High-risk SexNCT01931345
The SPOT Project : Motivational Interviewing in Conjunction With Rapid HIV Testing
A study testing Motivational Interviewing Counseling and Standard counseling in people with High-risk Sex, run by Université du Québec a Montréal at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
In 2009, a team of researchers from Montreal, Canada, implemented SPOT, an intervention aimed at reducing HIV transmission among men who have sex with men by offering rapid HIV testing in a community setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- High-risk Sex
- What is being tested?
- Motivational Interviewing Counseling and Standard counseling
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 900 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male
- 18 years of age or older
- Resident of Quebec
- Able to understand French or English
- Unprotected anal sex with a man on at least one occasion in the last 3 years
- HIV-negative or HIV status unknown
Who cannot join
- Symptoms of fever (over 38°C), headache, muscular pain, fatigue, and/or swollen lymp
- Previously tested at SPOT
- Enrolled as a participant in the IPERGAY study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The SPOT Project: Effect of Counseling Based on Motivational Interviewing Offered in Conjunction With Rapid HIV Testing on the Occurrence of Unprotected Anal Sex and Its Determinants Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) in Montreal
In 2009, a team of researchers from Montreal, Canada, implemented SPOT, an intervention aimed at reducing HIV transmission among men who have sex with men by offering rapid HIV testing in a community setting. During the first phase, counseling based on Quebec guidelines for rapid HIV testing was offered (standard counseling - SC) and in the second phase, counseling based on motivational interviewing (MIC) was developed and validated. The current phase of the project aims to strengthen the work undertaken during previous phases. The objective of the study is to assess the short and medium term effect of MIC on the occurrence of at-risk anal intercourse and its cognitive determinants. Participants will be randomly assigned to either SC or MIC, and will respond to a baseline questionnaire documenting their sexual behavior and psychosexual profile prior to the intervention at the start of their initial visit (T0). The effect of counseling will be assessed following the intervention at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2) and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3).
Read the detailed description
In Canada, the prevalence and incidence of HIV remain high among men who have sex with men (MSM). Moreover, epidemiological data show that a significant proportion of transmission can be attributed people who are unaware of their HIV status. To address these challenges, HIV testing has the potential to be a major prevention strategy. Indeed, the combination of testing and treatment (test \& treat) is now seen to be one of the most promising strategies in terms of its potential contribution to the eradication of HIV.
To maximize testing among MSM, it has been recommended that services be diversified by offering HIV testing in close proximity to areas where people most at risk for HIV reside and socialize. Rapid HIV testing can also help reduce barriers in access to testing by reaching those most at risk more effectively in non-traditional venues. In addition, testing offers an excellent opportunity and psycho-affective context within which to provide individualized counseling in order to explore preventive practices and testing routines.
Since July 2009, the SPOT project has combined a number of strategies (testing services in close proximity to a residential area; free, anonymous, and rapid HIV testing; individualized preventive counseling) in an original way at an innovative community site located in the heart of Montreal's Gay Village. In the first phase of the study, standard counseling (SC) based on Quebec guidelines for rapid HIV testing was used. During the second, counseling based on a motivational interviewing approach (MIC) was developed and has been provided to participants since May 2011.
Taking advantage of the existing infrastructure, the objective of the current phase of the study is to assess the short and medium term impact of MIC and its cognitive determinants in comparison to SC. The occurrence of at-risk anal intercourse (unprotected anal sex with an HIV-positive partner or partner of unknown HIV status) will be measured at baseline and followed over six months. Four cognitive determinants of at-risk anal sex will also be measured: the importance that participants accord to taking the necessary steps to protect themselves from HIV, perceived personal efficacy in achieving this, intention to do so, and the extent to which participants have planned to do so.
To achieve this objective, a 24 months randomized trial will be implemented SPOT's community site. Participants who present for HIV testing will be randomized between the two conditions, MIC and SC, alternated at a ratio of 1/1 (experimental condition: MIC offered by a community worker; control condition: SC offered by a nurse). Outcome measures will be collected by means of questionnaires. Four measurement times are planned. A baseline questionnaire will be administered prior to pre-test counseling at the start of the initial visit. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline (T0), and in follow-up questionnaires administered after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2) and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3). Target enrolment at T0 is 900, for a final sample of 508 participants at T3, representing 254 participants per group (MIC, SC). Mechanisms will be put in place to ensure the integrity of both MIC and SC interventions as well as to retain participants and involve community members in the research process.
