Parkinson DiseasePhase 3NCT01929317
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of 18 to 24mg/Day Ropinirole Controlled Release (CR) Tablets in Early and Advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) Patients.
A Phase 3 study testing Ropinirole CR 2mg tablet and Ropinirole CR 8mg tablet in people with Parkinson Disease, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 17 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
This study is a Phase III, multicentre, randomized, initial double-blind study with subsequent open label phases. The study will havea screening phase (4 weeks), a dose increase effect verification phase (12 weeks), a down titration 1 phase (1 week), a long-term phase (39 weeks), down titration 2 phase (1 to 2 weeks)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- Ropinirole CR 2mg tablet and Ropinirole CR 8mg tablet
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 81 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- 28 Aug 2013to 9 Jun 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who are diagnosed as Parkinson's Disease with severity of the modified Hoehn \& Yahr criteria Stages I-IV.
- 1) Monotherapy subject: Subjects who have never received L-dopa, or subjects who have had prior exposure to L-dopa (up to 450 milligram (mg)/day) for up to 3 months in total and L-dopa treatment has been discontinued, for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to the screening phase. 2) L-dopa adjunct subject: Subjects receiving L-dopa (up to 450 mg/day) for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening phase.
- Patients receiving 15mg/day Ropinirole IR or 16mg/day Ropinirole CR for 4 weeks prior to the screening phase, UPDRS Part III total (on) scores is 10 points or more at screening visit and can expect clinical efficacy by increasing Ropinirole CR.
- Age: 20years or older (at the time of informed written consent)
- Informed consent: Patients who are able to give informed written consent in person. (i.e. patients who are capable of giving informed written consent on their own)
- Sex: Either sex. Women of child-bearing potential will be eligible for inclusion in this study. However they have to have a negative pregnancy test at the screening visit and will have to agree to further pregnancy testing at the time points determined in study assessments and procedures and practice one of the methods of contraception mentioned in the protocol from the screening visit until the end of the follow-up examination - Outpatient status
Show all 12Show fewer
- corrected QT (QTc) <450 millisecond (msec) or <480msec for subjects with Bundle Branch Block. The QTc should be based on single or averaged QTc values of triplicate electrocardiograms (ECGs) obtained over a brief recording period.
- Liver function tests: Patients with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 2x upper limit of normal (ULN); and Alkaline Phosphatase and bilirubin =< 1.5xULN (isolated bilirubin > 1.5ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin < 35%) at the screening visit.
- Randomization Criteria
- Patients whose UPDRS Part III total (on) scores is 10 points or more at week 0
- Patients who did not achieve an optimal therapeutic response by treatment with 16mg/day Ropinirole CR and required higher dose of Ropinirole CR
- Patients who are 80% or more compliant taking study drug
Who cannot join
- Late stage advanced patients demonstrating incapacitating peak dose or biphasic dyskinsia on their stable dose of L-dopa.
- Patients who have used any other dopamine agonist (except for Ropinirole IR and CR) within 4 weeks prior to the screening phase.
- Patients who have been treated with the following drugs at 4 weeks or earlier before the start of the screening phase, and whose treatment regimen of the drug has been changed. Anticholinergic agents: trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride, piroheptine hydrochloride, mazaticol hydrochloride, metixene hydrochloride, biperiden hydrochloride, profenamine, amantadine hydrochloride,droxidopa, citicoline, selegiline hydrochloride, entacapone, zonisamide, Estrogens, CYP1A2 inhibitors.
- Patients who have been changing in smoking habit (started or stopped smoking) within the screening phase.
- Patients who have been treated with any other investigational drug within 12 weeks prior to the screening phase.
- Patients who present serious physical signs and symptoms other than those of the PD (e.g. cardiac/hepatic/renal disorder and haematopoietic disorder).
Show all 16Show fewer
- Patients with symptomatic postural hypotension. (e.g. dizziness and syncope).
- Patients with a current or history of drug abuse or alcoholism.
- Patients with severe dementia such as score 3 or 4 of the UPDRS item 1 (Mentation, behaviour, and mood).
