Ventilator-associated PneumoniaVAPRapid-2NCT01972425
Biomarker-based Exclusion of VAP for Improved Antibiotic Stewardship
A study testing Biomarker-based diagnostic in people with Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, run by Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust at 19 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Critically ill patients whose lungs are supported by breathing machines (ventilators) commonly develop a new lung infection, called ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Because VAP is often fatal, antibiotics are administered whenever it is suspected. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
- What is being tested?
- Biomarker-based diagnostic
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 211 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Oct 2013to Nov 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion criteria are based on those for adults fulfilling criteria for suspected VAP:
- Age ≥18 years
- Mechanically ventilated for ≥ 48hrs
- 2 or more of:
- Temperature <35ºC or >38ºC
- White cell count <4x109/L or >11x109/L
- Purulent tracheal secretions
- New or worsening CXR or CT scan changes
- The patient is considered suitable for early discontinuation of antibiotics
Exclusion criteria are based on features considered to predict poor tolerance of BAL and adapted from our previous studies:
- PaO2<8kPa on FiO2>0.7
- Positive end-expiratory pressure >15cmH2O
- Peak airway pressure >35 cmH2O
- Heart rate >140 bpm
- Mean arterial pressure <65mmHg
- Bleeding diathesis (including platelet count <20x109 per litre of blood or international normalised ratio (INR) >3)
- Poorly controlled intracranial pressure (>20mmHg)
- ICU consultant deems procedure not to be safe
- Previous BAL as part of this study
- Consent declined
Patients who are enrolled in observational studies will be eligible for co-enrolment. Co-enrolment with interventional studies will be possible following consideration of any scientific or statistical interaction, in accordance with current UK critical care research forum (UKCCRF) recommendations (see appendix). Until co-enrolment is considered appropriate for a particular study, patients enrolled in an interventional trial will not be included.
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 1 country.
19 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom19 sites
Wansbeck General Hospital
Ashington, Tyne and Wear
Royal Victoria Hospital
Belfast, County Antrim, BT12 6BA
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Birmingham, B9 5SS
Sandwell and West Birmingham
Birmingham
Countess of Chester Hospital
Chester, CH2 1UL
University Hospital Coventry
Coventry, CV4 7AL
Russells Hall Hospital
Dudley
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary
Edinburgh, EH16 4TS
Western General Hospital
Edinburgh
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Gateshead
Royal Liverpool Hospital
Liverpool
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
London, SW10 9NH
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Manchester
James Cook University Hospital
Middlesbrough
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE7 7DN
North Tyneside General Hospital
North Shields, NE29 8NH
Royal Preston Hospital
Preston, PR2 9HT
Salford Royal Hospital
Salford, M6 8HD
Sunderland Royal Hospital
Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, SR4 7TP
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Biomarker-based Exclusion of VAP to Improve Antibiotic Stewardship
Critically ill patients whose lungs are supported by breathing machines (ventilators) commonly develop a new lung infection, called ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Because VAP is often fatal, antibiotics are administered whenever it is suspected. However VAP is hard to distinguish from several non-infective lung conditions and most patients with suspected VAP do not have pneumonia. Therefore many patients receive unnecessary antibiotics for several days, promoting emergence of 'superbugs'. Laboratory test results for diagnosing VAP typically only reach the doctors after 3 days.
A simple test rapidly and confidently excluding VAP should improve patient care, reduce unnecessary antibiotics and decrease costs. We recently showed that low levels of specific proteins in fluid from the lungs of patients with suspected VAP effectively excluded VAP, using a test that may yield results within 6 hours. The test used is an extension of existing technology produced by our commercial partner Becton Dickinson (BD) Biosciences.
