AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Respiratory DistressNAVA-VNINCT01928238

Physiologic Effects of Noninvasive Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) Versus Noninvasive Pressure Support Ventilation in Patients at Risk for Respiratory Distress Needed Preventive Used of Noninvasive Ventilation After Extubation.

A study testing Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA). and Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV) in people with Acute Respiratory Distress, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare inspiratory effort, comfort, gas exchange and patient ventilator synchrony during non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist or pneumatically triggered and cycled-off noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV), in patient at risk of respiratory distress after… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Respiratory Distress
What is being tested?
Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA). and Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
13 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Aug 2012to Jan 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients intubated for 48 h or more
  • Patients who tolerated a 120-min spontaneous breathing trial after recovery from their acute disease with no signs of respiratory failure
  • Patients at high risk for respiratory after extubation were enrolled if they had at least two of the following risk factors for respiratory failure after extubation:
  • age older than 65 years
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,
  • heart failure as the cause for intubation
  • An Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II score greater than 12 on the day of extubation.

Who cannot join

  • Age younger than 18 years
  • Head trauma or surgery
  • Recent gastric or oesophageal surgery
  • Active upper gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Excessive amount of respiratory secretions
  • Poor cooperation
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Decision to limit life-supporting treatments in the ICU
  • Tracheostomy or other upper airway disorders
  • Lack of collaboration
  • Do not resuscitate order or any decision to limit therapeutic effort in the ICU.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU de Bordeaux

    Bordeaux, 33000

Other trials in France

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare inspiratory effort, comfort, gas exchange and patient ventilator synchrony during non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist or pneumatically triggered and cycled-off noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV), in patient at risk of respiratory distress after extubation.

Read the detailed description

Reintubation, which occurs after planned extubation, is a relevant consequence of respiratory failure after extubation. The early use of noninvasive pressure support ventilation averted respiratory failure after extubation in patients at increased risk. However patient tolerance to the technique is a critical factor determining its success. One of the key factors determining tolerance to Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) is optimal synchrony between the patient's spontaneous breathing activity and the ventilator's settings, known as patient ventilator interaction. Optimal patient-ventilator synchrony during NIV can prove very difficult to achieve due to the presence of leaks, the type of interface which can interfere with various aspects of ventilator function. Patient ventilator synchrony during NPSV can be compromised when using conventional pneumatic triggering, with the ventilator-delivered inspiratory support starting after the patient's inspiratory effort. The switch from inspiration to expiration (cycling-off) should, ideally, coincide with the end of the patient's inspiratory effort. However greater asynchrony at the end of inspiration, with the ventilator cycling off either too early or too late compared to the end of the patient's inspiratory effort can be observed during NPSV. A possible solution is to replace the pneumatic triggering with neural triggering and cycling off using the diaphragm electrical activity (Eadi). Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) uses the electrical activity of the diaphragm to control the timing and pressure of the ventilation delivered. The ventilator is triggered, limited and cycled-off directly by Eadi. The Eadi is measured by a multiple array oesophageal electrode. The array of bipolar electrodes can be mounted on a feeding tube, which is routinely introduced in critically ill patients.

Being tested
Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA)., Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV)
Keywords
NIV, NAVA, noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory, noninvasive pressure support ventilation
Medical subject headings
Acute Lung Injury

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA).Device

  • Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV)Device

Study groups in NCT01928238
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1ExperimentalPatients will have two 20-minute noninvasive periods : Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) and then Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV)
Receives: Device: Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA).; Device: Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV)
Arm 2ExperimentalPatients will have two 20-minute noninvasive periods : Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV) and then Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA)
Receives: Device: Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA).; Device: Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Inspiratory muscle effort

    The primary endpoint variable is the inspiratory muscle effort. To estimate the inspiratory effort, we will determine the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), the transdiaphragmatic pressure time product per breath (PTPdi/b) or per minute (PTPdi/min) and the Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm (EADI)max.

    Measured: At inclusion (day 0)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. patient ventilator synchrony

    Patient ventilator synchrony will be identified by estimating the following variables: autocycled breaths, ineffective inspiratory effort, the inspiratory trigger delay, the expiratory trigger delay and the time of synchrony between muscle effort and ventilator support.

    Measured: At inclusion (Day 0)

  2. gas exchange

    Measured: At inclusion (Day 0)

  3. Patient comfort

    Patient comfort will be assessed using a five-item semi quantitative scale: 1, uncomfortable; 2, somewhat uncomfortable; 3, acceptable; 4, somewhat comfortable; and 5, comfortable.

    Measured: At inclusion (Day 0)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2014
  4. Study completionJan 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01928238
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHUBX 2011/27
Other IDs
2012-A00197-36
Acronym
NAVA-VNI
Status last verified
Jan 2015
First submitted
20 Aug 2013
Last updated
22 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA). and Noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV) in people with Acute Respiratory Distress, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Inspiratory muscle effort (time frame: At inclusion (day 0)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in