AzTrials
AzTrials

Solid TumorsPhase 1NCT01945710

An Open-label, Multicenter, Multiple Dose, Phase 1 Study to Establish the Maximum Tolerated Dose of E7389 Liposomal Formulation in Patients With Solid Tumors

A Phase 1 study testing Eribulin-LF in people with Solid Tumors, run by Eisai Limited at 4 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study E7389-E044-112 is a Phase 1 study designed to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of eribulin-liposomal formulation (E7389-LF) in patients with solid tumors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Solid Tumors
What is being tested?
Eribulin-LF
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
62 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
11 Dec 2012to 17 May 2016
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Histological or cytological evidence of an unresectable or refractory solid tumor.
  • Participants who have at least one measurable lesion (long axis in non-lymph node: greater than or equal to 10 millimeters (mm); short axis in lymph node: greater than or equal to 15 mm) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 in the Expansion Part.
  • Adequate liver function as evidenced by bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limits of normal (ULN) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) less than or equal to 3 x ULN (in the case of liver metastases less than or equal to 5 x ULN). In case ALP is greater than 3 x ULN (in absence of liver metastases) or greater than 5 x ULN (in presence of liver metastases) AND participant also is known to have bone metastases, the liver specific ALP must be separated from the total and used to assess the liver function instead of the total ALP.
  • Adequate renal function as evidenced by serum creatinine less than or equal to 2.0 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) (177 micromole/liter (umol/L)) or calculated creatinine clearance greater than or equal to 40 milliliter/minute (mL/min) per the Cockcroft and Gault formula.
  • Adequate bone marrow function as evidenced by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10^9/liter (L), hemoglobin greater than or equal to 9 grams/deciliter (g/dL) (5.5 millimol/liter (mmol/L)) and platelet count greater than or equal to 100 x 10^9/L.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Females must not be lactating or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [B-hCG]). A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug.
  • All females will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless they are postmenopausal (amenorrheic for at least 12 consecutive months, in the appropriate age group and without other known or suspected cause) or have been sterilized surgically (i.e., bilateral tubal ligation, total hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, all with surgery at least one month before dosing).
  • Females of childbearing potential must not have had unprotected sexual intercourse within 30 days before study entry and must agree to use two highly effective methods of contraception (e.g., total abstinence, an intrauterine device, a double-barrier method [condom and occlusive cap - diaphragm or cervical/vault caps - with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository], a contraceptive implant, an oral contraceptive, or have a vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia) throughout the entire study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. If currently abstinent, the participant must agree to use a double barrier method with spermicide as described above if she becomes sexually active during the study period or for 30 days after study drug discontinuation. Females who are using hormonal contraceptives must have been on a stable dose of the same hormonal contraceptive product for at least 4 weeks before dosing and must continue to use the same contraceptive during the study and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation.
  • Male participants must have had a successful vasectomy (confirmed azoospermia) or they and their female partners must meet the criteria above (i.e., not of childbearing potential or practicing highly effective contraception throughout the study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation). No sperm donation is allowed during the study period and for 30 days after study drug discontinuation.
  • Provide written informed consent.
  • Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol.

