High Risk Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyPhase 2/3PROTEUSNCT01941329
Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre, Open-label, Phase II / III Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Intravitreal Injections Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) Versus PRP in Monotherapy in the Treatment of Subjects With High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
A Phase 2/3 study testing Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) and Intravitreous injection of ranibizumab in people with High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image at 13 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
This study is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, open label study that intents to compare the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg Intravitreal (ITV) injections plus Panretinal Photocoagulation versus Panretinal Photocoagulation alone in the regression of the neovascularization area in patients with High… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
- What is being tested?
- Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) and Intravitreous injection of ranibizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 94 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2014to Oct 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- High-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (HR-PDR); Neovascularization in the disc (NVD) ≥ 1/4 disc area (DA) OR Neovascularization elsewhere (NVE) ≥ 1/2 DA; NVE < 1/2 DA + vitreous and/or pre-retinal haemorrhage and/or rubeosis; NVD <1/4 DA + vitreous and/or pre-retinal haemorrhage and/or rubeosis;
- BCVA at baseline ≥ 24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters score (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/320);
- Type I or Type II diabetic subjects of either gender;
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Ability to provide written informed consent;
- Ability to return for all clinical trial visits;
Who cannot join
- Any intraocular surgery within 6 months before trial enrolment, including:
- Prior scatter (panretinal) or focal/grid photocoagulation; Eyes who have received yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser, or peripheral retinal cryoablation, or laser retinopexy (for retinal tears only);
- Fibrovascular proliferation with retinal traction;
- Other cause of retinal NV (retinal vein occlusion, radiation retinopathy or others);
- Atrophy/scarring/fibrosis/ hard exudates involving the centre of the macula;
- Significant media opacities or inadequate pupillary dilation, which might interfere with visual acuity, assessment of toxicity or fundus photography;
Show all 23Show fewer
- Any likelihood that the subject will require cataract surgery within the following 1 year;
- Diabetic macular edema (DME) with central involvement, i.e., central macular thickness (Central Point Thickness) > 300 µm (Stratus OCT) equivalent values measured by spectral domain (SD)-OCT, adjusted according to the SD-OCT machine used;
- Previous vitrectomy;
- Intraocular pressure > 21 mmHg;
- Previous anti-VEGF therapy within the last 3 months;
- Known serious allergies or history of hypersensitivity to fluorescein used in angiography, or to components of Lucentis® formulation;
- Acute ocular or periocular infection;
- Previous filtering surgery (e.g., trabeculectomy) or placement of a glaucoma drainage device (e.g., tube-shunt surgery); General Exclusion Criteria
- Systolic BP > 170 mmHg or diastolic BP > 100 mmHg;
- HbA1C level >11% or recent signs of uncontrolled diabetes;
- Any of the following underlying systemic diseases:
- History or evidence of severe cardiac disease, e.g. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV, clinical or medical history of unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, or revascularization procedure within 6 months prior to baseline, or ventricular tachyarrhythmia requiring treatment; History or evidence of clinically significant peripheral vascular disease such as intermittent claudication or prior amputation; Renal failure requiring dialysis or renal transplant or renal insufficiency with creatinine levels > 2.0 mg/dl at screening; Stroke (within 12 months of trial entry); Any major surgical procedure within one month before trial enrolment;
- Subject with a condition (such as advanced, severe or unstable disease or its treatment) or is in a situation which may put him/her at significant risk, which may confound the study results or may interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study;
- Previous radiation to the head in the region of the study eye;
- Use of any other investigational drugs within the last 3 months (for DR or other condition);
- History of malignancy of any organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases;
- Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation.
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 4 countries.
