HIV-1 InfectionPhase 3NCT01966822
Multicentre Study To Assess Changes In Bone Mineral Density Of The Switch From Protease Inhibitors To Dolutegravir In HIV-1-Infected Subjects With Low Bone Mineral Density
A Phase 3 study testing Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours and Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir in people with HIV-1 Infection, run by Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la Ciencia at 3 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Protease inhibitors (PI) have been associated with an acceleration of bone mineral density loss in HIV-infected individuals because of an enhanced osteoclast activity, although some controversial data have been also published. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV-1 Infection
- What is being tested?
- Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours and Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Oct 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HIV-infected patients over 18 years.
- In current antiretroviral therapy with abacavir and lamivudine (Kivexa) plus ritonavir-boosted PI, at least 6 months.
- Viral suppression (HIV RNA <50 copies / ml) for at least 12 months.
- T-score ≤ -1 evaluated by DEXA (done in the last 6 months).
- Signed informed consent.
- In potential childbearing women, commitment to use barrier contraceptive method throughout the study.
Who cannot join
- Suspected or documented resistance to integrase inhibitors or reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside analogues.
- Osteoporosis / osteopenia secondary (testosterone deficiency, thyroid disease ...), except vitamin D deficiency
- Treatment with bisphosphonates in the last 6 months.
- Have used integrase inhibitors
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT)> 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or ALT ≥ 3 times ULN and bilirubin ≥ 1.5 times ULN (direct bilirubin> 35%)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients with severe hepatic dysfunction (Class B or C) according to the Child-Pugh classification
- Patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) who can not use entecavir or telbivudine.
- Patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in which is expected to begin treatment during the study.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Spain3 sites
GermansTrias i Pujol Hospital
Badalona, Barcelona, 08916
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08025
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, Madrid, 28040
About this study
Official title: MULTICENTRE STUDY TO ASSESS CHANGES IN BONE MINERAL DENSITY OF THE SWITCH FROM PROTEASE INHIBITORS TO DOLUTEGRAVIR IN HIV-1-INFECTED SUBJECTS WITH LOW BONE MINERAL DENSITY
Protease inhibitors (PI) have been associated with an acceleration of bone mineral density loss in HIV-infected individuals because of an enhanced osteoclast activity, although some controversial data have been also published. A first study suggest an increase of bone mineral density after switching from PI to raltegravir, the first generation integrase inhibitor, but there are no more data about this subject.
Based on data that PI decrease bone mineral density by accelerating osteoclast cells and that the discontinuation of this drugs could improve bone mineralization, we propose a randomized prospective multicenter study to assess the impact of switching from PI to dolutegravir on bone mineral density in patients with low bone mineral density receiving a PI-containing regimen. At the same time, the study will help to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of a PI-sparing regimen including dolutegravir as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients.
Read the detailed description
The second generation integrase inhibitor dolutegravir has demonstrated good virological and immunological outcomes in antiretroviral-naive subjects, compared with efavirenz, (SPRING 1 study). As well, it is active against HIV strains resistant to first-generation inhibitors raltegravir and elvitegravir in heavily treatment-experienced patients (VIKING study).
Additionally, it was safe and well tolerated after two years of use. It is administered once daily with no need for boosting, no food requirements and has a long half-life. The easy posology and its pharmacokinetics, together with the antiviral potency, make this drug a good alternative as a simplification approach. However, no clinical data are available supporting the switch of protease inhibitors or no nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors to dolutegravir in virologically suppressed HIV-treated subjects.
Protease inhibitors (PI) have been associated with an acceleration of bone mineral density loss in HIV-infected individuals because of an enhanced osteoclast activity, although some controversial data have been also published. A first study suggest an increase of bone mineral density after switching from PI to raltegravir, the first generation integrase inhibitor, but there are no more data about this subject.
