AzTrials
AzTrials

Allergic RhinitisNCT01963741

Leukotriene D4 Nasal Provocation Test in Allergic Rhinitis

A study testing leukotriene D4 and histamine in people with Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma, run by Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Leukotrienes play critical roles in the inflammatory process in allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma, therefore, anti-leukotriene therapy is part of treatment for asthma. However, not all allergic rhinitis accompanied with or without asthma treated with anti-leukotriene were effective. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma
What is being tested?
leukotriene D4 and histamine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Nov 2012to Apr 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with allergic rhinitis accompanied with or without asthma
  • positive skin prick test (SPT)
  • had no acute upper or lower airway infection 2 weeks prior to study
  • no oral or nasal anti-histamines
  • no leukotriene receptor antagonists for 1 week
  • no oral or nasal and inhaled corticosteroids for 2 weeks

Who cannot join

  • smokers
  • a past confirmed history of chronic respiratory disease other than asthma
  • other severe systemic diseases (myocardial infarction, malignant tumor, etc.)
  • under immunotherapy
  • unable to complete the test or had limited understanding
  • pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Guangzhou institute of respiratory disease

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Leukotriene D4 Nasal Provocation Test: Rationale, Methodology, Diagnostic Value and Its Impact on Airway Inflammation in Allergic Rhinitis With or Without Asthma

Leukotrienes play critical roles in the inflammatory process in allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma, therefore, anti-leukotriene therapy is part of treatment for asthma. However, not all allergic rhinitis accompanied with or without asthma treated with anti-leukotriene were effective. So it is critical to develop a method to identify the response subgroup. In this study, it is assumed that nasal physiological responsiveness to leukotriene nasal provocation test (NPT) is able to gain evidence on the effect of leukotriene on the development of allergic rhinitis and asthma, and is helpful to the use of anti-leukotriene agent. The purpose of the study is to establish the methodology and diagnostic value of leukotriene D4 (LTD4) nasal provocation.

Read the detailed description

Nasal provocation test induced by LTD4 will be conducted by measuring nasal airway resistance and airway symptoms in a stepwise concentration of LTD4 by nasal spray. Inflammation biomarkers, such as eosinophilic granulocyte in sputum and nasal lavage, fractional exhaled nitric oxide(FeNO), and lung function before and after nasal provocation will be studied to explore the impact of LTD4 nasal provocation test on airway inflammation.

Being tested
leukotriene D4, histamine
Keywords
Leukotriene D4, allergic rhinitis, nasal airway resistance, nasal provocation test, nasal hyperreactivity, airway inflammation, asthma
Medical subject headings
Rhinitis, Allergic, Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • leukotriene D4Drug

    Also called Cayman chemical company (1-800-364-9897 Cat 20310).

    Nasal challenge using 16% ethanol diluent, the concentration of which corresponded to the highest concentration of LTD4, was undertaken for exclusion of subjects hypersensitive to ethanol or saline. The LTD4 challenge could be initiated provided that NAR increase was <30%. Ranges of 4 to 16 mcg.mL-1 LTD4 diluents were applied for a double-fold increment approach at intervals of 6 minutes.

  • histamineDrug

    Also called Guangzhou chemical company (serial number: 1703 )

    Nasal challenge using 0.9% saline, was undertaken for exclusion of subjects hypersensitive to saline. The histamine nasal challenge could be initiated provided that NAR increase was <30%. Ranges of 0.4 to 3.2 mg.mL-1 histamine diluents were applied for a double-fold increment approach at intervals of 3 minutes.

Study groups in NCT01963741
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
leukotriene D4ExperimentalNasal provocation test was induced by leukotriene D4 with a stepwisely concentration method (4 mcg/ml, 8 mcg/ml, 16 mcg/ml).
Receives: Drug: histamine
histamineExperimentalNasal provocation test was induced by histamine with a stepwisely concentration method (0.4 mg/ml, 0.8 mg/ml, 1.6 mg/ml, 3.2mg/ml).
Receives: Drug: leukotriene D4

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of participants positive response to leukotriene D4 or histamine nasal provocation test

    Nasal airway resistance measured by positive anterior rhinomanometry. Concentration induced 60% increase of nasal airway resistance (PC60-NAR) will be measured and reported; Composite symptoms score defined by reichmann H and his colleagues showed as follows:3-5 sneezes = 1 point (pt), >5 sneezes = 2 points (pts); rhinorrhoea < 1 milliliter (mL) = 1 pt, rhinorrhoea > 1 milliliter = 2 pts; pruritus of the palate or ear or eye= 1 pt, conjunctivitis or cough or urticaria or difficult breathing= 2 pts. Total score ranges from 0 to 6 pts. Positive response to LTD4 nasal provocation test was defined as PC60-NAR less than 16mcg/mL or the symptom score higher than 3.

