Non-small Cell Lung CancerNCT01936571
Usefulness of Blood Biomarkers for Overall Survival in NSCLC
An observational study of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Maastricht Radiation Oncology at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Lung cancer is the most common cancer type worldwide, with more than 1.1 million annual deaths. There are two types of the disease, namely non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), with the first accounting for 85% of the total number of cases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Blood samples
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Non-small cell lung cancer patients
The cohort consists of approximately 250 patients. As a rule of thumb 5-10 events per variable are needed to avoid overfitting a model. To model 6 clinical variables + 9 biomarker variables 75-150 events are needed. Assuming a two-year survival of 40%, the calculated (constant) hazard rate is 0.46 per year. With an inclusion rate of 50 patients per year, and a follow-up time varying between 0.5 and 4 year, at the time of analysis (November/December 2013) it is expected that there will be 138 events available for analysis.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Use of Blood Biomarkers to Predict Overall Survival for Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Treated With (Chemo)Radiotherapy.
Lung cancer is the most common cancer type worldwide, with more than 1.1 million annual deaths. There are two types of the disease, namely non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), with the first accounting for 85% of the total number of cases. The 5-year survival across stages remains disappointingly low, around 10% in most countries, due to a high incidence of both loco-regional and distant failure [3]. However, during the last decade improved radiotherapy techniques allowed an increase of the radiation dose, while at the same time more effective chemo radiation schemes are being applied. These developments have lead to improved outcome in terms of survival. As the TNM staging system is highly inaccurate for the prediction of survival outcome for non-surgical patients, attempts have been made to develop a more accurate risk stratification for these patients [1,2]. A model based on clinical variables yielded an AUC of 0.74, which was encouraging, but also left room for improvement [2]. An extended model, which included clinical as well as biomarker variables, reached a higher AUC, but the limited number of patients included in this study made it impossible to draw definitive conclusions [1].
New prognostic parameters can be retrieved from several sources, which include anatomic, molecular and functional imaging, genomics, proteomics and clinical analysis of patients. The unlimited amount of information is expected to lead to more accurate predictions of individual treatment outcome [4].
Read more
The analysis of biomarkers, including proteins, is a fast developing, promising and challenging area of research. Biomarkers can measure or evaluate normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention. Oncoproteins are produced by, or in response to tumor cells, and may be secreted in the circulation of patients. As tissue sampling is often not possible in lung cancer patients, blood sample collection by venepuncture offers an attractive alternative, which is safe and easy to implement. A number of studies described the prognostic and predictive value of blood biomarkers for NSCLC [5-7]. In this study we will investigate the prognostic value of blood biomarkers related to 1) hypoxia: Osteopontin (OPN), carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-9), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); 2) inflammation - interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8, and C-reactive protein (CRP), and α-2-macroglobulin (α-2M); and 3) tumor load: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA 21-1).
- Dehing-Oberije C, Aerts H, Yu S, De Ruysscher D, Menheere P, Hilvo M, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic model using blood biomarker information for prediction of survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with combined chemotherapy and radiation or radiotherapy alone (NCT00181519, NCT00573040, and NCT00572325). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 1;81(2):360-368.
- Dehing-Oberije C, Yu S, De Ruysscher D, Meersschout S, Van Beek K, Lievens Y, et al. Development and external validation of prognostic model for 2-year survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jun 1;74(2):355-362.
- Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK, Harris CC. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. Paul Kleihues MD, Leslie H. Sobin MD, editors. Lyon, France: IARC Press, International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2004.
- Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(4):441-446.
- Donati V, Boldrini L, Dell'Omodarme M, Prati MC, Faviana P, Camacci T, et al. Osteopontin expression and prognostic significance in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Sep 15;11(18):6459-6465.
- Muley T, Fetz TH, Dienemann H, Hoffmann H, Herth FJ, Meister M, et al. Tumor volume and tumor marker index based on CYFRA 21-1 and CEA are strong prognostic factors in operated early stage NSCLC. Lung Cancer. 2008 Jun;60(3):408-415.
- Pine SR, Mechanic LE, Enewold L, Chaturvedi AK, Katki HA, Zheng YL, et al. Increased levels of circulating interleukin 6, interleukin 8, C-reactive protein, and risk of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 20;103(14):1112-1122.
