StrokePhase 3NCT01953549
Physical Fitness Training in Subacute Stroke (PHYS-Stroke)
A Phase 3 study testing physical fitness training and relaxation in people with Stroke, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 7 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to investigate whether a 4-week physical fitness training (target intervention) in stroke patients (subacute stage) increase the walking speed and activities of daily living compared with a control intervention (relaxation exercises). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- physical fitness training and relaxation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Oct 2013to 1 Nov 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diagnosis of stroke within 5-45 days after stroke
- age >= 18 years
- able to sit for at least 30 seconds
- Barthel index < =65 at inclusion
- considered able to perform aerobic exercise as determined by responsible physician
- Written informed consent of the patient
Who cannot join
- Patient considered unable to comply with study requirements
- stroke due to intracranial hemorrhage primarily due to bleeding from ruptured aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation
- patients with progressive stroke
- unable to perfom the required exercises due to
- medical problems
- musculo-skeletal problems
Show all 12Show fewer
- neurological problems
- required help to at least 1 persons to walk before stroke due to neurological or non-neurological co-morbidities
- life expectancy of less than 1 year as determined by responsible physician
- alcohol or drug addiction within the last 6 months
- significant current psychiatric illness as defined as medication-refractory of bipolar affective disorder, psychosis, schizophrenia or suicidality
- current participation in another intervention study
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
Germany7 sites
Beelitz Heilstätten
Beelitz-Heilstätten, Brandenburg, 14547
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117
Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, 12200
Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln
Berlin, 12351
Evanglisches Geriatriezentrum Berlin
Berlin, 13347
Medical Park Berlin
Berlin, 13507
Median Klinik Grünheide
Grünheide, Brandenburg, 15537
About this study
The aim of this study is to investigate whether a 4-week physical fitness training (target intervention) in stroke patients (subacute stage) increase the walking speed and activities of daily living compared with a control intervention (relaxation exercises). The target or control intervention is performed in addition to standard rehabilitation treatment.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- physical fitness training, relaxation
- Keywords
- physical activity, relaxation, activities of daily living, motor functions, cognitive functions
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
physical fitness trainingProcedure or surgery
relaxationProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| physical fitness training | Experimental | aerobic physical fitness training Receives: Procedure: physical fitness training |
| relaxation | Active comparator | non-aerobic training Receives: Procedure: relaxation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gait speed and Barthel Index (BI) (co-primary endpoint)
comparing gait speed (m/s) and points achieved in BARTHEL Index in aerobic and non-aroebic training group 3 months after stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Measured: 3 months post stroke vs baseline
Secondary outcomes (11)
Gait speed and Barthel Index (BI)
comparing gait speed (m/s) and points achieved in BI in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Measured: directly after intervention; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
motor function
comparing motor function (assessed via different clinical scales e.g. Rivermead Arm test, REPAS, Box and Block Test, Medical Research Council Scale) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Measured: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
mobility
comparing different mobilitiy indices like gait endurance (in min), stride length, step cadence, use of walking aids, actigraph measurements and the Rivermead mobility Index in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Measured: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
cognitive function
comparing cognitive function (assessed via points achieved in different scales, e.g. Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Trail Making test, word fluency) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Measured: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Disability
comparing disability (Modified rankin scale) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Measured: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Quality of life (QoL)
comparing QoL (EQ-5D-5L scale) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Measured: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
sleep
comparing sleep quality (Pittsburgh sleep quality index) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Measured: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
mood
comparing mood (CES-D scale) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Measured: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Physical fitness
comparing gait energy Expenditure in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Measured: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke, all vs baseline
Assessment of safety
comparing different criteria (recurrent fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, refferal to acute hospital, death) in aerobic and non-aroebic training group after the 4-week intervention interval as well as after 3 and after 6 months post stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
Measured: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Maximal walking speed and Barthel-Index
per Protocol analysis of co-primary endpoint (pre-specified in statistical analysis plan and protocol)
Measured: 3 months post stroke vs. baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2013
- Primary completion6 Jul 2017
- Study completion1 Nov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Charite University, Berlin, GermanyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Agnes Flöel, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01953549
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PHYS-Stroke
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 28 Jun 2013
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Floel A, Werner C, Grittner U, Hesse S, Jobges M, Knauss J, Seifert M, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Govercin M, Dohle C, Fischer W, Schlieder R, Nave AH, Meisel A, Ebinger M, Wellwood I. Physical fitness training in Subacute Stroke (PHYS-STROKE)--study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Feb 3;15:45. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-45.
PubMed 24491065Rackoll T, Doppelbauer L, Neumann K, Nave AH. Serum BDNF in subacute stroke: effects of a four-week aerobic exercise intervention in the PHYS-STROKE trial. Front Stroke. 2026 Sep 15;5:1897859. doi: 10.3389/fstro.2026.1897859. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 42812344Pietrock C, Neumann K, Rentzsch K, Pruss H, Meisel A, Endres M, Nave AH. Neuronal autoantibodies associated with poorer neuropsychological and motor outcomes 6 months after stroke: results from the PHYS-STROKE trial. Front Immunol. 2026 Mar 18;16:1678840. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1678840. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 41929475Rackoll T, Hinrichs T, Neumann K, Wolfarth B, Nave AH; Phys-Stroke Study Group. Improvements in Walking During Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation Translate to Physical Activity at the Chronic Stage: A Sub-Analysis From the Phys Stroke Trial. Brain Neurorehabil. 2024 Oct 28;17(3):e17. doi: 10.12786/bn.2024.17.e17. eCollection 2024 Nov.
