Anesthesiology TrainingNCT01965314
A Trial to Determine the Effect of Simulation Based Training on Initial Performance of Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blockade in a Clinical Setting
A study testing Simulation based training and Traditional training in people with Anesthesiology Training, run by Cork University Hospital at 1 site in Ireland.
Trial summary
Investigators hypothesize that virtual reality based training offers an additional learning benefit over standard training (using cadaveric dissection and human volunteers) in preparing novice anaesthetists to perform their first Ultrasound guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blockade (USgABPB) in the clinical setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesiology Training
- What is being tested?
- Simulation based training and Traditional training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIreland
- Study dates
- Jul 2010to Nov 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ASA grades I and II
- Age 18-80 years
- Capacity to consent
- Already consented for ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade
- Body Mass index 20 - 26
Who cannot join
- Parameters outside inclusion criteria
- Contraindication to regional anaesthesia
- Language barrier
- Psychiatric history
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomised Control Trial to Determine the Effect of Simulation Based Training on Initial Performance of Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blockade in a Clinical Setting
Investigators hypothesize that virtual reality based training offers an additional learning benefit over standard training (using cadaveric dissection and human volunteers) in preparing novice anaesthetists to perform their first Ultrasound guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blockade (USgABPB) in the clinical setting.
Investigators hope that this body of work will aid the development of a visuo-haptic simulator used to improved training of doctors in performing USgABPB. Ultimately any patient having this procedure carried out in the future should benefit. In particular it will avoid the need for novice trainees to practice new techniques on patients.
Read the detailed description
Ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade (USgABPB) is a commonly performed medical procedure which enables the performance of surgery on the upper limb without general anaesthesia. Its competent performance entails complex, simultaneous interactions between three processes. These are active management of the patient, acquisition and interpretation of ultrasound images, and the placement a needle tip close to specific nerves to facilitate deposition of local anaesthetic. Currently, the procedure is taught using two-dimensional drawings, cadaveric specimens, videos, 3D animations, live demonstrations, and/or supervised clinical practice. Simulated practice, using tofu-based or animal models, have been used to bridge the gap from knowledge to clinical performance. Training in medical procedural skills is currently undergoing important change. Factors including altered patient expectations and the European Working Time Directive (2000/34/EC amending Directive 93/104/EC) limit the number of clinical learning opportunities available to trainees. These changes are likely to decrease particularly the number of opportunities for trainees to learn and practice procedural skills in a clinical setting. The traditional Halstedian apprenticeship model of medical training is being challenged. In this model, training is associated with progressively less supervision as part of progressive independence. "See one, do one" is no longer an appropriate method for teaching procedural skills because patients are necessarily exposed to inexperienced practitioners. This model requires a large investment of time by both trainer and trainee in the clinical environment. Its application decreases the efficiency of operating room activity. These circumstances pose medical trainers and training bodies with a dilemma, a decrease in the number of individual opportunities implies that the total duration of training should increase or a lesser level of competence accepted at completion of training
Simulation has been used widely for training in and assessment of medical procedural skills. Applied to essential anaesthetic skills, simulation may be more efficient than the apprenticeship approach. This may offer a partial solution to the problem of limited clinical learning opportunities for USgPNB. Simulated practice with formative feedback has been shown to be of benefit in the rapid acquisition of basic ultrasound skills by inexperienced clinicians. Ultimately, the purpose of simulated practice of medical procedures is to enhance clinical performance. One proven important role for simulation is to prepare novice clinicians to bridge the gap between acquiring knowledge and initial clinical performance. Significantly, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently mandated that clinicians who perform carotid stenting using a particular stent should train to a defined level of proficiency on a simulator before they perform the procedure on a patient.