Read the detailed description
Lung cancer is the most common cancer type worldwide, with more than 1.1 million annual deaths. There are two types of the disease, namely non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), with the first accounting for 85% of the total number of cases. The 5-year survival across stages remains disappointingly low, around 10% in most countries, due to a high incidence of both loco-regional and distant failure [3]. However, during the last decade improved radiotherapy techniques allowed an increase of the radiation dose, while at the same time more effective chemo radiation schemes are being applied. These developments have lead to improved outcome in terms of survival. As the TNM staging system is highly inaccurate for the prediction of survival outcome for non-surgical patients, attempts have been made to develop a more accurate risk stratification for these patients [1,2]. A model based on clinical variables yielded an AUC of 0.74, which was encouraging, but also left room for improvement [2]. An extended model, which included clinical as well as biomarker variables, reached a higher AUC, but the limited number of patients included in this study made it impossible to draw definitive conclusions [1].
New prognostic parameters can be retrieved from several sources, which include anatomic, molecular and functional imaging, genomics, proteomics and clinical analysis of patients. The unlimited amount of information is expected to lead to more accurate predictions of individual treatment outcome [4].
The analysis of biomarkers, including proteins, is a fast developing, promising and challenging area of research. Biomarkers can measure or evaluate normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention. Oncoproteins are produced by, or in response to tumor cells, and may be secreted in the circulation of patients. As tissue sampling is often not possible in lung cancer patients, blood sample collection by venepuncture offers an attractive alternative, which is safe and easy to implement. A number of studies described the prognostic and predictive value of blood biomarkers for NSCLC [5-7]. In this study we will investigate the prognostic value of blood biomarkers related to 1) hypoxia: Osteopontin (OPN), carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-9), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); 2) inflammation - interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8, and C-reactive protein (CRP), and α-2-macroglobulin (α-2M); and 3) tumor load: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA 21-1).
- Dehing-Oberije C, Aerts H, Yu S, De Ruysscher D, Menheere P, Hilvo M, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic model using blood biomarker information for prediction of survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with combined chemotherapy and radiation or radiotherapy alone (NCT00181519, NCT00573040, and NCT00572325). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 1;81(2):360-368.
- Dehing-Oberije C, Yu S, De Ruysscher D, Meersschout S, Van Beek K, Lievens Y, et al. Development and external validation of prognostic model for 2-year survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jun 1;74(2):355-362.
- Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK, Harris CC. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. Paul Kleihues MD, Leslie H. Sobin MD, editors. Lyon, France: IARC Press, International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2004.
- Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(4):441-446.
- Donati V, Boldrini L, Dell'Omodarme M, Prati MC, Faviana P, Camacci T, et al. Osteopontin expression and prognostic significance in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Sep 15;11(18):6459-6465.
- Muley T, Fetz TH, Dienemann H, Hoffmann H, Herth FJ, Meister M, et al. Tumor volume and tumor marker index based on CYFRA 21-1 and CEA are strong prognostic factors in operated early stage NSCLC. Lung Cancer. 2008 Jun;60(3):408-415.
- Pine SR, Mechanic LE, Enewold L, Chaturvedi AK, Katki HA, Zheng YL, et al. Increased levels of circulating interleukin 6, interleukin 8, C-reactive protein, and risk of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 20;103(14):1112-1122.
The investigators hypothesize that:
- Higher levels of blood biomarkers are associated with worse survival
- The biomarker information will improve the performance of prediction models, that were previously developed and validated [1, 2]
- Subgroups of patients can be identified that benefit most in terms of a more accurate prediction of survival when using biomarker information
Measurement procedure: Blood samples, that were collected, processed and stored in the Maastro biobank in a standardized way, will be used to measure CRP, LDH, Osteopontin, CA-9 IL-6, IL-8, CEA, CYFRA 21-1, and α-2M. Clinical data will be retrieved from the electronic medical files.
