Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 3NCT01964352
Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (OTEMTO 1)
A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium and olodaterol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 77 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the Respimat inhaler) compared with tiotropium and placebo in patients with COPD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- tiotropium and olodaterol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 813 participants
- Where
- 77 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2013to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Relatively stable airway obstruction with post FEV1 >=30 and < 80% predicted normal and post FEV1/ FVC < 70%
- Male or female patients, 40 years of age or more
- Smoking history more than 10 pack years
Who cannot join
- Significant diseases other than COPD
- History of asthma
- COPD exacerbation in previous 3 months
- Completion of pulmonary rehabilitation program within previous 6 weeks or current participation in pulmonary rehabilitation program.
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Patients unable to comply with pulmonary medication restrictions
Trial locations and contacts
77 sites in 10 countries.
77 sites in 10 countries
United States20 sites
1237.25.10516 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan
1237.25.10513 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina
1237.25.10519 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
1237.25.10503 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio
1237.25.10507 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Clearwater, Florida
1237.25.10505 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
1237.25.10518 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Columbia, Ohio
1237.25.10502 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio
1237.25.10511 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Dublin, Ohio
1237.25.10515 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Easley, South Carolina
1237.25.10506 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Greenville, South Carolina
1237.25.10520 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Killeen, Texas
1237.25.10509 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Livonia, Michigan
1237.25.10517 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Panama City, Florida
1237.25.10514 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
1237.25.10510 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia
1237.25.10501 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rock Hill, South Carolina
1237.25.10508 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spartanburg, South Carolina
1237.25.10521 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Spokane, Washington
1237.25.10504 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
Germany15 sites
1237.25.49504 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1237.25.49508 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1237.25.49510 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Berlin
1237.25.49501 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Großhansdorf
1237.25.49505 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Halle
1237.25.49506 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hamburg
1237.25.49515 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hamburg
1237.25.49509 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hanover
1237.25.49514 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Koblenz
1237.25.49507 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mainz
1237.25.49502 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Neu-Isenburg
1237.25.49516 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Oschersleben
1237.25.49511 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rodgau
1237.25.49503 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rosenheim
1237.25.49513 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Teuchern
Canada9 sites
1237.25.11505 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Burlington, Ontario
1237.25.11508 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta
1237.25.11504 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Edmonton, Alberta
1237.25.11507 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Grimsby, Ontario
1237.25.11510 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Ottawa, Ontario
1237.25.11502 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Québec, Quebec
1237.25.11506 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Québec, Quebec
1237.25.11509 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sherbrooke, Quebec
1237.25.11501 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vancouver, British Columbia
South Africa6 sites
1237.25.27506 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bloemfontein
1237.25.27501 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Cape Town
1237.25.27505 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
eMkhomazi
1237.25.27504 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Morningside, Sandton
1237.25.27502 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Parow
1237.25.27503 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pretoria
Belgium5 sites
1237.25.32001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Brussels
1237.25.32004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Brussels
1237.25.32005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Eupen
1237.25.32003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lebbeke
1237.25.32002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Turnhout
Czechia5 sites
1237.25.42003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Jindřichův Hradec
1237.25.42005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Karlovy Vary-Drahovice
1237.25.42002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Neratovice
1237.25.42001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Prague
1237.25.42004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Rokycany
Spain5 sites
1237.25.34003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Alicante
1237.25.34007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Barcelona
1237.25.34001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Mérida
1237.25.34002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pozuelo de Alarcón
1237.25.34004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Vic
United Kingdom5 sites
1237.25.44002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Bradford
1237.25.44001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chertsey
1237.25.44004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chester
1237.25.44005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Chippenham
1237.25.44003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wolverhampton
Denmark4 sites
1237.25.45003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Aalborg
1237.25.45002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Hellerup
1237.25.45001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Odense
1237.25.45004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Silkeborg
Finland3 sites
1237.25.35802 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pori
1237.25.35801 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Turku
1237.25.35803 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Turku