With institutional ethical approval and having obtained written informed consent from participants (patients and anaesthetists) 20 College of Anaesthetists (RCSI) affiliated trainees who have no experience of performing ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia will be recruited. Participating anaesthetists will provide baseline personal data including previous experience with peripheral nerve blockade and simulators, using a web-based collection facility (www.surveymonkey.com or similar). They will perform baseline psychomotor tests prior to beginning training. Baseline visuo-spatial ability will be assessed using the card rotation, cube comparison, and map planning tests (Educational Testing Service) or similar. Psychomotor ability will be assessed using a grooved pegboard (Lafayette Instruments, Lafayette, IN) or similar. All participating anaesthetists will receive standardized two hour didactic training encompassing relevant anatomy, ultrasound (physics, function and interpretation), pharmacology of relevant agents, indications/ contraindications of the block and complications of the procedure. Participants will be taught to perform USgABPB using a technique as described in Appendix IV and V of 'The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Joint Committee Recommendations for Education and Training in Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia'. This technique uses a transverse (or short-axis) view, on ultrasound imaging, of the axillary brachial plexus and axillary blood vessels. The needle is inserted in a sterile fashion using an 'in-plane' approach, that is, the needle shaft and tip will remain visible on ultrasound view throughout it course towards the relevant nerves. Following this initial period of common training subjects will be randomly allocated (using computer generated random numbers) to one of two groups of equal size for additional training which will occur in parallel over a two hour period, namely a simulator trained group (SG) or a control group (CG). Following the educational intervention all subjects will be asked to give written feedback on the content and delivery of the session.
Traditional training TG subjects will be offered multimodal training. This will be comprised of demonstration by suitably trained individuals of relevant anatomy using pre-existing cadaveric samples, performing ultrasound scans of the relevant areas on volunteers under expert supervision, and the practice of needle insertion under ultrasound-guidance using commonly used tissue phantoms (turkey breasts). All ultrasound examinations performed on volunteers or during the clinical performance on patients will use a Sonosite M Turbo (or similar device) with a 7-12 MHz 38mm linear probe. This training session will last two hours.
Simulator training In addition to traditional training the SG group will participate in a period of simulator based training. Following initial familiarization with the simulator SG participants will identify relevant structures and follow their course in the virtual arm. They will insert a virtual needle into the virtual environment and advance it using an in-plane technique towards various target structures. They will be given immediate directed feedback by an expert and offered the opportunity for repetitive, deliberate practice. The simulator, which SG participants will use, will comprise of a PHANTOM Desktop (http://www.sensable.com/), an haptic immersive workbench and the H3D API (http://www.sensegraphics.se/). The SG subject will scan and perform procedure specific tasks on a virtual arm. The model of the arm will be informed using MRI or ultrasound supervolume DICOM datasets. This training session will last two hours.
Assessment Within two weeks of the educational intervention all participants' first clinical performance of an ultrasound guided nerve block, specifically an ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade, will be video recorded for subsequent analysis by two experts in UGRA. Patients involved will require anaesthesia for forearm/wrist/hand surgery where USgABPB would ordinarily be offered as standard care. Subsequent care of the patient may include general anaesthesia, as clinically indicated. Intravenous sedation will be offered and administered as clinically indicated (Midazolam up to a maximum of 0.05mg/kg).
Subjects will perform the procedure, using an in-plane approach and short-axis view (see above), in the presence of a supervising trainer, blinded to training group, who is available to intervene if required, for patient safety, or requested by the subjects themselves. Patients involved will also be blinded to subject allocation. Using a video recording device Sony Handycam HDR-XR520VE, or similar, the performance of a clinician indicated USgABPB for a scheduled operation on patients will be recorded. The video-taping will target primarily the anaesthetist performing the clinically indicated ultrasound guided regional anaesthetic technique in the usual fashion at Cork University Hospital. The recording will proceed in a manner aimed to conceal the identity of the patient and maintain confidentiality. All efforts will be taken to ensure the recording will not include images of the patients face. For the purpose of blinding, a similar effort will be made conceal the identity of the anaesthetists performing the block by avoiding shots of their faces. The recording will include a pan shot of the setup of the room the block will take place in. This will indicate the location of the patient, the ultrasound machine, the trolley with the sterile equipment required, the assistant, the monitor, the emergency drugs, and the anaesthetist performing the block. Before commencing the block the camera will be fixed in position focusing on the axilla, with needle insertion site, ultrasound probe and the movements of the anaesthetist's hands recorded. The acquired ultrasound image will be recorded concurrently. After expert assessment of trainee performance and completion of the dataset all recorded video will be destroyed.