- Patients with current or history of major psychosis (e.g. schizophrenia or psychotic depression) such as score 3 or 4 of the UPDRS item 2 (thought disorder) or item 3(depression).
- Patients who have received surgical treatment for PD in the past (e.g. pallidectomy, deep brain stimulation).
- Female patients who are pregnant or lactating, who may be pregnant, or who plan for pregnancy during the study or within 30 days after the last dose of the study drug.
- Unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulapathy, hypoalbuminaemia, oesophageal or gastric varices or persistent jaundice), cirrhosis, known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones). Chronic hepatitis B administered immunosuppressive agents due to risk of hapatitis B reactivation.
- Patients with a history of drug allergy to Ropinirole hydrochloride.
- Except for patients with a history of basal cell carcinoma, patients with a current or history of cancer or malignant tumor within 5 years prior to the screening phase.
- Others whom the investigator (subinvestigator) considers ineligible for the study.
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country.
17 sites in 1 country
Japan17 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aichi, 466-8560
GSK Investigational Site
Akita, 010-0874
GSK Investigational Site
Aomori, 030-8553
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, 070-8530
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, 070-8644
GSK Investigational Site
Hyōgo, 672-8043
GSK Investigational Site
Hyōgo, 674-0081
GSK Investigational Site
Kagawa, 760-0027
GSK Investigational Site
Kanagawa, 252-0392
GSK Investigational Site
Kyoto, 600-8811
GSK Investigational Site
Numakunai, 020-0878
GSK Investigational Site
Numakunai, 025-0075
GSK Investigational Site
Okayama, 703-8265
GSK Investigational Site
Osaka, 530-8480
GSK Investigational Site
Osaka, 578-8588
GSK Investigational Site
Shizuoka, 416-0955
GSK Investigational Site
Shizuoka, 433-8125
About this study
Official title: A Study ROP116991, Clinical Evaluation of 18 to 24mg/Day Ropinirole CR for Parkinson's Disease.
This study is a Phase III, multicentre, randomized, initial double-blind study with subsequent open label phases. The study will havea screening phase (4 weeks), a dose increase effect verification phase (12 weeks), a down titration 1 phase (1 week), a long-term phase (39 weeks), down titration 2 phase (1 to 2 weeks) and a follow up phase. Subjects will be assigned to Ropinirole CR high-dose group or Ropinirole CR maintenance group at a ratio of 3:1. This study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy (effect of increasing Ropinirole dose from 16 mg/day to 18-24 mg/day) of the Ropinirole CR tablets in early and advanced PD patients who have not achieved an optimal therapeutic response with marketed Ropinirole Immediate release (IR) (15 mg/day) or marketed Ropinirole CR (16 mg/day) formulations.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- Ropinirole CR 2mg tablet, Ropinirole CR 8mg tablet, Ropinirole CR matching Placebo tablet
- Keywords
- Ropinirole, Parkinson's disease
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ropinirole CR 2mg tabletDrug
Ropinirole CR 2mg tablets will be supplied as white oval film-coated tablets.
Ropinirole CR 8mg tabletDrug
Ropinirole CR 8mg tablets will be supplied as white oval film-coated tablets.