Our previous findings were derived from a single hospital's intensive care unit. We have recently confirmed this finding across many intensive care units, which will help show that the test can be used in 'real life'. The aim of this study is to take the new test to the next step and determine whether it can improve the care of patients by reducing the amount of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed. This will be done using a 'randomised controlled trial', the best tool for scientifically testing a new diagnostic test. To do this we shall identify patients with suspected VAP, all of whom will have a lung sample - half of the patients will receive 'usual care' for suspected VAP, the other half will have the new test performed on their lung fluid. If the new test suggests no lung infection, the doctors will be asked to consider not giving antibiotics. We shall test how much antibiotic is given to each group.
Read the detailed description
VAP is associated with higher mortality than any other nosocomial infection. Several non-infective conditions mimic VAP and significant infection is usually confirmed in less than 40% of suspected cases. No tests reliably exclude VAP at the point of clinical suspicion, and microbiological results typically return 3 days later. Consequently, while empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics are routinely administered, most patients with suspected VAP do not have pneumonia.
Using cytometric bead array (CBA) technology, we have demonstrated that IL-1b in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) can be used to exclude VAP in both a single centre derivation study and a multi-centre validation study. A combination of IL-1b and IL-8 can exclude VAP with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 44.3% and a negative predictive value of 1.
This randomised controlled trial will determine whether a biomarker-based recommendation on antibiotics (versus routine use of antibiotics) will improve antibiotic stewardship in suspected VAP.
This study tests the hypothesis that a 'biomarker-guided recommendation on antibiotics' will improve antibiotic stewardship in patients with suspected VAP while maintaining equivalent patient outcomes.
Recruitment for RCT will end when BAL has been performed on 210 patients. For regulatory purposes, the study will continue until follow up data is collected for the 210th patient.
Safety measures will be made in relation to bronchoscopy and BAL and will include SaO2, heart rate, BP, PaO2:FiO2 before and after procedure. Adverse events considered related to antibiotics will also be recorded. SAE, as described below, will be recorded.
Markers of inflammation will be measured in BALF and will include but not be limited to IL-1b and IL-8.
Healthcare resource use will be estimated from the critical care length of stay (level 3 and level 2 care) and from hospital length of stay. Data will be collected from randomisation until hospital discharge or death, whichever occurs first, for a maximum of 56 days.
The sample size is based on changes in the frequency distribution of AFD towards more patients having more AFD in the 7 days following BAL. Using models outlined in the Study Protocol as exemplars of different effect sizes, we would judge that effect sizes of 0.7 and above would represent an important clinical difference under biomarker-guided care. From this exploration, our power calculation was judged to balance detectable effect size against feasible recruitment, on which basis to detect an effect size of 0.0797, 90 patients are required per study arm. Allowing for a 15% drop out (from non-evaluable data in case of problems running biomarker assays etc), a total sample size of 210 patients are required.
Data will be collected on the process of implementing the trial. In the situation that the patient has a biomarker result that excludes VAP but the ICU consultant does not follow the recommendation, the ICU consultant will be asked to complete a questionnaire to give information as to why the recommendation was not followed.
Randomisation will be performed by a designated researcher trained in the use of the biomarker kit. The randomisation will be performed using a web-based randomisation service hosted by NCTU. Patients will be randomised to 'biomarker-guided recommendation for antibiotics' or 'routine use of antibiotics' in a 1:1 ratio with stratification by site. Permuted blocks of variable length will be used and not disclosed to investigators. On enrolment the research team will inform the researcher that a BAL is to be performed allowing the researcher to randomise the patient. Each patient will be assigned a unique identification number that the technician will enter into the randomisation system. The patient will then be allocated to either study arm in accordance to the randomisation schedule. The online randomisation service will instruct the researcher to either 'ANALYSE THE SAMPLE ON ARRIVAL' (ie. the 'biomarker-guided recommendation on antibiotics' group) or 'DO NOT ANALYSE THE SAMPLE ON ARRIVAL' (ie. 'Routine use of antibiotics' group). The randomisation service will automatically confirm randomisation details to the NCTU by email and the researcher will also send the BALF biomarker result to the NCTU using the unique identifier.
