care providers and patients in optimizing and standardizing AF care.
Read the detailed description
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common abnormality of cardiac rhythm. It is also a disease of aging, affecting 3% of adults aged > 45 years and 12% of those aged > 75. Individually, AF's rapid and irregular heart beat is most frequently perceived as undesirable palpitations, but more threatening impacts are heart failure, catastrophic stroke and premature death. AF also markedly impairs quality of life.
Although patients with AF are at increased risk of stroke, death and hospitalization, many patients are not benefiting from evidence-informed, best-care strategies. Gaps have been documented in the knowledge, skills and competencies of primary care clinicians concerning the management of AF in Canada. For example, a large proportion of AF patients at moderate to high risk for stroke do not receive guideline recommended thromboprophylaxis; and of those that do, many are not optimally controlled. One Canadian study also found that in patient with known AF and a prior stroke, who were then admitted with a second stroke, 15% were not on any anticoagulation and only 18% were on warfarin and within the therapeutic range. Opportunities certainly exist to enhance the uptake of the Canadian AF Clinical Practice Guideline recommendations and best-care approaches in the primary care setting.
Patients need to be the focus of care services and be actively engaged and empowered to manage their care, with the support of health care providers. We believe that health system efficiency, care quality and patient safety can be enhanced through the use of innovative, integrated, interactive, pro-active and personalized point-of- care solutions targeting both providers and patients. This is the premise for the IMPACT-AF study.
Primary care providers and their patients are anticipated to benefit from enhanced use of health information technology regarding the management of patients with AF. A clinical guideline-based decision support system (CDSS) will be developed and tested in primary care settings across Nova Scotia.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Clinical Decision Support System for AF
- Keywords
- Clinical Decision Support System, Primary Health Care, Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clinical Decision Support System for AFOther
Also called CDSS
A web-based clinical decision support system, computerizing the Canadian AF clinical guidelines and best-practice approaches, to support primary care providers and patients in optimizing and standardizing AF care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Decision Support System for AF | Other | Providers randomized to use the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS, a web-based tool). Receives: Other: Clinical Decision Support System for AF |
| Usual Care | No intervention | Usual Care - providers are not eligible to access / use the CDSS. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Hospitalization and AF-related Emergency Department Visits
Any unplanned hospitalization (admission with an overnight stay in hospital) due to one of the following causes: acute coronary syndrome, pre-syncope /syncope, transient ischemic attack/ stroke, atrial fibrillation, flutter, pulmonary embolism /deep vein thrombosis /systemic embolism, worsening congestive heart failure including pulmonary edema or dyspnea of cardiac origin. AF-related ED visit was predefined as: any presentation with palpitations, rapid heart rate, presyncope or syncope, shortness of breath, transient chest discomfort, or hemodynamic instability resolving with cardioversion or rate-control, not resulting in hospitalization.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Number of Participants With AF-related Emergency Department Visits
- Individual element of primary outcome.
- AF-related emergency department visits.
Measured: 12 months
Process of Care
- Timely access to specialist consultation
- Timely access to echocardiograms
- Timely access to catheter ablations for AF and atrial flutter
Measured: 12 months
Health Related Quality of Life
- Health Related Quality of Life measured using an accepted health questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).
Measured: 12 months
Costs
- The costs associated with the development, implementation, and maintenance of CDSS.
- The costs associated with managing and treating patients with AF.
Measured: 12 months
Cost Effectiveness
- Incremental cost effectiveness ratio between the interventional arm and the control arm
Measured: 12 months
Number of Participations With CV Hospitalizations
- Individual element of primary outcome.
- AF-related emergency department visits.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionNov 2018
- Study completionNov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,145 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jafna L Cox
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McMaster University, Population Health Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Bayer
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jafna L Cox, Nova Scotia Health Authority
- Investigators
- Jafna L Cox, MD, FRCPC, FACC, Principal investigator, CDHASyed Sibte Raza Abidi, MSc, PhD, Study director, Dalhousie University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01927367
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IMPACT-AF-2013
- Acronym
- IMPACT-AF
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 20 Aug 2013
- Last updated
- 9 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data (IPD) is not available due to ethics regulations.
