EpicondylitisPhase 3B-PRPtendonNCT01945528
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in Chronic Epicondylitis
A Phase 3 study testing US-guided tenotomy with PRP and US-guided tenotomy with lidocaine in people with Epicondylitis, run by Jose Ignacio Martin at 2 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Background Tendinopathy is a difficult problem to manage and can result in significant patient morbidity. Currently, the clinical use of PRP in painful tendons is widespread but its efficacy remains controversial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Epicondylitis
- What is being tested?
- US-guided tenotomy with PRP and US-guided tenotomy with lidocaine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 86 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Apr 2014to 1 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Tendinopathy present in either lateral or medial elbow
- Pain by palpation at the lateral or medial epicondyle of the elbow
- Baseline elbow pain >3/10 during resisted wrist extension
- History of at least two periods of elbow pain lasting more than 10 days
- Symptoms lasting at least 3 months or longer
- Body Mass Index between 20 and 35.
- Commitment to comply with all study procedures
- The patient must give written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Presence of full tendon tear
- Body mass index> 35
- Systemic autoimmune rheumatologic disease (connective tissue diseases and systemic necrotizing vasculitis)
- Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (glycosylated hemoglobin above 9%)
- Blood disorders (thrombopathy, thrombocytopenia, anemia with Hb <9)
- Patients receiving immunosuppressive treatments
Show all 12Show fewer
- Received local steroid injection within 3 months of randomization received nonsteroidal antiinflammatory, opioids or oral corticosteroids within 15 days before inclusion in the study
- Severe heart diseasePatients unable to comply with scheduled visits, for work or spend long periods away from their habitual residence.
- Patients with active cancer or cancer diagnosed in the last five years.
- Analytical Diagnosis Hepatitis B, C or HIV infection.
- Pregnant or lactating.
- People who are taking a drug in clinical investigation or participated in any investigational study clinic (with an authorized or not) within 30 days prior to randomization.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Spain2 sites
Cruces University Hospital/BioCruces Health Research Institute
Barakaldo, Bizkaia, 48903
Cruces University Hospital
Barakaldo, Bizkaia, 48903
About this study
Official title: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy With Platelet Rich Plasma (Leukocyte Depleted)in Epicondylitis
Background Tendinopathy is a difficult problem to manage and can result in significant patient morbidity. Currently, the clinical use of PRP in painful tendons is widespread but its efficacy remains controversial. Current experimental research postulates different efficiency among PRP formulations.Recent reviews showed that most clinical studies in tendinopathies have been performed with L-PRP. The investigators aim to examine the efficacy of pure-PRP in the management of epicondylitis.
The investigators hypothesized that pure PRP associated to needling intervention can enhance tendon healing in epicondylitis, improve function and reduce pain.
Read more
Methods and design Randomized double blind controlled trial, a total of 80 patients will be randomly allocated into one of two groups: PRP or control. Interventions: PRP group, ultrasound (US)guided needling associated to delivery of multiple PRP depots each alternate week for a total of two interventions. Control Group: US-guided needling with lidocaine each alternate week for a total of two interventions. Main outcome measure: Changes in pain and activity levels, as assessed by Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)outcome measure score, before and six months after intervention.The primary end-point is 25% reduction in DASH. The investigators will compare the percentage of patients, in each group, that achieve a successful treatment defined as a reduction of at least 25% in the DASH score.
Secondary outcome measures:Changes in pain and function as assessed by DASH and changes in pain as assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS)at the 3, 6 and 12 month follow-up. Changes in sonographic features and neovascularity at 3, 6 and 12 months.
- Conditions
- Epicondylitis
- Being tested
- US-guided tenotomy with PRP, US-guided tenotomy with lidocaine
- Keywords
- Platelet Rich Plasma, tendinopathy, epicondylitis, ultrasound, injection therapy, needle tenotomy
- Medical subject headings
- Tendinopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
US-guided tenotomy with PRPDrug
Also called pure-PRP (without leukocytes)
Blood will be drawn from the patient from the patient's unaffected arm. the anti-coagulated blood will be centrifuged and pure-PRP (without leukocytes) collected.