For the purpose of the study the subjects will be give some specific directions.
- Position the patient and equipment appropriately.
- They will be asked to perform a pre-procedure ultrasonic survey of the relevant area, specifically identifying the four relevant nerves (musculocutaneous, radial, median, and ulnar).
- Perform a sterile four nerve ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, utilizing a single skin entry point (where possible), short axis view of the brachial plexus, and needle in-plane approach.
- They will be asked to demonstrate the effectiveness of the blockade.
Following the recorded performance of the procedure the subjects will be asked to complete a written questionnaire indicating their confidence in performing the procedure and their perception of the influence of external stressors (including the presence of a camera).
- Conditions
- Anesthesiology Training
- Being tested
- Simulation based training, Traditional training
- Keywords
- ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia, upper limb surgery, ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Simulation based trainingOther
In addition to traditional training (as delivered to participants in the Traditional Training Group), participants in the Simulation Training Group will receive the following:- Following initial familiarization with the simulator SG participants will identify relevant structures and follow their course in the virtual arm. They will insert a virtual needle into the virtual environment and advance it using an in-plane technique towards various target structures. They will be given immediate directed computer generated feedback and offered the opportunity for repetitive, deliberate practice. The simulator, which SG participants will use, will comprise of a PHANTOM Desktop (http://www.sensable.com/), an haptic immersive workbench and the H3D API (http://www.sensegraphics.se/). The SG subject will scan and perform procedure specific tasks on a virtual arm. Training will continue until they reach proficiency levels set by experts using the same device
Traditional trainingOther
Subjects will be offered standardized multimodal training. This will be comprised of demonstration by suitably trained individuals of relevant anatomy using pre-existing cadaveric samples, performing ultrasound scans of the relevant areas on volunteers under expert supervision, and the practice of needle insertion under ultrasound-guidance using commonly used tissue phantoms (turkey breasts).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Training Group | Placebo comparator | These subjects will be offered multimodal training. This will be comprised of demonstration by suitably trained individuals of relevant anatomy using pre-existing cadaveric samples, performing ultrasound scans of the relevant areas on volunteers under expert supervision, and the practice of needle insertion under ultrasound-guidance using commonly used tissue phantoms (turkey breasts). Receives: Other: Traditional training |
| Simulation Training Group | Active comparator | In addition to traditional training the SG group will participate in a period of simulator based training. Following initial familiarization with the simulator these participants will identify relevant structures and follow their course in the virtual arm. They will insert a virtual needle into the virtual environment and advance it using an in-plane technique towards various target structures. They will be given immediate directed computer generated feedback and offered the opportunity for repetitive, deliberate practice. The simulator, which these participants will use, will comprise of a PHANTOM Desktop (http://www.sensable.com/), an haptic immersive workbench and the H3D API (http://www.sensegraphics.se/). The SG subject will scan and perform procedure specific tasks on a virtual arm. Training will continue until they reach proficiency levels set by experts using the same simulator. Receives: Other: Simulation based training; Other: Traditional training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
positive total of procedural checklist items
Yes or No which of the following elements were performed
- Conducts clear pre-procedural consultation with patient
- Obtains informed consent
- Secures IV Access
- Applies appropriate monitoring
- Prepares equipment and emergency drugs appropriate for standard regional anaesthesia procedures
- Selects appropriate local anaesthetic agents
- Works with trained assistant
- Prepares sterile Regional Trolley
- Selects linear broadband transducer with 5-13MHz frequency
- Uses US coupling gel and sterile cover
- Uses 50 mm needle
- Positions patient semi recumbent with head supported for comfort
- Positions operative arm in-90° abduction and externally rotates and supports in comfortable position
- Elevates bed position to appropriate level
- Positions the performer and US screen on the operative side with the screen cephalad to the trolley etc...(limited by character count)
Measured: As assessed by retrospective video analysis of procedure (from patient positioning to assessment of adequacy of block) by two blinded experts (within 6 months of procedure)
Secondary outcomes (6)
procedural times
Measured: (During procedure) From patient and equipment positioning to assessment of adequacy of block
number of needle passes
A numerical count of the number of times the needle is inserted ands removed during performance of the procedure.
