AzTrials
AzTrials

Overactive BladderOABSYNERGONCT01955408

Severity of Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Patients After Synergo Treatment

An observational study of Overactive Bladder and Bladder Cancer, run by Meir Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Bladder carcinoma is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract. Approximately 75-85% of patients with bladder cancer present with a disease that is confined to the mucosa or submucosa. These categories are grouped as non-muscle-invasive bladder tumors(i.e. superficial tumors). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Overactive Bladder, Bladder Cancer, Synergo
What is being tested?
Questionnaires, anticholinergic treatment, urodynamic study
How many people
35 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
30 Sep 2013to 31 Dec 2016
How long will I take part?
12 Weeks
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Bladder cancer patients after Synergo treatment completion and no evidence of disease at cystoscopic evaluation

Who may be able to join

  • both genders
  • age above 18
  • bladder cancer patients after completion of Synergo treatment
  • no evidence of disease at cystoscopic evaluation after completion of Synergo treatment

Who cannot join

  • children
  • pregnant women
  • failure to complete Synergo treatment
  • evidence of bladder cancer at cystoscopic evaluation after Synergo treatment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site
  • Meir Medical Center

    Kfar Saba, Hasharon, 44410

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Severity of Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Patients After Synergo Treatment for Bladder Cancer

Bladder carcinoma is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract. Approximately 75-85% of patients with bladder cancer present with a disease that is confined to the mucosa or submucosa. These categories are grouped as non-muscle-invasive bladder tumors(i.e. superficial tumors).

Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the United States, with an estimated 67,160 newly diagnosed cases and 13,750 deaths in the United States in 2007. The 5-year survival rate is 82% for all stages combined. The standard of treatment for patients with superficial bladder cancer is surgical transurethal resection (TUR) of tumors, with an 80% early success rate. However, nearly 70% of these patients will develop tumor recurrence, with 25% showing progression to muscle-invading disease, within 5 years with TUR.

Read more

It is therefore necessary to consider adjuvant therapy in all patients. The absolute risks of recurrence and progression do not always indicate the risk at which a certain therapy is optimal. The choice of therapy may be considered differently according to what risk is acceptable for the individual patient and the urologist.

Intravesical chemotherapy and immunotherapy are widely used as adjuvant therapies after TUR, to prevent recurrence and progression of superficial disease. Systemic therapy is typically reserved for higher stage, muscle-invading, or metastatic diseases. The urinary bladder is an ideal organ for regional therapy.

The urethra provides easy access of therapeutic agents to the urinary bladder. The presence of the specialized asymmetric unit membrane on the urothelium serves as a barrier and limits the absorption of molecules or particulates into the systemic circulation.

The rationale for intravesical therapy is to maximize the exposure of tumors located in the bladder cavity to therapeutics agents while limiting the systemic exposure and thereby limiting the host toxicities; the primary goal is to eradicate existing or residual tumors through direct cytoablation or immunostimulation. The unique properties of the urinary bladder render it a fertile ground for evaluating novel approaches to regional therapy, including local hyperthermia, co-administration of permeation enhancers, bioadhesive carriers, and gene therapy.

One of the developing treatments for high-risk superficial bladder cancers is the combination of intravesical chemotherapy and hyperthermia (HT), called chemohyperthermia (C-HT). The most common form of C-HT uses the Synergo HT system, in which local HT is administered via direct microwave irradiation of the urothelium by means of a 915-MHz intravesical microwave applicator. The target intravesical temperature is set between 41.8C and 44.8C and is measured by five thermocouples integrated in a 20-F treatment catheter. To avoid injury, the urethra is continuously cooled. Due to extensive global experience with its use and a significant amount of preclinical data demonstrating improved antineoplastic efficacy when heated, mitomycin C (MMC) is the most common intravesical chemotherapy agent used in conjunction with HT.

The most common adverse events during treatment were bladder spasms and bladder pain. Literature reports bladder spasms in 21.6% of patients, and bladder pain in 17.5%. Bladder spasms tended to occur more frequently with the prophylactic schedule, whereas pain was present equally in the prophylactic and ablative schedules but more commonly after the ablative schedule. In the first days following C-HT, storage LUTS (frequency, dysuria, urgency, nocturia) (25.6%) and hematuria (6.0%) are the most common adverse events. Most studies mention that these symptoms were mild and transient, resolving spontaneously within a few days of treatment. One study described severe cystitis complaints in three patients (16%), but other studies have not confirmed these adverse events. Two studies report the development of a contracted bladder and severe urinary incontinence after ablative C-HT. However, the possibility cannot be excluded that previous transurethral resection and intravesical chemotherapy might have contributed to this event.

Following the appearance of bothersome storage LUTS, patient should be managed by existing guidelines. Based on AUA/SUFU Diagnosis and Treatment of Overactive Bladder (Non-Neurogenic) in Adults Guidelines published in 2012 patients should be diagnosed, followed and treated according to the suggested algorithm.

In our study, we would like to assess the severity of OAB symptoms and their response to a standard OAB treatment according to AUA Guidelines for Non-neurogenic OAB as well as to assess urodynamic study variables in those who didn't respond to a standard medical treatment and bothered by their OAB symptoms.

Being tested
Questionnaires, anticholinergic treatment, urodynamic study
Keywords
overactive bladder, bladder cancer, Synergo, urodynamic study
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Questionnaires, anticholinergic treatment, urodynamic studyOther

Study groups in NCT01955408
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Overactive bladder after SynergoNot described
Receives: Other: Questionnaires, anticholinergic treatment, urodynamic study

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. OAB symptoms severity and urodynamic variables in failed medical treatment patients

    OAB-SS, OAB-Q, OAB-SQ - questionnaires Urodynamic study results in patients who will undergo the test

    Measured: at recruitment and after treatment

  2. Synergo treatment variables and OAB severity

    relationship between the answers in OAB-SS, OAB-Q, OAB-SQ - questionnaires, Urodynamic study results in patients who will undergo the test and type of Synergo protocol, number of treatments received, time of hyperthermia per treatment, bladder cancer stage at the beginning of Synergo treatment.

    Measured: at recruitment and after treatment

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. OAB severity of symptoms and urodynamic variables in failed medical treatment patients

    OAB-SS, OAB-Q, OAB-SQ - questionnaires and relationship to Urodynamic study results in patients who will undergo the urodynamic test

    Measured: after the treatment

  2. OAB treatment satisfaction and urodynamic variables in failed medical treatment patients

    OAB-SQ - questionnaire and urodynamic study results

    Measured: after the treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Oct 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start30 Sep 2013
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2016
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
35 participants (actual)
Target duration
12 Weeks
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01955408
Sponsor's protocol ID
SYNERGO-OAB
Acronym
OABSYNERGO
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
24 Sep 2013
Last updated
6 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Overactive Bladder and Bladder Cancer, run by Meir Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

OAB symptoms severity and urodynamic variables in failed medical treatment patients (time frame: at recruitment and after treatment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in