Diabetic Macular EdemaPhase 2EPMNCT01975103
Non-damaging Retinal Laser Therapy With PASCAL Laser for Macular Diseases
A Phase 2 study testing Topcon Endpoint Management in people with Diabetic Macular Edema and Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, run by Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
This trial seeks to prove the safety and efficacy of photothermal stimulation treatment to diabetic macular edema, chronic central serous retinopathy, macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion and macular telangiectasia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Macular Edema, Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, Chronic Central Serous Retinopathy
- What is being tested?
- Topcon Endpoint Management
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Mar 2013to Apr 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient must have macular edema involving the center of the macula with a corresponding leakage on fluorescein angiography.
- Thickening of the fovea of at least 300 microns (thickness of the central point in OCT) with a standard deviation of the center point <10% and signal strength of ≥ 5 OCT ILM and borders (internal limiting membrane) and RPE (retinal pigment epithelium) properly identified. Also, the initial OCT must be confirmed by repeated measurements on the same day, with the thickness of the central point being within 10% between measurements. In cases where the OCT imaging program can not properly define the limits of ILM and RPE, if the investigator can obtain an estimate of the thickness of the manual by OCT central point of at least 300 microns, the patient will be considered eligible.
- The distance visual acuity in the better eye corrected the study must have an index between 70 and 35 letters inclusive (Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200).
- Clear media and eye pupil dilation adequate to allow fundus photography with good quality.
- Intraocular pressure not exceeding 21 mmHg. The ophthalmologist should feel comfortable with the delay of the focal laser treatment (direct and grid, as needed) by at least 12 weeks in the study eye.
- Patients with diabetes Type I or Type II as defined by WHO criteria of any gender and age ≥ 18 years.
- Ability to provide a written consent. Ability to return for all study visits.
Who cannot join
- Eyes with scatter photocoagulation (PRP) one month prior the enrollment, or eyes where scatter photocoagulation is required now, or it likely to be needed over the next 6months (for example, eyes with high risk PDR DRS not properly treated with photocoagulation).
- Presence of any abnormality that is likely to confound the assessment of the improvement in visual acuity in eyes with macular edema to resolve or improve as an area of hard exudates involving the foveal avascular zone (FAZ - involving 2 or more quadrants centered around the foveal avascular zone), epiretinal membrane associated with signs of contraction and / or significant opacification (ie, striations within the diameter of a disc from the center of the fovea), or the presence of chorioretinal atrophy involving the center of the macula.
- Vitreomacular traction determined clinically and / or OCT, which in the opinion of the investigator, contributes to macular edema (associated or cause a detachment of the fovea) and prevents the improvement with treatment.
- Atrophy / scar / fibrosis involving the center of the macula, including evidence of atrophy treated with laser within 200 microns of the FAZ.
- Patients who received panphotocoagulation, YAG laser, or peripheral retinal cryoablation (for retinal tears) or focal or grid photocoagulation within the last 12 weeks or more of treatment with focal or grid laser.
- Significant opacities of the optical medium, including cataracts, which may interfere with visual acuity, assessment of toxicity or photography background. Patients will not be included if they have high probability of requiring cataract surgery within the next year.
- Any intraocular surgery within 6 months prior to study entry. Prior peeling of epiretinal membrane or inner limiting membrane. Any major surgical procedure within one month of study entry Prior irradiation of the head region of the eye under study. Any previous pharmacological treatment for DME, BRVO, CSR or MacTel (including corticosteroid intravitreal, subconjunctival or subtenon) or at any time during the last 90 days for any other condition.
- Important known allergies to sodium fluorescein dye used in angiography. Acute ocular or periocular infection.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Instituto de Oftalmologia Lavinsky
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90440051
Daniel Lavinsky, MD, PhD, +5551982092999, daniellavinsky@gmail.com
Daniel Lavinsky, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: Phase 2 Study of Non-damaging Retinal Laser Therapy Using PASCAL Laser With Endpoint Management Software for Macular Diseases
This trial seeks to prove the safety and efficacy of photothermal stimulation treatment to diabetic macular edema, chronic central serous retinopathy, macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion and macular telangiectasia.
Read the detailed description
Sub-visible, non-damaging photothermal stimulation (532nm) exposures of 100 ms in duration resulted in enhanced expression of heat shock proteins in the retina. To test clinical efficacy of sub-visible retinal therapy using ms-range exposures of visible lasers one needs first to establish proper titration methods necessary to assure on one hand the lack of tissue damage, and on the other hand sufficient hyperthermia to elicit cellular response. We used an algorithm based on computational and experimental data to provide parameters that can cause photothermal stimulation to the retinal pigment epithelium without causing collateral damage to photoreceptors or choroid. This method will be used to treat macular diseases such as diabetic macular edema, branch retinal vein occlusion macular edema, chronic central serous retinopathy and macular telangiectasia.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema, Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, Chronic Central Serous Retinopathy, Macular Telangiectasia
- Being tested
- Topcon Endpoint Management
- Medical subject headings
- Retinal Vein Occlusion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Topcon Endpoint ManagementProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Topcon Endpoint management | Experimental | Active laser treatment Receives: Procedure: Topcon Endpoint Management |
| Control | Sham comparator | Powerless (sham) laser treatment Receives: Procedure: Topcon Endpoint Management |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Best corrected visual acuity
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Central macular thickness on OCT
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2013
- Primary completionApr 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic Macular EdemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniel Lavinsky, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
- Investigators
- Daniel Lavinsky, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01975103
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EPM-001
- Acronym
- EPM
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 28 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Lavinsky D, Sramek C, Wang J, Huie P, Dalal R, Mandel Y, Palanker D. Subvisible retinal laser therapy: titration algorithm and tissue response. Retina. 2014 Jan;34(1):87-97. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182993edc.