Measured: during the procedure
block success
as defined by sensory \& motor blockade in the distribution of all four relevant nerves demonstrated within 15 minutes of USgABPB
Measured: within 15 mins of the procedure
participating anaesthetist confidence levels
measured on a ten point verbal rating scale, on completion of assessment of the block - "How confident were you in performing the block?"
Measured: immediately following performance of the USgABPB (within 30 minutes)
patient satisfaction measure
measured on a ten point verbal rating scale, on discharge from recovery "How satisfied were you with the block?"
Measured: prior to discharge from the post anaesthesia care unit (recovery room) - (not more than 2 hours following completion of surgical procedure requiring anaesthesia)
global rating scale (GRS) scores
Global Rating Scale
Indicate on a continuous scale of 0-10 the manner in which the learner displays the following qualities:
- Good clinical judgement including patient selection
- Establishes and maintains rapport with the patient
- Confident and reassuring manner
- Patient, friendly and understanding manner
- Good communication skills with patient and team
- Organised, disciplined, plans ahead and uses time efficiently
- Attention to sterile technique
- Demonstrates ergonomics of movement and dexterity
- Checks hand/probe/needle position intermittently
- Gentle needle technique
- Safety conscious
- Attentive to patient comfort
Measured: On retrospective video analysis of procedure (from patient positioning to assessment of adequacy of block)by blinded observers (within 6 months of procedure)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2010
- Primary completionNov 2010
- Study completionNov 2010
Why it stopped: 1\. The simulator lacked the fidelity required to meet training needs of the novices, 2. Recruitment of novice anesthetists more difficult than anticipated
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anesthesiology TrainingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cork University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Owen O'Sullivan, Cork University Hospital
- Investigators
- George Shorten, PhD, Principal investigator, Cork University Hospital & University College Cork
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01965314
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Haystack USgABPB sim-training
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 11 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
O'Sullivan O, Iohom G, O'Donnell BD, Shorten GD. The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting - a pilot study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov 26;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-110. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25844062
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomised Control Trial to Determine the Effect of Simulation Based Training on Initial Performance of Ultrasound Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blockade in a Clinical Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01965314
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Haystack USgABPB sim-training
- Conditions
- Anesthesiology Training
- Keywords
- ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia, upper limb surgery, ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: 1\. The simulator lacked the fidelity required to meet training needs of the novices, 2. Recruitment of novice anesthetists more difficult than anticipated
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cork University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2010
- Primary completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Investigators hypothesize that virtual reality based training offers an additional learning benefit over standard training (using cadaveric dissection and human volunteers) in preparing novice anaesthetists to perform their first Ultrasound guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blockade (USgABPB) in the clinical setting.
Investigators hope that this body of work will aid the development of a visuo-haptic simulator used to improved training of doctors in performing USgABPB. Ultimately any patient having this procedure carried out in the future should benefit. In particular it will avoid the need for novice trainees to practice new techniques on patients.