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy of 12 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Two Doses of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (Delivered by the Respimat Inhaler) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the Respimat inhaler) compared with tiotropium and placebo in patients with COPD.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- tiotropium, placebo, olodaterol
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tiotropiumDrug
fixed dose combination
placeboDrug
olodaterolDrug
fixed dose combination
tiotropiumDrug
fixed dose combination
tiotropiumDrug
olodaterolDrug
fixed dose combination
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium + olodaterol low dose | Experimental | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium; Drug: olodaterol |
| tiotropium + olodaterol high dose | Experimental | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium; Drug: olodaterol |
| tiotropium | Active comparator | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: tiotropium |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Once daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
FEV1 AUC0-3h Response
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) Area under the curve (AUC) 0-3h was calculated as the area under the FEV1-time curve from 0 to 3h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC0-3h response was defined as FEV1 AUC0-3h minus baseline FEV1. The adjusted mean and standard error (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: baseline and 12 weeks
Trough FEV1 Response (Change From Baseline)
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours). It was calculated as the mean of the 2 FEV1 measurements performed 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at day 85. Trough FEV1 response was defines as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: baseline and 12 weeks
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score
This endpoint was evaluated based on the data from this individual trial and also based on the data from the combined dataset from this trial and the replicate study NCT02006732. The results for the combined dataset are included in the disclosure for NCT02006732 as specified in the analysis plan. The SGRQ ranges from 0 (no impairment of quality of life) to 100 (highest impairment of quality of life).
The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 12 weeks treatment
Secondary outcomes (3)
Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Response (Change From Baseline)
Trough FVC was defined as the FVC value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours). It was calculated as the mean of the 2 FVC measurements performed 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at day 85. Trough FVC response was defined as trough FVC minus baseline FVC. The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: baseline and 12 weeks
TDI Focal Score
This endpoint was evaluated based on the data from this individual trial and also based on the data from the combined dataset from this trial and the replicate study NCT02006732. The results for the combined dataset are included in the disclosure for NCT02006732 as specified in the analysis plan. Mahler Transitional Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score was performed to measure the effect of the treatment on patients' dyspnoea.(Rating scale of 3 components - change in functional impairment, change in magnitude of tasks, change in magnitude of efforts. Worst score = -9, best score = +9).
The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting an MMRM model including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: 12 weeks
FVC AUC0-3h Response (Change From Baseline)
The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Measured: baseline and 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2013
- Primary completionOct 2014
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Enrolment
- 813 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Study chair, Boehringer Ingelheim
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01964352
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1237.25
- Other IDs
- 2013-002243-29
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Buhl R, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT. Efficacy of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium as a First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with COPD Who Are Naive to LAMA, LABA and ICS: Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4175-4189. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01411-0. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
PubMed 32671684Buhl R, Singh D, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Ferguson GT. Benefits of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with COPD Receiving only LAMA at Baseline: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R) and OTEMTO(R) Studies. Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3485-3499. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01373-3. Epub 2020 May 27.
PubMed 32462607Singh D, Gaga M, Schmidt O, Bjermer L, Gronke L, Voss F, Ferguson GT. Effects of tiotropium + olodaterol versus tiotropium or placebo by COPD disease severity and previous treatment history in the OTEMTO(R) studies. Respir Res. 2016 Jun 18;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0387-7.
PubMed 27316465Singh D, Ferguson GT, Bolitschek J, Gronke L, Hallmann C, Bennett N, Abrahams R, Schmidt O, Bjermer L. Tiotropium + olodaterol shows clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life. Respir Med. 2015 Oct;109(10):1312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
PubMed 26320402
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy of 12 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Two Doses of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (Delivered by the Respimat Inhaler) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01964352
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1237.25
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 813 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2013
- Primary completion
- Oct 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Nov 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol FDC (delivered by the Respimat inhaler) compared with tiotropium and placebo in patients with COPD.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropium + olodaterol low dose | Experimental | Drug: tiotropium, Drug: olodaterolOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| tiotropium + olodaterol high dose | Experimental | Drug: tiotropium, Drug: olodaterolOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| tiotropium | Active comparator | Drug: tiotropiumOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: placeboOnce daily 2 puffs solution for inhalation Respimat |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Diagnosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Relatively stable airway obstruction with post FEV1 >=30 and < 80% predicted normal and post FEV1/ FVC < 70%
- Male or female patients, 40 years of age or more
- Smoking history more than 10 pack years
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Significant diseases other than COPD
- History of asthma
- COPD exacerbation in previous 3 months
- Completion of pulmonary rehabilitation program within previous 6 weeks or current participation in pulmonary rehabilitation program.