PubMed 39649709Kirzinger B, Stroux A, Rackoll T, Endres M, Floel A, Ebinger M, Nave AH. Elevated Serum Inflammatory Markers in Subacute Stroke Are Associated With Clinical Outcome but Not Modified by Aerobic Fitness Training: Results of the Randomized Controlled PHYS-STROKE Trial. Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 26;12:713018. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.713018. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34512526Nave AH, Rackoll T, Grittner U, Blasing H, Gorsler A, Nabavi DG, Audebert HJ, Klostermann F, Muller-Werdan U, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Meisel A, Endres M, Hesse S, Ebinger M, Floel A. Physical Fitness Training in Patients with Subacute Stroke (PHYS-STROKE): multicentre, randomised controlled, endpoint blinded trial. BMJ. 2019 Sep 18;366:l5101. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5101.
PubMed 31533934
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physical Fitness Training in Subacute Stroke (PHYS-Stroke)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01953549
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PHYS-Stroke
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- physical activity, relaxation, activities of daily living, motor functions, cognitive functions
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, GermanyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2013
- Primary completion
- 6 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to investigate whether a 4-week physical fitness training (target intervention) in stroke patients (subacute stage) increase the walking speed and activities of daily living compared with a control intervention (relaxation exercises). The target or control intervention is performed in addition to standard rehabilitation treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| physical fitness training | Experimental | Procedure: physical fitness trainingaerobic physical fitness training |
| relaxation | Active comparator | Procedure: relaxationnon-aerobic training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- diagnosis of stroke within 5-45 days after stroke
- age >= 18 years
- able to sit for at least 30 seconds
- Barthel index < =65 at inclusion
- considered able to perform aerobic exercise as determined by responsible physician
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patient considered unable to comply with study requirements
- stroke due to intracranial hemorrhage primarily due to bleeding from ruptured aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation
- patients with progressive stroke
- unable to perfom the required exercises due to
- required help to at least 1 persons to walk before stroke due to neurological or non-neurological co-morbidities
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| physical fitness training | Procedure or surgery | physical fitness training |
| relaxation | Procedure or surgery | relaxation |
Primary outcome
Gait speed and Barthel Index (BI) (co-primary endpoint)
Time frame: 3 months post stroke vs baseline
comparing gait speed (m/s) and points achieved in BARTHEL Index in aerobic and non-aroebic training group 3 months after stroke vs baseline (before intervention)
11 secondary outcomes
Gait speed and Barthel Index (BI)
Time frame: directly after intervention; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
motor function
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
mobility
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
cognitive function
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Disability
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Quality of life (QoL)
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
sleep
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
mood
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Physical fitness
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke, all vs baseline
Assessment of safety
Time frame: directly after intervention; 3 months post stroke; 6 months post stroke; all vs baseline
Maximal walking speed and Barthel-Index
Time frame: 3 months post stroke vs. baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2019.
- Background: PubMed 24491065Floel A, Werner C, Grittner U, Hesse S, Jobges M, Knauss J, Seifert M, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Govercin M, Dohle C, Fischer W, Schlieder R, Nave AH, Meisel A, Ebinger M, Wellwood I. Physical fitness training in Subacute Stroke (PHYS-STROKE)--study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Feb 3;15:45. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-45.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42812344Rackoll T, Doppelbauer L, Neumann K, Nave AH. Serum BDNF in subacute stroke: effects of a four-week aerobic exercise intervention in the PHYS-STROKE trial. Front Stroke. 2026 Sep 15;5:1897859. doi: 10.3389/fstro.2026.1897859. eCollection 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41929475Pietrock C, Neumann K, Rentzsch K, Pruss H, Meisel A, Endres M, Nave AH. Neuronal autoantibodies associated with poorer neuropsychological and motor outcomes 6 months after stroke: results from the PHYS-STROKE trial. Front Immunol. 2026 Mar 18;16:1678840. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1678840. eCollection 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39649709Rackoll T, Hinrichs T, Neumann K, Wolfarth B, Nave AH; Phys-Stroke Study Group. Improvements in Walking During Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation Translate to Physical Activity at the Chronic Stage: A Sub-Analysis From the Phys Stroke Trial. Brain Neurorehabil. 2024 Oct 28;17(3):e17. doi: 10.12786/bn.2024.17.e17. eCollection 2024 Nov.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34512526Kirzinger B, Stroux A, Rackoll T, Endres M, Floel A, Ebinger M, Nave AH. Elevated Serum Inflammatory Markers in Subacute Stroke Are Associated With Clinical Outcome but Not Modified by Aerobic Fitness Training: Results of the Randomized Controlled PHYS-STROKE Trial. Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 26;12:713018. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.713018. eCollection 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31533934Nave AH, Rackoll T, Grittner U, Blasing H, Gorsler A, Nabavi DG, Audebert HJ, Klostermann F, Muller-Werdan U, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Meisel A, Endres M, Hesse S, Ebinger M, Floel A. Physical Fitness Training in Patients with Subacute Stroke (PHYS-STROKE): multicentre, randomised controlled, endpoint blinded trial. BMJ. 2019 Sep 18;366:l5101. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5101.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing physical fitness training and relaxation in people with Stroke, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 7 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gait speed and Barthel Index (BI) (co-primary endpoint) (time frame: 3 months post stroke vs baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01953549, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2019.