Polycythemia VeraPhase 3PROUD-PVNCT01949805
Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b Versus Hydroxyurea in Polycythemia Vera
A Phase 3 study testing Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014) and Hydroxyurea in people with Polycythemia Vera, run by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG at 58 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
Phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of the novel monopegylated interferon alpha 2b AOP2014 versus Hydroxyurea (the current licensed therapy for this disease). One year treatment of patients with polycythemia vera. Objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of AOP2014 vs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Polycythemia Vera
- What is being tested?
- Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014) and Hydroxyurea
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 257 participants
- Where
- 58 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2013to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years or older
- Diagnosis of Polycythemia Vera according to the WHO 2008 criteria (Barbui et al, 2011) with the mandatory presence of JAK2V617F mutation as the major disease criterion.
- For previously cytoreduction untreated patients - documented need of cytoreductive treatment
- leukocytosis (WBC>10G/L for two measurements within one week)
- For patients currently treated or pre-treated with HU, all of the following criteria:
- being non responders (as defined by the response criteria for primary endpoint)
Show all 11Show fewer
- total HU treatment duration shorter than three years
- no documented resistance or intolerance as defined by modified Barosi et al, 2009 criteria
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score 0-7 on both subscales
- Patients with HADS score of 8-10 inclusive on either or both of the subscales may be eligible following psychiatric assessment that excludes clinical significance of the observed symptoms in the context of potential treatment with an interferon alpha
- Signed written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Any systematic cytoreduction for PV prior study entry with exception of HU for shorter than 3 years (see respective inclusion criterion)
- Any contraindication to any of the IMPs (pegylated interferon or hydroxyurea) or their excipients
- Any systemic exposure to a non-pegylated or pegylated interferon alpha
- Documented autoimmune disease at screening or in the medical history
- Clinically relevant pulmonary infiltrates, pneumonia, and pneumonitis at screening
- Systemic infections, e.g. hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV at screening
Show all 22Show fewer
- Known PV-related thromboembolic complications in the abdominal area (e.g. portal vein thrombosis, Budd-chiari syndrome) and/or splenectomy in the medical history
- Any investigational drug less than 6 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug or not recovered from effects of prior administration of any investigational agent
- History or presence of depression requiring treatment with antidepressant
- HADS score equal to or above 11 on either or both of the subscales
- Any risk of suicide at screening or previous suicide attempts
- Any significant morbidity or abnormality which may interfere with the study participation
- Pregnancy and breast-feeding females of reproductive potential and males not using effective means of contraception
- History of active substance or alcohol abuse within the last year
- Evidence of severe retinopathy (e.g. cytomegalovirus retinitis, macular degeneration) or clinically relevant ophthalmological disorder (due to diabetes mellitus or hypertension)
- Thyroid dysfunction not adequately controlled
- Patients tested positively with TgAb and / or TPOAb at screening
- History of major organ transplantation
- History of uncontrolled severe seizure disorder
- Leukocytopenia at the time of screening
- Thrombocytopenia at the time of screening
- History of malignant disease, including solid tumours and hematological malignancies (except basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix that have been completely excised and are considered cured) within the last 3 years
Trial locations and contacts
58 sites in 14 countries.