PubMed 23873164Lavinsky D, Silva MOD, Chaves AE, Schneider WFM, Lavinsky F, Palanker D. FUNCTIONAL AND STRUCTURAL EFFECTS OF NONDAMAGING RETINAL LASER THERAPY FOR MACULAR TELANGIECTASIA TYPE 2: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial. Retina. 2021 Mar 1;41(3):487-494. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002882.
PubMed 33370517
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 2 Study of Non-damaging Retinal Laser Therapy Using PASCAL Laser With Endpoint Management Software for Macular Diseases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01975103
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EPM / EPM-001
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema, Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, Chronic Central Serous Retinopathy, Macular Telangiectasia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of Rio Grande do SulUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2013
- Primary completion
- Apr 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial seeks to prove the safety and efficacy of photothermal stimulation treatment to diabetic macular edema, chronic central serous retinopathy, macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion and macular telangiectasia.
Detailed description
Sub-visible, non-damaging photothermal stimulation (532nm) exposures of 100 ms in duration resulted in enhanced expression of heat shock proteins in the retina. To test clinical efficacy of sub-visible retinal therapy using ms-range exposures of visible lasers one needs first to establish proper titration methods necessary to assure on one hand the lack of tissue damage, and on the other hand sufficient hyperthermia to elicit cellular response. We used an algorithm based on computational and experimental data to provide parameters that can cause photothermal stimulation to the retinal pigment epithelium without causing collateral damage to photoreceptors or choroid. This method will be used to treat macular diseases such as diabetic macular edema, branch retinal vein occlusion macular edema, chronic central serous retinopathy and macular telangiectasia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Topcon Endpoint management | Experimental | Procedure: Topcon Endpoint ManagementActive laser treatment |
| Control | Sham comparator | Procedure: Topcon Endpoint ManagementPowerless (sham) laser treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- The patient must have macular edema involving the center of the macula with a corresponding leakage on fluorescein angiography.
- Thickening of the fovea of at least 300 microns (thickness of the central point in OCT) with a standard deviation of the center point <10% and signal strength of ≥ 5 OCT ILM and borders (internal limiting membrane) and RPE (retinal pigment epithelium) properly identified. Also, the initial OCT must be confirmed by repeated measurements on the same day, with the thickness of the central point being within 10% between measurements. In cases where the OCT imaging program can not properly define the limits of ILM and RPE, if the investigator can obtain an estimate of the thickness of the manual by OCT central point of at least 300 microns, the patient will be considered eligible.
- The distance visual acuity in the better eye corrected the study must have an index between 70 and 35 letters inclusive (Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200).
- Clear media and eye pupil dilation adequate to allow fundus photography with good quality.
- Intraocular pressure not exceeding 21 mmHg. The ophthalmologist should feel comfortable with the delay of the focal laser treatment (direct and grid, as needed) by at least 12 weeks in the study eye.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Eyes with scatter photocoagulation (PRP) one month prior the enrollment, or eyes where scatter photocoagulation is required now, or it likely to be needed over the next 6months (for example, eyes with high risk PDR DRS not properly treated with photocoagulation).
- Presence of any abnormality that is likely to confound the assessment of the improvement in visual acuity in eyes with macular edema to resolve or improve as an area of hard exudates involving the foveal avascular zone (FAZ - involving 2 or more quadrants centered around the foveal avascular zone), epiretinal membrane associated with signs of contraction and / or significant opacification (ie, striations within the diameter of a disc from the center of the fovea), or the presence of chorioretinal atrophy involving the center of the macula.
- Vitreomacular traction determined clinically and / or OCT, which in the opinion of the investigator, contributes to macular edema (associated or cause a detachment of the fovea) and prevents the improvement with treatment.
- Atrophy / scar / fibrosis involving the center of the macula, including evidence of atrophy treated with laser within 200 microns of the FAZ.
- Patients who received panphotocoagulation, YAG laser, or peripheral retinal cryoablation (for retinal tears) or focal or grid photocoagulation within the last 12 weeks or more of treatment with focal or grid laser.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Topcon Endpoint Management | Procedure or surgery | Control, Topcon Endpoint management |
Primary outcome
Best corrected visual acuity
Time frame: 6 months
1 secondary outcome
Central macular thickness on OCT
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2018.
- Background: PubMed 23873164Lavinsky D, Sramek C, Wang J, Huie P, Dalal R, Mandel Y, Palanker D. Subvisible retinal laser therapy: titration algorithm and tissue response. Retina. 2014 Jan;34(1):87-97. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182993edc.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33370517Lavinsky D, Silva MOD, Chaves AE, Schneider WFM, Lavinsky F, Palanker D. FUNCTIONAL AND STRUCTURAL EFFECTS OF NONDAMAGING RETINAL LASER THERAPY FOR MACULAR TELANGIECTASIA TYPE 2: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial. Retina. 2021 Mar 1;41(3):487-494. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002882.
Related trials for Diabetic Macular Edema
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Long-Term Follow-up Study of ADVM-022 in DME (INFINITY-EXT)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Diabetic Retinopathy
RecruitingPhase 2
A Randomized, Phase 2 Study of Oral BGE-102 in Participants With Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Suprachoroidal Bevacizumab Versus Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of CU06-1004 in Patients With Daibetic Macular Edema
DME, Diabetic Macular Edema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of MK-8748 Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (MK-8748-004)
Diabetic Retinopathy, Macular Edema
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Lavinsky, MD, PhD principal investigator
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Topcon Endpoint Management in people with Diabetic Macular Edema and Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, run by Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Daniel Lavinsky, MD, PhD (+555133302444, daniellavinsky@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Best corrected visual acuity (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01975103, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.