AzTrials
AzTrials

SeromaNCT01942707

Scarpa´s Fascia in the Formation of Seroma Post Abdominoplasty After Bariatric Surgery

A study testing abdominoplasty with Scarpa's Fascia and Abdominoplasty without Scarpa´s Facia in people with Seroma, run by Federal University of São Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

46 female postbariatric patients will be submitted to anchor-line abdominoplasty with drains insertion. Patients will be randomized to two groups. One group will have the Fascia Scarpa removed and in the other the Fascia Scarpa will be preserved. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 24 to 55 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Seroma
What is being tested?
abdominoplasty with Scarpa's Fascia and Abdominoplasty without Scarpa´s Facia
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
46 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Mar 2013to Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 24 to 55 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • BMI between 22 and 30 Kg/m2
  • Female post-bariatric patient

Who cannot join

  • neoplasms
  • Diabetes
  • lymphatic system diseases
  • abdominal scars except C section and bariatric surgery scars
  • mental disorders

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Federal University of São Paulo

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 04024002

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Study of Scarpa´s Fascia in the Formation of Seroma Post Abdominoplasty After Bariatric Surgery

46 female postbariatric patients will be submitted to anchor-line abdominoplasty with drains insertion. Patients will be randomized to two groups. One group will have the Fascia Scarpa removed and in the other the Fascia Scarpa will be preserved. The drains will be removed when the volume is less than 30 ml in 24 hours. The primary outcome will be the volume of total drainage obtained in the drains of the abdominal region. Secondary outcomes will be the length of time the drains remain and the presence of seroma assessed by ultrasound on the twentieth postoperative day.

Read the detailed description

Morbid obesity has been increasing in Brazil and the world and bariatric surgery is the most effective and long-lasting treatment. This leads to large weight losses leading to large body deformities due to excess skin and subcutaneous tissue. The most common post-bariatric plastic surgery is post-bariatric abdominoplasty which main complication is seroma. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of Scarpa fascia preservation in seroma reduction. METHODS: A total of 46 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. One group will have the Fascia Scarpa removed and in the other the Fascia Scarpa will be preserved. The drains will be removed when the volume is less than 30 ml in 24 hours. The primary outcome will be the volume of total drainage obtained in the drains of the abdominal region. Secondary outcomes will be the length of time the drains remain and the presence of seroma assessed by ultrasound on the twentieth postoperative day.

Conditions
Seroma
Being tested
abdominoplasty with Scarpa's Fascia, Abdominoplasty without Scarpa´s Facia
Keywords
Abdominoplasty,Seroma,Bariatric surgery
Medical subject headings
Seroma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • abdominoplasty with Scarpa's FasciaProcedure or surgery

    During surgical detachment of the abdominal flap the Scarpa´s fascia is preserved.

  • Abdominoplasty without Scarpa´s FaciaProcedure or surgery

    During surgical detachment of the abdominal flap the Scarpa´s fascia is removed.

Study groups in NCT01942707
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Abdominoplasty without Scarpa´s FaciaActive comparatorAnchor-line abdominoplasty where the Scarpa's Fascia will be removed.
Receives: Procedure: Abdominoplasty without Scarpa´s Facia
abdominoplasty with Scarpa's FasciaExperimentalAnchor-line abdominoplasty where the Scarpa's Fascia will be preserved.
Receives: Procedure: abdominoplasty with Scarpa's Fascia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total Volume of Drainage in ml.

    We will measure the total volume of drainage, in ml, obtained by the drains in the abdominal region. The measure of drainage will be done at the same time (8:00 am) and by the same nurse everyday in all patients until the drain is withdrawn. The drain will be withdrawn when the drained volume is less than 30 ml in 24 hours. Total volume of drainage will be calculated as the sum of the volumes obtained daily.

    Measured: number of days required for drain withdrawal (drained volume less than 30 ml in 24 hours) and no later than 10 days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Number of Days Required for Drain Withdrawal.

    Number of days required for drain withdrawal. The measure of drainage will be done at the same time (8:00 am) and by the same nurse everyday in all patients until the drain is withdrawn. The drain will be withdrawn when the drained volume is less than 30 ml in 24 hours.