Based on data that PI decrease bone mineral density by accelerating osteoclast cells and that the discontinuation of this drugs could improve bone mineralization, we propose a randomized prospective multicenter study to assess the impact of switching from PI to dolutegravir on bone mineral density in patients with low bone mineral density receiving a PI-containing regimen. At the same time, the study will help to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of a PI-sparing regimen including dolutegravir as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients.
- Conditions
- HIV-1 Infection
- Being tested
- Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours, Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Bone mineral density, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, HIV infection, Dolutegravir, Integrase inhibitor
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis, HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hoursDrug
Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours
Protease Inhibitor/ritonavirDrug
Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dolutegravir 50mg | Experimental | Dolutegravir 50mg every 24 hours + Kivexa (ABC+3TC) Receives: Drug: Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours |
| Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir | Active comparator | Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir + Kivexa (ABC+3TC) Receives: Drug: Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compare changes in Bone Mineral Density (BMO) measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Measured: From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in femur T-score measured by DEXA
Measured: From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in lumbar spine (L1-L4) T-score measured by DEXA
Measured: From Baseline to week 48
Secondary outcomes (24)
HIV-1 viral load
Measured: Baseline
HIV-1 viral load
Measured: week 4
HIV-1 viral load
Measured: week 12
HIV-1 viral load
Measured: week 24
HIV-1 viral load
Measured: week 48
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Measured: Baseline
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Measured: week 4
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Measured: week 12
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Measured: week 24
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Measured: week 48
Genotypic test if virological failure occurs.
Measured: From baseline to week 48
Compare changes in total cholesterol
Measured: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in HDL cholesterol
Measured: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in LDL cholesterol
Measured: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in triglyceride levels.
Measured: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in filtrate glomerular rate by MDRD equation
Measured: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in creatinine
Measured: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in albumine/creatinine ratio
Measured: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in proteinuria/creatinine ratio
Measured: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Adverse events related to antiretroviral treatment (Toxicity).
Measured: From Baseline to week 48
Patient withdrawal
Measured: From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in osteocalcin
Measured: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in alkaline phosphatase
Measured: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in telopeptide
Measured: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionOct 2015
- Study completionOct 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIV-1 InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la Ciencia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01966822
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OSTEODOLU
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 30 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MULTICENTRE STUDY TO ASSESS CHANGES IN BONE MINERAL DENSITY OF THE SWITCH FROM PROTEASE INHIBITORS TO DOLUTEGRAVIR IN HIV-1-INFECTED SUBJECTS WITH LOW BONE MINERAL DENSITY
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01966822
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OSTEODOLU
- Conditions
- HIV-1 Infection
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Bone mineral density, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, HIV infection, Dolutegravir, Integrase inhibitor
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la CienciaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Protease inhibitors (PI) have been associated with an acceleration of bone mineral density loss in HIV-infected individuals because of an enhanced osteoclast activity, although some controversial data have been also published. A first study suggest an increase of bone mineral density after switching from PI to raltegravir, the first generation integrase inhibitor, but there are no more data about this subject.
Based on data that PI decrease bone mineral density by accelerating osteoclast cells and that the discontinuation of this drugs could improve bone mineralization, we propose a randomized prospective multicenter study to assess the impact of switching from PI to dolutegravir on bone mineral density in patients with low bone mineral density receiving a PI-containing regimen. At the same time, the study will help to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of a PI-sparing regimen including dolutegravir as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients.
Detailed description
The second generation integrase inhibitor dolutegravir has demonstrated good virological and immunological outcomes in antiretroviral-naive subjects, compared with efavirenz, (SPRING 1 study). As well, it is active against HIV strains resistant to first-generation inhibitors raltegravir and elvitegravir in heavily treatment-experienced patients (VIKING study).
Additionally, it was safe and well tolerated after two years of use. It is administered once daily with no need for boosting, no food requirements and has a long half-life. The easy posology and its pharmacokinetics, together with the antiviral potency, make this drug a good alternative as a simplification approach. However, no clinical data are available supporting the switch of protease inhibitors or no nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors to dolutegravir in virologically suppressed HIV-treated subjects.
