AzTrials
AzTrials

HIVPhase 2NCT01956370

Comparing the PrePex™ Device to Surgical MC for Rapid Scale Up of MC in Resource Limited Setting

A Phase 2 study testing PrePex™ device for adult male circumcision and Surgical circumcision in people with HIV, run by Ministry of Health and Child Welfare, Zimbabwe at 1 site in Zimbabwe.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The protocol, approved by the Medical Research Council, was issued to assess the safety and efficacy of the non-surgical device for applying it to the national scale up of adult male circumcision in Zimbabwe Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
HIV
What is being tested?
PrePex™ device for adult male circumcision and Surgical circumcision
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
240 participants
Where
1 siteZimbabwe
Study dates
Nov 2011to Feb 2012
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ages 18 - 30 years
  • Uncircumcised
  • Wants to be circumcised
  • Agrees to be circumcised by any of the study methods,PrePexTM or Surgical as appropriate
  • HIV sero-negative
  • Able to understand the study procedures and requirements
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Agrees to abstain from sexual intercourse and to keep caution not to directly rub the cut area if masturbating, for 8 weeks post removal (9 weeks total)
  • Agrees to return to the health care facility for follow-up visits (or as instructed) after his circumcision for a period of 8 weeks post removal (9 weeks total)
  • Subject able to comprehend and freely give informed consent for participation in this study and is considered by the investigator to have good compliance for the study
  • Subject agrees to anonymous video and photographs of the procedure and follow up visits
  • Agrees to stay overnight at the Hospital in order to follow pain measurements in the first 16 hours

Who cannot join

  • Active genital infection, anatomic abnormality or other condition, which in the opinion of the investigator prevents the subject from undergoing a circumcision
  • HIV sero-positive
  • Subject with the following diseases/conditions: phimosis, paraphimosis, warts under the prepuce, torn or tight frenulum, narrow prepuce, hypospadias, epispadias
  • Known bleeding / coagulation abnormality
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Subject that to the opinion of the investigator is not a good candidate
  • Subject does not agree to anonymous video and photographs of the procedure and follow up visits
  • Refusal to take HIV test.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Zimbabwe1 site
  • Znfpc Spilhaus Center

    Harare

Other trials in Zimbabwe

About this study

Official title: Phase II - Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of the PrePexTM Device for Rapid Scale up of Adult Male Circumcision Programs in Zimbabwe (Comparative Study)

The protocol, approved by the Medical Research Council, was issued to assess the safety and efficacy of the non-surgical device for applying it to the national scale up of adult male circumcision in Zimbabwe

Read the detailed description

Models show that to have the highest impact on the HIV epidemic, circumcision of up to 80% of men in high prevalence countries, where MC rates are low, needs to be achieved (UNAIDS 2009; Manicaland HIV/STD Prevention Project, 2008; Bollinger, et al, 2009). Hallett and colleagues in 2008 showed that for Zimbabwe specifically, HIV incidence could be reduced between 25% to 35% if about 50% of men are circumcised. All modelings conducted show that MC programs must be part of a comprehensive HIV prevention package as MC alone will not tip the HIV epidemic into a terminal decline.

The PrePex Device offers hope for rapid scale up of adult male circumcision in resource limited settings.

Once the safety and efficacy have been established, it is important to conduct operations research to determine how best to implement both device and surgical circumcisions in the national program. Thus, the Zimbabwe MOHCW is planning a three phase trial in order to determine the safety of the PrePexTM device, its performance and the ease of use in an implementation roll out.

Conditions
HIV
Being tested
PrePex™ device for adult male circumcision, Surgical circumcision
Keywords
Male Circumcision, HIV Prevention, Medical Device

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PrePex™ device for adult male circumcisionDevice

    Also called The PrePex Device, PrePex, PrePex™

    The PrePex™ device is designed to enable bloodless male circumcision procedure with no anesthesia and no sutures.

  • Surgical circumcisionProcedure or surgery

    The penis will be surgically circumcised according to one of the WHO recommended circumcision methods as described in the Manual for Male Circumcision under Local Anaesthesia Version 2.5C January 2008

Study groups in NCT01956370
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PrePex™ deviceExperimentalIntervention 'PrePex™ device for adult male circumcision
Receives: Device: PrePex™ device for adult male circumcision
SurgicalActive comparatorAdult male surgical circumcision
Receives: Procedure: Surgical circumcision

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procedure time

    To compare the total operative time of the PrePex Device circumcision procedure versus the total operative time of surgical circumcision procedure.

    Measured: 9 weeks

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Expectations of men regarding the procedure

    Expectations of men regarding the procedure using questionnaires

    Measured: 9 weeks

  2. Satisfaction rate of the procedure

    Satisfaction with procedure using questionnaires and evaluations

    Measured: 9 weeks

  3. Attitudes towards procedure

    Attitudes towards procedure using questionnaires

    Measured: 9 weeks

  4. Sharing information with family and friends

    Sharing information with family and friends by evaluating weather subjects would recommend the procedure to others using questionnaires

    Measured: 9 weeks

  5. Perception of norms

    Perception of norms using questionnaires

    Measured: 9 weeks

  6. Sexual relations, performance, satisfaction

    Sexual relations, performance, satisfaction using questionnaires

    Measured: 9 weeks

  7. Sexual behavior

    Sexual behavior using questionnaires. Inquiring of sexual behavior before and after the circumcision, etc.

    Measured: 9 weeks

  8. Sexual partner's attitudes

    Sexual partner's attitudes using questionnaires and investigating the partner's behavior change as a result of her partner's circumcision.

    Measured: 9 weeks

  9. Effect on daily activities

    Effect on daily activities using questionnaires. Inquiring and finding out if the MC procedure caused any missing of working days.

    Measured: 9 weeks

  10. Costs

    Evaluating the cost of PrePex circumcision procedure when taking into account the following parameters:

    1. PrePex Procedure time and the resulting cost of provider's time ii. Cost of staff time for follow-up visits iii. Cost of equipment and supplies needed for the circumcision procedure

    Measured: 9 weeks

  11. Cost-effectiveness

    Cost-effectiveness

    Measured: 9 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Oct 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2011
  3. Primary completionFeb 2012
  4. Study completionFeb 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
240 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01956370
Sponsor's protocol ID
MRCZ/A/1628 Comparative study
Status last verified
Oct 2013
First submitted
19 Sep 2012
Last updated
8 Oct 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Hohlfeld A, Ebrahim S, Shaik MZ, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 31;3(3):CD012250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012250.pub2.

    PubMed 33786810
  • Tshimanga M, Mangwiro T, Mugurungi O, Xaba S, Murwira M, Kasprzyk D, Montano DE, Nyamukapa D, Tambashe B, Chatikobo P, Gundidza P, Gwinji G. A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe. PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156220. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27227679

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing PrePex™ device for adult male circumcision and Surgical circumcision in people with HIV, run by Ministry of Health and Child Welfare, Zimbabwe at 1 site in Zimbabwe.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Zimbabwe. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procedure time (time frame: 9 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01956370, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in