AzTrials
AzTrials

Polycythemia VeraPhase 3PROUD-PVNCT01949805

Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2b Versus Hydroxyurea in Polycythemia Vera

A Phase 3 study testing Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014) and Hydroxyurea in people with Polycythemia Vera, run by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG at 58 sites in 14 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of the novel monopegylated interferon alpha 2b AOP2014 versus Hydroxyurea (the current licensed therapy for this disease). One year treatment of patients with polycythemia vera. Objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of AOP2014 vs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Polycythemia Vera
What is being tested?
Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014) and Hydroxyurea
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
257 participants
Where
58 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
Sep 2013to Jul 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years or older
  • Diagnosis of Polycythemia Vera according to the WHO 2008 criteria (Barbui et al, 2011) with the mandatory presence of JAK2V617F mutation as the major disease criterion.
  • For previously cytoreduction untreated patients - documented need of cytoreductive treatment
  • leukocytosis (WBC>10G/L for two measurements within one week)
  • For patients currently treated or pre-treated with HU, all of the following criteria:
  • being non responders (as defined by the response criteria for primary endpoint)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • total HU treatment duration shorter than three years
  • no documented resistance or intolerance as defined by modified Barosi et al, 2009 criteria
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score 0-7 on both subscales
  • Patients with HADS score of 8-10 inclusive on either or both of the subscales may be eligible following psychiatric assessment that excludes clinical significance of the observed symptoms in the context of potential treatment with an interferon alpha
  • Signed written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Any systematic cytoreduction for PV prior study entry with exception of HU for shorter than 3 years (see respective inclusion criterion)
  • Any contraindication to any of the IMPs (pegylated interferon or hydroxyurea) or their excipients
  • Any systemic exposure to a non-pegylated or pegylated interferon alpha
  • Documented autoimmune disease at screening or in the medical history
  • Clinically relevant pulmonary infiltrates, pneumonia, and pneumonitis at screening
  • Systemic infections, e.g. hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV at screening
Show all 22Show fewer
  • Known PV-related thromboembolic complications in the abdominal area (e.g. portal vein thrombosis, Budd-chiari syndrome) and/or splenectomy in the medical history
  • Any investigational drug less than 6 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug or not recovered from effects of prior administration of any investigational agent
  • History or presence of depression requiring treatment with antidepressant
  • HADS score equal to or above 11 on either or both of the subscales
  • Any risk of suicide at screening or previous suicide attempts
  • Any significant morbidity or abnormality which may interfere with the study participation
  • Pregnancy and breast-feeding females of reproductive potential and males not using effective means of contraception
  • History of active substance or alcohol abuse within the last year
  • Evidence of severe retinopathy (e.g. cytomegalovirus retinitis, macular degeneration) or clinically relevant ophthalmological disorder (due to diabetes mellitus or hypertension)
  • Thyroid dysfunction not adequately controlled
  • Patients tested positively with TgAb and / or TPOAb at screening
  • History of major organ transplantation
  • History of uncontrolled severe seizure disorder
  • Leukocytopenia at the time of screening
  • Thrombocytopenia at the time of screening
  • History of malignant disease, including solid tumours and hematological malignancies (except basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix that have been completely excised and are considered cured) within the last 3 years

Trial locations and contacts

58 sites in 14 countries.

58 sites in 14 countries

Austria7 sites
  • LKH Graz

    Graz

  • University Hospital Innsbruck

    Innsbruck

  • Elisabethinen Hospital Linz

    Linz

  • Salzburg Regional Hospital

    Salzburg

  • Hanusch Hospital

    Vienna

  • Medical University Vienna

    Vienna

  • Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen

    Wels

Other trials in Austria

Poland6 sites
  • Andrzej Mielecki Independent Public Clinical Hospital of Medical University of Silesia in Katowice

