Overactive BladderPhase 4COMFORTNCT01945489
OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) Treatment for Urinary Incontinence in Patients With Overactive Bladder
A Phase 4 study testing onabotulinumtoxinA and Normal saline in people with Overactive Bladder, run by Allergan at 40 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) compared with placebo, in achieving a 100% reduction in urinary incontinence in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) not properly managed with an anticholinergic. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Overactive Bladder
- What is being tested?
- onabotulinumtoxinA and Normal saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 254 participants
- Where
- 40 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Oct 2013to 5 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- -Patients with symptoms of Overactive Bladder (OAB) (frequency and urgency) with urinary incontinence for at least 6 months prior to screening.
Who cannot join
- Symptoms of OAB due to a neurological reason
- Use of anticholinergics or other medications or therapies to treat symptoms of OAB within 7 days of screening
- Use of Clean Intermittent Catheterization (CIC) or indwelling catheter to manage urinary incontinence
- Use of botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any urological condition
- Use of botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any non-urological condition in the 12 weeks prior to screening
- History of any pelvic or urological abnormalities, bladder surgery or disease, other than OAB, that may affect bladder function
- Diagnosis of Myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, or Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
Trial locations and contacts
40 sites in 1 country.
40 sites in 1 country
United States40 sites
Institute of Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103
Atlanta Medical Research Institute
Alpharetta, Georgia, 30005
Alaska Urological Institute dba Alaska Clinical Research Center
Anchorage, Alaska, 99503
U. Colorado, School of Med.
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Urologic Consultants of Southern Pennsylvania
Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, 19004
Brooklyn Urology Research Group
Brooklyn, New York, 11215
TriState Urologic Services PSC Inc., dba The Urology Group
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212
University Hospital Case Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Genitourinary Surgical Consultants
Denver, Colorado, 80220
Northeast Indiana
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825
Accumed Research
Garden City, New York, 11530
Carolina Urology Partners, PLLC
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28054
Urologic Clinics of North Alabama
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Urogynecology Associates
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
South Orange County Medical Research Center
Laguna Hills, California, 92653
Sunrise Medical Research
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Bladder and Prostate Health Investigations, LLC
Miramar, Florida, 33029
Integrity Medical Research, LLC
Mountlake Terrace, Washington, 98043
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Manhattan Medical Research
New York, New York, 10016
Deaconess Clinic, Inc.
Newburgh, Indiana, 47630
Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley
Newburgh, New York, 12550
Urology of Indiana, LLC
Noblesville, Indiana, 46062
Urology Associates of Norwalk
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06850
Renstar Medical Research
Ocala, Florida, 34471
Urology Health Team, PLLC
Ocala, Florida, 34474
Chesapeake Urology Research Associates
Owings Mills, Maryland, 21117
Advanced Urology Centers of NY A division of IMP
Plainview, New York, 11803
Premier Medical Group of the Hudson Valley
Poughkeepsie, New York, 12601
Associated Urologists of North Carolina
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Virginia Women's Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23233
Virginia Urology
Richmond, Virginia, 23235
Genesis Research LLC
San Diego, California, 92123
The Polyclinic
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Regional Urology, LLC
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71106
Mount Nittany Medical Center Health Services, Inc. dba Mount Nittany Physician Group
State College, Pennsylvania, 16801
Associated Medical Professionals of New York, PLLC
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Southeastern Research Group, Inc.
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Urology of Virginia, PLLC
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23462
About this study
This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) compared with placebo, in achieving a 100% reduction in urinary incontinence in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) not properly managed with an anticholinergic.
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder
- Being tested
- onabotulinumtoxinA, Normal saline
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
onabotulinumtoxinABiological
Also called BOTOX®, botulinum toxin Type A
OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) injected into the detrusor.