Detailed description
Ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade (USgABPB) is a commonly performed medical procedure which enables the performance of surgery on the upper limb without general anaesthesia. Its competent performance entails complex, simultaneous interactions between three processes. These are active management of the patient, acquisition and interpretation of ultrasound images, and the placement a needle tip close to specific nerves to facilitate deposition of local anaesthetic. Currently, the procedure is taught using two-dimensional drawings, cadaveric specimens, videos, 3D animations, live demonstrations, and/or supervised clinical practice. Simulated practice, using tofu-based or animal models, have been used to bridge the gap from knowledge to clinical performance. Training in medical procedural skills is currently undergoing important change. Factors including altered patient expectations and the European Working Time Directive (2000/34/EC amending Directive 93/104/EC) limit the number of clinical learning opportunities available to trainees. These changes are likely to decrease particularly the number of opportunities for trainees to learn and practice procedural skills in a clinical setting. The traditional Halstedian apprenticeship model of medical training is being challenged. In this model, training is associated with progressively less supervision as part of progressive independence. "See one, do one" is no longer an appropriate method for teaching procedural skills because patients are necessarily exposed to inexperienced practitioners. This model requires a large investment of time by both trainer and trainee in the clinical environment. Its application decreases the efficiency of operating room activity. These circumstances pose medical trainers and training bodies with a dilemma, a decrease in the number of individual opportunities implies that the total duration of training should increase or a lesser level of competence accepted at completion of training
Simulation has been used widely for training in and assessment of medical procedural skills. Applied to essential anaesthetic skills, simulation may be more efficient than the apprenticeship approach. This may offer a partial solution to the problem of limited clinical learning opportunities for USgPNB. Simulated practice with formative feedback has been shown to be of benefit in the rapid acquisition of basic ultrasound skills by inexperienced clinicians. Ultimately, the purpose of simulated practice of medical procedures is to enhance clinical performance. One proven important role for simulation is to prepare novice clinicians to bridge the gap between acquiring knowledge and initial clinical performance. Significantly, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently mandated that clinicians who perform carotid stenting using a particular stent should train to a defined level of proficiency on a simulator before they perform the procedure on a patient.
With institutional ethical approval and having obtained written informed consent from participants (patients and anaesthetists) 20 College of Anaesthetists (RCSI) affiliated trainees who have no experience of performing ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia will be recruited. Participating anaesthetists will provide baseline personal data including previous experience with peripheral nerve blockade and simulators, using a web-based collection facility (www.surveymonkey.com or similar). They will perform baseline psychomotor tests prior to beginning training. Baseline visuo-spatial ability will be assessed using the card rotation, cube comparison, and map planning tests (Educational Testing Service) or similar. Psychomotor ability will be assessed using a grooved pegboard (Lafayette Instruments, Lafayette, IN) or similar. All participating anaesthetists will receive standardized two hour didactic training encompassing relevant anatomy, ultrasound (physics, function and interpretation), pharmacology of relevant agents, indications/ contraindications of the block and complications of the procedure. Participants will be taught to perform USgABPB using a technique as described in Appendix IV and V of 'The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Joint Committee Recommendations for Education and Training in Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia'. This technique uses a transverse (or short-axis) view, on ultrasound imaging, of the axillary brachial plexus and axillary blood vessels. The needle is inserted in a sterile fashion using an 'in-plane' approach, that is, the needle shaft and tip will remain visible on ultrasound view throughout it course towards the relevant nerves. Following this initial period of common training subjects will be randomly allocated (using computer generated random numbers) to one of two groups of equal size for additional training which will occur in parallel over a two hour period, namely a simulator trained group (SG) or a control group (CG). Following the educational intervention all subjects will be asked to give written feedback on the content and delivery of the session.
Traditional training TG subjects will be offered multimodal training. This will be comprised of demonstration by suitably trained individuals of relevant anatomy using pre-existing cadaveric samples, performing ultrasound scans of the relevant areas on volunteers under expert supervision, and the practice of needle insertion under ultrasound-guidance using commonly used tissue phantoms (turkey breasts). All ultrasound examinations performed on volunteers or during the clinical performance on patients will use a Sonosite M Turbo (or similar device) with a 7-12 MHz 38mm linear probe. This training session will last two hours.
Simulator training In addition to traditional training the SG group will participate in a period of simulator based training. Following initial familiarization with the simulator SG participants will identify relevant structures and follow their course in the virtual arm. They will insert a virtual needle into the virtual environment and advance it using an in-plane technique towards various target structures. They will be given immediate directed feedback by an expert and offered the opportunity for repetitive, deliberate practice. The simulator, which SG participants will use, will comprise of a PHANTOM Desktop (http://www.sensable.com/), an haptic immersive workbench and the H3D API (http://www.sensegraphics.se/). The SG subject will scan and perform procedure specific tasks on a virtual arm. The model of the arm will be informed using MRI or ultrasound supervolume DICOM datasets. This training session will last two hours.