    Katowice

  • University Hospital in Cracow

    Krakow

  • Independent Public Teaching Hospital No.1 in Lublin

    Lublin

  • Fryderyk Chopin Provincial Specialized Hospital

    Rzeszów

  • Nicolaus Copernicus Municipal Specialist Hospital

    Torun

  • Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine

    Warsaw

Other trials in Poland

Russia6 sites
  • Baranov Republican Hospital

    Petrozavodsk

  • First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg

    Saint Petersburg

  • Samara Kalinin Regional Clinical Hospital

    Samara

  • Komi Republican Oncology Center

    Syktyvkar

  • Tula Regional Clinical Hospital

    Tula

  • Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital

    Yaroslavl

Other trials in Russia

Czechia5 sites
  • University Hospital Brno

    Brno

  • University Hospital Hradec Kralove

    Hradec Králové

  • Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion

    Prague

  • University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady

    Prague

  • University Hospital Motol

    Prague

Other trials in Czechia

Hungary5 sites
  • St Istvan and St Laszlo Hospital of Budapest

    Budapest

  • University of Debrecen

    Debrecen

  • Bekes County Pandy Kalman Hospital, 1st Department of Medicine, Hematology

    Gyula

  • Kaposi Mor County Teaching Hospital

    Kaposvár

  • University of Szeged, Albert Szent-Gyorgyi Clinical Center, Koranyi fasor 6

    Szeged

Other trials in Hungary

Ukraine5 sites
  • Cherkasy Regional Oncology Center, Regional Treatment and Diagnostics Hematology Center

    Cherkasy

  • Dnipropetrovsk City Multispecialty Clinical Hospital #4

    Dnipropetrovsk

  • National Research Center for Radiation Medicine, Institute of Clinical Radiology

    Kiev

  • Institute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine

    Lviv

  • O.F. Herbachevskyi Regional Clinical Hospital

    Zhytomyr

Other trials in Ukraine

Belgium4 sites
  • Centre du Cancer et D'hematologie

    Brussels

  • UZA, Antwerp University Hospital

    Edegem

  • UZ Leuven

    Leuven

  • Haematolgy, University of Liège

    Liège

Other trials in Belgium

Bulgaria4 sites
  • University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Sveti Georgi"

    Plovdiv

  • Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Hematological Diseases

    Sofia

  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Sveta Marina"

    Varna

  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment - Hristo Botev, Vratsa, First Department of Internal Medicine

    Vratsa

Other trials in Bulgaria

Romania4 sites
  • Emergency Clinical County Hospital Brasov

    Brasov

  • Bucharest University Emergency Hospital

    Bucharest

  • Coltea Clinical Hospital

    Bucharest

  • "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta" Institute of Oncology

    Cluj-Napoca

Other trials in Romania

France3 sites
  • Institute Paoli-Calmettes

    Marseille

  • Hospital Saint-Louis

    Paris

  • Clinical Research Center CIC

    Poitiers

Other trials in France

Germany3 sites
  • Aachen University Hospital, Medical Clinic IV

    Aachen

  • University Hospital Bonn, Center for Internal Medicine, Medical Clinic and Outpatient Clinic III

    Bonn

  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Clinic and Polyclinic I

    Dresden

Other trials in Germany

Italy2 sites
  • Careggi University Hospital

    Florence

  • Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

    Pavia

Other trials in Italy

Slovakia2 sites
  • University Hospital with Outpatient Clinic F.D. Roosevelt

    Banská Bystrica

  • Saint Cyril and Metod University Hospital Bratislava

    Bratislava

Other trials in Slovakia

Spain2 sites
  • Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona

    Barcelona

  • Hospital del Mar

    Barcelona

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Controlled, Parallel Arm, Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of AOP2014 vs. Hydroxyurea in Patients With Polycythemia Vera

Phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of the novel monopegylated interferon alpha 2b AOP2014 versus Hydroxyurea (the current licensed therapy for this disease). One year treatment of patients with polycythemia vera. Objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of AOP2014 vs. HU in terms of disease response rate in both HU naïve and currently treated patients, diagnosed with Polycythemia Vera. Response is measured as normalisation of key lab parameters as well as normalized spleen size.

Read the detailed description

Hydroxyurea is an established first-line treatment option currently approved in several European countries for Polycythemia Vera (PV) patients requiring a cytoreductive therapy (Barbui et al, 2011). Clinical trials have shown that HU is an effective drug for preventing thrombosis in PV compared to phlebotomy (Michiels et al, 1999).

The main concern of a long term treatment with HU is its potential leukaemogenicity: based on the mechanism of action, HU can potentially accelerate the accumulation of mutations in DNA and increase the risk of leukaemic transformation (Dingli et Tefferi, 2006). However, there is currently no clear clinical data to confirm leukaemogenicity of HU in patients with PV (Tefferi, 2012).

Even though IFN-alpha has shown its activity in PV in the 1980s, it is still considered as an experimental treatment in Europe due to pending approval in this indication (Barbui et al, 2011). It induces major or complete molecular remissions in patients with PV accompanied by a reduction in the risk of thrombosis and bleeding - the major determinants of morbidity in this indication (Hasselbalch, 2011). However, only low doses are tolerated and significant adverse effects from long-term use may limit its usefulness.