Publications
Hamlin J, Cox J, Hamilton L, Nemis-White J, McKillop J, Sandila N, Parkash R. Regional Disparities in Atrial Fibrillation Management: An IMPACT-AF Substudy. CJC Open. 2024 Jul 3;6(10):1162-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.06.010. eCollection 2024 Oct.
PubMed 39525336Cox J, Hamilton L, Thabane L, Foster G, MacKillop J, Xie F, Ciaccia A, Choudhri S, Nemis-White J, Parkash R; IMPACT-AF Investigators. Computerized clinical decision support to improve stroke prevention therapy in primary care management of atrial fibrillation: a cluster randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2024 Jul;273:102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.04.016. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
PubMed 38685464Humphries B, Cox JL, Parkash R, Thabane L, Foster GA, MacKillop J, Nemis-White J, Hamilton L, Ciaccia A, Choudhri SH, Kovic B, Xie F. Resource use and cost associated with computerized decision support system and usual care in managing patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis of IMPACT-AF randomized trial data. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02329-7.
PubMed 37853351Nemis-White JM, Hamilton LM, Shaw S, MacKillop JH, Parkash R, Choudhri SH, Ciaccia A, Xie F, Thabane L, Cox JL; IMPACT-AF Investigators. Lessons learned from Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF): a pragmatic clinical trial of computerized decision support in primary care. Trials. 2021 Aug 11;22(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05488-y.
PubMed 34380542Humphries B, Cox JL, Parkash R, Thabane L, Foster GA, MacKillop J, Nemis-White J, Hamilton L, Ciaccia A, Choudhri SH, Xie F; IMPACT-AF Investigators. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient-Reported Experience of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the IMPACT-AF Clinical Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e019783. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019783. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
PubMed 34315232Cox JL, Parkash R, Abidi SS, Thabane L, Xie F, MacKillop J, Abidi SR, Ciaccia A, Choudhri SH, Abusharekh A, Nemis-White J; IMPACT-AF Investigators. Optimizing primary care management of atrial fibrillation: The rationale and methods of the Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF) study. Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
PubMed 29807323
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01927367
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMPACT-AF / IMPACT-AF-2013
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- Clinical Decision Support System, Primary Health Care, Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,145 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jafna L CoxUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McMaster University, Population Health Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Bayer
- Study start
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Sep 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Research Question: Among community-based patients with AF, does providing an integrated Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) to providers and patients improve process of care and clinical outcomes, and decrease the healthcare costs and resource utilization over 12 months, as compared to usual care?
Intervention: A web-based clinical decision support system, computerizing the Canadian AF clinical guidelines, to support primary care providers and patients in optimizing and standardizing AF care.
Detailed description
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common abnormality of cardiac rhythm. It is also a disease of aging, affecting 3% of adults aged > 45 years and 12% of those aged > 75. Individually, AF's rapid and irregular heart beat is most frequently perceived as undesirable palpitations, but more threatening impacts are heart failure, catastrophic stroke and premature death. AF also markedly impairs quality of life.
Although patients with AF are at increased risk of stroke, death and hospitalization, many patients are not benefiting from evidence-informed, best-care strategies. Gaps have been documented in the knowledge, skills and competencies of primary care clinicians concerning the management of AF in Canada. For example, a large proportion of AF patients at moderate to high risk for stroke do not receive guideline recommended thromboprophylaxis; and of those that do, many are not optimally controlled. One Canadian study also found that in patient with known AF and a prior stroke, who were then admitted with a second stroke, 15% were not on any anticoagulation and only 18% were on warfarin and within the therapeutic range. Opportunities certainly exist to enhance the uptake of the Canadian AF Clinical Practice Guideline recommendations and best-care approaches in the primary care setting.
Patients need to be the focus of care services and be actively engaged and empowered to manage their care, with the support of health care providers. We believe that health system efficiency, care quality and patient safety can be enhanced through the use of innovative, integrated, interactive, pro-active and personalized point-of- care solutions targeting both providers and patients. This is the premise for the IMPACT-AF study.