Who cannot join

  • Females who are pregnant (positive B-hCG [or hCG] test) or breastfeeding.
  • Participants who have received any anticancer therapy within 21 days prior to study entry for cytotoxic agents (42 days for mitomycin C and nitrosoureas), radiotherapy, hormonal, biological (including humanized antibodies) and targeted agents, or within 30 days for an investigational agent.
  • Participants who have not recovered from acute toxicities as a result of prior anti-cancer therapy to less than Grade 2, according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), except alopecia.
  • Participants who have previously been treated with eribulin-LF.
  • Radiation therapy encompassing greater than 30% of the bone marrow.
  • Major surgery within 21 days prior to enrollment.
Show all 30Show fewer
  • Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy greater than CTCAE Grade 1.
  • Significant cardiovascular impairment, defined as:
  • Congestive heart failure greater than Class II according to the New York Heart Association.
  • Unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 6 months of enrollment, or cardiac arrhythmia requiring treatment.
  • A clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, including a marked baseline prolonged QT/QTc interval (e.g., a repeated demonstration of a QTc interval greater than 500 milliseconds (ms)).
  • A history of risk factors for torsade de pointes (e.g., heart failure, hypokalemia, family history of long QT Syndrome) or the use of concomitant medications that prolonged the QT/QTc interval.
  • Evidence of clinically significant disease (e.g., cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal disease) that in the opinion of the investigator(s) could affect the participant's safety or interfere with the study assessments.
  • Diagnosed with meningeal carcinomatosis.
  • Participants with brain or subdural metastases are not eligible, unless they have completed local therapy and have discontinued the use of corticosteroids for this indication for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment. Any symptom(s) attributed to brain metastases must be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment, and radiographic stability should be confirmed by comparing a brain scan (CT with contrast or MRI with and without contrast) performed during the Screening Period to a brain scan performed at least 4 weeks earlier using the same modality.
  • Any serious concomitant illness or infection requiring treatment: known active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection (asymptomatic positive serology is not exclusionary).
  • Pulmonary lymphangitic involvement that results in pulmonary dysfunction requiring active treatment, including the use of oxygen.
  • History of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within approximately the last 2 years or current use of illegal recreational drugs.
  • Known intolerance to Halaven (eribulin-LF; E7389-LF) or any of the excipients.
  • Any medical or other condition that in the opinion of the investigator(s) would preclude the participant's participation in a clinical study.
  • Scheduled for surgery during the study.
  • Participants with body mass index (BMI) less than 35.
  • Participants with proven abdominal malignancy with concurrent refractory ascites defined by one of the following criteria:
  • Symptomatic ascites (more than 2 L) that did not respond clinically to at least 2 weeks of diuretics OR
  • Removal of at least 10 L in the preceding 2 months for symptoms relief OR
  • Symptomatic ascites that recurred on at least three occasions within a 2 month period despite diuretic treatment.
  • Participants with concurrent refractory pleural effusion defined by the following criteria:
  • Symptomatic pleural effusion that did not respond clinically to the treatment and needed pleural drainage in the preceding 2 months for symptoms relief OR
  • Recurrent symptomatic pleural effusion on at least three occasions within a 2 month period despite treatment.
  • Currently enrolled in another clinical trial or used any investigational drug or device within 30 days or 5X the half-life, whichever is longer preceding informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom4 sites

  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre

    Glasgow

  • UCL Cancer Institute

    London

  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

    Manchester

  • Royal Marsden Hospital

    Sutton, Surrey

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Study E7389-E044-112 is a Phase 1 study designed to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of eribulin-liposomal formulation (E7389-LF) in patients with solid tumors. This dose-escalation study will determine the maximum tolerated dose, dosing schedules tested, the dose schedule regimen with a more favorable tolerability profile, and a preliminary indication of efficacy.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 1 first-in-human, non-randomized (individuals will not be assigned by chance to study treatments), open-label (individuals will know the identity of study treatments), multicenter, 2-part, dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (study of what the body does to a drug) of eribulin-LF administered intravenously to patients with solid tumors. Each treatment cycle will be 21 days (Schedule 1) or 28 days (Schedule 1a or 2). Part 1 is the dose-escalation phase, which will be guided by pharmacokinetics and safety. Three to 6 new patients will be enrolled in sequential cohorts (first cohort will receive the starting dose and subsequent cohorts will receive increased doses of eribulin-LF). Enrollment in each cohort will be staggered; the second and third participant in every cohort will not be dosed until the first patient in that cohort completes 2 weeks of Cycle 1. If no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) have been observed during the first 2 week of Cycle 1 in the first patient, the second and third patients in the cohort will initiate treatment. Enrollment will be first initiated into cohort 1 of Schedule 1 (dosing on Day 1 of 21 day cycle). Interim analysis will be conducted upon completion of this cohort. The following decisions will be made based upon the results of the interim analysis 1) proceed with escalating to next dose level (cohort 2) of Schedule 1 (dosing on Day 1 of 21 day cycle) and initiate cohort 1 of Schedule 2 (dosing on Day 1 and Day 15 of 28 day cycle), or 2) discontinue plans to evaluate Schedule 2 and initiate Schedule 1a (dosing on Day 1 of 28 day cycle).