Protease inhibitors (PI) have been associated with an acceleration of bone mineral density loss in HIV-infected individuals because of an enhanced osteoclast activity, although some controversial data have been also published. A first study suggest an increase of bone mineral density after switching from PI to raltegravir, the first generation integrase inhibitor, but there are no more data about this subject.
Based on data that PI decrease bone mineral density by accelerating osteoclast cells and that the discontinuation of this drugs could improve bone mineralization, we propose a randomized prospective multicenter study to assess the impact of switching from PI to dolutegravir on bone mineral density in patients with low bone mineral density receiving a PI-containing regimen. At the same time, the study will help to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of a PI-sparing regimen including dolutegravir as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dolutegravir 50mg | Experimental | Drug: Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hoursDolutegravir 50mg every 24 hours + Kivexa (ABC+3TC) |
| Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir | Active comparator | Drug: Protease Inhibitor/ritonavirProtease Inhibitor/ritonavir + Kivexa (ABC+3TC) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- HIV-infected patients over 18 years.
- In current antiretroviral therapy with abacavir and lamivudine (Kivexa) plus ritonavir-boosted PI, at least 6 months.
- Viral suppression (HIV RNA <50 copies / ml) for at least 12 months.
- T-score ≤ -1 evaluated by DEXA (done in the last 6 months).
- Signed informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Suspected or documented resistance to integrase inhibitors or reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside analogues.
- Osteoporosis / osteopenia secondary (testosterone deficiency, thyroid disease ...), except vitamin D deficiency
- Treatment with bisphosphonates in the last 6 months.
- Have used integrase inhibitors
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hoursDolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours | Drug | Dolutegravir 50mg |
| Protease Inhibitor/ritonavirProtease Inhibitor/ritonavir | Drug | Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir |
Primary outcome
Compare changes in Bone Mineral Density (BMO) measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in femur T-score measured by DEXA
Time frame: From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in lumbar spine (L1-L4) T-score measured by DEXA
Time frame: From Baseline to week 48
24 secondary outcomes
HIV-1 viral load
Time frame: Baseline
HIV-1 viral load
Time frame: week 4
HIV-1 viral load
Time frame: week 12
HIV-1 viral load
Time frame: week 24
HIV-1 viral load
Time frame: week 48
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time frame: Baseline
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time frame: week 4
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time frame: week 12
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time frame: week 24
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.
Time frame: week 48
Genotypic test if virological failure occurs.
Time frame: From baseline to week 48
Compare changes in total cholesterol
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in HDL cholesterol
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in LDL cholesterol
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in triglyceride levels.
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in filtrate glomerular rate by MDRD equation
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in creatinine
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in albumine/creatinine ratio
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in proteinuria/creatinine ratio
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Adverse events related to antiretroviral treatment (Toxicity).
Time frame: From Baseline to week 48
Patient withdrawal
Time frame: From Baseline to week 48
Compare changes in osteocalcin
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in alkaline phosphatase
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Compare changes in telopeptide
Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Nov 2015.
Related trials for HIV-1 Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
HIV-1 Non-group M in Cameroon : Study of Genotypic and Phylogenetic Diversity (OBSOCAM)
HIV Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Antiviral Activity of Two Human Monoclonal Antibodies (VRC07-523LS and PGT121.414.LS) During Analytic Treatment Interruption in Participants Living With HIV Who Initiated ART During Acute/Early HIV-1 Infection
HIV-1-infection
RecruitingPhase 1
Dasatinib for HIV-1 Reservoir Reduction
HIV Infections
RecruitingObservational study
Leukapheresis Procedures to Obtain Plasma and Lymphocytes for Research Studies on Antiretroviral Naive HIV-1 Research Participants
HIV
RecruitingPhase 2
Doravirine (DOR) in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected Children Aged 4 Weeks to <12 Years and <45 kg (MK-1439-066)
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours and Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir in people with HIV-1 Infection, run by Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la Ciencia at 3 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compare changes in Bone Mineral Density (BMO) measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (time frame: From Baseline to week 48). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2015.