Gastric CancerPhase 3NCT01971775
Clinical Study for Energy Based Devices in Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Ultrasonically activated Shears and Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
Surgery is the first standard treatment for stomach cancer, but it still has negative factors such as bleeding, leakage, closure, surgery part infection and cardiovascular and lung complication by general anesthesia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasonically activated Shears and Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Aug 2011to May 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pathologically proven primary gastric adenocarcinoma
- Patients who may undergo distal gastrectomy
- Patients who qualified for open gastrectomy for gastric cancer stage T1-3, M0 according to the 7th International Union Against Cancer classification
- 20 ≤ age ≤ 75
- Patients with informed consent
Who cannot join
- Previous abdominal operation Hx.
- Patients who are impossible to undergo Billroth-I reconstruction because of duodenal invasion caused by duodenal ulcers or gastric cancer
- Patients who have CT defined ascites prior to operation
- Patients with liver dysfunction defined as T.Bil>1.2 or albumin<3.0
- Patients with heart disease such as uncontrolled hypertension, history of angina or coronary artery disease, history of cardiomyopathy, Ventricular Ejection Fraction <50% measured by echocardiography
- Patients with renal dysfunction defined as creatinine>1.4 mg/dL or Blood Urea Nitrogen>26mg/dL
Show all 13Show fewer
- Patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction defined as Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 second<1.0 L in Pulmonary Function Test
- Patients with abnormal coagulation (PT International Normalized Ratio >1.2 or activated Partial Thromboplastin Time>45 sec)
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes
- Treatment with aspirin or antithrombotic agents within 7days before operation
- Treatment with anticoagulant drug
- History of preoperative stress dose steroid treatment
- Patients who the investigators believe will be ineligible for participation in the clinical trial
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Study for Energy Based Devices in Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Conventional Monopolar Electrosurgery vs. Ultrasonically Activated Shear(UAS)
Surgery is the first standard treatment for stomach cancer, but it still has negative factors such as bleeding, leakage, closure, surgery part infection and cardiovascular and lung complication by general anesthesia.
electric cautery is used extensively in surgery room due to the utility of simultaneous severance and hemostasis. In some case, the electric current from vitality electrode may unexpectedly stimulate or damage nearby muscles and nerves. Ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) is a device to transform the protein of organ for organ incision or hemostasis. General advantages possibly include shortened operating time, decrease of operative blood loss, and relatively less damages to the normal organ. UAS is commonly used in the operation room, which is now considered as a secure and useful medical device for for tissue dissection and coagulation. Also, it is expected to lower the risk of surgery by reducing operating time and blood loss.
Read more
However, clinical evidence is not sufficient for this device until now. Therefore, in this study,
- Evaluate the utility, efficacy, and safety of energy based device, in the case of open gastrectomy
- Would like to compare the following two kinds of energy based devices. A. For conventional monopolar electrosurgery group : dissection and sealing will be conducted by conventional monopolar electrocautery device B. For UAS group : dissection and sealing will be conducted by UAS
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Being tested
- Ultrasonically activated Shears, Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery
- Keywords
- Ultrasonically Activated Shear, Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery, Gastric Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ultrasonically activated ShearsDevice
Also called Harmonic Scalpel, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, INC (USA)
Dissection and lymphovascular sealing with Ultrasonically Activated Shears
Conventional Monopolar ElectrocauteryDevice
Also called Monopolar Electrocautery
Dissection and lymphovascular sealing with Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasonically Activated Shear | Active comparator | Dissection and lymphovascular sealing with Ultrasonically Activated Shears Receives: Device: Ultrasonically activated Shears |
| Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery | Active comparator | Dissection and lymphovascular sealing with Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery Receives: Device: Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intraoperative blood loss
Measured: within a month
Amount of drain at postoperative period
Measured: within a month
Secondary outcomes (5)
Operation time
Measured: within 2 months
Transfusion
Measured: within 2 months
Inflammatory factors (Serum C-Reactive Protein and cytokines, ascites cytokines)
Measured: within 2 months
Postoperative hospital stay
Measured: within 2 months
4. Postoperative hospital stay Complications
Measured: within 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2011
- Primary completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson Medical Companies
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Han-Kwang Yang, M.D., Ph.D., Principal investigator, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01971775
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ENERGY_FRM001480
- Status last verified
- Oct 2013
- First submitted
- 18 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Oh SY, Choi B, Lee KG, Choe HN, Lee HJ, Suh YS, Kong SH, Lee HJ, Kim WH, Yang HK. Ultrasonically Activated Shears Reduce Blood Loss without Increasing Inflammatory Reactions in Open Distal Gastrectomy for Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Feb;24(2):494-501. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5518-3. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
PubMed 27613551
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Study for Energy Based Devices in Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Conventional Monopolar Electrosurgery vs. Ultrasonically Activated Shear(UAS)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01971775
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ENERGY_FRM001480
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Keywords
- Ultrasonically Activated Shear, Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery, Gastric Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson Medical Companies
- Study start
- Aug 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Surgery is the first standard treatment for stomach cancer, but it still has negative factors such as bleeding, leakage, closure, surgery part infection and cardiovascular and lung complication by general anesthesia.