After the last patient in each cohort completes Cycle 1, the safety for DLT determination will be evaluated and a decision will be made on whether to escalate the dose in a new cohort of 3 to 6 new patients. Dose escalation will halt when the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is reached. The total number of patients to be enrolled in Part 1 will depend on the dose level at which the DLT will be achieved. After MTD for each schedule is determined, patients will be enrolled into Expansion Part of the study to confirm safety and tolerability of each dosing schedule. Nine to 12 patients will be treated with MTD for each schedule for 6 cycles. The total study duration for each participant will be approximately 18 months.

Conditions
Solid Tumors
Being tested
Eribulin-LF
Keywords
Tumors
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Eribulin-LFDrug

    Also called E7389-liposomal formulation (E7389-LF), Eribulin mesylate, Eribulin mesilate

Study groups in NCT01945710
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Eribulin-LF Schedule 1ExperimentalSchedule 1: Eribulin-LF administered as IV infusion on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle starting at 1 mg/m^2 escalating up to 3.5 mg/m^2. Schedule 1a: Eribulin-LF administered as IV infusion on Day 1 of a 28-day cycle starting at 1 mg/m^2 escalating up to 3.5 mg/m^2 (only to be investigated in the event that a 21-day cycle is considered inappropriate).
Receives: Drug: Eribulin-LF
Eribulin-LF Schedule 2ExperimentalSchedule 2: Eribulin-LF administered as IV infusion on Day 1 and Day 15 of a 28-day cycle starting at 1 mg/m^2 escalating up to 3.5 mg/m^2 (only to be investigated in the event that a 21-day cycle is considered appropriate).
Receives: Drug: Eribulin-LF

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Eribulin-LF

    The MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which no more than 1/6 participants experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLTs), with the next higher dose having at least 2 of 3 or 2 of 6 participants experiencing DLTs. MTD was determined by summarizing the number and percentage of participants with DLTs for the first cycle, by study dosing schedule, initial dosing level and overall for the dose escalation part. For participants who continued to Cycle 2, the DLTs which occurred from 1st dose up to the day before Day 1 of Cycle 2 were counted. For participants who discontinued before Cycle 2, the DLTs which occurred from 1st dose up to Day 21 (Schedule 1) or Day 28 (Schedule 2) of Cycle 1 were counted. DLTs were evaluated and graded based on the National Cancer Institutes (NCI)'s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03.

    Measured: Schedule 1: Cycle 1 (21 days); Schedule 2: Cycle 1 (28 days)

  2. Dose Limiting Toxicities at the Indicated Dose Levels, as an Assessment of Dosing Frequency

    DLTs were evaluated for both Schedule 1 and Schedule 2. DLTs were defined as neutropenia grade 4 that lasted more than 5 days, neutropenia grade 3 or 4 complicated by fever and/or infection (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 1.0 x 10^9/liter, fever greater than or equal to 38.5 degrees Celsius), thrombocytopenia grade 4 of any duration, thrombocytopenia grade 3 complicated by bleeding and/or requiring platelet or blood transfusion, hypersensitivity reaction grade 3 or 4 including allergy reactions or anaphylaxis; symptomatic bronchospasm requiring parenteral medication(s) with our without urticarial; allergy-related edema/angioedema, or other grade 3 or 4 clinically significant non-hematologic toxicities (except for inadequately treated nausea and /or vomiting) considered related to study drug. Participants with two or more adverse events in the same system organ class (or with the same preferred term) was counted only once for that system organ class (or preferred term).