Local anesthetic (lidocaine) will be infiltrated into the subcutaneous tissue of the lateral elbow, after which a single skin portal and multiple longitudinal and transversal penetrations of the tendon will be performed; PRP will be delivered in multiple depots during the procedure
US-guided tenotomy with lidocaineDrug
Also called local anesthetic
Blood will be drawn from the patient from the patient's unaffected arm. Local anesthetic (lidocaine) will be infiltrated into the subcutaneous tissue of the lateral elbow, after which a single skin portal and multiple longitudinal and transversal penetrations of the tendon will be performed; lidocaine will be delivered in multiple depots during the procedure
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| US-guided tenotomy with PRP | Experimental | ultrasound guided percutaneous tenotomy with PRP injection each alternate week for a total of two interventions Receives: Drug: US-guided tenotomy with PRP |
| US-guided tenotomy with lidocaine | Active comparator | ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle tenotomy with lidocaine injection each alternate week for a total of two interventions Receives: Drug: US-guided tenotomy with lidocaine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
changes in the DASH-E score
percentage of patients that achieve a successful treatment defined as a reduction of at least 25% in the DASH score compared with baseline
Measured: six months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Percentage of patients that achieve a successful treatment
successful treatment defined as a reduction of greater than 25% of the DASH-E score
Measured: three and twelve months
Pain reduction as measured by VAS.
changes in pain rating on a visual analogue scale (VAS)with respect to baseline
Measured: three, six and twelve months
changes in echogenicity and vascularity as assessed by Doppler sonography
Measured: three, six and twelve months
frequency, severity, intensity and duration of adverse events
Measured: three, six and twelve months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2014
- Primary completion1 Jul 2018
- Study completion1 Jul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EpicondylitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jose Ignacio Martin
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jose Ignacio Martin, Basque Health Service
- Investigators
- Jose I Martin, MD, Principal investigator, Cruces University Hospital, Osakidetza, Basque Health Service
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01945528
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2013-000478-32
- Other IDs
- 2013-000478-32
- Acronym
- B-PRPtendon
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 16 Sep 2013
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Andia I, Sanchez M, Maffulli N. Tendon healing and platelet-rich plasma therapies. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010 Oct;10(10):1415-26. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2010.514603.
PubMed 20718690Karjalainen TV, Silagy M, O'Bryan E, Johnston RV, Cyril S, Buchbinder R. Autologous blood and platelet-rich plasma injection therapy for lateral elbow pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 30;9(9):CD010951. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010951.pub2.
PubMed 34590307Martin JI, Atilano L, Merino J, Gonzalez I, Iglesias G, Areizaga L, Bully P, Grandes G, Andia I. Platelet-rich plasma versus lidocaine as tenotomy adjuvants in people with elbow epicondylopathy: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Apr 23;14(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1153-6.
PubMed 31014382Martin JI, Atilano L, Merino J, Gonzalez I, Iglesias G, Areizaga L, Bully P, Grandes G, Andia I. Predictors of Outcome Following Tenotomy in Patients with Recalcitrant Epicondylopathy. PM R. 2019 Sep;11(9):979-988. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12064. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
PubMed 30609276Martin JI, Merino J, Atilano L, Areizaga LM, Gomez-Fernandez MC, Burgos-Alonso N, Andia I. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in chronic epicondylitis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Dec 1;14:410. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-410.
PubMed 24289799
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy With Platelet Rich Plasma (Leukocyte Depleted)in Epicondylitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01945528
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B-PRPtendon / 2013-000478-32
- Conditions
- Epicondylitis
- Keywords
- Platelet Rich Plasma, tendinopathy, epicondylitis, ultrasound, injection therapy, needle tenotomy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jose Ignacio MartinOther government
- Study start
- Apr 2014
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background Tendinopathy is a difficult problem to manage and can result in significant patient morbidity. Currently, the clinical use of PRP in painful tendons is widespread but its efficacy remains controversial. Current experimental research postulates different efficiency among PRP formulations.Recent reviews showed that most clinical studies in tendinopathies have been performed with L-PRP. The investigators aim to examine the efficacy of pure-PRP in the management of epicondylitis.
The investigators hypothesized that pure PRP associated to needling intervention can enhance tendon healing in epicondylitis, improve function and reduce pain.
Methods and design Randomized double blind controlled trial, a total of 80 patients will be randomly allocated into one of two groups: PRP or control. Interventions: PRP group, ultrasound (US)guided needling associated to delivery of multiple PRP depots each alternate week for a total of two interventions. Control Group: US-guided needling with lidocaine each alternate week for a total of two interventions. Main outcome measure: Changes in pain and activity levels, as assessed by Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)outcome measure score, before and six months after intervention.The primary end-point is 25% reduction in DASH. The investigators will compare the percentage of patients, in each group, that achieve a successful treatment defined as a reduction of at least 25% in the DASH score.
