Lumbar Spinal StenosisTOPSNCT01933607
Post-market Study of the TOPS™ System
A study testing TOPS System in people with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis, run by Premia Spine at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The study is being conducted to evaluate look the TOPS System when used in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and lumbar spinal stenosis who would normally be candidates for spinal fusion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Spondylolisthesis
- What is being tested?
- TOPS System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- May 2014to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
IInclusion Criteria - Prospective subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be considered eligible for inclusion in this clinic study:
- Age 40-85 years old;
- One or both of the following at a single level from L3 to L5; (1) symptomatic monosegmental lumbar spinal stenosis or facet arthrosis, (2) degenerative spondylolisthesis up to and including grade 1.
- At least three (3) months of failed, conservative treatment prior to surgery (unless deemed inadvisable due to progressive motor weakness or other evidence of rapidly deteriorating condition) including the use of anti-inflammatory medications at maximum specified dosage, administration of epidural/facet injections, rest, heat, electrotherapy and/or physical therapy;
- Narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal (central and/or foramenal) classified as moderate to severe using CT scans/MRI;
- VAS leg pain of at least 40/100;
- Oswestry Disability Index score of at least 40/100;
- Lower back pain or sciatica with or without spinal claudication and
- Psychosocially, mentally and physically able to fully comply with the clinical protocol and willing to adhere to follow-up schedule and requirements.
Exclusion Criteria - Prospective subjects must not meet any of the exclusion criteria to participate in this clinical study:
- Primary diagnosis of discogenic back pain at the TOPS System level;
- Back or non-radicular leg pain of unknown etiology at the index level;
- Lytic spondylolisthesis at the index level;
- More than one (1) motion segment involved in the degenerative pathology to the extent that justifies its inclusion in the surgical procedure, unless a decompression alone can be done at that level without compromising stability;
- Known allergy to titanium and/or polyurethane;
- Supplemental interbody support required (e.g., bone graft, spacers, VBRs, or fusion cages) at the index level;
- Clinically compromised vertebral bodies at the affected level(s) due to any traumatic, neoplastic, metabolic or infectious pathology;
- Deformity of the spine that would compromise the implant, e.g. scoliosis of greater than ten (10) degrees;
- Morbid obesity defined as a body mass index > 40 or a weight more than 100 lbs. over ideal body weight;
- DEXA bone density measured T score equal to or lower than - 2.0;
- Paget's disease, osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, thyroid and/or parathyroid gland disorder and/or any other metabolic bone disease;
- Active infection;
- AIDS, HIV, or active hepatitis;
- Rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disease;
- Tuberculosis active or in the past 3 years;
- Active malignancy: unless treated with curative intent and there have been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years;
- Medical condntions requiring treatment with any drugs known to potentially interfere with bone/soft tissue healing;
- Pregnant or interested in becoming pregnant in the next 3 years;
- Current chemical/alcohol dependency or significant psychosocial disturbance;
- Cauda equina syndrome or neurogenic bowel/bladder dysfunction;
- Severe arterial insufficiency of the legs, peripheral vascular disease;
- Sustained pathologic fractures of the vertebra or multiple fractures of the vertebra or hip;
- Significant peripheral neuropathy;
- Immunologically suppressed, received steroids > 1 month out of the past year;
- Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus;
- Life expectancy less than 3 years;
- Waddell signs > 3;
- Currently involved in active spinal litigation OR
- Subject is incarcerated.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD
Stephen McGillion, MD, Stephen.McGillion@uhs.nhs.uk
John Fowler, MD
About this study
Official title: A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the TOPS System
The study is being conducted to evaluate look the TOPS System when used in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and lumbar spinal stenosis who would normally be candidates for spinal fusion.
Read the detailed description
This study is being conducted to evaluate the TOPS™ SP System from ("TOPS™ System" or "TOPS"). TOPS is an alternative to spinal fusion and is designed to stabilize but not fuse the affected vertebral level to alleviate pain stemming from degenerative spondylolisthesis (abnormal/excessive movement of the vertebrae causing pain in the lower back and legs) and spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal resulting in compression of nerves producing symptoms of pain, numbness and tingling in the legs).
