Ovarian CancerPhase 2NCT01936363
Trial of Pimasertib With SAR245409 or Placebo in Ovarian Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Pimasertib once daily, SAR245409 and Pimasertib twice daily in people with Ovarian Cancer, run by EMD Serono at 34 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
This is a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-arm, Phase 2 trial investigating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of pimasertib plus SAR245409 and pimasertib placebo administered once per day compared to pimasertib administered twice per day plus SAR245409 placebo administered once per day in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Pimasertib once daily, SAR245409 and Pimasertib twice daily
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2013to 30 Nov 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The female participant had a diagnosis of one of the following: a) low-grade serous ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma, or grade 1 serous ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma or well-differentiated serous ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma or b) serous borderline ovarian or peritoneal tumor, ovarian or peritoneal tumor of low-malignant potential, ovarian or peritoneal atypical proliferative serous tumor that recurs as low grade serous carcinoma or has invasive peritoneal implants
- The participant had at least one prior line of systemic therapy and had a tumor, which was not amenable to potentially curative surgical resection
- The participant had measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1
- The participant had read and understood the written informed consent form (ICF) and was willing and able to gave informed consent, fully understood the requirements of the trial and was willing to comply with all trial visits and assessments, including completion of patient-reported measures. Consent must be given before any trial related activities
- Women of childbearing potential must had a negative serum pregnancy test at the screening visit
- Women of childbearing potential must be willing to avoid pregnancy by using an adequate method of contraception for 2 weeks prior to screening, during and at least 3 months after the last dose of trial medication
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria may apply
Who cannot join
- The participant had previously been treated with a PI3K inhibitor and taken off treatment due to treatment related AEs
- The participant had been previously treated with a Mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor
- Any anti-cancer therapy or treatment incorporating chemotherapy, immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, or biologic therapy within 28 days of the start of trial treatment or within 5 times the half-life of such treatment, whichever was shorter. Treatment with nitrosoureas or mitomycin C were exceptions to this for which a treatment interval of at least 6 weeks was required
- The participant had not recovered from toxicity due to prior therapy to baseline level or National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0) Grade 1 or less (except alopecia). Residual chemotherapy-induced neuropathy grade less than equal to (<=) 2 was permitted
- The participant had poor organ and marrow function as defined in the protocol
- The participant had creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation NCI CTCAE grade greater than equal to (>=) 2, and/or a previous history of myositis or rhabdomyolysis
Show all 13Show fewer
- The participant had difficulty swallowing, malabsorption or other chronic gastrointestinal disease or conditions that may hamper compliance and/or absorption of the trial drug. Participants requiring total parenteral nutrition were to be excluded
- The participant had a history of delayed healing/open wounds or diabetic ulcers
- The participant had a history of congestive heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cardiac conduction abnormalities including Fridericia corrected QT interval (QTcF) prolongation of > 480 milliseconds (ms) or a pacemaker, clinically relevant impaired cardiovascular function (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV) or stroke within 3 months prior to enrollment
- The participant had a history of retinal degenerative disease (hereditary retinal degeneration or age-related macular degeneration), uveitis or retinal vein occlusion (RVO), or had other relevant abnormalities identified on screening ophthalmologic examination, which might increase the risk of serous retinal detachment (SRD) or RVO
- The participant had a history of uncontrolled intercurrent illness including but not limited to an active infection, hypertension, or uncontrolled diabetes (e.g. glycosylated hemoglobin >= 8 percent [%]) that would limit compliance with treatment requirements
- Any previous malignancy treated with curative intent and the participant had been disease free for less than 5 years prior to randomization, with exception of carcinoma-in-situ of the cervix, squamous carcinoma of the skin, basal cell carcinoma of the skin
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 7 countries.
34 sites in 7 countries
United States17 sites
Research site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Research site
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Research site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Research site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215-5450
Research site
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Research site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Research site
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Research site
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Research site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Research site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Research site
Kalispell, Montana, 59901
Research site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Research site
Middletown, Ohio, 45042
Research site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Research site
New York, New York, 10065
Research site
Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910
Research site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Canada5 sites
Research site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
Research site
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
Research site
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6
Research site
Québec, G1R 2J6
Research site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Spain5 sites
Research site
Madrid, 28033
Research site
Madrid, 28046
Research site
Palma Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07198
Research site
Seville, 41013
Research site
Valencia, 46010
Australia3 sites
Research site
Greenslopes, Queensland, 4120
Research site
Northmead, New South Wales, 2152
Research site
Subiaco, Western Australia, 6008
About this study
Official title: Phase II Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Combination of Pimasertib With SAR245409 or of Pimasertib With SAR245409 Placebo in Subjects With Previously Treated Unresectable Low Grade Ovarian Cancer
This is a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-arm, Phase 2 trial investigating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of pimasertib plus SAR245409 and pimasertib placebo administered once per day compared to pimasertib administered twice per day plus SAR245409 placebo administered once per day in participants with previously treated unresectable low-grade serous ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma or serous borderline ovarian or peritoneal tumors.