Ropinirole CR matching Placebo tabletDrug
Ropinirole CR matching Placebo tablet tablets (containing no active ingredients) indistinguishable in appearance from Ropinirole CR 2 mg tablets.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ropinirole CR high-dose group | Experimental | The subjects will receive Ropinirole CR 16mg/day for 4 weeks in screening phase. After randomization the subject will enter dose increase effect verification phase, where Ropinirole CR dose will titrated (2 mg /day/week) from 18 mg/day up to a maximum 24mg/day at intervals of 1 week or longer for 8 weeks, till subject reaches a dose level above which further symptomatic improvement cannot be expected; the subject will be maintained on that dose for 4 weeks. This will be followed by a down titration phase of one week and long term phase of 39 weeks in which the subjects will receive incremental doses (2 mg /day/week) of Ropinirole CR from 18 mg/day till to a maximum of 24 mg/day till subject reaches a dose level above which further symptomatic improvement cannot be expected; the subject will be maintained on that dose. Subjects completing the long term phase will undergo a down titration phase of 1 to 2 weeks. Receives: Drug: Ropinirole CR 2mg tablet; Drug: Ropinirole CR 8mg tablet |
| Ropinirole CR maintenance group | Experimental | The subjects will receive Ropinirole CR 16mg/day for 4 weeks in screening phase. After randomization the subject will enter dose increase effect verification phase and Ropinirole CR dose will maintained at 16mg/day and placebo will be increased at intervals of 1 week for 8 weeks till subject reaches a dose level above which further symptomatic improvement cannot be expected; the subject will be maintained on that dose for 4 weeks. This will be followed by a down titration phase of one week and long term phase of 39 weeks in which the subjects will receive incremental doses (2 mg/day/week) of Ropinirole CR from 18 mg/day till to a maximum of 24 mg/day till subject reaches a dose level above which further symptomatic improvement cannot be expected; the subject will be maintained on that dose. Subjects completing the long term phase will undergo a down titration phase of 1 to 2 weeks. Receives: Drug: Ropinirole CR 2mg tablet; Drug: Ropinirole CR 8mg tablet; Drug: Ropinirole CR matching Placebo tablet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 0) in UPDRS Part III Total Score at Week 12 in the CR High-dose Group
The Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 minus the total score at Baseline. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. The imputation was conducted using the data within only the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase; therefore, the value observed in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was not used to impute a missing data in the Long-term Phase.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Secondary outcomes (30)
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 0) in UPDRS Part III Total Score at the Indicated Visits
The Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 minus the total score at Baseline. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. The imputation was conducted using the data within only the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase; therefore, the value observed in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was not used to impute a missing data in the Long-term Phase.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Number of Participants Achieving a 30% and 20% Reduction From Baseline in the UPDRS Total Part 3 Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Number of participants achieving a 30% or greater and 20% or greater reduction from Baseline in UPDRS total part III score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 are presented using LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. The imputation was conducted using the data within only the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase; therefore, the value observed in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was not used to impute a missing data in the Long-term Phase.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at the planned visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluated activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluated complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for "No" and 1 for "Yes". The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluates activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. "Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 3 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 3 evaluated motor examination on 27 items, response for each items were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 27 items ranged from 0 to 108. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluated complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for "No" and 1 for "Yes". The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long-term Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data. Full Analysis Set 2 (FAS2) Population comprised of all participants in the FAS1 and shifted to Long-term Phase, excluding those participants who received no dose of study medication and participants without UPDRS part III total score data after supply of the investigational product.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Long Term Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluates activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data."Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Mean Change From Baseline in UPDRS Part 3 Total Score at the Indicated Visits for Long Term Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 3 evaluates motor examination on 27 items, response for each items were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 27 items ranged from 0 to 108. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 52
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long Term Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluated complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for "No" and 1 for "Yes". The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms.Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long Term Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part I evaluated mentation, behavior, and mood on 4 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 16. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Long-term Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 2 evaluates activities of daily living on 13 items, response for each item were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 4 items ranged from 0 to 52. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data."Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. "On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. The score of UPDRS part 2 in off status is rated as '0' (Normal/None), if L-dopa adjunct participants do not have diurnal fluctuations.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 3 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long Term Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assessed the status of PD participants objectively. Part 3 evaluated motor examination on 27 items, response for each items were scored numerically from 0-4. The total score for the 27 items ranged from 0 to 108. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long-term Phase
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of PD participants objectively. Part 4 evaluates complications on 11 items, response for 4 items were scored numerically from 0-4 and response for other 7 items were Yes/No questions and responses are numerically scored as 0 for "No" and 1 for "Yes". The total score for the 11 items ranged from 0 to 23. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as Post baseline value minus Baseline value, divided by Baseline value and multiplied by 100. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "Off" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct
"Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their "off " periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent "Off"(actual hours) is calculated as awake time spent "Off" (hours) at the indicated visit minus awake time spent "Off" (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Awake Time Spent "Off" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct
"Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their "off " periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent "off" is defined as sum of two days off time (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplied by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent "off") from the post Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent "off"). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "On" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct
"On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their "off " periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent "On"(actual hours) is calculated as awake time spent "On" (hours) at the indicated visit minus awake time spent "On" (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "On"Without Troublesome Dyskinesias at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct
"On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their "off " periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent "On" without troublesome dyskinesias (actual hours) is calculated as [awake time spent "On" minus awake time spent "On" with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at visit minus [awake time spent "On" minus awake time spent "On" with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 0. The analyses for Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the LOCF data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Number of Participants With an Improvement (Responder) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Global Improvement Scale at Week 12
The CGI global improvement scale allows the investigator to rate the participant's total improvement since the beginning of treatment (Baseline). Scores on the scale range from 1 to 7 (1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse). Participants with a CGI global improvement score of <=2 (representing much improved or very much improved) were considered to be moderate improvement (responder). The analyses performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.