Secondary outcome measures:Changes in pain and function as assessed by DASH and changes in pain as assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS)at the 3, 6 and 12 month follow-up. Changes in sonographic features and neovascularity at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| US-guided tenotomy with PRP | Experimental | Drug: US-guided tenotomy with PRPultrasound guided percutaneous tenotomy with PRP injection each alternate week for a total of two interventions |
| US-guided tenotomy with lidocaine | Active comparator | Drug: US-guided tenotomy with lidocaineultrasound-guided percutaneous needle tenotomy with lidocaine injection each alternate week for a total of two interventions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Tendinopathy present in either lateral or medial elbow
- Pain by palpation at the lateral or medial epicondyle of the elbow
- Baseline elbow pain >3/10 during resisted wrist extension
- History of at least two periods of elbow pain lasting more than 10 days
- Symptoms lasting at least 3 months or longer
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Presence of full tendon tear
- Body mass index> 35
- Systemic autoimmune rheumatologic disease (connective tissue diseases and systemic necrotizing vasculitis)
- Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (glycosylated hemoglobin above 9%)
- Blood disorders (thrombopathy, thrombocytopenia, anemia with Hb <9)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| US-guided tenotomy with PRPAlso: pure-PRP (without leukocytes)Blood will be drawn from the patient from the patient's unaffected arm. the anti-coagulated blood will be centrifuged and pure-PRP (without leukocytes) collected. Local anesthetic (lidocaine) will be infiltrated into the subcutaneous tissue of the lateral elbow, after which a single skin portal and multiple longitudinal and transversal penetrations of the tendon will be performed; PRP will be delivered in multiple depots during the procedure | Drug | US-guided tenotomy with PRP |
| US-guided tenotomy with lidocaineAlso: local anestheticBlood will be drawn from the patient from the patient's unaffected arm. Local anesthetic (lidocaine) will be infiltrated into the subcutaneous tissue of the lateral elbow, after which a single skin portal and multiple longitudinal and transversal penetrations of the tendon will be performed; lidocaine will be delivered in multiple depots during the procedure | Drug | US-guided tenotomy with lidocaine |
Primary outcome
changes in the DASH-E score
Time frame: six months
percentage of patients that achieve a successful treatment defined as a reduction of at least 25% in the DASH score compared with baseline
4 secondary outcomes
Percentage of patients that achieve a successful treatment
Time frame: three and twelve months
Pain reduction as measured by VAS.
Time frame: three, six and twelve months
changes in echogenicity and vascularity as assessed by Doppler sonography
Time frame: three, six and twelve months
frequency, severity, intensity and duration of adverse events
Time frame: three, six and twelve months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2019.
- Background: PubMed 20718690Andia I, Sanchez M, Maffulli N. Tendon healing and platelet-rich plasma therapies. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010 Oct;10(10):1415-26. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2010.514603.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34590307Karjalainen TV, Silagy M, O'Bryan E, Johnston RV, Cyril S, Buchbinder R. Autologous blood and platelet-rich plasma injection therapy for lateral elbow pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 30;9(9):CD010951. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010951.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31014382Martin JI, Atilano L, Merino J, Gonzalez I, Iglesias G, Areizaga L, Bully P, Grandes G, Andia I. Platelet-rich plasma versus lidocaine as tenotomy adjuvants in people with elbow epicondylopathy: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Apr 23;14(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1153-6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30609276Martin JI, Atilano L, Merino J, Gonzalez I, Iglesias G, Areizaga L, Bully P, Grandes G, Andia I. Predictors of Outcome Following Tenotomy in Patients with Recalcitrant Epicondylopathy. PM R. 2019 Sep;11(9):979-988. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12064. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24289799Martin JI, Merino J, Atilano L, Areizaga LM, Gomez-Fernandez MC, Burgos-Alonso N, Andia I. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in chronic epicondylitis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Dec 1;14:410. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-410.
Related trials for Epicondylitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Investigation of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Patients With Elbow Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis, Medial Epicondylitis
Recruiting
A Comparison of the Effects of Combining ESWT With Blood Flow Restriction Therapy in Patients Diagnosed With Lateral Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis
Recruiting
Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Posterior Cutaneous Nerve of the Forearm Epicondylar Branch Block on Pain and Function in Lateral Epicondylitis (PCNF-BrEpi)
Lateral Epicondylitis
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Surgical and Nonsurgical Outcomes of Tennis Elbow
Lateral Epicondylitis
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Tenoxicam and Corticosteroid Injections for Lateral Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jose I Martin, MD principal investigator
Cruces University Hospital, Osakidetza, Basque Health Service
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing US-guided tenotomy with PRP and US-guided tenotomy with lidocaine in people with Epicondylitis, run by Jose Ignacio Martin at 2 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
changes in the DASH-E score (time frame: six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01945528, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2019.