electric cautery is used extensively in surgery room due to the utility of simultaneous severance and hemostasis. In some case, the electric current from vitality electrode may unexpectedly stimulate or damage nearby muscles and nerves. Ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) is a device to transform the protein of organ for organ incision or hemostasis. General advantages possibly include shortened operating time, decrease of operative blood loss, and relatively less damages to the normal organ. UAS is commonly used in the operation room, which is now considered as a secure and useful medical device for for tissue dissection and coagulation. Also, it is expected to lower the risk of surgery by reducing operating time and blood loss.
However, clinical evidence is not sufficient for this device until now. Therefore, in this study,
- Evaluate the utility, efficacy, and safety of energy based device, in the case of open gastrectomy
- Would like to compare the following two kinds of energy based devices. A. For conventional monopolar electrosurgery group : dissection and sealing will be conducted by conventional monopolar electrocautery device B. For UAS group : dissection and sealing will be conducted by UAS
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasonically Activated Shear | Active comparator | Device: Ultrasonically activated ShearsDissection and lymphovascular sealing with Ultrasonically Activated Shears |
| Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery | Active comparator | Device: Conventional Monopolar ElectrocauteryDissection and lymphovascular sealing with Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pathologically proven primary gastric adenocarcinoma
- Patients who may undergo distal gastrectomy
- Patients who qualified for open gastrectomy for gastric cancer stage T1-3, M0 according to the 7th International Union Against Cancer classification
- 20 ≤ age ≤ 75
- Patients with informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Previous abdominal operation Hx.
- Patients who are impossible to undergo Billroth-I reconstruction because of duodenal invasion caused by duodenal ulcers or gastric cancer
- Patients who have CT defined ascites prior to operation
- Patients with liver dysfunction defined as T.Bil>1.2 or albumin<3.0
- Patients with heart disease such as uncontrolled hypertension, history of angina or coronary artery disease, history of cardiomyopathy, Ventricular Ejection Fraction <50% measured by echocardiography
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ultrasonically activated ShearsAlso: Harmonic Scalpel, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, INC (USA)Dissection and lymphovascular sealing with Ultrasonically Activated Shears | Device | Ultrasonically Activated Shear |
| Conventional Monopolar ElectrocauteryAlso: Monopolar ElectrocauteryDissection and lymphovascular sealing with Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery | Device | Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery |
Primary outcome
Intraoperative blood loss
Time frame: within a month
Amount of drain at postoperative period
Time frame: within a month
5 secondary outcomes
Operation time
Time frame: within 2 months
Transfusion
Time frame: within 2 months
Inflammatory factors (Serum C-Reactive Protein and cytokines, ascites cytokines)
Time frame: within 2 months
Postoperative hospital stay
Time frame: within 2 months
4. Postoperative hospital stay Complications
Time frame: within 2 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27613551Oh SY, Choi B, Lee KG, Choe HN, Lee HJ, Suh YS, Kong SH, Lee HJ, Kim WH, Yang HK. Ultrasonically Activated Shears Reduce Blood Loss without Increasing Inflammatory Reactions in Open Distal Gastrectomy for Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Feb;24(2):494-501. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5518-3. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
Recruiting
TEAS Timing for Gastrectomy Recovery (TEAS-TIME Trial)
Gastric Cancer (GC), Stomach Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08098488 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors.
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of [177Lu]Lu-DWJ155 and [68Ga]Ga-DWJ155 in Patients With Solid Tumors
Breast Cancer, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of IM-1617 in Participants With Advanced Cancer
Colorectal Cancer, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of RYZ401 in Subjects With Solid Tumors Expressing SSTRs.
GEP-NET, Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Han-Kwang Yang, M.D., Ph.D. principal investigator
Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, Republic of.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ultrasonically activated Shears and Conventional Monopolar Electrocautery in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intraoperative blood loss (time frame: within a month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01971775, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.