AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventilator-associated PneumoniaVAPRapid-2NCT01972425

Biomarker-based Exclusion of VAP for Improved Antibiotic Stewardship

A study testing Biomarker-based diagnostic in people with Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, run by Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust at 19 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Critically ill patients whose lungs are supported by breathing machines (ventilators) commonly develop a new lung infection, called ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Because VAP is often fatal, antibiotics are administered whenever it is suspected. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
What is being tested?
Biomarker-based diagnostic
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
211 participants
Where
19 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Oct 2013to Nov 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Inclusion criteria are based on those for adults fulfilling criteria for suspected VAP:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Mechanically ventilated for ≥ 48hrs
  • 2 or more of:
  • Temperature <35ºC or >38ºC
  • White cell count <4x109/L or >11x109/L
  • Purulent tracheal secretions
  • New or worsening CXR or CT scan changes
  • The patient is considered suitable for early discontinuation of antibiotics

Exclusion criteria are based on features considered to predict poor tolerance of BAL and adapted from our previous studies:

  • PaO2<8kPa on FiO2>0.7
  • Positive end-expiratory pressure >15cmH2O
  • Peak airway pressure >35 cmH2O
  • Heart rate >140 bpm
  • Mean arterial pressure <65mmHg
  • Bleeding diathesis (including platelet count <20x109 per litre of blood or international normalised ratio (INR) >3)
  • Poorly controlled intracranial pressure (>20mmHg)
  • ICU consultant deems procedure not to be safe
  • Previous BAL as part of this study
  • Consent declined

Patients who are enrolled in observational studies will be eligible for co-enrolment. Co-enrolment with interventional studies will be possible following consideration of any scientific or statistical interaction, in accordance with current UK critical care research forum (UKCCRF) recommendations (see appendix). Until co-enrolment is considered appropriate for a particular study, patients enrolled in an interventional trial will not be included.

Trial locations and contacts

19 sites in 1 country.

19 sites in 1 country

United Kingdom19 sites
  • Wansbeck General Hospital

    Ashington, Tyne and Wear

  • Royal Victoria Hospital

    Belfast, County Antrim, BT12 6BA

  • Birmingham Heartlands Hospital

    Birmingham, B9 5SS

  • Sandwell and West Birmingham

    Birmingham

  • Countess of Chester Hospital

    Chester, CH2 1UL

  • University Hospital Coventry

    Coventry, CV4 7AL

  • Russells Hall Hospital

    Dudley

  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary

    Edinburgh, EH16 4TS

  • Western General Hospital

    Edinburgh

  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital

    Gateshead

  • Royal Liverpool Hospital

    Liverpool

  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital

    London, SW10 9NH

  • Manchester Royal Infirmary

    Manchester

  • James Cook University Hospital

    Middlesbrough

  • Freeman Hospital

    Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE7 7DN

  • North Tyneside General Hospital

    North Shields, NE29 8NH

  • Royal Preston Hospital

    Preston, PR2 9HT

  • Salford Royal Hospital

    Salford, M6 8HD

  • Sunderland Royal Hospital

    Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, SR4 7TP

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Biomarker-based Exclusion of VAP to Improve Antibiotic Stewardship

Critically ill patients whose lungs are supported by breathing machines (ventilators) commonly develop a new lung infection, called ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Because VAP is often fatal, antibiotics are administered whenever it is suspected. However VAP is hard to distinguish from several non-infective lung conditions and most patients with suspected VAP do not have pneumonia. Therefore many patients receive unnecessary antibiotics for several days, promoting emergence of 'superbugs'. Laboratory test results for diagnosing VAP typically only reach the doctors after 3 days.

A simple test rapidly and confidently excluding VAP should improve patient care, reduce unnecessary antibiotics and decrease costs. We recently showed that low levels of specific proteins in fluid from the lungs of patients with suspected VAP effectively excluded VAP, using a test that may yield results within 6 hours. The test used is an extension of existing technology produced by our commercial partner Becton Dickinson (BD) Biosciences.

Our previous findings were derived from a single hospital's intensive care unit. We have recently confirmed this finding across many intensive care units, which will help show that the test can be used in 'real life'. The aim of this study is to take the new test to the next step and determine whether it can improve the care of patients by reducing the amount of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed. This will be done using a 'randomised controlled trial', the best tool for scientifically testing a new diagnostic test. To do this we shall identify patients with suspected VAP, all of whom will have a lung sample - half of the patients will receive 'usual care' for suspected VAP, the other half will have the new test performed on their lung fluid. If the new test suggests no lung infection, the doctors will be asked to consider not giving antibiotics. We shall test how much antibiotic is given to each group.