Primary care providers and their patients are anticipated to benefit from enhanced use of health information technology regarding the management of patients with AF. A clinical guideline-based decision support system (CDSS) will be developed and tested in primary care settings across Nova Scotia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Decision Support System for AF | Other | Other: Clinical Decision Support System for AFProviders randomized to use the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS, a web-based tool). |
| Usual Care | No intervention | –Usual Care - providers are not eligible to access / use the CDSS. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age >/= 18 years (no max age limit)
- Confirmed atrial fibrillation.
- Able to provide informed consent in English.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients unable to provide informed consent.
- Patients who are not expected to be alive at the end of the 12 month follow up.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Decision Support System for AFAlso: CDSSA web-based clinical decision support system, computerizing the Canadian AF clinical guidelines and best-practice approaches, to support primary care providers and patients in optimizing and standardizing AF care. | Other | Clinical Decision Support System for AF |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Hospitalization and AF-related Emergency Department Visits
Time frame: 12 months
Any unplanned hospitalization (admission with an overnight stay in hospital) due to one of the following causes: acute coronary syndrome, pre-syncope /syncope, transient ischemic attack/ stroke, atrial fibrillation, flutter, pulmonary embolism /deep vein thrombosis /systemic embolism, worsening congestive heart failure including pulmonary edema or dyspnea of cardiac origin. AF-related ED visit was predefined as: any presentation with palpitations, rapid heart rate, presyncope or syncope, shortness of breath, transient chest discomfort, or hemodynamic instability resolving with cardioversion or rate-control, not resulting in hospitalization.
6 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With AF-related Emergency Department Visits
Time frame: 12 months
Process of Care
Time frame: 12 months
Health Related Quality of Life
Time frame: 12 months
Costs
Time frame: 12 months
Cost Effectiveness
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Participations With CV Hospitalizations
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Mar 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39525336Hamlin J, Cox J, Hamilton L, Nemis-White J, McKillop J, Sandila N, Parkash R. Regional Disparities in Atrial Fibrillation Management: An IMPACT-AF Substudy. CJC Open. 2024 Jul 3;6(10):1162-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.06.010. eCollection 2024 Oct.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38685464Cox J, Hamilton L, Thabane L, Foster G, MacKillop J, Xie F, Ciaccia A, Choudhri S, Nemis-White J, Parkash R; IMPACT-AF Investigators. Computerized clinical decision support to improve stroke prevention therapy in primary care management of atrial fibrillation: a cluster randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2024 Jul;273:102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.04.016. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37853351Humphries B, Cox JL, Parkash R, Thabane L, Foster GA, MacKillop J, Nemis-White J, Hamilton L, Ciaccia A, Choudhri SH, Kovic B, Xie F. Resource use and cost associated with computerized decision support system and usual care in managing patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis of IMPACT-AF randomized trial data. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02329-7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34380542Nemis-White JM, Hamilton LM, Shaw S, MacKillop JH, Parkash R, Choudhri SH, Ciaccia A, Xie F, Thabane L, Cox JL; IMPACT-AF Investigators. Lessons learned from Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF): a pragmatic clinical trial of computerized decision support in primary care. Trials. 2021 Aug 11;22(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05488-y.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34315232Humphries B, Cox JL, Parkash R, Thabane L, Foster GA, MacKillop J, Nemis-White J, Hamilton L, Ciaccia A, Choudhri SH, Xie F; IMPACT-AF Investigators. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient-Reported Experience of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the IMPACT-AF Clinical Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e019783. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019783. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29807323Cox JL, Parkash R, Abidi SS, Thabane L, Xie F, MacKillop J, Abidi SR, Ciaccia A, Choudhri SH, Abusharekh A, Nemis-White J; IMPACT-AF Investigators. Optimizing primary care management of atrial fibrillation: The rationale and methods of the Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF) study. Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data (IPD) is not available due to ethics regulations.
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Pulsed Field Ablation-Asia
Concomitant Procedures, Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Early Closure of Left Atrial Appendage for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke Despite Anticoagulation Therapy
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Treated With Anticoagulation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jafna L Cox, MD, FRCPC, FACC principal investigator
CDHA
Syed Sibte Raza Abidi, MSc, PhD study director
Dalhousie University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Clinical Decision Support System for AF in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Jafna L Cox at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Hospitalization and AF-related Emergency Department Visits (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01927367, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2021.