AzTrials
AzTrials

TinnitusNCT01927991

Internet-based Self-help for Tinnitus: The Role of Support

A study testing iCBT (internet-based, cognitive-behavioural therapy) in people with Tinnitus, run by Philipps University Marburg at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Internet-based cognitive behavioural self-help (iCBT) has become increasingly popular to provide psychotherapy. For several psychological and psychosomatic disorders, treatment efficacy was shown. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tinnitus
What is being tested?
iCBT (internet-based, cognitive-behavioural therapy)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
112 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Sep 2012to May 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • tinnitus duration of more than 6 months
  • severe or most severe tinnitus distress
  • age of at least 18 years
  • fluent in German

Who cannot join

  • psychosis, severe psychological disorder, risk for suicide
  • prior participation in associated study
  • medical disorder as reason for tinnitus, i.e. morbus ménière

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Philipps University Marburg, Dept. of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy

    Marburg, Hesse, 35037

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Internet-based cognitive behavioural self-help (iCBT) has become increasingly popular to provide psychotherapy. For several psychological and psychosomatic disorders, treatment efficacy was shown. Previously, iCBT has also been applied to patients suffering from tinnitus and results show significant and long-term stable improvements in tinnitus distress. However, the role of therapeutic support in iCBT has not been thoroughly investigated. Previous results suggest that iCBT without therapeutic support is less effective and leads to higher dropout rates than therapist-guided iCBT. The aim of the randomized controlled trial is thus to investigate the role of therapeutic support in an iCBT for tinnitus sufferers.

Conditions
Tinnitus
Being tested
iCBT (internet-based, cognitive-behavioural therapy)
Keywords
tinnitus, cognitive behavioural therapy, internet treatment
Medical subject headings
Tinnitus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • iCBT (internet-based, cognitive-behavioural therapy)Behavioural

    The intervention is based on cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and is offered as a self-help and provided over the internet. Participants work on their own on different modules which give information about tinnitus and the associated symptoms and provide instructions for practical exercises.

Study groups in NCT01927991
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
iCBT with therapeutic supportExperimentalParticipants work with the online self-help and receive additional therapeutic support on demand
Receives: Behavioral: iCBT (internet-based, cognitive-behavioural therapy)
iCBT without therapeutic supportActive comparatorParticipants work with the online self-help on their own and do not receive additional therapeutic support
Receives: Behavioral: iCBT (internet-based, cognitive-behavioural therapy)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in tinnitus distress

    Assessment of tinnitus distress with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the Mini-Tinnitus Questionnaire (Mini-TQ)

    Newman, C. W., Jacobson, G. P., \& Spitzer, J. B. (1996). Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 122(2), 143-148.

    Hiller, W., \& Goebel, G. (2004). Rapid assessment of tinnitus-related psychological distress using the Mini-TQ. Int J Audiol, 43(10), 600-604.

    Measured: 1 year; pre, post, 6-mo-follow-up

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change in depressive Symptoms

    Assessment of depressive symptoms with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., \& Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med, 16(9), 606-613. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x

    Zigmond, A. S., \& Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 67(6), 361-370.

    Measured: 1 year; pre, post, 6mo-follow-up

  2. Change in tinnitus-related thoughts

    Assessment of dysfunctional tinnitus-related thoughts with the Tinnitus Cognitions Scale (T-Cog)

    Hiller, W., \& Haerkötter, C. (2005). Does sound stimulation have additive effects on cognitive-behavioral treatment of chronic tinnitus? Behav Res Ther, 43(5), 595-612.

    Measured: 1 year; pre, post, 6mo-follow-up

  3. Change of tinnitus acceptance

    Assessment of tinnitus acceptance with the Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire (TAQ)

    Weise, C., Kleinstauber, M., Hesser, H., Westin, V. Z., \& Andersson, G. (2013). Acceptance of tinnitus: validation of the tinnitus acceptance questionnaire. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 42(2), 100-115. 10.1080/16506073.2013.781670

    Measured: 1 year; pre, post, 6mo-follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionMay 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
112 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01927991
Sponsor's protocol ID
Titus2
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
17 Aug 2013
Last updated
28 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing iCBT (internet-based, cognitive-behavioural therapy) in people with Tinnitus, run by Philipps University Marburg at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in tinnitus distress (time frame: 1 year; pre, post, 6-mo-follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in