    Measured: Until 1 hour after the nasal provocation test

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change from baseline of eosinophils in sputum and nasal lavage and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)

    Biomarkers in upper and lower airways such as eosinophils in sputum and nasal lavage and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) will be studied.

    Measured: 4 and 24 hours after the nasal provocation test

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2012
  3. Primary completionFeb 2014
  4. Study completionApr 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01963741
Sponsor's protocol ID
LTD4NAPT201218
Status last verified
Jul 2015
First submitted
27 Aug 2013
Last updated
9 Jul 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Busse WW. The role of leukotrienes in asthma and allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 1996 Aug;26(8):868-79.

    PubMed 9011329
  • Howarth PH, Salagean M, Dokic D. Allergic rhinitis: not purely a histamine-related disease. Allergy. 2000;55 Suppl 64:7-16. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00802.x.

    PubMed 11291780
  • Patel P, Philip G, Yang W, Call R, Horak F, LaForce C, Gilles L, Garrett GC, Dass SB, Knorr BA, Reiss TF. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of montelukast for treating perennial allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Dec;95(6):551-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61018-6.

    PubMed 16400895
  • Philip G, Williams-Herman D, Patel P, Weinstein SF, Alon A, Gilles L, Tozzi CA, Dass SB, Reiss TF. Efficacy of montelukast for treating perennial allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2007 May-Jun;28(3):296-304. doi: 10.2500/aap.2007.28.3000.

    PubMed 17619558
  • Price DB, Swern A, Tozzi CA, Philip G, Polos P. Effect of montelukast on lung function in asthma patients with allergic rhinitis: analysis from the COMPACT trial. Allergy. 2006 Jun;61(6):737-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01007.x.

    PubMed 16677244
  • Pinar E, Eryigit O, Oncel S, Calli C, Yilmaz O, Yuksel H. Efficacy of nasal corticosteroids alone or combined with antihistamines or montelukast in treatment of allergic rhinitis. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2008 Mar;35(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2007.06.004. Epub 2007 Sep 7.

    PubMed 17826020
  • Nayak A, Langdon RB. Montelukast in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: an evidence-based review. Drugs. 2007;67(6):887-901. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767060-00005.

    PubMed 17428106
  • Virchow JC, Bachert C. Efficacy and safety of montelukast in adults with asthma and allergic rhinitis. Respir Med. 2006 Nov;100(11):1952-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.02.026. Epub 2006 Apr 12.

    PubMed 16626955
  • Bisgaard H, Olsson P, Bende M. Effect of leukotriene D4 on nasal mucosal blood flow, nasal airway resistance and nasal secretion in humans. Clin Allergy. 1986 Jul;16(4):289-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1986.tb01960.x.

    PubMed 2427255
  • Miadonna A, Tedeschi A, Leggieri E, Lorini M, Folco G, Sala A, Qualizza R, Froldi M, Zanussi C. Behavior and clinical relevance of histamine and leukotrienes C4 and B4 in grass pollen-induced rhinitis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Aug;136(2):357-62. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/136.2.357.

    PubMed 3039881
  • Brozek JL, Baena-Cagnani CE, Bonini S, Canonica GW, Rasi G, van Wijk RG, Zuberbier T, Guyatt G, Bousquet J, Schunemann HJ. Methodology for development of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma guideline 2008 update. Allergy. 2008 Jan;63(1):38-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01560.x.

    PubMed 18053015
  • Riechelmann H, Bachert C, Goldschmidt O, Hauswald B, Klimek L, Schlenter WW, Tasman AJ, Wagenmann M; German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (ENT Section); Working Team for Clinical Immunology. [Application of the nasal provocation test on diseases of the upper airways. Position paper of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (ENT Section) in cooperation with the Working Team for Clinical Immunology]. Laryngorhinootologie. 2003 Mar;82(3):183-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38411. No abstract available. German.

    PubMed 12673517
  • Guan W, Zheng J, Gao Y, Jiang C, Xie Y, An J, Yu X, Liu W, Zhong N. Leukotriene D4 and methacholine bronchial provocation tests for identifying leukotriene-responsiveness subtypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Feb;131(2):332-8.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

    PubMed 23040886
  • Guan W, Zheng J, Gao Y, Jiang C, An J, Yu X, Liu W. Leukotriene D4 bronchial provocation test: methodology and diagnostic value. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 May;28(5):797-803. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.678936. Epub 2012 May 3.

    PubMed 22435894
  • Zhu Z, Xie Y, Guan W, Gao YI, Xia S, Liang J, Zheng J. Leukotriene D4 nasal provocation test: Rationale, methodology and diagnostic value. Exp Ther Med. 2016 Jul;12(1):525-529. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3324. Epub 2016 May 10.

    PubMed 27347089

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing leukotriene D4 and histamine in people with Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma, run by Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of participants positive response to leukotriene D4 or histamine nasal provocation test (time frame: Until 1 hour after the nasal provocation test). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01963741, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in