Since all recruited patients will undergo the same study procedures the clinical team will initially be blind to the study arm. The researcher performs the randomisation and either processes the sample or does not. For the 6 hours that it takes to process the sample by CBA, the clinical team will be blinded to the study arm. Following this period the clinical team will be un-blinded by the researcher who will inform the clinical team of the biomarker result or that the biomarker test has not been performed.
A within-trial cost analysis will be undertaken to assess the impact of biomarker-based guidance of VAP management on hospital resource use from the point of randomisation until hospital discharge or death, whichever occurs first, for a maximum of 56 days. Patient-level hospital resource use will be estimated from length of ICU stay and length of hospital stay. Mean hospital resource use and associated costs will be estimated for the intervention and standard care groups and compared. Multiple regression analyses will be performed to examine patient factors which are potentially associated with costs. Robustness of results will be evaluated using sensitivity analyses.
Data received at NCTU will be processed as per the CTU SOPs, including entering the data into a secure central database. Responsibility for maintenance of the database will rest with the study manager.
The trial will be managed through the Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU). The Principal Investigators will be responsible for the day-to-day study conduct at site.
NCTU will provide day-to-day support, provide trial training and routine monitoring visits.
Quality control will be maintained through adherence to NCTU SOPs, study protocol, the principles of GCP, research governance and clinical trial regulations. An independent data monitoring and ethics committee (DMEC) will be convened to undertake independent review. The purpose of this committee will be to monitor efficacy and safety endpoints. Only the DMEC will have access to unblinded study data. The committee will meet at least 3 times, at the start, middle and completion of the study. At the first meeting, the DMEC will discuss and advise on the inclusion of an interim analysis and possible adoption of a formal stopping rule for efficacy or safety.
A Trial Steering Committee (TSC) will be established to provide overall supervision of the trial. The committee will meet at baseline and at regular intervals during recruitment.
Monitoring of study conduct and data collected will be performed by a combination of central review and site monitoring visits to ensure the study is conducted in accordance with GCP. Study site monitoring will be undertaken by NCTU. The main areas of focus will include consent, serious adverse events and essential documents in study files.
All monitoring findings will be reported and followed-up with the appropriate persons in a timely manner.
The study may be subject to inspections and audit by Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust under their remit as sponsor, and other regulatory bodies to ensure adherence to GCP. The investigator(s)/institutions will permit trial-related monitoring, audits, REC review and regulatory inspection(s), providing direct access to source data/documents.
- Conditions
- Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
- Being tested
- Biomarker-based diagnostic
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biomarker-based diagnosticOther
The intervention will be a biomarker-based diagnostic test for the exclusion of VAP
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Biomarker-based diagnostic | Experimental | Analyse sample on arrival Receives: Other: Biomarker-based diagnostic |
| Routine use of antibiotics | No intervention | Do not analyse the sample on arrival |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Antibiotic free days (AFD)
The frequency distribution of antibiotic-free days (AFD) in the 7 days following BAL
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2013
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionNov 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ventilator-associated PneumoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 211 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wellcome Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John Simpson, Principal investigator, Newcastle University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01972425
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NUTH6293
- Other IDs
- 65937227
- Acronym
- VAPRapid-2
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 24 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 28 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hellyer TP, McAuley DF, Walsh TS, Anderson N, Conway Morris A, Singh S, Dark P, Roy AI, Perkins GD, McMullan R, Emerson LM, Blackwood B, Wright SE, Kefala K, O'Kane CM, Baudouin SV, Paterson RL, Rostron AJ, Agus A, Bannard-Smith J, Robin NM, Welters ID, Bassford C, Yates B, Spencer C, Laha SK, Hulme J, Bonner S, Linnett V, Sonksen J, Van Den Broeck T, Boschman G, Keenan DJ, Scott J, Allen AJ, Phair G, Parker J, Bowett SA, Simpson AJ. Biomarker-guided antibiotic stewardship in suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAPrapid2): a randomised controlled trial and process evaluation. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Feb;8(2):182-191. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30367-4. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
PubMed 31810865Conway Morris A, Gadsby N, McKenna JP, Hellyer TP, Dark P, Singh S, Walsh TS, McAuley DF, Templeton K, Simpson AJ, McMullan R. 16S pan-bacterial PCR can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Thorax. 2017 Nov;72(11):1046-1048. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209065. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
PubMed 27974525Hellyer TP, Anderson NH, Parker J, Dark P, Van Den Broeck T, Singh S, McMullan R, Agus AM, Emerson LM, Blackwood B, Gossain S, Walsh TS, Perkins GD, Conway Morris A, McAuley DF, Simpson AJ. Effectiveness of biomarker-based exclusion of ventilator-acquired pneumonia to reduce antibiotic use (VAPrapid-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Jul 16;17(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1442-x.