- Pregnant or nursing women
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tiotropiumfixed dose combination | Drug | tiotropium + olodaterol high dose |
| placebo | Drug | placebo |
| olodaterolfixed dose combination | Drug | tiotropium + olodaterol high dose |
| tiotropiumfixed dose combination | Drug | tiotropium + olodaterol low dose |
| tiotropium | Drug | tiotropium |
| olodaterolfixed dose combination | Drug | tiotropium + olodaterol low dose |
Primary outcome
FEV1 AUC0-3h Response
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) Area under the curve (AUC) 0-3h was calculated as the area under the FEV1-time curve from 0 to 3h post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the duration (3h) to report in litres. FEV1 AUC0-3h response was defined as FEV1 AUC0-3h minus baseline FEV1. The adjusted mean and standard error (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
Trough FEV1 Response (Change From Baseline)
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks
Trough FEV1 was defined as the FEV1 value at the end of the dosing interval (24 hours). It was calculated as the mean of the 2 FEV1 measurements performed 23 h and at 23 h 50 min after inhalation of study medication at day 85. Trough FEV1 response was defines as trough FEV1 minus baseline FEV1. The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score
Time frame: 12 weeks treatment
This endpoint was evaluated based on the data from this individual trial and also based on the data from the combined dataset from this trial and the replicate study NCT02006732. The results for the combined dataset are included in the disclosure for NCT02006732 as specified in the analysis plan. The SGRQ ranges from 0 (no impairment of quality of life) to 100 (highest impairment of quality of life). The adjusted mean (SE) are obtained from fitting a mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM) including fixed effects of treatment, planned test day, treatment by test day interaction, baseline, and baseline by test day interaction; patient as a random effect; spatial power covariance structure for within-patient errors and Kenward-Roger approximation of denominator degrees of freedom.
3 secondary outcomes
Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Response (Change From Baseline)
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks
TDI Focal Score
Time frame: 12 weeks
FVC AUC0-3h Response (Change From Baseline)
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Nov 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32671684Buhl R, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Singh D, Ferguson GT. Efficacy of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium as a First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with COPD Who Are Naive to LAMA, LABA and ICS: Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials. Adv Ther. 2020 Oct;37(10):4175-4189. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01411-0. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32462607Buhl R, Singh D, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Ferguson GT. Benefits of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with COPD Receiving only LAMA at Baseline: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO(R) and OTEMTO(R) Studies. Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3485-3499. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01373-3. Epub 2020 May 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27316465Singh D, Gaga M, Schmidt O, Bjermer L, Gronke L, Voss F, Ferguson GT. Effects of tiotropium + olodaterol versus tiotropium or placebo by COPD disease severity and previous treatment history in the OTEMTO(R) studies. Respir Res. 2016 Jun 18;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0387-7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26320402Singh D, Ferguson GT, Bolitschek J, Gronke L, Hallmann C, Bennett N, Abrahams R, Schmidt O, Bjermer L. Tiotropium + olodaterol shows clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life. Respir Med. 2015 Oct;109(10):1312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Axatilimab and Corticosteroids as Initial Treatment for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Chronic Graft-versus-host-disease
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Multidisciplinary Care, Structured and Targeted on the COPD Patient's Clinical Pathway.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Lung Diseases, Obstructive
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
The AIRWARD Study: A Study to Test Whether Verducatib Helps People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating and Promoting Resilience in Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome
Tourette Syndrome, Tic Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boehringer Ingelheim study chair
Boehringer Ingelheim
77 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing tiotropium and olodaterol in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 77 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 77 sites in United States, Germany, Canada, South Africa, Belgium and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Nov 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
FEV1 AUC0-3h Response (time frame: baseline and 12 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01964352, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2015.