- Conditions
- Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Spondylolisthesis
- Being tested
- TOPS System
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Stenosis, Spondylolisthesis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TOPS SystemDevice
Non-randomized study involving implantation of a TOPS via lumbar surgery to decompress and provide stability to the index level.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TOPS System | Other | Post Marketing Study Receives: Device: TOPS System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Improvement in ODI and improvement in VAS leg score
Composite endpoint - Subjects who exhibit a reduction of 15 percent in their Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score compared to their preoperative ODI score AND a reduction of at least 20mm (20% improvement) in either of their VAS Leg Score will be considered a success.
Measured: 24 months post implantation
Secondary outcomes (4)
Average improvement in back and leg visual analog scales (VAS)
A failure to meet of any of the secondary endpoints will not be considered a therapeutic failure unless such a failure requires subsequent surgical intervention.
Measured: 24 months post implantation
ZCQ Scores
A failure to meet of any of the secondary endpoints will not be considered a therapeutic failure unless such a failure requires subsequent surgical intervention.
Measured: 24 months post implantation
Quality of life (SF-36)
A failure to meet of any of the secondary endpoints will not be considered a therapeutic failure unless such a failure requires subsequent surgical intervention.
Measured: 24 months post implantation
Maintenance or improvement in neurological symptoms
A failure to meet of any of the secondary endpoints will not be considered a therapeutic failure unless such a failure requires subsequent surgical intervention.
Measured: 24 months post implantation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2014
- Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lumbar Spinal StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Premia Spine
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John Fowler, MD, Principal investigator, University Southampton Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01933607
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1513-CL-VL-01 SOU UK
- Acronym
- TOPS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2016
- First submitted
- 8 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 18 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: May publish if enough enrollment
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the TOPS System
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01933607
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TOPS / 1513-CL-VL-01 SOU UK
- Conditions
- Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Spondylolisthesis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Premia SpineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2014
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is being conducted to evaluate look the TOPS System when used in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and lumbar spinal stenosis who would normally be candidates for spinal fusion.
Detailed description
This study is being conducted to evaluate the TOPS™ SP System from ("TOPS™ System" or "TOPS"). TOPS is an alternative to spinal fusion and is designed to stabilize but not fuse the affected vertebral level to alleviate pain stemming from degenerative spondylolisthesis (abnormal/excessive movement of the vertebrae causing pain in the lower back and legs) and spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal resulting in compression of nerves producing symptoms of pain, numbness and tingling in the legs).
Study design
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TOPS System | Other | Device: TOPS SystemPost Marketing Study |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TOPS SystemNon-randomized study involving implantation of a TOPS via lumbar surgery to decompress and provide stability to the index level. | Device | TOPS System |
Primary outcome
Improvement in ODI and improvement in VAS leg score
Time frame: 24 months post implantation
Composite endpoint - Subjects who exhibit a reduction of 15 percent in their Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score compared to their preoperative ODI score AND a reduction of at least 20mm (20% improvement) in either of their VAS Leg Score will be considered a success.
4 secondary outcomes
Average improvement in back and leg visual analog scales (VAS)
Time frame: 24 months post implantation
ZCQ Scores
Time frame: 24 months post implantation
Quality of life (SF-36)
Time frame: 24 months post implantation
Maintenance or improvement in neurological symptoms
Time frame: 24 months post implantation
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Apr 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. May publish if enough enrollment
Related trials for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Recruiting
Surgical Treatment of Adjacent Segment Stenosis
Adjacent Segment Disease, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
RecruitingObservational study
MILD® Percutaneous Image-Guided Lumbar Decompression: A Medicare Claims Study
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Kore Fiber PLF Study
Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases, Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
Recruiting
Activity Post Spinal Surgery Engagement Trial
Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS)
Active, not recruiting
SLIP II Registry: Spinal Laminectomy Versus Instrumented Pedicle Screw Fusion
Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Fowler, MD principal investigator
University Southampton Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing TOPS System in people with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis, run by Premia Spine at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Stephen McGillion, MD (02380796245, Stephen.McGillion@uhs.nhs.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Improvement in ODI and improvement in VAS leg score (time frame: 24 months post implantation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2016.