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer
- Being tested
- Pimasertib once daily, Pimasertib placebo, SAR245409 placebo, SAR245409, Pimasertib twice daily
- Keywords
- Ovarian Cancer, Pimasertib, Placebo, SAR245409
- Medical subject headings
- Ovarian Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pimasertib once dailyDrug
Pimasertib administered as oral capsule at a dose of 60 milligram (mg) once daily until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever came first.
Pimasertib placeboDrug
Placebo matching Pimasertib administered once daily in evening until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever came first.
SAR245409 placeboDrug
Placebo matching SAR245409 administered once daily in morning until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever came first.
SAR245409Drug
SAR245409 administered as oral capsule at a dose of 70 milligram (mg) once daily until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever came first.
Pimasertib twice dailyDrug
Pimasertib administered as oral capsule at a dose of 60 milligram (mg) twice daily until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever came first.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pimasertib (once daily) plus SAR245409 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Pimasertib once daily; Drug: Pimasertib placebo; Drug: SAR245409 |
| Pimasertib (twice daily) plus SAR245409 placebo | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: SAR245409 placebo; Drug: Pimasertib twice daily |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective Tumor Response
Objective tumor response was defined as the presence of at least one Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to more than (<) 10 millimeter (mm). Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death assessed every 8 weeks up to week 32, and thereafter every 12 weeks up to 52 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Progression-Free Survival
PFS defined as time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression.CR:Disappearance of all target lesions.Any pathological lymph nodes(whether target or non-target)must have reduction in short axis to<10 mm.PR:At least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions,taking as reference baseline sum diameters.PD:At least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions,taking as reference smallest sum on study.In addition to relative increase of 20%,the sum also demonstrate absolute increase of at least 5 mm.SD:Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD,taking as reference smallest sum diameters while on study. PFS calculated as(Months)=first event date minus randomization or first dose date plus 1.Median PFS was computed using Kaplan-Meier estimates (product-limit estimates) and was presented with 95% confidence interval.The confidence intervals for median was calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: Time from randomization until first observation of progressive disease or death, assessed up to 52 months
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
Disease control as per RECIST v.1.1 was defined as the proportion of participants with stable disease (SD), for at least 16 weeks, PR or CR according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: At least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters). CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.
Measured: Randomization until disease progression or death assessed every 8 weeks up to week 32, and thereafter every 12 weeks up to 52 months
Overall Survival
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death. Data has been presented in terms of number participants who died and number of censored participants.
Measured: Time from randomization until death, assessed up to 52 months
Health Related Quality of Life (HrQoL) Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire comprising of five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial impact), and a global quality of life (QoL) scale summarized from two 7-point scales (overall QoL and overall general health). Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and the individual single-items ranged in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. High score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
Measured: Baseline up to disease progression or withdrawal, assessed up to 52 months
Health Related Quality of Life (HrQoL) Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Ovarian-Specific Module Quality of Life Questionnaire Ovarian Cancer Module (QLQ-OV28)
EORTC QLQ-OV28 assesses disease and treatment-related symptoms of ovarian cancer. The 28-item module comprises of 6 symptom scales (abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms, peripheral neuropathy, other chemotherapy side-effects, hormonal symptoms, body image, attitude to disease and treatment), and sexual functioning. All of the scales and the individual single-items ranged in score from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline up to disease progression or withdrawal, assessed up to 52 months
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment and Death
TEAEs, Serious TEAEs and AEs were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 4.0. An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A Serious Adverse Event was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to data cut-off that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Measured: First dose of study drug up to 52 months
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Dose of Pimasertib and SAR245409
Measured: Pre-dose Hour 0.5, 1.5, 4.5 8 post dose on Day 15, 29, 43
Area Under the Curve (AUC) After Dose of Pimasertib and SAR245409
Measured: Pre-dose Hour 0.5, 1.5, 4.5 8 post dose on Day 15, 29, 43
Molecular Alterations in MAPK and/or PI3K Signaling Pathway Components/Modulators in Tumor Tissue and Blood
Measured: Screening visit (day -28 to 1)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Study start30 Sep 2013
- Primary completion31 May 2015
- Study completion30 Nov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Ovarian CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- EMD Serono
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Responsible, Study director, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01936363
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EMR 200066_012
- Other IDs
- 2013-000902-40
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 23 Aug 2013
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Combination of Pimasertib With SAR245409 or of Pimasertib With SAR245409 Placebo in Subjects With Previously Treated Unresectable Low Grade Ovarian Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01936363
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EMR 200066_012
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer
- Keywords
- Ovarian Cancer, Pimasertib, Placebo, SAR245409