    Measured: Cycle 1 of Dose Escalation part in Schedule 1 and Schedule 2

Secondary outcomes (16)

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability of Eribulin-LF

    Safety was assessed by the monitoring and recording of all adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs), regular monitoring of hematology, clinical chemistry, and urine values; periodic measurement of vital signs, electrocardiograms; and the performance of physical examinations. For each row category, a participant with two or more adverse events in that category is counted only once. Treatment-related TEAEs include TEAEs that were considered by the Investigator to be possibly or probably related to study drug and TEAEs with a missing relationship to study drug.

    Measured: From date of first dose until 30 days after the final dose of study drug, up to approximately 3 years 6 months

  2. Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Eribulin-LF

    Blood samples for Schedule 1 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1 predose, 15 minutes (min) after the start of infusion (SOI), 5 min after the end of infusion (EOI), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours (h) postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9, and Day 11. Blood samples for Schedule 2 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15 predose, 15 min after the SOI, 5 min after the EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9 and Day 11. Some participants followed a different pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment schedule prior to protocol amendment 3. Plasma concentrations of eribulin-LF were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. Plasma PK data were analyzed using a noncompartmental analysis approach to obtain individual participant estimates of Cmax, which was then summarized as the mean and standard deviation for all participants and expressed as nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL).

    Measured: Schedule 1: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1; Schedule 2: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15

  3. Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Eribulin-LF

    Blood samples for Schedule 1 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1 predose, 15 min after the SOI, 5 min after the EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9, and Day 11. Blood samples for Schedule 2 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15 predose, 15 min after the SOI, 5 min after the EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9 and Day 11. Some participants followed a different PK assessment schedule prior to protocol amendment 3. Plasma concentrations of eribulin-LF were determined using a validated LC/MS/MS method. Plasma PK data were analyzed using a noncompartmental analysis approach to obtain individual participant estimates of Tmax, which was then summarized as the median and full range for all participants and expressed as hours.

    Measured: Schedule 1: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1; Schedule 2: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15

  4. Plasma Half-life (t1/2) of Eribulin-LF

    Blood samples for Schedule 1 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1 predose, 15 min after SOI, 5 min after EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9, and Day 11. Blood samples for Schedule 2 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15 predose, 15 min after the SOI, 5 min after the EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9 and Day 11. Plasma concentrations of eribulin-LF were determined using a validated LC/MS/MS method. Plasma PK data were analyzed using a noncompartmental analysis approach to obtain individual participant estimates of t1/2, which was then summarized as the mean and standard deviation for all participants and expressed in hours.

    Measured: Schedule 1: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1; Schedule 2: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15

  5. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC(0-t) ) of Eribulin-LF

    Blood samples for Schedule 1 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1 predose, 15 min after SOI, 5 min after EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9, and Day 11. Blood samples for Schedule 2 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15 predose, 15 min after the SOI, 5 min after the EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9 and Day 11. Plasma concentrations of eribulin-LF were determined using a validated LC/MS/MS method. Plasma PK data were analyzed using a noncompartmental analysis approach to obtain individual participant estimates of AUC(0-t), which was then summarized as the mean and standard deviation for all participants and expressed in nanograms*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL).

    Measured: Schedule 1: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1; Schedule 2: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15

  6. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC(0-inf)) of Eribulin-LF

    Blood samples for Schedule 1 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1 predose, 15 min after SOI, 5 min after EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9, and Day 11. Blood samples for Schedule 2 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15 predose, 15 min after the SOI, 5 min after the EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9 and Day 11. Plasma concentrations of eribulin-LF were determined using a validated LC/MS/MS method. Plasma PK data were analyzed using a noncompartmental analysis approach to obtain individual participant estimates of AUC(0-inf), which was then summarized as the mean and standard deviation for all participants and expressed in ng*hr/mL.