Assessment Within two weeks of the educational intervention all participants' first clinical performance of an ultrasound guided nerve block, specifically an ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade, will be video recorded for subsequent analysis by two experts in UGRA. Patients involved will require anaesthesia for forearm/wrist/hand surgery where USgABPB would ordinarily be offered as standard care. Subsequent care of the patient may include general anaesthesia, as clinically indicated. Intravenous sedation will be offered and administered as clinically indicated (Midazolam up to a maximum of 0.05mg/kg).
Subjects will perform the procedure, using an in-plane approach and short-axis view (see above), in the presence of a supervising trainer, blinded to training group, who is available to intervene if required, for patient safety, or requested by the subjects themselves. Patients involved will also be blinded to subject allocation. Using a video recording device Sony Handycam HDR-XR520VE, or similar, the performance of a clinician indicated USgABPB for a scheduled operation on patients will be recorded. The video-taping will target primarily the anaesthetist performing the clinically indicated ultrasound guided regional anaesthetic technique in the usual fashion at Cork University Hospital. The recording will proceed in a manner aimed to conceal the identity of the patient and maintain confidentiality. All efforts will be taken to ensure the recording will not include images of the patients face. For the purpose of blinding, a similar effort will be made conceal the identity of the anaesthetists performing the block by avoiding shots of their faces. The recording will include a pan shot of the setup of the room the block will take place in. This will indicate the location of the patient, the ultrasound machine, the trolley with the sterile equipment required, the assistant, the monitor, the emergency drugs, and the anaesthetist performing the block. Before commencing the block the camera will be fixed in position focusing on the axilla, with needle insertion site, ultrasound probe and the movements of the anaesthetist's hands recorded. The acquired ultrasound image will be recorded concurrently. After expert assessment of trainee performance and completion of the dataset all recorded video will be destroyed.
For the purpose of the study the subjects will be give some specific directions.
- Position the patient and equipment appropriately.
- They will be asked to perform a pre-procedure ultrasonic survey of the relevant area, specifically identifying the four relevant nerves (musculocutaneous, radial, median, and ulnar).
- Perform a sterile four nerve ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, utilizing a single skin entry point (where possible), short axis view of the brachial plexus, and needle in-plane approach.
- They will be asked to demonstrate the effectiveness of the blockade.
Following the recorded performance of the procedure the subjects will be asked to complete a written questionnaire indicating their confidence in performing the procedure and their perception of the influence of external stressors (including the presence of a camera).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional Training Group | Placebo comparator | Other: Traditional trainingThese subjects will be offered multimodal training. This will be comprised of demonstration by suitably trained individuals of relevant anatomy using pre-existing cadaveric samples, performing ultrasound scans of the relevant areas on volunteers under expert supervision, and the practice of needle insertion under ultrasound-guidance using commonly used tissue phantoms (turkey breasts). |
| Simulation Training Group | Active comparator | Other: Simulation based training, Other: Traditional trainingIn addition to traditional training the SG group will participate in a period of simulator based training. Following initial familiarization with the simulator these participants will identify relevant structures and follow their course in the virtual arm. They will insert a virtual needle into the virtual environment and advance it using an in-plane technique towards various target structures. They will be given immediate directed computer generated feedback and offered the opportunity for repetitive, deliberate practice. The simulator, which these participants will use, will comprise of a PHANTOM Desktop (http://www.sensable.com/), an haptic immersive workbench and the H3D API (http://www.sensegraphics.se/). The SG subject will scan and perform procedure specific tasks on a virtual arm. Training will continue until they reach proficiency levels set by experts using the same simulator. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ASA grades I and II
- Age 18-80 years
- Capacity to consent
- Already consented for ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus blockade
- Body Mass index 20 - 26
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Parameters outside inclusion criteria
- Contraindication to regional anaesthesia
- Language barrier
- Psychiatric history