In the wake of the recommendations of the Federal Initiative to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada, this study will provide data on the effectiveness of different forms of preventive counseling tailored for use in conjunction with rapid HIV testing. If MIC proves to be effective, the training and clinical supervision offered to intervention staff as well as the tools and quality control procedures developed during the implementation of this approach to counseling will be made available in other settings where testing is offered. Important lessons may also be learned with regards to the organization of services and the benefits and challenges associated with the implementation of this type of HIV prevention infrastructure. Ultimately, this study will contribute to efforts to more effectively combat the HIV epidemic amongst MSM in Canada and reduce the direct and indirect costs associated with HIV in these communities.
- Conditions
- High-risk Sex
- Being tested
- Motivational Interviewing Counseling, Standard counseling
- Keywords
- Rapid HIV testing, MSM, Motivational Interviewing, HIV prevention, HIV/AIDS, At-risk anal intercourse, Randomized trial
- Medical subject headings
- Unsafe Sex, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Motivational Interviewing CounselingBehavioural
Counseling developed by the research team based on a motivational interviewing approach
Standard counselingBehavioural
Counseling based on Quebec guidelines for rapid HIV testing
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing Counseling | Experimental | Counseling developed by the research team based on a motivational interviewing approach Receives: Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing Counseling |
| Standard counseling | Active comparator | Counseling based on Quebec guidelines for rapid HIV testing Receives: Behavioral: Standard counseling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline occurrence of at-risk anal intercourse at 6 months
Occurrence of at-risk anal intercourse will be assessed prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3).
Measured: Prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change from baseline importance that participants accord to taking the necessary steps to protect themselves from HIV at 6 months
Importance that participants accord to taking the necessary steps to protect themselves from HIV will be assessed prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3).
Measured: Prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Change from baseline perceived personal efficacy in protecting themselves from HIV at 6 months
Perceived personal efficacy in protecting themselves from HIV will be assessed prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Measured: Prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Change from baseline intention to protect themselves from HIV at 6 months
Intention to protect themselves from HIV will be assessed prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Measured: Prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Change from baseline extent to which participants have planned to protect themselves from HIV at 6 months
Extent to which participants have planned to protect themselves from HIV will be assessed prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Measured: Prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionMar 2016
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for High-risk SexStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Université du Québec a Montréal
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jessica Caruso, Université du Québec a Montréal
- Investigators
- Joanne Otis, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Université du Québec a Montréal
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01931345
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPOT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 6 Aug 2013
- Last updated
- 25 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The SPOT Project: Effect of Counseling Based on Motivational Interviewing Offered in Conjunction With Rapid HIV Testing on the Occurrence of Unprotected Anal Sex and Its Determinants Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) in Montreal
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01931345
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPOT
- Conditions
- High-risk Sex
- Keywords
- Rapid HIV testing, MSM, Motivational Interviewing, HIV prevention, HIV/AIDS, At-risk anal intercourse, Randomized trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Université du Québec a MontréalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- Jul 2013
- Primary completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In 2009, a team of researchers from Montreal, Canada, implemented SPOT, an intervention aimed at reducing HIV transmission among men who have sex with men by offering rapid HIV testing in a community setting. During the first phase, counseling based on Quebec guidelines for rapid HIV testing was offered (standard counseling - SC) and in the second phase, counseling based on motivational interviewing (MIC) was developed and validated. The current phase of the project aims to strengthen the work undertaken during previous phases. The objective of the study is to assess the short and medium term effect of MIC on the occurrence of at-risk anal intercourse and its cognitive determinants. Participants will be randomly assigned to either SC or MIC, and will respond to a baseline questionnaire documenting their sexual behavior and psychosexual profile prior to the intervention at the start of their initial visit (T0). The effect of counseling will be assessed following the intervention at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2) and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3).
Detailed description
In Canada, the prevalence and incidence of HIV remain high among men who have sex with men (MSM). Moreover, epidemiological data show that a significant proportion of transmission can be attributed people who are unaware of their HIV status. To address these challenges, HIV testing has the potential to be a major prevention strategy. Indeed, the combination of testing and treatment (test \& treat) is now seen to be one of the most promising strategies in terms of its potential contribution to the eradication of HIV.
To maximize testing among MSM, it has been recommended that services be diversified by offering HIV testing in close proximity to areas where people most at risk for HIV reside and socialize. Rapid HIV testing can also help reduce barriers in access to testing by reaching those most at risk more effectively in non-traditional venues. In addition, testing offers an excellent opportunity and psycho-affective context within which to provide individualized counseling in order to explore preventive practices and testing routines.
Since July 2009, the SPOT project has combined a number of strategies (testing services in close proximity to a residential area; free, anonymous, and rapid HIV testing; individualized preventive counseling) in an original way at an innovative community site located in the heart of Montreal's Gay Village. In the first phase of the study, standard counseling (SC) based on Quebec guidelines for rapid HIV testing was used. During the second, counseling based on a motivational interviewing approach (MIC) was developed and has been provided to participants since May 2011.