    Measured: Schedule 1: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1; Schedule 2: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15

  7. Total Body Clearance (CL) of Eribulin-LF

    Blood samples for Schedule 1 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1 predose, 15 min after the SOI, 5 min after the EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9, and Day 11. Blood samples for Schedule 2 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15 predose, 15 min after the SOI, 5 min after the EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9 and Day 11. Some participants followed a different PK assessment schedule prior to protocol amendment 3. Plasma concentrations of eribulin-LF were determined using a validated LC/MS/MS method. Plasma PK data were analyzed using a noncompartmental analysis approach to obtain individual participant estimates of CL, which was then summarized as the mean and standard deviation for all participants and expressed as milliliter/hour (mL/h).

    Measured: Schedule 1: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1; Schedule 2: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15

  8. Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Eribulin-LF

    Blood samples for Schedule 1 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1 predose, 15 min after the SOI, 5 min after the EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9, and Day 11. Blood samples for Schedule 2 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15 predose, 15 min after the SOI, 5 min after the EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9 and Day 11. Some participants followed a different PK assessment schedule prior to protocol amendment 3. Plasma concentrations of eribulin-LF were determined using a validated LC/MS/MS method. Plasma PK data were analyzed using a noncompartmental analysis approach to obtain individual participant estimates of Vd, which was then summarized as the mean and standard deviation for all participants and expressed as milliliters (mL).

    Measured: Schedule 1: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1; Schedule 2: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15

  9. Renal Clearance (CLr) of Eribulin-LF

    Blood samples for Schedule 1 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1 predose, 15 min after SOI, 5 min after EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9, and Day 11. Blood samples for Schedule 2 were drawn on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15 predose, 15 min after SOI, 5 min after EOI, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postdose, and Day 4, Day 7, Day 9 and Day 11. Some participants followed a different PK assessment schedule prior to protocol amendment 3. Plasma concentrations of eribulin-LF were determined using a validated LC/MS/MS method. Plasma PK data were analyzed using a noncompartmental analysis approach to obtain individual participant estimates of CLr, which was then summarized as the mean and standard deviation for all participants and expressed in liters/hour (L/hr).

    Measured: Schedule 1: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1; Schedule 2: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15

  10. Fraction of Unchanged Eribulin-LF Excreted in the Urine (fe)

    Urinalysis was performed at Screening, Baseline, Cycle 1/Day 15, and each study visit of every cycle thereafter. If urinalysis suggested a urinary tract infection, or if clinically indicated, a urine microscopy, culture, and sensitivity was to be performed at the institution's laboratory. If urine protein was ≥ 2+ on urinalysis, then a 24-hour urine collection was to be done to quantify the 24-hour urine protein excretion. The samples were analyzed for the amount of eribulin in the urine using liquid LC/MS method of analysis. Urine PK data were analyzed using a noncompartmental analysis approach to obtain individual participant estimates of fe, which was then summarized as the mean and standard deviation for all participants and expressed in percentage of eribulin-LF.

    Measured: Schedule 1: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1; Schedule 2: Cycle 1/Day 1 and Day 15 and Cycle 3/Day 1 and Day 15

  11. Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR)

    BOR to treatment was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1. BOR was the best confirmed response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), progressive disease (PD), stable disease (SD), or not evaluable (NE), recorded from the start of eribulin-LF until disease progression/recurrence or death. CR; disappearance of all target lesions for at least 1 month. PR; at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD; at least 20% or greater increase in the sum of the longest diameter of measured lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. SD; PR failed to be achieved in the overall response assessment and there was no PD observed at the end of 6 cycles or later after starting eribulin-LF.