PubMed 27422026
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Controlled Trial of Biomarker-based Exclusion of VAP to Improve Antibiotic Stewardship
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01972425
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VAPRapid-2 / NUTH6293
- Conditions
- Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 211 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wellcome Trust
- Study start
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Critically ill patients whose lungs are supported by breathing machines (ventilators) commonly develop a new lung infection, called ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Because VAP is often fatal, antibiotics are administered whenever it is suspected. However VAP is hard to distinguish from several non-infective lung conditions and most patients with suspected VAP do not have pneumonia. Therefore many patients receive unnecessary antibiotics for several days, promoting emergence of 'superbugs'. Laboratory test results for diagnosing VAP typically only reach the doctors after 3 days.
A simple test rapidly and confidently excluding VAP should improve patient care, reduce unnecessary antibiotics and decrease costs. We recently showed that low levels of specific proteins in fluid from the lungs of patients with suspected VAP effectively excluded VAP, using a test that may yield results within 6 hours. The test used is an extension of existing technology produced by our commercial partner Becton Dickinson (BD) Biosciences.
Our previous findings were derived from a single hospital's intensive care unit. We have recently confirmed this finding across many intensive care units, which will help show that the test can be used in 'real life'. The aim of this study is to take the new test to the next step and determine whether it can improve the care of patients by reducing the amount of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed. This will be done using a 'randomised controlled trial', the best tool for scientifically testing a new diagnostic test. To do this we shall identify patients with suspected VAP, all of whom will have a lung sample - half of the patients will receive 'usual care' for suspected VAP, the other half will have the new test performed on their lung fluid. If the new test suggests no lung infection, the doctors will be asked to consider not giving antibiotics. We shall test how much antibiotic is given to each group.
Detailed description
VAP is associated with higher mortality than any other nosocomial infection. Several non-infective conditions mimic VAP and significant infection is usually confirmed in less than 40% of suspected cases. No tests reliably exclude VAP at the point of clinical suspicion, and microbiological results typically return 3 days later. Consequently, while empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics are routinely administered, most patients with suspected VAP do not have pneumonia.
Using cytometric bead array (CBA) technology, we have demonstrated that IL-1b in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) can be used to exclude VAP in both a single centre derivation study and a multi-centre validation study. A combination of IL-1b and IL-8 can exclude VAP with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 44.3% and a negative predictive value of 1.
This randomised controlled trial will determine whether a biomarker-based recommendation on antibiotics (versus routine use of antibiotics) will improve antibiotic stewardship in suspected VAP.
This study tests the hypothesis that a 'biomarker-guided recommendation on antibiotics' will improve antibiotic stewardship in patients with suspected VAP while maintaining equivalent patient outcomes.
Recruitment for RCT will end when BAL has been performed on 210 patients. For regulatory purposes, the study will continue until follow up data is collected for the 210th patient.