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- EMD SeronoIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 Apr 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-arm, Phase 2 trial investigating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of pimasertib plus SAR245409 and pimasertib placebo administered once per day compared to pimasertib administered twice per day plus SAR245409 placebo administered once per day in participants with previously treated unresectable low-grade serous ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma or serous borderline ovarian or peritoneal tumors.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pimasertib (once daily) plus SAR245409 | Experimental | Drug: Pimasertib once daily, Drug: Pimasertib placebo, Drug: SAR245409 |
| Pimasertib (twice daily) plus SAR245409 placebo | Experimental | Drug: SAR245409 placebo, Drug: Pimasertib twice daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- The female participant had a diagnosis of one of the following: a) low-grade serous ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma, or grade 1 serous ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma or well-differentiated serous ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma or b) serous borderline ovarian or peritoneal tumor, ovarian or peritoneal tumor of low-malignant potential, ovarian or peritoneal atypical proliferative serous tumor that recurs as low grade serous carcinoma or has invasive peritoneal implants
- The participant had at least one prior line of systemic therapy and had a tumor, which was not amenable to potentially curative surgical resection
- The participant had measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1
- The participant had read and understood the written informed consent form (ICF) and was willing and able to gave informed consent, fully understood the requirements of the trial and was willing to comply with all trial visits and assessments, including completion of patient-reported measures. Consent must be given before any trial related activities
- Women of childbearing potential must had a negative serum pregnancy test at the screening visit
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- The participant had previously been treated with a PI3K inhibitor and taken off treatment due to treatment related AEs
- The participant had been previously treated with a Mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor
- Any anti-cancer therapy or treatment incorporating chemotherapy, immunotherapy, hormonal therapy, or biologic therapy within 28 days of the start of trial treatment or within 5 times the half-life of such treatment, whichever was shorter. Treatment with nitrosoureas or mitomycin C were exceptions to this for which a treatment interval of at least 6 weeks was required
- The participant had not recovered from toxicity due to prior therapy to baseline level or National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v4.0) Grade 1 or less (except alopecia). Residual chemotherapy-induced neuropathy grade less than equal to (<=) 2 was permitted
- The participant had poor organ and marrow function as defined in the protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pimasertib once dailyPimasertib administered as oral capsule at a dose of 60 milligram (mg) once daily until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever came first. | Drug | Pimasertib (once daily) plus SAR245409 |
| Pimasertib placeboPlacebo matching Pimasertib administered once daily in evening until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever came first. | Drug | Pimasertib (once daily) plus SAR245409 |
| SAR245409 placeboPlacebo matching SAR245409 administered once daily in morning until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever came first. | Drug | Pimasertib (twice daily) plus SAR245409 placebo |
| SAR245409SAR245409 administered as oral capsule at a dose of 70 milligram (mg) once daily until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever came first. | Drug | Pimasertib (once daily) plus SAR245409 |
| Pimasertib twice dailyPimasertib administered as oral capsule at a dose of 60 milligram (mg) twice daily until disease progression, death, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever came first. | Drug | Pimasertib (twice daily) plus SAR245409 placebo |
Primary outcome
Objective Tumor Response
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death assessed every 8 weeks up to week 32, and thereafter every 12 weeks up to 52 months
Objective tumor response was defined as the presence of at least one Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to more than (<) 10 millimeter (mm). Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
9 secondary outcomes
Progression-Free Survival
Time frame: Time from randomization until first observation of progressive disease or death, assessed up to 52 months
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
Time frame: Randomization until disease progression or death assessed every 8 weeks up to week 32, and thereafter every 12 weeks up to 52 months
Overall Survival
Time frame: Time from randomization until death, assessed up to 52 months
Health Related Quality of Life (HrQoL) Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time frame: Baseline up to disease progression or withdrawal, assessed up to 52 months
Health Related Quality of Life (HrQoL) Assessed Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Ovarian-Specific Module Quality of Life Questionnaire Ovarian Cancer Module (QLQ-OV28)
Time frame: Baseline up to disease progression or withdrawal, assessed up to 52 months
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment and Death
Time frame: First dose of study drug up to 52 months
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Dose of Pimasertib and SAR245409
Time frame: Pre-dose Hour 0.5, 1.5, 4.5 8 post dose on Day 15, 29, 43
Area Under the Curve (AUC) After Dose of Pimasertib and SAR245409
Time frame: Pre-dose Hour 0.5, 1.5, 4.5 8 post dose on Day 15, 29, 43
Molecular Alterations in MAPK and/or PI3K Signaling Pathway Components/Modulators in Tumor Tissue and Blood
Time frame: Screening visit (day -28 to 1)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
A Study to Compare Two Surgical Procedures in Individuals With BRCA1 Mutations to Assess Reduced Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Investigation of Ubamatamab Combination Therapy in Adult Participants With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of the Anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 Durvalumab Antibody (MEDI4736) in Combination With Olaparib and/or Cediranib for Advanced Solid Tumors and Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian, Triple Negative Breast, Lung, Prostate and Colorectal Can...
Colorectal Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Responsible study director
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
34 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Pimasertib once daily, SAR245409 and Pimasertib twice daily in people with Ovarian Cancer, run by EMD Serono at 34 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in United States, Canada, Spain, Australia, Belgium and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective Tumor Response (time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death assessed every 8 weeks up to week 32, and thereafter every 12 weeks up to 52 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2018.