AzTrials
AzTrials

Tear; Knee, Cartilage, ArticularPhase 3NCT01947374

Arthroscopic Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfractures

A Phase 3 study testing Matrix encapsulated chondrocyte implantation and Microfracture awl in people with Tear; Knee, Cartilage, Articular, run by Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion at 1 site in Mexico.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a phase III, randomised controlled trial of matrix-encapsulated chondrocyte implantation procedure compared to the microfracture procedure in the repair of symptomatic cartilage lesions of the knee. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Tear; Knee, Cartilage, Articular
What is being tested?
Matrix encapsulated chondrocyte implantation and Microfracture awl
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
48 participants
Where
1 siteMexico
Study dates
Jan 2010to Jan 2015
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with symptomatic single chondral lesions of the knee from 1 to 4 cm2.
  • Signed patient informed consent.
  • Agree to adhere to rehabilitation protocol.

Who cannot join

  • Inflammatory arthritis, septic arthritis, gout, pseudogout, Paget's disease, ochronosis, acromegaly, hemochromatosis, tumors, collagen mutations.
  • Total meniscectomy
  • Malalignment
  • Evidence of osteoarthritis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mexico1 site
  • National Institute of Rehabilitation

    Mexico City, 14389

Other trials in Mexico

About this study

Official title: Matrix-encapsulated Arthroscopic Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfractures for Articular Cartilage Regeneration. Randomised Clinical Trial.

This is a phase III, randomised controlled trial of matrix-encapsulated chondrocyte implantation procedure compared to the microfracture procedure in the repair of symptomatic cartilage lesions of the knee. Eligible patients were asked for informed consent preoperatively and randomised for chondrocyte implantation of microfractures. Those patients allocated to the chondrocyte implantation group will be harvested at time of first arthroscopic procedure and concurrent lesions were treated, as meniscus repair, ligament reconstruction, or malalignment corrected. The patients allocated to microfracture will be treated at the time of the only arthroscopic procedure. Both groups will have the same rehabilitation program. Prospective clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging will be performed as main outcomes.

Being tested
Matrix encapsulated chondrocyte implantation, Microfracture awl
Keywords
Cartilage, Articular
Medical subject headings
Lacerations

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Matrix encapsulated chondrocyte implantationProcedure or surgery

    Each implant contains 6,000,000 autologous chondrocytes.

  • Microfracture awlProcedure or surgery

    Is an awl that allow perforation of the subchondral bone.

Study groups in NCT01947374
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Chondrocyte implantationExperimentalFrom a previous biopsy, articular cartilage matrix is digested and chondrocytes are cultured in 2 passages until implants with at least 6,000,000 cells are constructed. These constructus of 8 mm in diameter are implanted arthroscopically by means of biodegradable anchor (MINILOK QUICKANCHOR TM from DePuy-Mitek ) located at the defect and tied securely.
Receives: Procedure: Matrix encapsulated chondrocyte implantation
MicrofracturesExperimentalSubchondral bone perforations that allow a clot to be formed, and subsequent scar at the cartilage defect area.
Receives: Procedure: Microfracture awl

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. MRI T2 Mapping

    Special magnetic resonance imaging technique for measurement of collagen and water content, expressed in milliseconds.

    Measured: 24 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Clinical evaluation

    Clinical assessment with validated knee scores, and adverse effects register are taken.

    Measured: 0, 10, 30 days; 3, 6, 9 ,12, 24, 36 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Sep 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionJan 2015
  4. Study completionJan 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
48 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01947374
Sponsor's protocol ID
017-05-INR
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
4 Feb 2012
Last updated
12 Apr 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Masri M, Lombardero G, Velasquillo C, Martinez V, Neri R, Villegas H, Ibarra C. Matrix-encapsulation cell-seeding technique to prevent cell detachment during arthroscopic implantation of matrix-induced autologous chondrocytes. Arthroscopy. 2007 Aug;23(8):877-83. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.05.010.

    PubMed 17681210
  • Ibarra-Ponce de Leon JC, Velasquillo-Martinez MC, Izaguirre A, Villalobos-Cordova E, Masri M, Ibarra-Ibarra LG. [Cartilage repair: cell-based techniques]. Acta Ortop Mex. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):38-44. Spanish.

    PubMed 19462773
  • Ibarra C, Izaguirre A, Villalobos E, Masri M, Lombardero G, Martinez V, Velasquillo C, Meza AO, Guevara V, Ibarra LG. Follow-up of a new arthroscopic technique for implantation of matrix-encapsulated autologous chondrocytes in the knee. Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun;30(6):715-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.032. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

    PubMed 24746406
  • Ibarra C, Villalobos E, Madrazo-Ibarra A, Velasquillo C, Martinez-Lopez V, Izaguirre A, Olivos-Meza A, Cortes-Gonzalez S, Perez-Jimenez FJ, Vargas-Ramirez A, Franco-Sanchez G, Ibarra-Ibarra LG, Sierra-Suarez L, Almazan A, Ortega-Sanchez C, Trueba C, Martin FB, Arredondo-Valdes R, Chavez-Arias D. Arthroscopic Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation Versus Microfracture: A 6-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jul;49(8):2165-2176. doi: 10.1177/03635465211010487. Epub 2021 May 28.

    PubMed 34048286

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Matrix encapsulated chondrocyte implantation and Microfracture awl in people with Tear; Knee, Cartilage, Articular, run by Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion at 1 site in Mexico.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

MRI T2 Mapping (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01947374, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in