Safety measures will be made in relation to bronchoscopy and BAL and will include SaO2, heart rate, BP, PaO2:FiO2 before and after procedure. Adverse events considered related to antibiotics will also be recorded. SAE, as described below, will be recorded.
Markers of inflammation will be measured in BALF and will include but not be limited to IL-1b and IL-8.
Healthcare resource use will be estimated from the critical care length of stay (level 3 and level 2 care) and from hospital length of stay. Data will be collected from randomisation until hospital discharge or death, whichever occurs first, for a maximum of 56 days.
The sample size is based on changes in the frequency distribution of AFD towards more patients having more AFD in the 7 days following BAL. Using models outlined in the Study Protocol as exemplars of different effect sizes, we would judge that effect sizes of 0.7 and above would represent an important clinical difference under biomarker-guided care. From this exploration, our power calculation was judged to balance detectable effect size against feasible recruitment, on which basis to detect an effect size of 0.0797, 90 patients are required per study arm. Allowing for a 15% drop out (from non-evaluable data in case of problems running biomarker assays etc), a total sample size of 210 patients are required.
Data will be collected on the process of implementing the trial. In the situation that the patient has a biomarker result that excludes VAP but the ICU consultant does not follow the recommendation, the ICU consultant will be asked to complete a questionnaire to give information as to why the recommendation was not followed.
Randomisation will be performed by a designated researcher trained in the use of the biomarker kit. The randomisation will be performed using a web-based randomisation service hosted by NCTU. Patients will be randomised to 'biomarker-guided recommendation for antibiotics' or 'routine use of antibiotics' in a 1:1 ratio with stratification by site. Permuted blocks of variable length will be used and not disclosed to investigators. On enrolment the research team will inform the researcher that a BAL is to be performed allowing the researcher to randomise the patient. Each patient will be assigned a unique identification number that the technician will enter into the randomisation system. The patient will then be allocated to either study arm in accordance to the randomisation schedule. The online randomisation service will instruct the researcher to either 'ANALYSE THE SAMPLE ON ARRIVAL' (ie. the 'biomarker-guided recommendation on antibiotics' group) or 'DO NOT ANALYSE THE SAMPLE ON ARRIVAL' (ie. 'Routine use of antibiotics' group). The randomisation service will automatically confirm randomisation details to the NCTU by email and the researcher will also send the BALF biomarker result to the NCTU using the unique identifier.
Since all recruited patients will undergo the same study procedures the clinical team will initially be blind to the study arm. The researcher performs the randomisation and either processes the sample or does not. For the 6 hours that it takes to process the sample by CBA, the clinical team will be blinded to the study arm. Following this period the clinical team will be un-blinded by the researcher who will inform the clinical team of the biomarker result or that the biomarker test has not been performed.
A within-trial cost analysis will be undertaken to assess the impact of biomarker-based guidance of VAP management on hospital resource use from the point of randomisation until hospital discharge or death, whichever occurs first, for a maximum of 56 days. Patient-level hospital resource use will be estimated from length of ICU stay and length of hospital stay. Mean hospital resource use and associated costs will be estimated for the intervention and standard care groups and compared. Multiple regression analyses will be performed to examine patient factors which are potentially associated with costs. Robustness of results will be evaluated using sensitivity analyses.
Data received at NCTU will be processed as per the CTU SOPs, including entering the data into a secure central database. Responsibility for maintenance of the database will rest with the study manager.
The trial will be managed through the Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU). The Principal Investigators will be responsible for the day-to-day study conduct at site.
NCTU will provide day-to-day support, provide trial training and routine monitoring visits.
Quality control will be maintained through adherence to NCTU SOPs, study protocol, the principles of GCP, research governance and clinical trial regulations. An independent data monitoring and ethics committee (DMEC) will be convened to undertake independent review. The purpose of this committee will be to monitor efficacy and safety endpoints. Only the DMEC will have access to unblinded study data. The committee will meet at least 3 times, at the start, middle and completion of the study. At the first meeting, the DMEC will discuss and advise on the inclusion of an interim analysis and possible adoption of a formal stopping rule for efficacy or safety.