- Conditions
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Blood samples
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood samplesOther
Blood samples, that were collected, processed and stored in the Maastro biobank in a standardized way, will be used to measure CRP, LDH, Osteopontin, CA-9 IL-6, IL-8, CEA, CYFRA 21-1, and α-2M. Clinical data will be retrieved from the electronic medical files.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NSCLC | The cohort consists of approximately 250 patients. As a rule of thumb 5-10 events per variable are needed to avoid overfitting a model. To model 6 clinical variables + 9 biomarker variables 75-150 events are needed. Assuming a two-year survival of 40%, the calculated (constant) hazard rate is 0.46 per year. With an inclusion rate of 50 patients per year, and a follow-up time varying between 0.5 and 4 year, at the time of analysis (November/December 2013) it is expected that there will be 138 events available for analysis. Receives: Other: Blood samples |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Correlation of blood biomarkers to overall survival
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionFeb 2014
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Non-small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht Radiation Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Cary Oberije, PhD, Principal investigator, Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01936571
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Blood Biomarkers
- Status last verified
- Apr 2014
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2013
- Last updated
- 11 Apr 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Apr 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use of Blood Biomarkers to Predict Overall Survival for Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Treated With (Chemo)Radiotherapy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01936571
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Blood Biomarkers
- Conditions
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht Radiation OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2013
- Primary completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lung cancer is the most common cancer type worldwide, with more than 1.1 million annual deaths. There are two types of the disease, namely non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), with the first accounting for 85% of the total number of cases. The 5-year survival across stages remains disappointingly low, around 10% in most countries, due to a high incidence of both loco-regional and distant failure [3]. However, during the last decade improved radiotherapy techniques allowed an increase of the radiation dose, while at the same time more effective chemo radiation schemes are being applied. These developments have lead to improved outcome in terms of survival. As the TNM staging system is highly inaccurate for the prediction of survival outcome for non-surgical patients, attempts have been made to develop a more accurate risk stratification for these patients [1,2]. A model based on clinical variables yielded an AUC of 0.74, which was encouraging, but also left room for improvement [2]. An extended model, which included clinical as well as biomarker variables, reached a higher AUC, but the limited number of patients included in this study made it impossible to draw definitive conclusions [1].
New prognostic parameters can be retrieved from several sources, which include anatomic, molecular and functional imaging, genomics, proteomics and clinical analysis of patients. The unlimited amount of information is expected to lead to more accurate predictions of individual treatment outcome [4].
The analysis of biomarkers, including proteins, is a fast developing, promising and challenging area of research. Biomarkers can measure or evaluate normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention. Oncoproteins are produced by, or in response to tumor cells, and may be secreted in the circulation of patients. As tissue sampling is often not possible in lung cancer patients, blood sample collection by venepuncture offers an attractive alternative, which is safe and easy to implement. A number of studies described the prognostic and predictive value of blood biomarkers for NSCLC [5-7]. In this study we will investigate the prognostic value of blood biomarkers related to 1) hypoxia: Osteopontin (OPN), carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-9), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); 2) inflammation - interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8, and C-reactive protein (CRP), and α-2-macroglobulin (α-2M); and 3) tumor load: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA 21-1).
- Dehing-Oberije C, Aerts H, Yu S, De Ruysscher D, Menheere P, Hilvo M, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic model using blood biomarker information for prediction of survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with combined chemotherapy and radiation or radiotherapy alone (NCT00181519, NCT00573040, and NCT00572325). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 1;81(2):360-368.
- Dehing-Oberije C, Yu S, De Ruysscher D, Meersschout S, Van Beek K, Lievens Y, et al. Development and external validation of prognostic model for 2-year survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jun 1;74(2):355-362.
- Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK, Harris CC. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. Paul Kleihues MD, Leslie H. Sobin MD, editors. Lyon, France: IARC Press, International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2004.
- Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(4):441-446.
- Donati V, Boldrini L, Dell'Omodarme M, Prati MC, Faviana P, Camacci T, et al. Osteopontin expression and prognostic significance in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Sep 15;11(18):6459-6465.
- Muley T, Fetz TH, Dienemann H, Hoffmann H, Herth FJ, Meister M, et al. Tumor volume and tumor marker index based on CYFRA 21-1 and CEA are strong prognostic factors in operated early stage NSCLC. Lung Cancer. 2008 Jun;60(3):408-415.
- Pine SR, Mechanic LE, Enewold L, Chaturvedi AK, Katki HA, Zheng YL, et al. Increased levels of circulating interleukin 6, interleukin 8, C-reactive protein, and risk of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 20;103(14):1112-1122.
Detailed description
Lung cancer is the most common cancer type worldwide, with more than 1.1 million annual deaths. There are two types of the disease, namely non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), with the first accounting for 85% of the total number of cases. The 5-year survival across stages remains disappointingly low, around 10% in most countries, due to a high incidence of both loco-regional and distant failure [3]. However, during the last decade improved radiotherapy techniques allowed an increase of the radiation dose, while at the same time more effective chemo radiation schemes are being applied. These developments have lead to improved outcome in terms of survival. As the TNM staging system is highly inaccurate for the prediction of survival outcome for non-surgical patients, attempts have been made to develop a more accurate risk stratification for these patients [1,2]. A model based on clinical variables yielded an AUC of 0.74, which was encouraging, but also left room for improvement [2]. An extended model, which included clinical as well as biomarker variables, reached a higher AUC, but the limited number of patients included in this study made it impossible to draw definitive conclusions [1].