Read the detailed description

VAP is associated with higher mortality than any other nosocomial infection. Several non-infective conditions mimic VAP and significant infection is usually confirmed in less than 40% of suspected cases. No tests reliably exclude VAP at the point of clinical suspicion, and microbiological results typically return 3 days later. Consequently, while empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics are routinely administered, most patients with suspected VAP do not have pneumonia.

Using cytometric bead array (CBA) technology, we have demonstrated that IL-1b in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) can be used to exclude VAP in both a single centre derivation study and a multi-centre validation study. A combination of IL-1b and IL-8 can exclude VAP with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 44.3% and a negative predictive value of 1.

This randomised controlled trial will determine whether a biomarker-based recommendation on antibiotics (versus routine use of antibiotics) will improve antibiotic stewardship in suspected VAP.

This study tests the hypothesis that a 'biomarker-guided recommendation on antibiotics' will improve antibiotic stewardship in patients with suspected VAP while maintaining equivalent patient outcomes.

Recruitment for RCT will end when BAL has been performed on 210 patients. For regulatory purposes, the study will continue until follow up data is collected for the 210th patient.

Safety measures will be made in relation to bronchoscopy and BAL and will include SaO2, heart rate, BP, PaO2:FiO2 before and after procedure. Adverse events considered related to antibiotics will also be recorded. SAE, as described below, will be recorded.

Markers of inflammation will be measured in BALF and will include but not be limited to IL-1b and IL-8.

Healthcare resource use will be estimated from the critical care length of stay (level 3 and level 2 care) and from hospital length of stay. Data will be collected from randomisation until hospital discharge or death, whichever occurs first, for a maximum of 56 days.

The sample size is based on changes in the frequency distribution of AFD towards more patients having more AFD in the 7 days following BAL. Using models outlined in the Study Protocol as exemplars of different effect sizes, we would judge that effect sizes of 0.7 and above would represent an important clinical difference under biomarker-guided care. From this exploration, our power calculation was judged to balance detectable effect size against feasible recruitment, on which basis to detect an effect size of 0.0797, 90 patients are required per study arm. Allowing for a 15% drop out (from non-evaluable data in case of problems running biomarker assays etc), a total sample size of 210 patients are required.

Data will be collected on the process of implementing the trial. In the situation that the patient has a biomarker result that excludes VAP but the ICU consultant does not follow the recommendation, the ICU consultant will be asked to complete a questionnaire to give information as to why the recommendation was not followed.

Randomisation will be performed by a designated researcher trained in the use of the biomarker kit. The randomisation will be performed using a web-based randomisation service hosted by NCTU. Patients will be randomised to 'biomarker-guided recommendation for antibiotics' or 'routine use of antibiotics' in a 1:1 ratio with stratification by site. Permuted blocks of variable length will be used and not disclosed to investigators. On enrolment the research team will inform the researcher that a BAL is to be performed allowing the researcher to randomise the patient. Each patient will be assigned a unique identification number that the technician will enter into the randomisation system. The patient will then be allocated to either study arm in accordance to the randomisation schedule. The online randomisation service will instruct the researcher to either 'ANALYSE THE SAMPLE ON ARRIVAL' (ie. the 'biomarker-guided recommendation on antibiotics' group) or 'DO NOT ANALYSE THE SAMPLE ON ARRIVAL' (ie. 'Routine use of antibiotics' group). The randomisation service will automatically confirm randomisation details to the NCTU by email and the researcher will also send the BALF biomarker result to the NCTU using the unique identifier.

Since all recruited patients will undergo the same study procedures the clinical team will initially be blind to the study arm. The researcher performs the randomisation and either processes the sample or does not. For the 6 hours that it takes to process the sample by CBA, the clinical team will be blinded to the study arm. Following this period the clinical team will be un-blinded by the researcher who will inform the clinical team of the biomarker result or that the biomarker test has not been performed.

A within-trial cost analysis will be undertaken to assess the impact of biomarker-based guidance of VAP management on hospital resource use from the point of randomisation until hospital discharge or death, whichever occurs first, for a maximum of 56 days. Patient-level hospital resource use will be estimated from length of ICU stay and length of hospital stay. Mean hospital resource use and associated costs will be estimated for the intervention and standard care groups and compared. Multiple regression analyses will be performed to examine patient factors which are potentially associated with costs. Robustness of results will be evaluated using sensitivity analyses.