58 sites in 14 countries
Austria7 sites
LKH Graz
Graz
University Hospital Innsbruck
Innsbruck
Elisabethinen Hospital Linz
Linz
Salzburg Regional Hospital
Salzburg
Hanusch Hospital
Vienna
Medical University Vienna
Vienna
Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen
Wels
Poland6 sites
Andrzej Mielecki Independent Public Clinical Hospital of Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
Katowice
University Hospital in Cracow
Krakow
Independent Public Teaching Hospital No.1 in Lublin
Lublin
Fryderyk Chopin Provincial Specialized Hospital
Rzeszów
Nicolaus Copernicus Municipal Specialist Hospital
Torun
Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine
Warsaw
Russia6 sites
Baranov Republican Hospital
Petrozavodsk
First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg
Saint Petersburg
Samara Kalinin Regional Clinical Hospital
Samara
Komi Republican Oncology Center
Syktyvkar
Tula Regional Clinical Hospital
Tula
Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital
Yaroslavl
Czechia5 sites
University Hospital Brno
Brno
University Hospital Hradec Kralove
Hradec Králové
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
Prague
University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Prague
University Hospital Motol
Prague
Hungary5 sites
St Istvan and St Laszlo Hospital of Budapest
Budapest
University of Debrecen
Debrecen
Bekes County Pandy Kalman Hospital, 1st Department of Medicine, Hematology
Gyula
Kaposi Mor County Teaching Hospital
Kaposvár
University of Szeged, Albert Szent-Gyorgyi Clinical Center, Koranyi fasor 6
Szeged
Ukraine5 sites
Cherkasy Regional Oncology Center, Regional Treatment and Diagnostics Hematology Center
Cherkasy
Dnipropetrovsk City Multispecialty Clinical Hospital #4
Dnipropetrovsk
National Research Center for Radiation Medicine, Institute of Clinical Radiology
Kiev
Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine
Lviv
O.F. Herbachevskyi Regional Clinical Hospital
Zhytomyr
Belgium4 sites
Centre du Cancer et D'hematologie
Brussels
UZA, Antwerp University Hospital
Edegem
UZ Leuven
Leuven
Haematolgy, University of Liège
Liège
Bulgaria4 sites
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Sveti Georgi"
Plovdiv
Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Hematological Diseases
Sofia
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Sveta Marina"
Varna
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Hristo Botev, Vratsa, First Department of Internal Medicine
Vratsa
Romania4 sites
Emergency Clinical County Hospital Brasov
Brasov
Bucharest University Emergency Hospital
Bucharest
Coltea Clinical Hospital
Bucharest
"Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta" Institute of Oncology
Cluj-Napoca
France3 sites
Institute Paoli-Calmettes
Marseille
Hospital Saint-Louis
Paris
Clinical Research Center CIC
Poitiers
Germany3 sites
Aachen University Hospital, Medical Clinic IV
Aachen
University Hospital Bonn, Center for Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic and Outpatient Clinic III
Bonn
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Clinic and Polyclinic I
Dresden
Italy2 sites
Careggi University Hospital
Florence
Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia
Slovakia2 sites
University Hospital with Outpatient Clinic F.D. Roosevelt
Banská Bystrica
Saint Cyril and Metod University Hospital Bratislava
Bratislava
Spain2 sites
Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
Barcelona
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Controlled, Parallel Arm, Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of AOP2014 vs. Hydroxyurea in Patients With Polycythemia Vera
Phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of the novel monopegylated interferon alpha 2b AOP2014 versus Hydroxyurea (the current licensed therapy for this disease). One year treatment of patients with polycythemia vera. Objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of AOP2014 vs. HU in terms of disease response rate in both HU naïve and currently treated patients, diagnosed with Polycythemia Vera. Response is measured as normalisation of key lab parameters as well as normalized spleen size.
Read the detailed description
Hydroxyurea is an established first-line treatment option currently approved in several European countries for Polycythemia Vera (PV) patients requiring a cytoreductive therapy (Barbui et al, 2011). Clinical trials have shown that HU is an effective drug for preventing thrombosis in PV compared to phlebotomy (Michiels et al, 1999).
The main concern of a long term treatment with HU is its potential leukaemogenicity: based on the mechanism of action, HU can potentially accelerate the accumulation of mutations in DNA and increase the risk of leukaemic transformation (Dingli et Tefferi, 2006). However, there is currently no clear clinical data to confirm leukaemogenicity of HU in patients with PV (Tefferi, 2012).
Even though IFN-alpha has shown its activity in PV in the 1980s, it is still considered as an experimental treatment in Europe due to pending approval in this indication (Barbui et al, 2011). It induces major or complete molecular remissions in patients with PV accompanied by a reduction in the risk of thrombosis and bleeding - the major determinants of morbidity in this indication (Hasselbalch, 2011). However, only low doses are tolerated and significant adverse effects from long-term use may limit its usefulness.
