Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 3NCT01970475
Efficacy and Safety Study of ABP 501 Compared to Adalimumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 3 study testing ABP 501 and Adalimumab in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Amgen at 11 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of ABP 501 against adalimumab (HUMIRA®) in adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- What is being tested?
- ABP 501 and Adalimumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 526 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2013to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men or women ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old
- Subjects must be diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis for at least 3 months before baseline
- Active RA defined as ≥ 6 swollen joints and ≥ 6 tender joints at screening and baseline
- Subjects must be taking MTX for ≥ 12 consecutive weeks and on a stable dose of 7.5 to 25 mg/week for > 8 weeks prior to receiving the study drug and be willing to remain on stable dose throughout the study
- Subject has no known history of active tuberculosis
Who cannot join
- Class IV RA, Felty's syndrome or history of prosthetic or native joint infection
- Major chronic inflammatory disease or connective tissue disease other than RA, with the exception of secondary Sjögren's syndrome
- Prior use of 2 or more biologic therapies for RA
- Previous receipt of HUMIRA® (adalimumab) or a biosimilar of adalimumab
- Ongoing use of prohibited treatments
- Other Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 4 countries.
11 sites in 4 countries
United States5 sites
Research Site
Jupiter, Florida, 33458
Research Site
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
Research Site
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Research Site
Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328
Research Site
Victorville, California, 92395
United Kingdom4 sites
Research Site
Barnsley, England, S75 2EP
Research Site
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XN
Research Site
North Shields, England, NE29 8NH
Research Site
Suffolk, England, IP4 5PD
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study of ABP 501 Efficacy and Safety Compared to Adalimumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of ABP 501 against adalimumab (HUMIRA®) in adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX).
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Being tested
- ABP 501, Adalimumab
- Keywords
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Arthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ABP 501Biological
Also called AMJEVITA™, Adalimumab-atto
Solution for subcutaneous injection in pre-filled syringe
AdalimumabBiological
Also called HUMIRA®
Solution for subcutaneous injection in pre-filled syringe
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ABP 501 | Experimental | Participants received ABP 501 40 mg subcutaneously on day 1 and every 2 weeks thereafter until week 22. Receives: Biological: ABP 501 |
| Adalimumab | Active comparator | Participants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously on day 1 and every 2 weeks thereafter until week 22. Receives: Biological: Adalimumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- C-Reactive Protein level.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)
The DAS28-CRP is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables:
- The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count;
- C-reactive protein (CRP) level
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity assessed on a score from 0 to 100 transformed from the result measured on a horizontal scale from 0 (no RA activity at all) to 10 (worst RA activity imaginable).
The DAS28-CRP score ranges from approximately zero to ten. Higher DAS28-CRP scores indicate higher disease activity.
A repeated measures analysis with the DAS28-CRP change from baseline as the response and the stratification variables, visit, treatment, treatment-by-visit interaction and the baseline DAS28-CRP measurement as predictors in the model was performed.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 2 and Week 8
A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- C-Reactive Protein level.
Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 8
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24
A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- C-Reactive Protein level.
Measured: Baseline and week 24
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24
A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:
- ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count;
- ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and
- ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
- Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
- Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
- Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
- C-Reactive Protein level.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Adverse events (AEs) were graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 according to the following scale:
1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe; 4 = life-threatening; 5 = fatal. A treatment-related AE is defined as an event where the answer to the question "is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by the Investigational Medicinal Product" was yes.
A serious adverse event is defined as an AE that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria:
- fatal
- life threatening (places the subject at immediate risk of death)
- requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
- results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
- congenital anomaly/birth defect
- other medically important serious event.
Measured: From the time of first treatment up to 28 days following the last dose of study treatment; 26 weeks.
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to ABP 501 or Adalimumab
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-drug antibodies. Samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based bridging immunoassay to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against ABP 501 and adalimumab (Binding Antibody Assay). Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a non-cell based bioassay to determine neutralizing activity against ABP 501 or adalimumab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay).
Developing antibody incidence is defined as a negative or no antibody result at baseline and a positive antibody result at a post-baseline time point.
Measured: Up to week 26
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2013
- Primary completionNov 2014
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 526 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01970475
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20120262
- Other IDs
- 2013-000525-31
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 13 Dec 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Huizinga TWJ, Torii Y, Muniz R. Adalimumab Biosimilars in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Biosimilarity. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):41-61. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00259-8. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
PubMed 33263165Cohen S, Genovese MC, Choy E, Perez-Ruiz F, Matsumoto A, Pavelka K, Pablos JL, Rizzo W, Hrycaj P, Zhang N, Shergy W, Kaur P. Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Oct;76(10):1679-1687. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210459. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
PubMed 28584187
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Dec 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study of ABP 501 Efficacy and Safety Compared to Adalimumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01970475
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20120262
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Keywords
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 526 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2013
- Primary completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Dec 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of ABP 501 against adalimumab (HUMIRA®) in adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ABP 501 | Experimental | Biological: ABP 501Participants received ABP 501 40 mg subcutaneously on day 1 and every 2 weeks thereafter until week 22. |
| Adalimumab | Active comparator | Biological: AdalimumabParticipants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously on day 1 and every 2 weeks thereafter until week 22. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Men or women ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old
- Subjects must be diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis for at least 3 months before baseline
- Active RA defined as ≥ 6 swollen joints and ≥ 6 tender joints at screening and baseline
- Subjects must be taking MTX for ≥ 12 consecutive weeks and on a stable dose of 7.5 to 25 mg/week for > 8 weeks prior to receiving the study drug and be willing to remain on stable dose throughout the study
- Subject has no known history of active tuberculosis
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Class IV RA, Felty's syndrome or history of prosthetic or native joint infection
- Major chronic inflammatory disease or connective tissue disease other than RA, with the exception of secondary Sjögren's syndrome
- Prior use of 2 or more biologic therapies for RA
- Previous receipt of HUMIRA® (adalimumab) or a biosimilar of adalimumab
- Ongoing use of prohibited treatments
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ABP 501Also: AMJEVITA™, Adalimumab-attoSolution for subcutaneous injection in pre-filled syringe | Biological | ABP 501 |
| AdalimumabAlso: HUMIRA®Solution for subcutaneous injection in pre-filled syringe | Biological | Adalimumab |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); * C-Reactive Protein level.
6 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24
Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 2 and Week 8
Time frame: Baseline, week 2 and week 8
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: From the time of first treatment up to 28 days following the last dose of study treatment; 26 weeks.
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to ABP 501 or Adalimumab
Time frame: Up to week 26
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Dec 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33263165Huizinga TWJ, Torii Y, Muniz R. Adalimumab Biosimilars in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Biosimilarity. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):41-61. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00259-8. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28584187Cohen S, Genovese MC, Choy E, Perez-Ruiz F, Matsumoto A, Pavelka K, Pablos JL, Rizzo W, Hrycaj P, Zhang N, Shergy W, Kaur P. Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Oct;76(10):1679-1687. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210459. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
- AmgenTrials clinical trials websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
11 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ABP 501 and Adalimumab in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Amgen at 11 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Dec 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01970475, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2016.