AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 3NCT01970475

Efficacy and Safety Study of ABP 501 Compared to Adalimumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 3 study testing ABP 501 and Adalimumab in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Amgen at 11 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of ABP 501 against adalimumab (HUMIRA®) in adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What is being tested?
ABP 501 and Adalimumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
526 participants
Where
11 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Oct 2013to Nov 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men or women ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old
  • Subjects must be diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis for at least 3 months before baseline
  • Active RA defined as ≥ 6 swollen joints and ≥ 6 tender joints at screening and baseline
  • Subjects must be taking MTX for ≥ 12 consecutive weeks and on a stable dose of 7.5 to 25 mg/week for > 8 weeks prior to receiving the study drug and be willing to remain on stable dose throughout the study
  • Subject has no known history of active tuberculosis

Who cannot join

  • Class IV RA, Felty's syndrome or history of prosthetic or native joint infection
  • Major chronic inflammatory disease or connective tissue disease other than RA, with the exception of secondary Sjögren's syndrome
  • Prior use of 2 or more biologic therapies for RA
  • Previous receipt of HUMIRA® (adalimumab) or a biosimilar of adalimumab
  • Ongoing use of prohibited treatments
  • Other Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 4 countries.

11 sites in 4 countries

United States5 sites
  • Research Site

    Jupiter, Florida, 33458

  • Research Site

    Lansing, Michigan, 48910

  • Research Site

    Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130

  • Research Site

    Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328

  • Research Site

    Victorville, California, 92395

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom4 sites
  • Research Site

    Barnsley, England, S75 2EP

  • Research Site

    Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XN

  • Research Site

    North Shields, England, NE29 8NH

  • Research Site

    Suffolk, England, IP4 5PD

Other trials in United Kingdom

Canada1 site
  • Research Site

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1M3

Other trials in Canada

Germany1 site
  • Research Site

    Hattingen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45525

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study of ABP 501 Efficacy and Safety Compared to Adalimumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of ABP 501 against adalimumab (HUMIRA®) in adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX).

Being tested
ABP 501, Adalimumab
Keywords
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Arthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ABP 501Biological

    Also called AMJEVITA™, Adalimumab-atto

    Solution for subcutaneous injection in pre-filled syringe

  • AdalimumabBiological

    Also called HUMIRA®

    Solution for subcutaneous injection in pre-filled syringe

Study groups in NCT01970475
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ABP 501ExperimentalParticipants received ABP 501 40 mg subcutaneously on day 1 and every 2 weeks thereafter until week 22.
Receives: Biological: ABP 501
AdalimumabActive comparatorParticipants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously on day 1 and every 2 weeks thereafter until week 22.
Receives: Biological: Adalimumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24

    A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • C-Reactive Protein level.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)

    The DAS28-CRP is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables:

    • The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count;
    • C-reactive protein (CRP) level
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity assessed on a score from 0 to 100 transformed from the result measured on a horizontal scale from 0 (no RA activity at all) to 10 (worst RA activity imaginable).

    The DAS28-CRP score ranges from approximately zero to ten. Higher DAS28-CRP scores indicate higher disease activity.

    A repeated measures analysis with the DAS28-CRP change from baseline as the response and the stratification variables, visit, treatment, treatment-by-visit interaction and the baseline DAS28-CRP measurement as predictors in the model was performed.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24

  2. Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 2 and Week 8

    A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • C-Reactive Protein level.

    Measured: Baseline, week 2 and week 8

  3. Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24

    A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • C-Reactive Protein level.

    Measured: Baseline and week 24

  4. Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24

    A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • C-Reactive Protein level.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  5. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Adverse events (AEs) were graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 according to the following scale:

    1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe; 4 = life-threatening; 5 = fatal. A treatment-related AE is defined as an event where the answer to the question "is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by the Investigational Medicinal Product" was yes.

    A serious adverse event is defined as an AE that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria:

    • fatal
    • life threatening (places the subject at immediate risk of death)
    • requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
    • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
    • congenital anomaly/birth defect
    • other medically important serious event.

    Measured: From the time of first treatment up to 28 days following the last dose of study treatment; 26 weeks.

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to ABP 501 or Adalimumab

    Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-drug antibodies. Samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based bridging immunoassay to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against ABP 501 and adalimumab (Binding Antibody Assay). Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a non-cell based bioassay to determine neutralizing activity against ABP 501 or adalimumab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay).

    Developing antibody incidence is defined as a negative or no antibody result at baseline and a positive antibody result at a post-baseline time point.

    Measured: Up to week 26

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Oct 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2013
  3. Primary completionNov 2014
  4. Study completionNov 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
526 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01970475
Sponsor's protocol ID
20120262
Other IDs
2013-000525-31
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
23 Oct 2013
Last updated
13 Dec 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Huizinga TWJ, Torii Y, Muniz R. Adalimumab Biosimilars in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Biosimilarity. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):41-61. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00259-8. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

    PubMed 33263165
  • Cohen S, Genovese MC, Choy E, Perez-Ruiz F, Matsumoto A, Pavelka K, Pablos JL, Rizzo W, Hrycaj P, Zhang N, Shergy W, Kaur P. Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Oct;76(10):1679-1687. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210459. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

    PubMed 28584187

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing ABP 501 and Adalimumab in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Amgen at 11 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Dec 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01970475, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in