Taking advantage of the existing infrastructure, the objective of the current phase of the study is to assess the short and medium term impact of MIC and its cognitive determinants in comparison to SC. The occurrence of at-risk anal intercourse (unprotected anal sex with an HIV-positive partner or partner of unknown HIV status) will be measured at baseline and followed over six months. Four cognitive determinants of at-risk anal sex will also be measured: the importance that participants accord to taking the necessary steps to protect themselves from HIV, perceived personal efficacy in achieving this, intention to do so, and the extent to which participants have planned to do so.
To achieve this objective, a 24 months randomized trial will be implemented SPOT's community site. Participants who present for HIV testing will be randomized between the two conditions, MIC and SC, alternated at a ratio of 1/1 (experimental condition: MIC offered by a community worker; control condition: SC offered by a nurse). Outcome measures will be collected by means of questionnaires. Four measurement times are planned. A baseline questionnaire will be administered prior to pre-test counseling at the start of the initial visit. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline (T0), and in follow-up questionnaires administered after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2) and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3). Target enrolment at T0 is 900, for a final sample of 508 participants at T3, representing 254 participants per group (MIC, SC). Mechanisms will be put in place to ensure the integrity of both MIC and SC interventions as well as to retain participants and involve community members in the research process.
In the wake of the recommendations of the Federal Initiative to Address HIV/AIDS in Canada, this study will provide data on the effectiveness of different forms of preventive counseling tailored for use in conjunction with rapid HIV testing. If MIC proves to be effective, the training and clinical supervision offered to intervention staff as well as the tools and quality control procedures developed during the implementation of this approach to counseling will be made available in other settings where testing is offered. Important lessons may also be learned with regards to the organization of services and the benefits and challenges associated with the implementation of this type of HIV prevention infrastructure. Ultimately, this study will contribute to efforts to more effectively combat the HIV epidemic amongst MSM in Canada and reduce the direct and indirect costs associated with HIV in these communities.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing Counseling | Experimental | Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing CounselingCounseling developed by the research team based on a motivational interviewing approach |
| Standard counseling | Active comparator | Behavioral: Standard counselingCounseling based on Quebec guidelines for rapid HIV testing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male
- 18 years of age or older
- Resident of Quebec
- Able to understand French or English
- Unprotected anal sex with a man on at least one occasion in the last 3 years
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Symptoms of fever (over 38°C), headache, muscular pain, fatigue, and/or swollen lymp
- Previously tested at SPOT
- Enrolled as a participant in the IPERGAY study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Motivational Interviewing CounselingCounseling developed by the research team based on a motivational interviewing approach | Behavioural | Motivational Interviewing Counseling |
| Standard counselingCounseling based on Quebec guidelines for rapid HIV testing | Behavioural | Standard counseling |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline occurrence of at-risk anal intercourse at 6 months
Time frame: Prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Occurrence of at-risk anal intercourse will be assessed prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3).
4 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline importance that participants accord to taking the necessary steps to protect themselves from HIV at 6 months
Time frame: Prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Change from baseline perceived personal efficacy in protecting themselves from HIV at 6 months
Time frame: Prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Change from baseline intention to protect themselves from HIV at 6 months
Time frame: Prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Change from baseline extent to which participants have planned to protect themselves from HIV at 6 months
Time frame: Prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Oct 2016.
- Our websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for High-risk Sex
Enrolling by invitation
Evaluating the Efficacy of Annual CHTC Retesting Among Male Couples at High Risk of HIV Infection
HIV Infections
Recruiting
Sex Differences in Metabolism Following a High-fat Meal
Healthy Nutrition
RecruitingPhase 4
Pharmacological Optimization in Prevention in Heart Failure: A Sex-gap?
Heart Failure, Acute Heart Failure
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Therapy Adapted for High Risk and Low Risk HIV-Associated Anal Cancer
AIDS-Related Anal Carcinoma, Anal Margin Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Flexibility and the Predictive Brain in Autistic Males and Females
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joanne Otis, Ph.D. principal investigator
Université du Québec a Montréal
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Motivational Interviewing Counseling and Standard counseling in people with High-risk Sex, run by Université du Québec a Montréal at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline occurrence of at-risk anal intercourse at 6 months (time frame: Prior to pre-test counseling at the start of participants' initial visit (baseline, T0), after post-test counseling at the end of the initial visit (T1), at 3 months after the initial visit (T2), and at 6 months after the initial visit (T3)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Oct 2016.