Data received at NCTU will be processed as per the CTU SOPs, including entering the data into a secure central database. Responsibility for maintenance of the database will rest with the study manager.

The trial will be managed through the Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU). The Principal Investigators will be responsible for the day-to-day study conduct at site.

NCTU will provide day-to-day support, provide trial training and routine monitoring visits.

Quality control will be maintained through adherence to NCTU SOPs, study protocol, the principles of GCP, research governance and clinical trial regulations. An independent data monitoring and ethics committee (DMEC) will be convened to undertake independent review. The purpose of this committee will be to monitor efficacy and safety endpoints. Only the DMEC will have access to unblinded study data. The committee will meet at least 3 times, at the start, middle and completion of the study. At the first meeting, the DMEC will discuss and advise on the inclusion of an interim analysis and possible adoption of a formal stopping rule for efficacy or safety.

A Trial Steering Committee (TSC) will be established to provide overall supervision of the trial. The committee will meet at baseline and at regular intervals during recruitment.

Monitoring of study conduct and data collected will be performed by a combination of central review and site monitoring visits to ensure the study is conducted in accordance with GCP. Study site monitoring will be undertaken by NCTU. The main areas of focus will include consent, serious adverse events and essential documents in study files.

All monitoring findings will be reported and followed-up with the appropriate persons in a timely manner.

The study may be subject to inspections and audit by Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust under their remit as sponsor, and other regulatory bodies to ensure adherence to GCP. The investigator(s)/institutions will permit trial-related monitoring, audits, REC review and regulatory inspection(s), providing direct access to source data/documents.

Being tested
Biomarker-based diagnostic
Medical subject headings
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Biomarker-based diagnosticOther

    The intervention will be a biomarker-based diagnostic test for the exclusion of VAP

Study groups in NCT01972425
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Biomarker-based diagnosticExperimentalAnalyse sample on arrival
Receives: Other: Biomarker-based diagnostic
Routine use of antibioticsNo interventionDo not analyse the sample on arrival

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Antibiotic free days (AFD)

    The frequency distribution of antibiotic-free days (AFD) in the 7 days following BAL

    Measured: 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Oct 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2013
  3. Primary completionSep 2016
  4. Study completionNov 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
211 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01972425
Sponsor's protocol ID
NUTH6293
Other IDs
65937227
Acronym
VAPRapid-2
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
24 Oct 2013
Last updated
28 Mar 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Hellyer TP, McAuley DF, Walsh TS, Anderson N, Conway Morris A, Singh S, Dark P, Roy AI, Perkins GD, McMullan R, Emerson LM, Blackwood B, Wright SE, Kefala K, O'Kane CM, Baudouin SV, Paterson RL, Rostron AJ, Agus A, Bannard-Smith J, Robin NM, Welters ID, Bassford C, Yates B, Spencer C, Laha SK, Hulme J, Bonner S, Linnett V, Sonksen J, Van Den Broeck T, Boschman G, Keenan DJ, Scott J, Allen AJ, Phair G, Parker J, Bowett SA, Simpson AJ. Biomarker-guided antibiotic stewardship in suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAPrapid2): a randomised controlled trial and process evaluation. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Feb;8(2):182-191. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30367-4. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

    PubMed 31810865
  • Conway Morris A, Gadsby N, McKenna JP, Hellyer TP, Dark P, Singh S, Walsh TS, McAuley DF, Templeton K, Simpson AJ, McMullan R. 16S pan-bacterial PCR can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Thorax. 2017 Nov;72(11):1046-1048. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209065. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

    PubMed 27974525
  • Hellyer TP, Anderson NH, Parker J, Dark P, Van Den Broeck T, Singh S, McMullan R, Agus AM, Emerson LM, Blackwood B, Gossain S, Walsh TS, Perkins GD, Conway Morris A, McAuley DF, Simpson AJ. Effectiveness of biomarker-based exclusion of ventilator-acquired pneumonia to reduce antibiotic use (VAPrapid-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Jul 16;17(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1442-x.

    PubMed 27422026

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Biomarker-based diagnostic in people with Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, run by Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust at 19 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 19 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Antibiotic free days (AFD) (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01972425, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in