Pegylated interferons are better tolerated and are the preferred options of treatment in PV patients (Kiladjian et al, 2008) despite the lack of evidences based on well-designed randomized controlled clinical studies.
AOP2014 is a next generation pegylated interferon (Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b), with the addition of proline in the N-terminal end.
AOP2014 like all interferon suppresses the malignant clone causing PV and subsequently is expected to possibly defer the onset of or avoid long term sequelae of PV. In addition, a reduction in the frequency of phlebotomies should be achieved. The peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b might potentially have a positive impact on reducing the drop-out rate compared to conventional IFNs. It is expected that the reduced frequency of administration of AOP2014 will contribute to higher compliance rates.
The maximum tolerated dose as well as the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of AOP2014 were assessed in a phase I/II study in patients with PV. After 24 evaluable patients had entered the Phase I dose finding part, the MTD was defined at the level of 540 µg administered every two weeks. Another 27 patients were recruited in order to further investigate the drug efficacy and safety in PV. Efficacy results of AOP2014 were promising. By visit 18, 53.0% of the patients had reached complete response (12 evaluable patients). Adverse events were manageable and rarely necessitated treatment discontinuation.
AOP2014 was shown to have a prolonged plasma half-life with a concomitant increase in AUC. This is expected to enhance the therapeutic window of peg-IFN-alpha-2b.
The safety profile of type I interferons alpha is believed to be well characterized after clinical experience for nearly 20 years. Since the dose is carefully titrated to the optimal effective dose no additional risks for the patients are expected. HU, the IMP-comparator in the study, is the standard reference treatment in PV.
This phase III study was designed to compare, for the first time, the efficacy and safety of HU with a pegylated prolin-interferon alpha-2b (AOP2014) in patients with PV. Two populations will be assessed: HU naïve patients and patients currently treated or pre-treated with HU for less than 3 years, not responding to HU treatment (according to criteria in this protocol).
- Conditions
- Polycythemia Vera
- Being tested
- Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014), Hydroxyurea
- Medical subject headings
- Polycythemia Vera
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014)Drug
Also called AOP2014, P1101
Pegylated interferon alpha 2b given Q2W as SC injection
HydroxyureaDrug
Also called HU, Hydroxycarbamide, brand name Litalir (or other)
Hydroyurea capsules taken daily po
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyurea | Active comparator | Hydroxyurea capsules (500 mg each). Daily intake of doses from 500 mg Q2D to 3000 mg QD Receives: Drug: Hydroxyurea |
| Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014) | Experimental | Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b at 50mcg to max 500 mcg, given every other week as one subcutanous injection Receives: Drug: Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease response rate
Disease response rate is defined as hematocrit <45% without phlebotomy (at least 3 months since last phlebotomy), platelets <400 G/L, leukocytes <10 G/L , and normal spleen size
Measured: Month 12
Secondary outcomes (10)
Disease response
Measured: at month 3, 6 and 9
JAK2 allelic burden changes
Measured: at month 6 and 12
time to response
will be measured during the study period of 12 months
Measured: from inclusion until first response confirmation
duration of response
from the first documented response on study
Measured: during the 12 months of study duration
number of phlebotomies
Measured: from inclusion until month 12
blood parameters
biweekly
Measured: from inclusion until month 12
spleen size
both centrally (blinded assessment) and locally
Measured: at month 3, 6, 9 and 12
disease related symptoms
biweekly
Measured: from inclusion until month 12
adverse events
biweekly
Measured: from inclusion until month 12
protocol-specific adverse events of special interest
biweekly
Measured: from inclusion until month 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2013
- Primary completionJul 2016
- Study completionJul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Polycythemia VeraStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 257 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PharmaEssentia (Co-Sponsor for USA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Heinz Gisslinger, MD, Principal investigator, Medical University of Vienna
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01949805
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PROUD-PV
- Other IDs
- 2012-005259-18
- Acronym
- PROUD-PV
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2013
- Last updated
- 28 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Verger E, Soret-Dulphy J, Maslah N, Roy L, Rey J, Ghrieb Z, Kralovics R, Gisslinger H, Grohmann-Izay B, Klade C, Chomienne C, Giraudier S, Cassinat B, Kiladjian JJ. Ropeginterferon alpha-2b targets JAK2V617F-positive polycythemia vera cells in vitro and in vivo. Blood Cancer J. 2018 Oct 4;8(10):94. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0133-0.