Measured: Week 12
Number of Participants Remaining in the Study
Measured: From the start of the study medication (Week 0) until Week 52
Number of Participants Achieving a 30% and 20% Reduction From Baseline in the UPDRS Total Part 3 Score at the Indicated Visits in Long Term Phase.
The Japanese UPDRS assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Number of participants achieving a 30% or greater and 20% or greater reduction from Baseline in UPDRS total part III score at Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52,are presented using OC data. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post Baseline value. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 13. If the value evaluated at Week 13 was missing, then first observed value post Week 13 was used as Baseline. The OC (observed Case) dataset was defined as the dataset consisting of observed data without any missing data imputation.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 52
Change From Baseline in the Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "Off" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
"Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their "off " periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (actual hours of awake time spent "off") from the week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (proportion of awake time spent "off"). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline.The analyses for long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Awake Time Spent "Off" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
"Off" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are not adequately controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their "off " periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent "off" is defined as sum of two days off time (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplied by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent "off") from week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (percentage of awake time spent "off"). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13, If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline. The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "On" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
"On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their "off " periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent "On"(actual hours) is calculated as awake time spent "On" (hours) at the week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value minus awake time spent "On" (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline. The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. The OC (observed Case) dataset was defined as the dataset consisting of observed data without any missing data imputation.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "On" Without Troublesome Dyskinesias at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
"On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their "on " periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Change from Baseline in awake time spent "On" without troublesome dyskinesias (actual hours) is calculated as [awake time spent "On" minus awake time spent "On" with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at visit minus [awake time spent "On" minus awake time spent "On" with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) at Baseline. Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing then first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline. The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Awake Time Spent "On" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
"On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Participants were asked to record the duration of their "on " periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent "on" is defined as sum of two days on time (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplified by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent "on") from week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (percentage of awake time spent "on"). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing the first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline.The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Awake Time Spent "On" Without Troublesome Dyskinesias at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
"On" state is defined as the state at which PD symptoms are well controlled by the drug. Par. were asked to record the duration of their "on " periods and asleep in diary cards every day. Percentage of awake time spent "On" without troublesome dyskinesias is defined as sum of two days on time without troublesome dyskinesias ["On" time minus "On" time with troublesome dyskinesias] (hours) divided by sum of two days awake time (hours) and multiplified by 100. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (percentage of awake time spent "On" without troublesome dyskinesias) from week 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52 value (percentage of awake time spent "On" without troublesome dyskinesias). Baseline is defined as the value at Week 13. If the value evaluated at week 13 was missing the first observed value post week 13 was used as a Baseline.The analyses for Long term phase was performed using the OC data. In the OC data, no imputation was carried for any missing data.