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Simulation based trainingIn addition to traditional training (as delivered to participants in the Traditional Training Group), participants in the Simulation Training Group will receive the following:- Following initial familiarization with the simulator SG participants will identify relevant structures and follow their course in the virtual arm. They will insert a virtual needle into the virtual environment and advance it using an in-plane technique towards various target structures. They will be given immediate directed computer generated feedback and offered the opportunity for repetitive, deliberate practice. The simulator, which SG participants will use, will comprise of a PHANTOM Desktop (http://www.sensable.com/), an haptic immersive workbench and the H3D API (http://www.sensegraphics.se/). The SG subject will scan and perform procedure specific tasks on a virtual arm. Training will continue until they reach proficiency levels set by experts using the same device | Other | Simulation Training Group |
| Traditional trainingSubjects will be offered standardized multimodal training. This will be comprised of demonstration by suitably trained individuals of relevant anatomy using pre-existing cadaveric samples, performing ultrasound scans of the relevant areas on volunteers under expert supervision, and the practice of needle insertion under ultrasound-guidance using commonly used tissue phantoms (turkey breasts). | Other | Simulation Training Group, Traditional Training Group |
Primary outcome
positive total of procedural checklist items
Time frame: As assessed by retrospective video analysis of procedure (from patient positioning to assessment of adequacy of block) by two blinded experts (within 6 months of procedure)
Yes or No which of the following elements were performed 1. Conducts clear pre-procedural consultation with patient 2. Obtains informed consent 3. Secures IV Access 4. Applies appropriate monitoring 5. Prepares equipment and emergency drugs appropriate for standard regional anaesthesia procedures 6. Selects appropriate local anaesthetic agents 7. Works with trained assistant 8. Prepares sterile Regional Trolley 9. Selects linear broadband transducer with 5-13MHz frequency 10. Uses US coupling gel and sterile cover 11. Uses 50 mm needle 12. Positions patient semi recumbent with head supported for comfort 13. Positions operative arm in-90° abduction and externally rotates and supports in comfortable position 14. Elevates bed position to appropriate level 15. Positions the performer and US screen on the operative side with the screen cephalad to the trolley etc...(limited by character count)
6 secondary outcomes
procedural times
Time frame: (During procedure) From patient and equipment positioning to assessment of adequacy of block
number of needle passes
Time frame: during the procedure
block success
Time frame: within 15 mins of the procedure
participating anaesthetist confidence levels
Time frame: immediately following performance of the USgABPB (within 30 minutes)
patient satisfaction measure
Time frame: prior to discharge from the post anaesthesia care unit (recovery room) - (not more than 2 hours following completion of surgical procedure requiring anaesthesia)
global rating scale (GRS) scores
Time frame: On retrospective video analysis of procedure (from patient positioning to assessment of adequacy of block)by blinded observers (within 6 months of procedure)
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: 1\. The simulator lacked the fidelity required to meet training needs of the novices, 2. Recruitment of novice anesthetists more difficult than anticipated). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25844062O'Sullivan O, Iohom G, O'Donnell BD, Shorten GD. The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting - a pilot study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov 26;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-110. eCollection 2014.
Related trials for Anesthesiology Training
Not yet recruiting
Low-Cost Model Versus Airway Part-Task Trainer for Flexible Bronchoscope-Guided Tracheal Intubation Training
Simulation Based Medical Education, Tracheal Intubation
Recruiting
Effect of Simulation-Based Postpartum Hemorrhage Training on Team Performance in Senior Anesthesiology Teams
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Simulation Based Medical Education
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Simulation-based Training in the Anaesthesia Residency Curriculum
Education, Training
Enrolling by invitation
Comparative Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Nerve Block Training With Low-Fidelity Low-Cost Simulation Model Among Junior Doctors in Department of Emergency Medicine USM.
Regional Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine
Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound-guided Non-invasive Simulation in Anesthesia Residency Training
Ultrasound, Needle
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
George Shorten, PhD principal investigator
Cork University Hospital & University College Cork
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Simulation based training and Traditional training in people with Anesthesiology Training, run by Cork University Hospital at 1 site in Ireland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: 1\. The simulator lacked the fidelity required to meet training needs of the novices, 2. Recruitment of novice anesthetists more difficult than anticipated). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
positive total of procedural checklist items (time frame: As assessed by retrospective video analysis of procedure (from patient positioning to assessment of adequacy of block) by two blinded experts (within 6 months of procedure)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01965314, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2016.