PubMed 30287855
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Controlled, Parallel Arm, Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of AOP2014 vs. Hydroxyurea in Patients With Polycythemia Vera
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01949805
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROUD-PV / PROUD-PV
- Conditions
- Polycythemia Vera
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 257 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PharmaEssentia (Co-Sponsor for USA)
- Study start
- Sep 2013
- Primary completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of the novel monopegylated interferon alpha 2b AOP2014 versus Hydroxyurea (the current licensed therapy for this disease). One year treatment of patients with polycythemia vera. Objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of AOP2014 vs. HU in terms of disease response rate in both HU naïve and currently treated patients, diagnosed with Polycythemia Vera. Response is measured as normalisation of key lab parameters as well as normalized spleen size.
Detailed description
Hydroxyurea is an established first-line treatment option currently approved in several European countries for Polycythemia Vera (PV) patients requiring a cytoreductive therapy (Barbui et al, 2011). Clinical trials have shown that HU is an effective drug for preventing thrombosis in PV compared to phlebotomy (Michiels et al, 1999).
The main concern of a long term treatment with HU is its potential leukaemogenicity: based on the mechanism of action, HU can potentially accelerate the accumulation of mutations in DNA and increase the risk of leukaemic transformation (Dingli et Tefferi, 2006). However, there is currently no clear clinical data to confirm leukaemogenicity of HU in patients with PV (Tefferi, 2012).
Even though IFN-alpha has shown its activity in PV in the 1980s, it is still considered as an experimental treatment in Europe due to pending approval in this indication (Barbui et al, 2011). It induces major or complete molecular remissions in patients with PV accompanied by a reduction in the risk of thrombosis and bleeding - the major determinants of morbidity in this indication (Hasselbalch, 2011). However, only low doses are tolerated and significant adverse effects from long-term use may limit its usefulness.
Pegylated interferons are better tolerated and are the preferred options of treatment in PV patients (Kiladjian et al, 2008) despite the lack of evidences based on well-designed randomized controlled clinical studies.
AOP2014 is a next generation pegylated interferon (Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b), with the addition of proline in the N-terminal end.
AOP2014 like all interferon suppresses the malignant clone causing PV and subsequently is expected to possibly defer the onset of or avoid long term sequelae of PV. In addition, a reduction in the frequency of phlebotomies should be achieved. The peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b might potentially have a positive impact on reducing the drop-out rate compared to conventional IFNs. It is expected that the reduced frequency of administration of AOP2014 will contribute to higher compliance rates.
The maximum tolerated dose as well as the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of AOP2014 were assessed in a phase I/II study in patients with PV. After 24 evaluable patients had entered the Phase I dose finding part, the MTD was defined at the level of 540 µg administered every two weeks. Another 27 patients were recruited in order to further investigate the drug efficacy and safety in PV. Efficacy results of AOP2014 were promising. By visit 18, 53.0% of the patients had reached complete response (12 evaluable patients). Adverse events were manageable and rarely necessitated treatment discontinuation.
AOP2014 was shown to have a prolonged plasma half-life with a concomitant increase in AUC. This is expected to enhance the therapeutic window of peg-IFN-alpha-2b.
The safety profile of type I interferons alpha is believed to be well characterized after clinical experience for nearly 20 years. Since the dose is carefully titrated to the optimal effective dose no additional risks for the patients are expected. HU, the IMP-comparator in the study, is the standard reference treatment in PV.