13 sites in 4 countries
Portugal4 sites
Centre for Clinical Trials - Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image
Coimbra, 3000-548
Espaço Médico de Coimbra
Coimbra, 3030-163
Instituto de Retina de Lisboa
Lisbon, 1050-085
Serviço de Oftalmologia,Hospital de Vila Franca de Xira
Vila Franca de Xira, 2600-009
France3 sites
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, CHU Dijon
Dijon, 21033
Department of Ophthalmology, Lariboisière Hospital
Paris, 75475
Centre d'Investigation Clinique - Centre National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts
Paris, 75571
Italy3 sites
Department of Ophthalmology, University Vita Salute - Scientific Institute of San Raffael
Milan, 20132
Centre for Clinical Trials, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova
Padova, 35128
G.B.Bietti Eye Foundation - IRCCS
Rome, 00198
United Kingdom3 sites
Ophthalmology Clinical Trials Unit Frimley Park Hospital Foundation Trust
Frimley, GU16 7UJ
Clinical Trial Unit, Dep. Ophth., Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Gloucestershire, GL53 7PX
Laser and Retinal Research Unit, King's Health Partners
London, SE5 9RS
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre, Open-label, Phase II / III Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Intravitreal Injections Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) Versus PRP in Monotherapy in the Treatment of Subjects With High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. (PROTEUS)
This study is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, open label study that intents to compare the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg Intravitreal (ITV) injections plus Panretinal Photocoagulation versus Panretinal Photocoagulation alone in the regression of the neovascularization area in patients with High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy over a 12-month treatment period.
One of the major complications of the diabetes mellitus is Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), one of the leading causes of visual impairment in working age in industrialized countries. Longer diabetes duration and poor glycaemic and blood pressure control are strongly associated with Diabetic Retinopathy. The overall prevalence of any form of Diabetic Retinopathy is 34.4% and 6.96% corresponds to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR). Therefore, approximately 93 million people have Diabetic Retinopathy and 17 million of them have Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
Read more
It has been shown that treatment with repeated injections of ranibizumab can improve visual acuity in patients with PDR. Further, , the standard PRP treatment of PDR remains unsatisfactory. The knowledge of the mechanisms of this retinal complication is incomplete and, therefore, efforts should be done to understand and characterize patients' eyes response to combined treatments.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the standard treatment for PDR (i.e. Panretinal Photocoagulation) with Panretinal Photocoagulation treatment combined with ITV injections of ranibizumab since it is expected that anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment with ITV injections will increase the rate of success of Panretinal Photocoagulation in regression of neovascularization with improved final visual acuity.
- Being tested
- Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP), Intravitreous injection of ranibizumab
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Proliferative Retinopathy, Ranibizumab, Panretinal Photocoagulation
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP)Procedure or surgery
Intravitreous injection of ranibizumabDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ranimizumab + Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) | Experimental | 3 Intravitreous injections of ranibizumab combined with standard PRP (2 ± 1 weeks after injection), at month-0, month-1 and month-2 that can be repeated after month-3, with always at least 1 month of interval between injections. Receives: Procedure: Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP); Drug: Intravitreous injection of ranibizumab |
| Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) | Active comparator | Panretinal photocoagulation treatment (PRP) between month-0 and month-2, with 1 mandatory laser session in month-0 and more laser sessions as needed until Month-2 to complete the PRP treatment.
After completing the PRP treatment, PRP sessions can be repeated from Month-3 to Month-11. Receives: Procedure: Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Regression of neovascularization
Defined as any decrease in the area of neovascularization
Measured: 12-month treatment
Secondary outcomes (7)
Changes in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Measured: 12-Month treatment
Time to complete neovascularization regression
Measured: 12-Month treatment
Recurrence of neovascularization
Measured: 12-Month treatment
Macular retinal thickness
Measured: 12-Month treatment
Need of treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
Measured: 12-Month treatment
Need of vitrectomy due to the occurrence of vitreous hemorrhage, tractional retinal detachment or other complications of Diabetic Retinopathy.
Measured: 12-Month treatment
Adverse events related to the treatments
Measured: 12-Month treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2014
- Primary completionApr 2016
- Study completionOct 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for High Risk Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Vision Institute Clinical Research Network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- José Cunha-Vaz, MD, PhD, Study chair, Association of Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01941329
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ECR-RET-2013-05
- Acronym
- PROTEUS
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 10 Sep 2013
- Last updated
- 14 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Randomized, Multicentre, Open-label, Phase II / III Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Intravitreal Injections Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) Versus PRP in Monotherapy in the Treatment of Subjects With High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. (PROTEUS)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01941329
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROTEUS / ECR-RET-2013-05
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Proliferative Retinopathy, Ranibizumab, Panretinal Photocoagulation
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and ImageUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Vision Institute Clinical Research Network
- Study start
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, open label study that intents to compare the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg Intravitreal (ITV) injections plus Panretinal Photocoagulation versus Panretinal Photocoagulation alone in the regression of the neovascularization area in patients with High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy over a 12-month treatment period.