A Trial Steering Committee (TSC) will be established to provide overall supervision of the trial. The committee will meet at baseline and at regular intervals during recruitment.
Monitoring of study conduct and data collected will be performed by a combination of central review and site monitoring visits to ensure the study is conducted in accordance with GCP. Study site monitoring will be undertaken by NCTU. The main areas of focus will include consent, serious adverse events and essential documents in study files.
All monitoring findings will be reported and followed-up with the appropriate persons in a timely manner.
The study may be subject to inspections and audit by Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust under their remit as sponsor, and other regulatory bodies to ensure adherence to GCP. The investigator(s)/institutions will permit trial-related monitoring, audits, REC review and regulatory inspection(s), providing direct access to source data/documents.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Biomarker-based diagnostic | Experimental | Other: Biomarker-based diagnosticAnalyse sample on arrival |
| Routine use of antibiotics | No intervention | –Do not analyse the sample on arrival |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biomarker-based diagnosticThe intervention will be a biomarker-based diagnostic test for the exclusion of VAP | Other | Biomarker-based diagnostic |
Primary outcome
Antibiotic free days (AFD)
Time frame: 7 days
The frequency distribution of antibiotic-free days (AFD) in the 7 days following BAL
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Mar 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31810865Hellyer TP, McAuley DF, Walsh TS, Anderson N, Conway Morris A, Singh S, Dark P, Roy AI, Perkins GD, McMullan R, Emerson LM, Blackwood B, Wright SE, Kefala K, O'Kane CM, Baudouin SV, Paterson RL, Rostron AJ, Agus A, Bannard-Smith J, Robin NM, Welters ID, Bassford C, Yates B, Spencer C, Laha SK, Hulme J, Bonner S, Linnett V, Sonksen J, Van Den Broeck T, Boschman G, Keenan DJ, Scott J, Allen AJ, Phair G, Parker J, Bowett SA, Simpson AJ. Biomarker-guided antibiotic stewardship in suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAPrapid2): a randomised controlled trial and process evaluation. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Feb;8(2):182-191. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30367-4. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27974525Conway Morris A, Gadsby N, McKenna JP, Hellyer TP, Dark P, Singh S, Walsh TS, McAuley DF, Templeton K, Simpson AJ, McMullan R. 16S pan-bacterial PCR can accurately identify patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Thorax. 2017 Nov;72(11):1046-1048. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209065. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27422026Hellyer TP, Anderson NH, Parker J, Dark P, Van Den Broeck T, Singh S, McMullan R, Agus AM, Emerson LM, Blackwood B, Gossain S, Walsh TS, Perkins GD, Conway Morris A, McAuley DF, Simpson AJ. Effectiveness of biomarker-based exclusion of ventilator-acquired pneumonia to reduce antibiotic use (VAPrapid-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Jul 16;17(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1442-x.
Related trials for Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Traditional Chinese Medicine in Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Pneumonia
Multi Drug Resistant Infections, Pneumnia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Early Identification of Pathogens in Children With Respiratory Tract Infection by Mechanical Ventilation Using mNGS
VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
RecruitingPhase 4
EaRly impAct theraPy With Ceftazidime-avibactam Via rapID Diagnostics
Blood Stream Infections, Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Not yet recruiting
Mobile-Based Microlearning for Improving ICU Nurses' Adherence to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Prevention Protocols
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Cefepime-Zidebactam Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam With or Without Colistin for Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia
Hospital Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (HABP), Ventilator Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (VABP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Simpson principal investigator
Newcastle University
19 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Biomarker-based diagnostic in people with Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, run by Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust at 19 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Antibiotic free days (AFD) (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01972425, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2017.