This phase III study was designed to compare, for the first time, the efficacy and safety of HU with a pegylated prolin-interferon alpha-2b (AOP2014) in patients with PV. Two populations will be assessed: HU naïve patients and patients currently treated or pre-treated with HU for less than 3 years, not responding to HU treatment (according to criteria in this protocol).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyurea | Active comparator | Drug: HydroxyureaHydroxyurea capsules (500 mg each). Daily intake of doses from 500 mg Q2D to 3000 mg QD |
| Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014) | Experimental | Drug: Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014)Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b at 50mcg to max 500 mcg, given every other week as one subcutanous injection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- 18 years or older
- Diagnosis of Polycythemia Vera according to the WHO 2008 criteria (Barbui et al, 2011) with the mandatory presence of JAK2V617F mutation as the major disease criterion.
- For previously cytoreduction untreated patients - documented need of cytoreductive treatment
- For patients currently treated or pre-treated with HU, all of the following criteria:
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score 0-7 on both subscales
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Any systematic cytoreduction for PV prior study entry with exception of HU for shorter than 3 years (see respective inclusion criterion)
- Any contraindication to any of the IMPs (pegylated interferon or hydroxyurea) or their excipients
- Any systemic exposure to a non-pegylated or pegylated interferon alpha
- Documented autoimmune disease at screening or in the medical history
- Clinically relevant pulmonary infiltrates, pneumonia, and pneumonitis at screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014)Also: AOP2014, P1101Pegylated interferon alpha 2b given Q2W as SC injection | Drug | Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014) |
| HydroxyureaAlso: HU, Hydroxycarbamide, brand name Litalir (or other)Hydroyurea capsules taken daily po | Drug | Hydroxyurea |
Primary outcome
Disease response rate
Time frame: Month 12
Disease response rate is defined as hematocrit <45% without phlebotomy (at least 3 months since last phlebotomy), platelets <400 G/L, leukocytes <10 G/L , and normal spleen size
10 secondary outcomes
Disease response
Time frame: at month 3, 6 and 9
JAK2 allelic burden changes
Time frame: at month 6 and 12
time to response
Time frame: from inclusion until first response confirmation
duration of response
Time frame: during the 12 months of study duration
number of phlebotomies
Time frame: from inclusion until month 12
blood parameters
Time frame: from inclusion until month 12
spleen size
Time frame: at month 3, 6, 9 and 12
disease related symptoms
Time frame: from inclusion until month 12
adverse events
Time frame: from inclusion until month 12
protocol-specific adverse events of special interest
Time frame: from inclusion until month 12
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Nov 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30287855Verger E, Soret-Dulphy J, Maslah N, Roy L, Rey J, Ghrieb Z, Kralovics R, Gisslinger H, Grohmann-Izay B, Klade C, Chomienne C, Giraudier S, Cassinat B, Kiladjian JJ. Ropeginterferon alpha-2b targets JAK2V617F-positive polycythemia vera cells in vitro and in vivo. Blood Cancer J. 2018 Oct 4;8(10):94. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0133-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Polycythemia Vera
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of INCA036978 in Participants With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Recruiting
Functional and Phenotypic Characterization of Monocytes in Myeloproliferative Syndromes
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm, Polycythemia Vera
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of PRT12396 in Participants With Select Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Polycythemia Vera (PV), Myelofibrosis (MF)
RecruitingPhase 3
INTREPID: A Study of Sapablursen Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy in Participants With Polycythemia Vera (PV)
Polycythemia Vera
RecruitingObservational study
Tissue, Blood, and Body Fluid Sample Collection From Patients With Hematologic Cancer
Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders, Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Heinz Gisslinger, MD principal investigator
Medical University of Vienna
58 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014) and Hydroxyurea in people with Polycythemia Vera, run by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG at 58 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 58 sites in Austria, Poland, Russia, Czechia, Hungary and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease response rate (time frame: Month 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01949805, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2016.