One of the major complications of the diabetes mellitus is Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), one of the leading causes of visual impairment in working age in industrialized countries. Longer diabetes duration and poor glycaemic and blood pressure control are strongly associated with Diabetic Retinopathy. The overall prevalence of any form of Diabetic Retinopathy is 34.4% and 6.96% corresponds to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR). Therefore, approximately 93 million people have Diabetic Retinopathy and 17 million of them have Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
It has been shown that treatment with repeated injections of ranibizumab can improve visual acuity in patients with PDR. Further, , the standard PRP treatment of PDR remains unsatisfactory. The knowledge of the mechanisms of this retinal complication is incomplete and, therefore, efforts should be done to understand and characterize patients' eyes response to combined treatments.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the standard treatment for PDR (i.e. Panretinal Photocoagulation) with Panretinal Photocoagulation treatment combined with ITV injections of ranibizumab since it is expected that anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment with ITV injections will increase the rate of success of Panretinal Photocoagulation in regression of neovascularization with improved final visual acuity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ranimizumab + Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) | Experimental | Procedure: Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP), Drug: Intravitreous injection of ranibizumab3 Intravitreous injections of ranibizumab combined with standard PRP (2 ± 1 weeks after injection), at month-0, month-1 and month-2 that can be repeated after month-3, with always at least 1 month of interval between injections. |
| Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) | Active comparator | Procedure: Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP)Panretinal photocoagulation treatment (PRP) between month-0 and month-2, with 1 mandatory laser session in month-0 and more laser sessions as needed until Month-2 to complete the PRP treatment. After completing the PRP treatment, PRP sessions can be repeated from Month-3 to Month-11. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- High-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (HR-PDR); Neovascularization in the disc (NVD) ≥ 1/4 disc area (DA) OR Neovascularization elsewhere (NVE) ≥ 1/2 DA; NVE < 1/2 DA + vitreous and/or pre-retinal haemorrhage and/or rubeosis; NVD <1/4 DA + vitreous and/or pre-retinal haemorrhage and/or rubeosis;
- BCVA at baseline ≥ 24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters score (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/320);
- Type I or Type II diabetic subjects of either gender;
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Ability to provide written informed consent;
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Any intraocular surgery within 6 months before trial enrolment, including:
- Prior scatter (panretinal) or focal/grid photocoagulation; Eyes who have received yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser, or peripheral retinal cryoablation, or laser retinopexy (for retinal tears only);
- Fibrovascular proliferation with retinal traction;
- Other cause of retinal NV (retinal vein occlusion, radiation retinopathy or others);
- Atrophy/scarring/fibrosis/ hard exudates involving the centre of the macula;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) | Procedure or surgery | Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), Ranimizumab + Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) |
| Intravitreous injection of ranibizumab | Drug | Ranimizumab + Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) |
Primary outcome
Regression of neovascularization
Time frame: 12-month treatment
Defined as any decrease in the area of neovascularization
7 secondary outcomes
Changes in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Time frame: 12-Month treatment
Time to complete neovascularization regression
Time frame: 12-Month treatment
Recurrence of neovascularization
Time frame: 12-Month treatment
Macular retinal thickness
Time frame: 12-Month treatment
Need of treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
Time frame: 12-Month treatment
Need of vitrectomy due to the occurrence of vitreous hemorrhage, tractional retinal detachment or other complications of Diabetic Retinopathy.
Time frame: 12-Month treatment
Adverse events related to the treatments
Time frame: 12-Month treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2018.
Related trials for High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
High Dose Eylea for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Outcomes
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
RecruitingPhase 4
High Dose Aflibercept in Diabetic Macular Edema in Patients With Previous Vitrectomy
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Recruiting
Immediate Postoperative Bevacizumab Administration in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Patients Undergoing Vitrectomy
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy - High Risk
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
José Cunha-Vaz, MD, PhD study chair
Association of Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image
13 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP) and Intravitreous injection of ranibizumab in people with High Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image at 13 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in Portugal, France, Italy, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Regression of neovascularization (time frame: 12-month treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2018.