    Measured: Number of days required for drain withdrawal (drained volume less than 30 ml in 24 hours) and no later than 10 days

  2. Volume of Seroma Assessed by Ultrasound of the Abdominal Wall.

    An ultrasound of the abdominal wall will be realized to check the volume of any residual seroma.

    Measured: Done after 20 days of surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Sep 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2013
  3. Primary completionApr 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01942707
Sponsor's protocol ID
INFORZATO55
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
11 Sep 2013
Last updated
29 Mar 2018
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Andrades P, Prado A. Composition of postabdominoplasty seroma. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;31(5):514-8. doi: 10.1007/s00266-007-0078-3. Epub 2007 Jul 20.

    PubMed 17659406
  • Andrades P, Prado A, Danilla S, Guerra C, Benitez S, Sepulveda S, Sciarraffia C, De Carolis V. Progressive tension sutures in the prevention of postabdominoplasty seroma: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Sep 15;120(4):935-946. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000253445.76991.de.

    PubMed 17805122
  • Baroudi R, Ferreira CA. Seroma: how to avoid it and how to treat it. Aesthet Surg J. 1998 Nov-Dec;18(6):439-41. doi: 10.1016/s1090-820x(98)70073-1.

    PubMed 19328174
  • Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724.

    PubMed 15479938
  • Bussolaro RA, Garcia EB, Zanella MT, Ferreira LM. Impaired abdominal skin sensory function in morbid obesity and after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2012 Mar;22(3):353-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0485-z.

    PubMed 21805192
  • Bercial ME, Sabino Neto M, Calil JA, Rossetto LA, Ferreira LM. Suction drains, quilting sutures, and fibrin sealant in the prevention of seroma formation in abdominoplasty: which is the best strategy? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;36(2):370-3. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9807-8. Epub 2011 Aug 20.

    PubMed 21858593
  • Colquitt J, Clegg A, Loveman E, Royle P, Sidhu MK. Surgery for morbid obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub2.

    PubMed 16235331
  • Costa LF, Landecker A, Manta AM. Optimizing body contour in massive weight loss patients: the modified vertical abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Dec;114(7):1917-23; discussion 1924-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000142997.63346.95.

    PubMed 15577368
  • Dellon AL. Fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1985;9(1):27-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01570680.

    PubMed 3158172
  • Di Martino M, Nahas FX, Barbosa MVJ, Montecinos Ayaviri NA, Kimura AK, Barella SM, Novo NF, Ferreira LM. Seroma in lipoabdominoplasty and abdominoplasty: a comparative study using ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1742-1751. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181efa6c5.

    PubMed 20639797
  • Costa-Ferreira A, Rebelo M, Vasconez LO, Amarante J. Scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr;125(4):1232-1239. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d0ac59.

    PubMed 20072084
  • Farah AB, Nahas FX, Ferreira LM, Mendes Jde A, Juliano Y. Sensibility of the abdomen after abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Aug;114(2):577-82; discussion 583. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000128356.93462.7b.

    PubMed 15277836
  • Fraccalvieri M, Datta G, Bogetti P, Verna G, Pedrale R, Bocchiotti MA, Boriani F, Obbialero FD, Kefalas N, Bruschi S. Abdominoplasty after weight loss in morbidly obese patients: a 4-year clinical experience. Obes Surg. 2007 Oct;17(10):1319-24. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9235-7.

    PubMed 18000727
  • Garcia-Garcia ML, Martin-Lorenzo JG, Campillo-Soto A, Torralba-Martinez JA, Liron-Ruiz R, Miguel-Perello J, Mengual-Ballester M, Aguayo-Albasini JL. [Complications and level of satisfaction after dermolipectomy and abdominoplasty post-bariatric surgery]. Cir Esp. 2014 Apr;92(4):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.04.024. Epub 2013 Dec 18. Spanish.

    PubMed 24360407
  • Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, Kashyap SR, Schauer PR, Mingrone G, Bucher HC, Nordmann AJ. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013 Oct 22;347:f5934. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5934.

    PubMed 24149519

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing abdominoplasty with Scarpa's Fascia and Abdominoplasty without Scarpa´s Facia in people with Seroma, run by Federal University of São Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total Volume of Drainage in ml. (time frame: number of days required for drain withdrawal (drained volume less than 30 ml in 24 hours) and no later than 10 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01942707, which also lists 29 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in