Pegylated interferons are better tolerated and are the preferred options of treatment in PV patients (Kiladjian et al, 2008) despite the lack of evidences based on well-designed randomized controlled clinical studies.

AOP2014 is a next generation pegylated interferon (Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b), with the addition of proline in the N-terminal end.

AOP2014 like all interferon suppresses the malignant clone causing PV and subsequently is expected to possibly defer the onset of or avoid long term sequelae of PV. In addition, a reduction in the frequency of phlebotomies should be achieved. The peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b might potentially have a positive impact on reducing the drop-out rate compared to conventional IFNs. It is expected that the reduced frequency of administration of AOP2014 will contribute to higher compliance rates.

The maximum tolerated dose as well as the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of AOP2014 were assessed in a phase I/II study in patients with PV. After 24 evaluable patients had entered the Phase I dose finding part, the MTD was defined at the level of 540 µg administered every two weeks. Another 27 patients were recruited in order to further investigate the drug efficacy and safety in PV. Efficacy results of AOP2014 were promising. By visit 18, 53.0% of the patients had reached complete response (12 evaluable patients). Adverse events were manageable and rarely necessitated treatment discontinuation.

AOP2014 was shown to have a prolonged plasma half-life with a concomitant increase in AUC. This is expected to enhance the therapeutic window of peg-IFN-alpha-2b.

The safety profile of type I interferons alpha is believed to be well characterized after clinical experience for nearly 20 years. Since the dose is carefully titrated to the optimal effective dose no additional risks for the patients are expected. HU, the IMP-comparator in the study, is the standard reference treatment in PV.

This phase III study was designed to compare, for the first time, the efficacy and safety of HU with a pegylated prolin-interferon alpha-2b (AOP2014) in patients with PV. Two populations will be assessed: HU naïve patients and patients currently treated or pre-treated with HU for less than 3 years, not responding to HU treatment (according to criteria in this protocol).

Being tested
Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014), Hydroxyurea
Medical subject headings
Polycythemia Vera

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014)Drug

    Also called AOP2014, P1101

    Pegylated interferon alpha 2b given Q2W as SC injection

  • HydroxyureaDrug

    Also called HU, Hydroxycarbamide, brand name Litalir (or other)

    Hydroyurea capsules taken daily po

Study groups in NCT01949805
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HydroxyureaActive comparatorHydroxyurea capsules (500 mg each). Daily intake of doses from 500 mg Q2D to 3000 mg QD
Receives: Drug: Hydroxyurea
Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014)ExperimentalPeg-P-IFN-alpha-2b at 50mcg to max 500 mcg, given every other week as one subcutanous injection
Receives: Drug: Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Disease response rate

    Disease response rate is defined as hematocrit <45% without phlebotomy (at least 3 months since last phlebotomy), platelets <400 G/L, leukocytes <10 G/L , and normal spleen size

    Measured: Month 12

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Disease response

    Measured: at month 3, 6 and 9

  2. JAK2 allelic burden changes

    Measured: at month 6 and 12

  3. time to response

    will be measured during the study period of 12 months

    Measured: from inclusion until first response confirmation

  4. duration of response

    from the first documented response on study

    Measured: during the 12 months of study duration

  5. number of phlebotomies

    Measured: from inclusion until month 12

  6. blood parameters

    biweekly

    Measured: from inclusion until month 12

  7. spleen size

    both centrally (blinded assessment) and locally

    Measured: at month 3, 6, 9 and 12

  8. disease related symptoms

    biweekly

    Measured: from inclusion until month 12

  9. adverse events

    biweekly

    Measured: from inclusion until month 12

  10. protocol-specific adverse events of special interest

    biweekly

    Measured: from inclusion until month 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2013
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
257 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01949805
Sponsor's protocol ID
PROUD-PV
Other IDs
2012-005259-18
Acronym
PROUD-PV
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
6 Sep 2013
Last updated
28 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Verger E, Soret-Dulphy J, Maslah N, Roy L, Rey J, Ghrieb Z, Kralovics R, Gisslinger H, Grohmann-Izay B, Klade C, Chomienne C, Giraudier S, Cassinat B, Kiladjian JJ. Ropeginterferon alpha-2b targets JAK2V617F-positive polycythemia vera cells in vitro and in vivo. Blood Cancer J. 2018 Oct 4;8(10):94. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0133-0.

    PubMed 30287855

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Peg-P-IFN-alpha-2b (AOP2014) and Hydroxyurea in people with Polycythemia Vera, run by AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG at 58 sites in 14 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 58 sites in Austria, Poland, Russia, Czechia, Hungary and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Disease response rate (time frame: Month 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01949805, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in