New prognostic parameters can be retrieved from several sources, which include anatomic, molecular and functional imaging, genomics, proteomics and clinical analysis of patients. The unlimited amount of information is expected to lead to more accurate predictions of individual treatment outcome [4].
The analysis of biomarkers, including proteins, is a fast developing, promising and challenging area of research. Biomarkers can measure or evaluate normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention. Oncoproteins are produced by, or in response to tumor cells, and may be secreted in the circulation of patients. As tissue sampling is often not possible in lung cancer patients, blood sample collection by venepuncture offers an attractive alternative, which is safe and easy to implement. A number of studies described the prognostic and predictive value of blood biomarkers for NSCLC [5-7]. In this study we will investigate the prognostic value of blood biomarkers related to 1) hypoxia: Osteopontin (OPN), carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-9), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); 2) inflammation - interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8, and C-reactive protein (CRP), and α-2-macroglobulin (α-2M); and 3) tumor load: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA 21-1).
- Dehing-Oberije C, Aerts H, Yu S, De Ruysscher D, Menheere P, Hilvo M, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic model using blood biomarker information for prediction of survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with combined chemotherapy and radiation or radiotherapy alone (NCT00181519, NCT00573040, and NCT00572325). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 1;81(2):360-368.
- Dehing-Oberije C, Yu S, De Ruysscher D, Meersschout S, Van Beek K, Lievens Y, et al. Development and external validation of prognostic model for 2-year survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jun 1;74(2):355-362.
- Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK, Harris CC. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. Paul Kleihues MD, Leslie H. Sobin MD, editors. Lyon, France: IARC Press, International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2004.
- Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(4):441-446.
- Donati V, Boldrini L, Dell'Omodarme M, Prati MC, Faviana P, Camacci T, et al. Osteopontin expression and prognostic significance in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Sep 15;11(18):6459-6465.
- Muley T, Fetz TH, Dienemann H, Hoffmann H, Herth FJ, Meister M, et al. Tumor volume and tumor marker index based on CYFRA 21-1 and CEA are strong prognostic factors in operated early stage NSCLC. Lung Cancer. 2008 Jun;60(3):408-415.
- Pine SR, Mechanic LE, Enewold L, Chaturvedi AK, Katki HA, Zheng YL, et al. Increased levels of circulating interleukin 6, interleukin 8, C-reactive protein, and risk of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 20;103(14):1112-1122.
The investigators hypothesize that:
- Higher levels of blood biomarkers are associated with worse survival
- The biomarker information will improve the performance of prediction models, that were previously developed and validated [1, 2]
- Subgroups of patients can be identified that benefit most in terms of a more accurate prediction of survival when using biomarker information
Measurement procedure: Blood samples, that were collected, processed and stored in the Maastro biobank in a standardized way, will be used to measure CRP, LDH, Osteopontin, CA-9 IL-6, IL-8, CEA, CYFRA 21-1, and α-2M. Clinical data will be retrieved from the electronic medical files.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NSCLC | – | Other: Blood samplesThe cohort consists of approximately 250 patients. As a rule of thumb 5-10 events per variable are needed to avoid overfitting a model. To model 6 clinical variables + 9 biomarker variables 75-150 events are needed. Assuming a two-year survival of 40%, the calculated (constant) hazard rate is 0.46 per year. With an inclusion rate of 50 patients per year, and a follow-up time varying between 0.5 and 4 year, at the time of analysis (November/December 2013) it is expected that there will be 138 events available for analysis. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Non-small cell lung cancer patients
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood samplesBlood samples, that were collected, processed and stored in the Maastro biobank in a standardized way, will be used to measure CRP, LDH, Osteopontin, CA-9 IL-6, IL-8, CEA, CYFRA 21-1, and α-2M. Clinical data will be retrieved from the electronic medical files. | Other | NSCLC |
Primary outcome
Correlation of blood biomarkers to overall survival
Time frame: 4 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Apr 2014.
Related trials for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cary Oberije, PhD principal investigator
Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Maastricht Radiation Oncology at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Correlation of blood biomarkers to overall survival (time frame: 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2014.