    Measured: Baseline to first date of documented CR, PR, SD, or PD, assessed up to data cutoff date (17 May 2016), for up to approximately 3 years 7 months

  12. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with BOR of CR or PR based on RECIST v1.1 criteria or target lesions assessed by magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography (MRI/CT) scans, as determined by independent radiologic review. BOR of CR was confirmed by a subsequent CR assessment at least 4 weeks later. BOR of PR was confirmed by a subsequent CR or PR assessment at least 4 weeks later. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) had to be reduced in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. The null hypothesis ORR was less than or equal to 10% was tested using 1-sided exact test of a single proportion, at 1-sided 0.05 level. ORR was presented with corresponding 2-sided, 95% confidence interval (CI). ORR=CR+PR.

    Measured: From date of treatment start until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, participant's choice to stop study treatment, or up to data cutoff date (17 May 2016), for up to approximately 3 years 7 months

  13. Percentage of Participants With Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    DCR was the percentage of the participants who had BOR of CR, PR, and SD, based on assessments by each site investigator using RECIST v1.1. The minimum duration of SD was defined as 5 weeks (or 7 weeks for Schedules 1a and 2 in the Dose Escalation Part) following the date of the first dose of study drug in order for stable disease to be considered the best overall response. The 95% CI was constructed using the method of Clopper and Pearson. DCR = CR + PR + SD

    Measured: From date of treatment start until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, participant's choice to stop study treatment, or up to data cutoff date (17 May 2016), for up to approximately 3 years 7 months

  14. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

    CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with BOR of CR or PR or durable stable disease (dSD) [CR + PR + dSD] based on RECIST v1.1. The dSD rate was defined as the percentage of participants with dSD (based on RECIST 1.1 and defined as SD lasting greater than or equal to 6 months), as determined by the site Investigator.

    Measured: From date of treatment start until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, participant's choice to stop study treatment, or up to data cutoff date (17 May 2016), for up to approximately 3 years 7 months

  15. Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the time from the date of treatment start until progressive disease or death from any cause in the absence of progressive disease. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study), recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions as assessed by IRR using RECIST v1.1. The duration of PFS was calculated as end date minus date of first drug plus 1, based on assessments by the site Investigator. PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimate and presented with 2-sided 95% Cl.

    Measured: From date of treatment start until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, participant's choice to stop study treatment, or up to data cutoff date (17 May 2016), for up to approximately 3 years 7 months

  16. Number of Participants With the Indicated Shift From Baseline Category to the Indicated Worst Post-Baseline Category

    The effects of eribulin-LF on cardiovascular repolarization were evaluated via 24-hour, 12-lead continuous Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring in Cycle 1, Day 1 for Schedule 1 and Day 1 and Day 15 of Schedule 2. Individual ECGs were extracted in triplicate from the Holter recordings at specified time points and were evaluated by a central laboratory. QT intervals were measured from Lead II and were corrected for heart rate (QTc) using Fridericia's (QTcF) and Bazett's (QTcB) correction factors. The primary QTc parameter was QTcF. Secondary parameters (QTcB, QT, QRS, and hazard ratio/heart rate (HR)) and waveforms (T-waves) were evaluated. BL= Baseline, PBL = post-Baseline, A,NCS = abnormal, not clinically significant, A, CS = abnormal, clinically significant

    Measured: Baseline (Day -1), Schedule 1 (Cycle 1 Day 1); Schedule 2 (Cycle 1 Day 1 and Day 15)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Sep 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 Dec 2012
  3. Primary completionOct 2015
  4. Study completion17 May 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01945710
Sponsor's protocol ID
E7389-E044-112
Other IDs
2012-001184-69
Status last verified
Mar 2018
First submitted
16 Sep 2013
Last updated
23 Jul 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Eisai's data sharing commitment and further information on how to request data can be found on our website http://eisaiclinicaltrials.com/.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Eribulin-LF in people with Solid Tumors, run by Eisai Limited at 4 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Eribulin-LF (time frame: Schedule 1: Cycle 1 (21 days); Schedule 2: Cycle 1 (28 days)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01945710.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2019.

AzTrials uses cookies for analytics and advertising. You can accept or reject them; the site works either way. Privacy Policy.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in