Normal salineDrug
Normal saline (placebo) injected into the detrusor.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA | Experimental | OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) 100U injected into the detrusor at Day 1, followed by a repeat injection of onabotulinumtoxinA 100U after a minimum of 12 weeks (if applicable). Receives: Biological: onabotulinumtoxinA |
| Placebo/OnabotulinumtoxinA | Other | Placebo (Normal saline) injected into the detrusor on Day 1, followed by an injection of onabotulinumtoxinA 100U after a minimum of 12 weeks (if applicable). Receives: Biological: onabotulinumtoxinA; Drug: Normal saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a 100% Reduction in Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during the 3 consecutive days prior to the study visit in Treatment Cycle 1. The number of incontinence episodes were averaged daily during this period and compared to baseline to determine 100% reduction in episodes.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Episodes of Urinary Incontinence
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during the 3 consecutive days prior to the study visit in Treatment Cycle 1. The number of incontinence episodes were averaged daily during this period. A negative number change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from Baseline indicates a worsening.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Scores
The King's Health Questionnaire is a disease-specific questionnaire that measures the quality of life of participants with urinary incontinence. The questionnaire consists of 7 domains, including emotions, personal relationships, physical limitations, role limitations, severity (coping) measures, sleep/energy and social limitations. Domain scores range from 0 to 100, with a lower score indicating a preferable health status (absence of urinary incontinence impacts). A negative number change from Baseline indicates improvement and a positive number change from Baseline indicates a worsening.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Micturition Episodes
The number of micturition episodes (the number of times a patient urinates into the toilet) in Treatment Cycle 1 was recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during the 3 consecutive days prior to the study visit in Treatment Cycle 1. The number of micturition episodes were averaged daily during this period A negative number change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from Baseline indicates a worsening.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urgency Episodes
The number of daily urgency episodes (the number of times a patient experiences the urgency to urinate) in Treatment Cycle 1 was recorded by the patient in a bladder diary during the 3 consecutive days prior to the study visit in Treatment Cycle 1. The number of urgency episodes were averaged daily during this period A negative number change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from Baseline indicates a worsening.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Nocturia Episodes
Nocturia episodes were recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during the 3 consecutive days prior to the study visit in Treatment Cycle 1. The number of nocturia episodes were averaged daily during this period. A nocturia episode is a void (urinating into the toilet) that interrupts one's sleep. A negative number change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Study start28 Oct 2013
- Primary completion24 May 2016
- Study completion5 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Overactive BladderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 254 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergan
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tamer Aboushwareb, Study director, Allergan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01945489
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GMA-OAB-113
- Acronym
- COMFORT
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 16 Sep 2013
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
McCammon K, Gousse A, Kohan A, Glazier D, Gruenenfelder J, Bai Z, Patel A, Hale D. Early and Consistent Improvements in Urinary Symptoms and Quality of Life With OnabotulinumtoxinA in Patients With Overactive Bladder and Urinary Incontinence: Results From a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Phase IV Clinical Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 1;27(7):450-456. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000914.
PubMed 32665528
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) Treatment for Urinary Incontinence in Patients With Overactive Bladder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01945489
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COMFORT / GMA-OAB-113
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 254 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AllerganIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Oct 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Nov 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) compared with placebo, in achieving a 100% reduction in urinary incontinence in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) not properly managed with an anticholinergic.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OnabotulinumtoxinA | Experimental | Biological: onabotulinumtoxinAOnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) 100U injected into the detrusor at Day 1, followed by a repeat injection of onabotulinumtoxinA 100U after a minimum of 12 weeks (if applicable). |
| Placebo/OnabotulinumtoxinA | Other | Biological: onabotulinumtoxinA, Drug: Normal salinePlacebo (Normal saline) injected into the detrusor on Day 1, followed by an injection of onabotulinumtoxinA 100U after a minimum of 12 weeks (if applicable). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -Patients with symptoms of Overactive Bladder (OAB) (frequency and urgency) with urinary incontinence for at least 6 months prior to screening.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Symptoms of OAB due to a neurological reason
- Use of anticholinergics or other medications or therapies to treat symptoms of OAB within 7 days of screening
- Use of Clean Intermittent Catheterization (CIC) or indwelling catheter to manage urinary incontinence
- Use of botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any urological condition
- Use of botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype for any non-urological condition in the 12 weeks prior to screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| onabotulinumtoxinAAlso: BOTOX®, botulinum toxin Type AOnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) injected into the detrusor. | Biological | OnabotulinumtoxinA, Placebo/OnabotulinumtoxinA |
| Normal salineNormal saline (placebo) injected into the detrusor. | Drug | Placebo/OnabotulinumtoxinA |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a 100% Reduction in Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during the 3 consecutive days prior to the study visit in Treatment Cycle 1. The number of incontinence episodes were averaged daily during this period and compared to baseline to determine 100% reduction in episodes.
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Episodes of Urinary Incontinence
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine as recorded by the participant in a bladder diary during the 3 consecutive days prior to the study visit in Treatment Cycle 1. The number of incontinence episodes were averaged daily during this period. A negative number change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive number change from Baseline indicates a worsening.
4 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Micturition Episodes
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Urgency Episodes
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Daily Average Number of Nocturia Episodes
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32665528McCammon K, Gousse A, Kohan A, Glazier D, Gruenenfelder J, Bai Z, Patel A, Hale D. Early and Consistent Improvements in Urinary Symptoms and Quality of Life With OnabotulinumtoxinA in Patients With Overactive Bladder and Urinary Incontinence: Results From a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Phase IV Clinical Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 1;27(7):450-456. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000914.
Related trials for Overactive Bladder
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingObservational study
Predictive Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Mirabegron Response in Women With Overactive Bladder
Overactive Bladder (OAB)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tamer Aboushwareb study director
Allergan
40 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing onabotulinumtoxinA and Normal saline in people with Overactive Bladder, run by Allergan at 40 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 40 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Nov 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a 100% Reduction in Urinary Incontinence Episodes (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01945489, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2017.