Measured: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Study start28 Aug 2013
- Primary completion16 Sep 2014
- Study completion9 Jun 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01929317
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 116991
- Status last verified
- Jun 2018
- First submitted
- 22 Aug 2013
- Last updated
- 20 Jun 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
Hattori N, Hasegawa K, Sato K, Mitsuyama E, Numachi Y. Clinical evaluation of ropinirole controlled-release formulation at 18-24 mg/day in Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017 Jul;40:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
PubMed 28442303
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jun 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study ROP116991, Clinical Evaluation of 18 to 24mg/Day Ropinirole CR for Parkinson's Disease.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01929317
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 116991
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Keywords
- Ropinirole, Parkinson's disease
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Aug 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Jun 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 May 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a Phase III, multicentre, randomized, initial double-blind study with subsequent open label phases. The study will havea screening phase (4 weeks), a dose increase effect verification phase (12 weeks), a down titration 1 phase (1 week), a long-term phase (39 weeks), down titration 2 phase (1 to 2 weeks) and a follow up phase. Subjects will be assigned to Ropinirole CR high-dose group or Ropinirole CR maintenance group at a ratio of 3:1. This study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy (effect of increasing Ropinirole dose from 16 mg/day to 18-24 mg/day) of the Ropinirole CR tablets in early and advanced PD patients who have not achieved an optimal therapeutic response with marketed Ropinirole Immediate release (IR) (15 mg/day) or marketed Ropinirole CR (16 mg/day) formulations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ropinirole CR high-dose group | Experimental | Drug: Ropinirole CR 2mg tablet, Drug: Ropinirole CR 8mg tabletThe subjects will receive Ropinirole CR 16mg/day for 4 weeks in screening phase. After randomization the subject will enter dose increase effect verification phase, where Ropinirole CR dose will titrated (2 mg /day/week) from 18 mg/day up to a maximum 24mg/day at intervals of 1 week or longer for 8 weeks, till subject reaches a dose level above which further symptomatic improvement cannot be expected; the subject will be maintained on that dose for 4 weeks. This will be followed by a down titration phase of one week and long term phase of 39 weeks in which the subjects will receive incremental doses (2 mg /day/week) of Ropinirole CR from 18 mg/day till to a maximum of 24 mg/day till subject reaches a dose level above which further symptomatic improvement cannot be expected; the subject will be maintained on that dose. Subjects completing the long term phase will undergo a down titration phase of 1 to 2 weeks. |
| Ropinirole CR maintenance group | Experimental | Drug: Ropinirole CR 2mg tablet, Drug: Ropinirole CR 8mg tablet, Drug: Ropinirole CR matching Placebo tabletThe subjects will receive Ropinirole CR 16mg/day for 4 weeks in screening phase. After randomization the subject will enter dose increase effect verification phase and Ropinirole CR dose will maintained at 16mg/day and placebo will be increased at intervals of 1 week for 8 weeks till subject reaches a dose level above which further symptomatic improvement cannot be expected; the subject will be maintained on that dose for 4 weeks. This will be followed by a down titration phase of one week and long term phase of 39 weeks in which the subjects will receive incremental doses (2 mg/day/week) of Ropinirole CR from 18 mg/day till to a maximum of 24 mg/day till subject reaches a dose level above which further symptomatic improvement cannot be expected; the subject will be maintained on that dose. Subjects completing the long term phase will undergo a down titration phase of 1 to 2 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients who are diagnosed as Parkinson's Disease with severity of the modified Hoehn \& Yahr criteria Stages I-IV.
- 1) Monotherapy subject: Subjects who have never received L-dopa, or subjects who have had prior exposure to L-dopa (up to 450 milligram (mg)/day) for up to 3 months in total and L-dopa treatment has been discontinued, for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to the screening phase. 2) L-dopa adjunct subject: Subjects receiving L-dopa (up to 450 mg/day) for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening phase.
- Patients receiving 15mg/day Ropinirole IR or 16mg/day Ropinirole CR for 4 weeks prior to the screening phase, UPDRS Part III total (on) scores is 10 points or more at screening visit and can expect clinical efficacy by increasing Ropinirole CR.
- Age: 20years or older (at the time of informed written consent)
- Informed consent: Patients who are able to give informed written consent in person. (i.e. patients who are capable of giving informed written consent on their own)
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Late stage advanced patients demonstrating incapacitating peak dose or biphasic dyskinsia on their stable dose of L-dopa.
- Patients who have used any other dopamine agonist (except for Ropinirole IR and CR) within 4 weeks prior to the screening phase.
- Patients who have been treated with the following drugs at 4 weeks or earlier before the start of the screening phase, and whose treatment regimen of the drug has been changed. Anticholinergic agents: trihexyphenidyl hydrochloride, piroheptine hydrochloride, mazaticol hydrochloride, metixene hydrochloride, biperiden hydrochloride, profenamine, amantadine hydrochloride,droxidopa, citicoline, selegiline hydrochloride, entacapone, zonisamide, Estrogens, CYP1A2 inhibitors.
- Patients who have been changing in smoking habit (started or stopped smoking) within the screening phase.
- Patients who have been treated with any other investigational drug within 12 weeks prior to the screening phase.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ropinirole CR 2mg tabletRopinirole CR 2mg tablets will be supplied as white oval film-coated tablets. | Drug | Ropinirole CR high-dose group, Ropinirole CR maintenance group |
| Ropinirole CR 8mg tabletRopinirole CR 8mg tablets will be supplied as white oval film-coated tablets. | Drug | Ropinirole CR high-dose group, Ropinirole CR maintenance group |
| Ropinirole CR matching Placebo tabletRopinirole CR matching Placebo tablet tablets (containing no active ingredients) indistinguishable in appearance from Ropinirole CR 2 mg tablets. | Drug | Ropinirole CR maintenance group |
Primary outcome
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 0) in UPDRS Part III Total Score at Week 12 in the CR High-dose Group
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
The Japanese Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assesses the status of Parkinson's Disease (PD) participants objectively. Part III assessed motor examination on 27 items. Participants received a score of 0-4 points per item. The maximum total score is 108 points. A higher score indicates more severe PD symptoms. Baseline is defined as the value evaluated at Week 0. Mean change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 minus the total score at Baseline. The analyses for the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was performed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) data. In the LOCF data, the last available data was used for the imputation for missing data at a planned visit. The imputation was conducted using the data within only the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase; therefore, the value observed in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase was not used to impute a missing data in the Long-term Phase.
30 secondary outcomes
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 0) in UPDRS Part III Total Score at the Indicated Visits
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Number of Participants Achieving a 30% and 20% Reduction From Baseline in the UPDRS Total Part 3 Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 3 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Dose Increase Effect Verification Phase
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long-term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Long Term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Mean Change From Baseline in UPDRS Part 3 Total Score at the Indicated Visits for Long Term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 52
Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long Term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 1 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long Term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 2 Total Score at the Indicated Visits by the on/Off Status in the Long-term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 3 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long Term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Percent Change From Baseline in the Japanese UPDRS Part 4 Total Score at the Indicated Visits in the Long-term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "Off" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Awake Time Spent "Off" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "On" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "On"Without Troublesome Dyskinesias at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12
Number of Participants With an Improvement (Responder) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Global Improvement Scale at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants Remaining in the Study
Time frame: From the start of the study medication (Week 0) until Week 52
Number of Participants Achieving a 30% and 20% Reduction From Baseline in the UPDRS Total Part 3 Score at the Indicated Visits in Long Term Phase.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49, 52
Change From Baseline in the Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "Off" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Awake Time Spent "Off" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "On" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in Actual Hours of Awake Time Spent "On" Without Troublesome Dyskinesias at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Awake Time Spent "On" at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Awake Time Spent "On" Without Troublesome Dyskinesias at the Indicated Visits Only in Participants Who Received L-dopa Adjunct in Long Term Phase
Time frame: Baseline (Week 13), Weeks 17, 21, 25, 37, 49 and 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jun 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28442303Hattori N, Hasegawa K, Sato K, Mitsuyama E, Numachi Y. Clinical evaluation of ropinirole controlled-release formulation at 18-24 mg/day in Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017 Jul;40:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ropinirole CR 2mg tablet and Ropinirole CR 8mg tablet in people with Parkinson Disease, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 17 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 May 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change From Baseline (Week 0) in UPDRS Part III Total Score at Week 12 in the CR High-dose Group (time frame: Baseline and Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01929317, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2018.